Abstract
In order to improve the wear resistance of titanium alloy, and to prevent the deformation of thin-walled components, taking Ti6Al4V alloy as the object, the effect of shot peening pretreatment on the low-temperature nitriding of titanium alloy was studied. The results show that the pretreatment of shot peening (SP) can effectively promote the plasma nitriding process at low temperature. Under the test conditions of 500 °C, with the increase of shot peening strength, nitriding efficiency of pretreated samples increases gradually, and the surface hardness, load-bearing capacity and the wear resistance of nitrided layer increase gradually. Compared with unpretreated nitrided samples (Ti6Al4V-PN), when the shot strength increases to 0.25 mmA, the surface hardness of the pretreated nitrided samples (SP(0.25)-PN) increases by 32.7% and the wear rate decreases by 42.3%. The goal of shot peening pretreatment to promote low-temperature plasma nitriding of Ti6Al4V alloy is well achieved.
Science Press
Titanium alloy has become an attractive candidate for aero-space, automotive and biomedical applications due to its high strength-to-mass ratio, corrosion/oxidation resistance, stability at elevated temperatures, good biocompatibility and fatigue resistanc
An annealed Ti6Al4V alloy was used as the substrate in this work. Its chemical composition (wt%) was 6.7 Al, 4.2 V, 0.1 Fe, 0.03 C, 0.015 N, 0.03 H, 0.14 O, and balance Ti. The microstructure of this alloy consisted of a primary α phase (the main component) and a transformed β phase, with the following mechanical properties: ultimate tensile strength 1080 MPa, yield strength 1010 MPa, and micro-hardness 3700 MPa.
The specimens for the basic performance test and friction and wear test were processed into discs of Ф30 mm×8 mm. Specimens were ground by a flat wheel machine and then mechanically ground by abrasive papers of 180#, 240#, 400#, 600#, 800#, 1000# and 2000# grits.
Pretreatment of shot peening used a pneumatic blasting machine and the Z-300 ceramic pellet was used as a shot blasting medium. Hardness of Z-300 ceramic pellet was about 7800 MPa and the average diameter was about 0.30 mm. The specimens were blasted in an air powered system at 6.2 MPa for 30 s. The top surface of the coupons was completely covered with shot peening collision dents (200% coverage). The spray angle was 90°.
According to the production experience and the preliminary exploratory test, the shot peening strengths determined were 0.15, 0.20 and 0.25 mmA.
A set of Ti6Al4V samples without shot peening were also prepared and nitrided under the same conditions for compari-son (ie, unpretreated nitrided samples, Ti6Al4V-PN). The pretreated and unpretreated samples were cleaned by ultra-sonic washer before being placed inside the nitriding chamber. Plasma nitriding was carried out in a pulsed plasma furnace with the maximum working voltage of 800 V, maximum working current of 120 A, frequency of 3~12 kHz and duty cycle of 40%~80%. The plasma nitriding was performed at 500 °C for 24 h in a pulsed plasma furnace. The environment was φ(N):φ(Ar)=3:1 and the voltage was 700 V. The duty cycle and frequency were adjusted to about 40% and 8 kHz, respec-tively for all tests. Subsequently, the nitrided samples were cooled down to room temperature under vacuum conditions.
The sliding wear resistance of the nitrided layers was determined with a ball-plate wear tester (HT-1000). During the sliding wear test, the disk rotated around its center while the ball remained fixed. Testing was performed under the following conditions: wear radius 4 mm, load 5 N, rotation speed 224 r/min, sliding velocity about 0.094 m/s, wear time 30 min, test temperature of room temperature and relative humidity 50%. The GCr15 ball had the following attributes: diameter 5 mm, micro-hardness 62HRC, and roughness 0.05 μm. Changes in the friction coefficients with wear time were recorded by a computer.
The micro-morphology of the wear track was evaluated via SEM, and the section contour of the track was measured with a roughness/contour tester (TR300). The wear volume (Vw) of the track and the wear rates K (m
Vw=2πRA | (1) |
K=Vw/Ps | (2) |
where R is wear radius (mm); A is wear area (m
The toughness of the layers was evaluated via a static indention tester (WS2005) equipped with a four prismatic diamond indenter. During the static press test, samples were indented for 30 s under a load of 60 and 150 N. A micro-hardness tester (HV-1000) equipped with a Vicker diamond indenter was used to evaluate the hardness and load carrying capability of the nitrided layers, which were subjected to a load of 0.245 N for 15 s. And the depth of nitride layers was determined by glow discharge optical emission spectroscopy (GDOES; GDA 750).
The scanning electron microscope (SEM; VEGA3 XMU) was used to characterize the microscopic morphology of the nitrided layers, and in order to observe the cross-sectional morphology of the nitrided layers more clearly, HNO3 and HF etching were performed on the nitrided sample after polishing. Furthermore, the chemical composition of the nitrided layer was determined via energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS; INCA Energy 350 EDX analyzer, Oxford Instru- ments, Oxfordshire, UK). The phase composition of the nitrided layers was determined via X-ray diffraction (XRD; D/Max-RB).

Fig.1 Cross-sectional morphologies of unpretreated (a) and pretreated (b~d) nitrided samples: (b) SP(0.15)-PN, (c) SP(0.20)-PN, and (d) SP(0.25)-PN
Plasma nitriding studies on stee

Fig.2 shows the XRD patterns of Ti6Al4V alloy, unpre-treated nitrided samples (Ti6Al4V-PN) and pretreated nitrided samples (SP(0.15)-PN, SP(0.20)-PN, SP(0.25)-PN). The Ti6Al4V alloy is mainly composed of α-Ti phase and a small amount of β-Ti phase. In addition to the α-Ti phase, the unpretreated nitrided sample (Ti6Al4V-PN) also has a small amount of TiN and TiN0.3 nitride phases, but the diffraction peak of β-Ti disappears. Furthermore, the position of the α-Ti peak shifts slightly to a small angle. This may be due to the interstitial solid solution of N atoms in the Ti6Al4V alloy lattice during nitriding process, resulting in an increase in the interplanar spacing d and a decrease in the diffraction angle θ. The pretreated nitrided samples are similar to the unpretreated nitrided samples in phase composition, containing α-Ti, TiN and TiN0.3 nitride phases. It indicates that the shot peening pretreatment cannot change the phase composition of the samples, but the content of the TiN and TiN0.3 phases increases. In addition, the position of the α-Ti peak of the pretreated nitrided sample is slightly shifted to a large angle, because the surface stress is formed by shot peening, and the interplanar spacing d decreases. Therefore, the diffraction angle θ increases, resulting in a shift of the peak position to the right. It can be seen from the XRD analysis that TiN and TiN0.3 phases exist on the surface of pretreated and unpretreated nitrided samples. Due to their low content or shallow depth, it is difficult to distinguish in metallographic analysis (
The surface hardness of pretreated and unpretreated nitrided samples is shown in
It is worth noting that pure shot peening also increases the surface hardness of the titanium allo
Fig.3 shows the depth of the nitrided layers of pretreated and unpretreated samples. It can be seen that the depth of the nitrided layers is very thin regardless of pretreatment. However, the depth of the nitrided layer pretreated with 0.25 mmA shot strength is slightly higher than that of other samples. It is further verified that 500 ℃ low-temperature nitriding introduces a nitriding layer on the surface of the samples, but due to the shallow depth of the layer, it is difficult to distinguish by metallographic analysis (
In order to characterize the bonding strength between the nitrided layers and the Ti6Al4V alloy substrate, and the apparent toughness of the nitrided layers, the static indentation method was used for evaluation.


Fig.4 Indentation morphologies of unpretreated and pretreated nitrided samples under the load of 60 N (a1~d1) and 150 N (a2~d2)
The variation of the friction coefficient with the sliding time is shown in Fig.5. It can be seen that the friction coefficient of the Ti6Al4V alloy increases rapidly to around 0.5 in the initial running phase, the running-in phase is completed at about 10 min, and the friction factor is basically stable at around 0.53. The variation of friction coefficient of nitrided samples pretreated with different shot strengths is similar to that of unpretreated nitrided samples, except that the running-in period is shorter, and the increase range of friction coefficient is not much different after shot peening pretreatment. The friction coefficient comparison of different surface state samples shows that the nitriding treatment cannot reduce the friction factor of the Ti6Al4V alloy.

The section contour of each surface state sample is shown in Fig.6. It can be seen that the wear of the Ti6Al4V alloy is the most serious, and the deepest point of the wear scar is 30 μm. The maximum depth of wear track of nitrided samples pretreated with 0.15, 0.20 and 0.25 mmA shot strength is about 18, 15 and 8 μm, respectively. That is, as the shot strength increases, the wear resistance of the nitrided sample is gradually increased, which is closely related to the gradual increase of the surface hardness.


After calculation, the wear rate of Ti6Al4V alloy, unpretreated and pretreated nitrided samples is shown in Fig.7. It can be seen that the nitriding treatment reduces the wear rate of the Ti6Al4V alloy by 48.9%. That is, nitriding treatment can significantly improve the wear resistance of the Ti6Al4V alloy. Pretreatment with shot peening further improves the wear resistance of the nitrided samples, and the higher the shot strength, the lower the wear rate of the nitrided samples. The nitrided sample pretreated with the highest shot strength (SP(0.25)-PN) has the best wear resistance, whose wear rate is 70.5% lower than that of Ti6Al4V alloy, and 42.3% lower than that of the unpretreated nitrided sample (Ti6Al4V-PN).

Fig.8 shows the wear micro-morphology of Ti6Al4V alloy. Abrasive wear is the main mechanism, accompanied by the adhesion wear. This is attributed to the low hardness of Ti6Al4V alloy and the high hardness of the friction-matched GCr15 steel, which easily cause abrasive wear and adhesive wear of Ti6Al4V allo

Fig.9 Wear morphologies of unpretreated (a) and pretreated (b~d) nitrided samples: (b) SP(0.15)-PN, (c) SP(0.20)-PN, and (d) SP(0.25)-PN
Ti6Al4V alloy exhibits poor wear resistance when GCr15 steel with high hardness is used as the counter face for ball disk wear test, which is attributed to its low hardness, poor thermal conductivity and high friction coefficien
1) TiN and TiN0.3 compound phases form on the surface of unpretreated nitrided samples (Ti6Al4V-PN). Compared with Ti6Al4V substrate, the surface hardness and wear rate of nitrided Ti6Al4V alloys are increased by 37.1% and reduced by 48.9%, respectively.
2) Pretreatment of shot peening promotes the low- temperature plasma nitriding process of the Ti6Al4V alloy. As the shot strength increases, the degree of promotion of nitriding process increases. Compared with unpretreated nitrided samples (Ti6Al4V-PN), the surface hardness of the sample pretreated with 0.25 mmA shot strength is increased by 32.7% and the wear rate is reduced by 42.3%.
3) Pretreatment of shot peening promotes the plasma nitriding process of Ti6Al4V alloy. Due to the increase of dislocation density on the surface and formation of refined microstructures, the diffusion of nitrogen into the Ti6Al4V alloy substrate is promoted. Furthermore, surface activity of the Ti6Al4V alloy is increased to promote the formation of nitride phases.
References
Liu Jianglin, Zeng Weidong, Zhu Yanchun et al. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance[J], 2015, 24(5): 2140 [Baidu Scholar]
Sun Huanzheng, Zheng Jun, Song Yang et al. Surface and Coatings Technology[J], 2019, 362: 234 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Xiaoyan, Qu Zeming, Li Jianjun et al. Surface and Coatings Technology[J], 2017, 329: 109 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhu Lin, He Jining, Yan Dianren et al. Chinese Science Bulletin[J], 2007, 52(13): 1849 [Baidu Scholar]
Cui Wenfang, Qin Gaowu, Duan Jingzhu et al. Materials Science and Engineering C[J], 2017, 71: 520 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhecheva A, Sha W, Malinov S et al. Surface and Coatings Technology[J], 2005, 200(7): 2192 [Baidu Scholar]
Hosseini S R, Ahmadi A. Vacuum[J], 2013, 87: 30 [Baidu Scholar]
Meletis E I. Surface and Coatings Technology[J], 2002, 149(2): 95 [Baidu Scholar]
Sun Jinquan, Yan Zifeng, Cui Hongzhi et al. Catalysis Today[J], 2010, 158(3-4): 205 [Baidu Scholar]
Fu Yudong, Zhu Xiaoshuo, Li Zifeng et al. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China[J], 2016, 26(10): 2609 [Baidu Scholar]
Kikuchi S, Yoshida S, Ueno A. International Journal of Fatigue[J], 2019, 120: 134 [Baidu Scholar]
Ferkel H, Glatzer M, Estrin Y et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2003, 348(1): 100 [Baidu Scholar]
Gu J F, Bei D H, Pan J S et al. Materials Letters[J], 2002, 55(5): 340 [Baidu Scholar]
Gao Yukui, Li Xiangbin, Yang Qingyang et al. Materials Letters[J], 2007, 61(2): 466 [Baidu Scholar]
Fathallah R, Laamouri A, Sidhom H et al. International Journal of Fatigue[J], 2004, 26(10): 1053 [Baidu Scholar]
Cui Panpan, Li Wei, Liu Ping et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2020, 834: 155 063 [Baidu Scholar]
Cao Chuanliang, Zhang Xianglin. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology[J], 2016, 30(8): 3785 [Baidu Scholar]
Miao Qiang, Cui C, Pan J et al. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics[J], 2006, 19(3): 266 [Baidu Scholar]
Terres M A, Ben Mohamed S, Sidhom H. International Journal of Fatigue[J], 2010, 32(11): 1795-1804 [Baidu Scholar]
Lin Yimin, Lu Jian, Wang Liping et al. Acta Materialia[J], 2006, 54(20): 5599 [Baidu Scholar]
Yin B D, Zhang S F, Yang J Y et al. Advanced Materials Research[J], 2013, 842: 267 [Baidu Scholar]
Huang K, Logé R E. Materials & Design[J], 2016, 111: 548 [Baidu Scholar]
Luo X, Wei Y, Wang Y et al. Materials & Design[J], 2015, 85: 527 [Baidu Scholar]
Farokhzadeh K, Edrisy A, Pigott G et al. Wear[J], 2013, 302(1-2): 845 [Baidu Scholar]
Shen L, Wang L, Wang Y et al. Surface and Coatings Technology[J], 2010, 204(20): 3222 [Baidu Scholar]
Kim K, Baek S Y. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing[J], 2018, 19(5): 713 [Baidu Scholar]
Martín V, Vázquez J, Navarro C et al. Tribology International[J], 2020, 142: 106 004 [Baidu Scholar]
Gao Yukui. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2010, 39(9): 1536 [Baidu Scholar]
Farokhzadeh K, Qian J, Edrisy A. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2014, 589: 199 [Baidu Scholar]