Abstract
The application of ultrasonic surface rolling process (USRP) to obtain gradient nanostructured materials is presented with comprehensive researches. Concept and description of USRP treatment which has been proved to be able to create gradient nanostructured layers and induce residual compressive stress were depicted. Meanwhile, the microstructural evolutions and surface characteristics which critically depend on processing regimes were discussed. On this basis, it is found that the improvement of mechanical properties, i.e. hardness, strength, wear and fatigue performances, is obtained by USRP treatment while the corrosion/oxidation behavior depends on the composition and structure, surface integrity and stress, solution and service environment. In addition, some possible addresses for future research in this field were drawn and underlined.
Science Press
In engineering applications, the components suffer from wear, corrosion, cracking and fatigue damage, leading to severe accidents and economic disasters. In most cases, mechanical failures occur in the exterior layers of the components and are sensitive to the corresponding surface microstructure
Based on the surface severe plastic deformation (SSPD) method, L
USRP is most commonly used for surface integrity manufacturing to produce severe elastic-plastic deformation and enhance the surface quality by decreasing surface roughness, refining grains, inducing residual compressive stress and improving surface properties. Additionally, there is no clear dividing line between plastic deformation layer and matrix because the strain and strain rate induced by USRP gradually change from the top surface to the interior of material. Finally, a gradient nanostructure consisting of nanocrystalline layer, refined structure layer, deformed coarse-grained layer and strain-free coarse-grained matrix is formed with a certain thickness beneath the treated surface. However, several review papers have focused broadly on the deformation behavior of ultrafine-grained or nanostructured metals induced by severe plastic deformation, with very limited attention to SSPD techniques. Moreover, there are few studies available on USRP treatment, and the microstructure evolutions and service properties of materials induced by USRP treatment are still unclear. Also a proper relation between the processes, their parameters and the properties of the surface and subsurface layers obtained by USRP is to be found. In the present review, the focus on the microstructure evolution and surface properties to produce gradient nanostructures by USRP is discussed.
Recently, it is relatively common to use ultrasonic equipment to provide desired kinetic energy required for the treatment. Ultrasonic technology has been integrated into conventional surface enhancement techniques to further increase the treatment capabilitie
The main concept and mechanism of USRP is as follow

As shown in Fig.1, the cemented carbide ball on the rolling tip is used to crush the surface of samples. When the processed surface is hit by the ball on the rolling tip, the contact area between the surface and the ball can be regarded as two contact types, including the circular contact area and elliptical contact area. Under these different contact types, the ball on the rolling tip is used to process a flat surface (the contact area is a circle) and cylindrical surface (the contact area is an ellipse), thereby flattening materials and causing residual compressive stresses after the full coverag
SSPD based surface nanocrystallization is the process of formation, accumulation and evolution of surface defects and interfaces. Extensive research on the plastic deformation induced surface structural evolution mechanisms has been carried out worldwide. As for USRP treatment, the dislocations generated from the repeated impacts initially accumulate and subdivide the original near-surface grains into sub-grains and deformed twin lamellae in different orientations. Further strain induced by the mechanical impacts creates more and more refined sub-grains with greater misorientations and these sub-grains presumably undergo rotation. Under the external force, the crystallographic orientations of grains must rotate with respect to defects moving in certain directions within certain planes. The smaller grains rotate more under stress due to the motion of grain boundary dislocations, and textures also evolve during plastic deformation, where polycrystals change their shape, finally leaving nano-grains or crystallite
(1) |
where γSFE is the stacking fault energy and bp is the Burgers vector of a Shockley partial dislocation. The lower the γSFE, the easier the dislocations are decomposed into stacking faults. This means that twin deformation is easy to occur under certain circumstances such as low γSFE, high strain rate and/or low temperatur
After the USRP treatment, the grain size is often governed by a balance between the hardening rate introduced by dislocation generation and the recovery rate arising from dislocation annihilation and recombination. However, it is well-documented that there is a saturation or minimum value in the grain size obtained by SSPD techniques, because the dislocation multiplication from strain is balanced by the dislocation annihilation due to grain boundary migration, strain-induced structural evolution ceases, and dislocation density reaches its limi
According to different material characteristics, original surface conditions and process parameters, the USRP treatment can produce a high frequency impact on the surface of material and reduce the surface roughness to less than 0.1 μm under certain loading conditions based on surface rollin
Surface plastic deformation is capable of smoothing out majority of original micro cracks left by turning. Micro-dimple pattern produced by ultrasonic impacts on the surface has lower profile than original micro crack
After the USRP treatment, there is a typical residual stress distribution with significant magnitude of compressive stress in surface layer, and the maximum residual compressive stress appears at a certain depth from the treated surface. The value and depth of residual compressive stress field induced by USRP are higher than those induced by conventional surface treatment. Lee et a
However, Liu et a
Hardness, strength and ductility, are primary grain-size-dependent characteristics of materials, which determine virtually all facets of the mechanical response. It is well known that hardness of materials induced by USRP can be improved through grain refinement, residual compressive stress and work hardening. Like many other surface deformation strengthening techniques, the surface hardness and strength distribution obtained by plastic deformation and strain in the USRP show a gradient characteristic, with the maximum value on the topmost surface, followed by a gradual decrease until the first layer of the original material is reached. Therefore, by selecting specific USRP parameters and processing routes, the surface hardness of Ti6Al4V alloy increases by about 30% and decreases gradually with increasing the distance from the surface, which attributes to a gradient distribution of the ultrafine-grained structure as the depth of the surface increase
(2) |
where σs is the strength, σ0 is the friction stress to overcome when moving a single dislocation, d is the average grain size and k is a material constant which characterizes the degree of strengthening effect caused by grain boundary. In addition, materials strength can also be predicted by adding contributions from the reduction in grain size (grain boundary strengthening) and increase in dislocation density (work hardening) with plastic deformatio
L

However, the improper USRP parameters and processing routes can weaken mechanical properties and cause severe surface damage. Panin et a
The surface of materials can be damaged by repetitive localized stresses which can cause surface micro-crack initiation and propagation. Once the removal of discrete pieces of material which appear as micro-pits incubated, the micro-pits will expand, coalesce and evolve to a much larger area, leading to the formation of surface spalling and debris generatio
(3) |
where W is volume worn per unit sliding distance, K is the wear coefficient, P is the applied load and H is the hardness of the worn surface. Evident improvements of friction and wear properties were achieved in HIP Ti6Al4V alloy with a hardened surface layer due to surface nanocrystallization by USRP at different temperature
However, the gradient microstructure inhibits stress concentration and crack nucleation after USRP treatment, causing the surface being insensitive to the delamination formation. Moreover, it has been established that the microstructure of USRP-induced layer is different from that of the pristine and the hardness is a gradient distribution perpendicular to the surface. Therefore, wear performance with increasing the thickness in the layer may be different, and the changes in the wear performance can be divided into three stage
Modeling and experimental observations are used to evaluate the nanocrystalline metals in terms of fatigue resistanc
Although the strength of conventional bulk nanomaterials is higher than that of ordinary coarse-grained materials, deformation or crack propagation to a certain extent also causes the risk of sudden failure. However, for the gradient microstructures, the surface nanostructure can effectively prevent the initiation of fatigue cracks due to its high strength, and the coarse-grained structure in core can hinder the crack propagation due to its high ductility. Finally, the synergistic effects of the gradient nanostructure and the gradient residual compressive stress, etc, in the vicinity of surface can suppress the fatigue crack initiation and propagatio
For the untreated sample, visible surface tool marks/turning traces and irregular subsurface pores with random shapes and sizes are found along the cutting direction, which turn into fatigue crack nucleation and initiation source sites at some stress concentration zones after alternating load is applied, and the fatigue cracks expand immediately inward along a fan-shaped path until early fatigue fracture. Once the fatigue crack propagation process starts, some subsurface cracks or pores are connected to each other, and the materials close to the cracks or pores are bonded weakly to the substrate. Further-more, the broken material is detached and the crack propaga-tion is further deteriorated, thereby resulting in collaps
(4) |
where n is a positive number that can be determined through experimental data and C is a constant. It is obvious that the fatigue stress increases when the value decreases. Typically, it can be observed that the number of pores is significantly reduced and pores become smaller or even disappear due to the compression effect induced by USRP treatment, and the material flows from high peaks to low valleys. It is found that the USRP treatment results in much better surface finish, lower subsurface porosity and beneficial residual compressive stresses, leading to significant improvement in rotation bending fatigue performance of 3D-printed Ti64 sample
(5) |
where C1 and C2 are constants that can be determined through experimental data, HV is the material hardness, σm is the residual stress. Yasuoka et a

As for the synergistic effects of these factors introduced by USRP, integrated surface and gradient nanostructured layer of excellent mechanical properties are in positive relation with fatigue life improvement due to inhibited crack initiation and propagation proces
In general, the surface nano-grained structures of high-density grain boundaries are more prone to corrosion than coarse-grained structures, which can increase the surface free energy and chemical activity. However, it seems likely that grain refinement by severe plastic deformation, while enhancing mechanical properties without exceptions, shows complex characteristics in corrosion and has some contradictory results in the same materials and same environment, depending on the composition and structural factors, surface integrity and stress, environments and preparation processes, etc. Indeed, any processing or grain refinement that alters the reactivity of different material surface will impact the corrosion response. Miyamot
(6) |
where icorr represents the corrosion rate, A is a constant that depends on the environment, B is a material constant that differs according to composition or impurity level, and gs represents the grain size. For the inner componential and structural factors, it is assumed that the grain boundaries can conduct particles and react, so that the corrosion rate is also related to the total length of grain boundaries which is associated with grain size, area term, and scale term. The rationalization of -0.5 dependence in
In addition, the corrosion behavior of gradient nanostructure induced by SSPD is affected not only by grain refinement but also by other microstructural changes occurring commonly, i.e. surface integrality, residual stress. SSPD treatment can reduce the grain size of materials and improve the homogenization of surface chemical inhomogeneity, which can achieve high potential, so that the corrosion behavior tends to change from local to uniform modes. The precipitated phase or other impurities can also affect the electrochemical polarization of small areas on the surface and the formation of microelectrodes between impurities and matrix is also prone to pitting corrosion, leading to some conflicting results about the influence of gradient nanostructures on the corrosion performanc
Correspondingly, the residual compressive stress induced by USRP can offset partial internal tensile stress generated by the growth of the oxide/passive film and resist the infiltration of corrosive agents at early stage of corrosion development. After USRP treatment, a gradient structure with a thickness of 425 μm and a compressive residual stress field with a depth of 700 μm are created, so that the corrosion rate of 7B50-T7751 aluminum alloy is reduced by 60.08% owing to the combined effect of compressive residual stress and surface nanocrystallizatio
The high diffusion rates of ultrafine grained structures are believed to be related to higher excess free energy of non-equilibrium grain boundaries in severely deformed metals. The excess free energy of non-equilibrium interfaces in ultrafine grained materials is larger than in coarse-grained material
In general, the gradient nanostructure formation of metals by USRP treatment is a promising way to improve mechanical properties, and in recent years has become a subject of increasing scientific and technological fields. Previous work has proven the possibility of obtaining gradient nanostructured surfaces by USRP and assessed the deformation mechanism and microstructural characteristics of the obtained layers.
1) The USRP treatment enables the surface to obtain a gradient nanostructure through severe plastic deformation, which significantly reduces surface roughness, increases residual compressive stress, and obtains gradient ultrafine grains, compared to coarse-grained materials.
2) The effect of USRP treatment on the mechanical properties of the material are shown nearly without exceptions in the improvement of hardness, strength, wear resistance and fatigue properties while still maintaining high ductility. As the grain size decreases, the strength in most cases follows the classic Hall-Petch relationship.
3) USRP enhances the corrosion resistance through much better surface finish, beneficial residual compressive stresses and homogenization of chemical inhomogeneity by the ultrasonic vibration and mechanical rolling effects. Nevertheless, some researches demonstrate that change to more subsurface porosity and micro cracks is accompanied by grain size reduction and high densities of non-equilibrium grain boundaries may increase the corrosion rate in different solutions. Evidently, the literatures on corrosion properties of gradient nanostructured materials by USRP treatment are definitely insufficient to find the general trends, and more studies are needed.
4) USRP treatment can act as a pretreatment process for surface coatings or plasma nitriding, etc, which may markedly increase the corrosion resistance and preserve the improved mechanical characteristics.
In addition, about materials, some engineering materials processed by USRP, i.e. stainless steels, Ti alloys, Al alloys, have been investigated mostly while comprehensive studies of multi-kinds of steels, Ti alloys, pure metals like Cu and Ni are carried out by SSPD techniques. There are other materials that are currently used in engineering applications, which can be a potential object of research in this field, i.e. Mg alloys, U alloys, Be alloys, V alloys, low alloy steels, and also the pure metals. For these active materials, there are little data available but on the basis of the results shown in this work, a great improvement of their mechanical properties is expected while the corrosion/oxidation behavior should be systemically studied. In summary, as more data are considered in the research and understanding in this area grows, it is worthwhile to revisit whether USRP treatment shows positive impacts on the service properties of different materials.
References
Liu D, Liu D, Zhang X et al. Materials Science & Engineering A[J], 2018, 726: 69 [Baidu Scholar]
Bagheri S, Guagliano M. Surface Engineering[J], 2009, 25(1): 3 [Baidu Scholar]
Silvis-Cividjian N, Hagen C W, Kruit P. Journal of Applied Physics[J], 2005, 98: 84 905 [Baidu Scholar]
Oboňa J V, Ocelík V, Rao J C et al. Applied Surface Science[J], 2014, 303: 118 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu K Z, Wang X F, Liu J et al. Progress in Surface Science[J], 2018(93): 47 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang L, Ma A, Jiang J et al. Surface & Coatings Technology[J], 2013, 232: 412 [Baidu Scholar]
Li X, Lu K. Science[J], 2019, 364(6442): 733 [Baidu Scholar]
Li X, Lu K. Nature Materials[J], 2017, 16: 700 [Baidu Scholar]
Valiev R Z, Islamgaliev R K, Alexandrov I V. Progress in Materials Science[J], 2000, 45: 103 [Baidu Scholar]
Umemoto M. Materials Transactions[J], 2003, 44(10): 1900 [Baidu Scholar]
Lu K, Lu J. Journal of Materials Science & Technology[J], 1999, 15(3): 193 [Baidu Scholar]
Huang H W, Wang Z B, Lu J et al. Acta Materialia[J], 2015, 87: 150 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu Y, Wang L, Wang D. Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J], 2011, 211: 2106 [Baidu Scholar]
Waltz L, Retraint D, Roos A et al. Scripta Materialia[J], 2009, 60: 21 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhao K, Liu Y, Yao T et al. Materials Letters[J], 2016, 166: 59 [Baidu Scholar]
M Liu, Li J Y, Ma Y et al. Surface & Coatings Technology[J], 2016, 289: 94 [Baidu Scholar]
Morita T, Noda S, Kagaya C. Materials Science & Engineering A[J], 2013, 574: 197 [Baidu Scholar]
Li Y, Sun K, Liu P et al. Vacuum[J], 2014, 101: 102 [Baidu Scholar]
Marteau J, Bigerelle M. Tribology International[J], 2015, 83: 105 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhao W, Liu D, Zhang X et al. International Journal of Fatigue[J], 2019, 121: 30 [Baidu Scholar]
Bagherifard S, Fernandez-Pariente I, Ghelichi R et al. International Journal of Fatigue[J], 2014, 65: 64 [Baidu Scholar]
Bozdana A T, Gindy N N Z, Li H. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture[J], 2005, 45: 713 [Baidu Scholar]
Suh C M, Song G H, Suh M S et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2007, 443: 101 [Baidu Scholar]
Mei G, Zhang K, Ding J. Advanced Materials Research[J], 2010, 102-104: 591 [Baidu Scholar]
Cherif A, Pyoun Y, Scholtes B. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance[J], 2010, 19: 282 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu C, Liu D, Zhang X et al. Materials[J], 2017, 10: 833 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu C, Liu D, Liu D et al. Surface & Coatings Technology[J], 2019, 370: 24 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang M, Liu Z, Deng J et al. Applied Mathematical Modelling[J], 2019, 76: 800 [Baidu Scholar]
Kattoura M, Telang A, Mannava S R et al. Materials Science & Engineering A[J], 2018, 711: 364 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhou X, Tamura N, Mi Z et al. Physical Review Letters[J], 2017, 118: 96 101 [Baidu Scholar]
Margulies L, Winther G, Poulsen H F. Science[J], 2001, 291: 2392 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Y, Liao X, Zhu Y. International Journal of Materials Research[J], 2009, 100(12): 1632 [Baidu Scholar]
Hughes D A, Hansen N. Acta Materialia[J],1997, 45: 3871 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang Y, Lai F, Qu S et al. Surface & Coatings Technology[J], 2019, 366: 321 [Baidu Scholar]
Ye Y, Kure-Chu S Z, Sun Z et al. Materials and Design[J], 2018, 149: 214 [Baidu Scholar]
Ao N, Liu D, Zhang X et al. Surface & Coatings Technology[J], 2019, 361: 35 [Baidu Scholar]
Ao N, Liu D, Xu X et al. Materials Science & Engineering A[J], 2019, 742: 820 [Baidu Scholar]
Ye C, Telang A, Gill A S et al. Materials Science & Engineering A[J], 2014, 613: 274 [Baidu Scholar]
Christian J W, Mahajan S. Progress in Materials Science[J], 1995, 39: 1 [Baidu Scholar]
Li W L, Tao N R, Lu K. Scripta Materialia[J], 2008, 59: 546 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhu Y T. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance[J], 2005, 14: 467 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu Y, Zhang Y, Zhao X. Micro & Nano Letters[J], 2017, 12(9): 585 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang Q, Hu Z, Su W et al. Surface & Coatings Technology[J], 2017, 321: 64 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Z, Gao C, Liu Z et al. Materials Science & Engineering A[J], 2020, 772: 138 696 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu X C, Zhang H W, Lu K. Science[J], 2013, 342: 337 [Baidu Scholar]
Mohamed F A. Acta Materialia[J], 2003, 51: 4107 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang T, Wang D, Liu G et al. Applied Surface Science[J], 2008, 255: 1824 [Baidu Scholar]
Ismail R, Tauviqirrahman M, Saputra E et al. Procedia Engineering[J], 2013, 68: 593 [Baidu Scholar]
Zheng J, Hou Y, Ming P. Key Engineering Materials[J], 2016, 667: 29 [Baidu Scholar]
Lu L X, Sun J, Li L et al. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology[J], 2016, 87: 2533 [Baidu Scholar]
Pyun Y S, Cho I H, Suh C M et al. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing[J], 2013, 14(11): 2027 [Baidu Scholar]
Cheng M, Zhang D, Chen H et al. Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J], 2014, 214: 2395 [Baidu Scholar]
Li W, Li D Y. Acta Materialia[J], 2006, 54: 445 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang H, Song G, Tang G. Surface & Coatings Technology[J], 2015, 282: 149 [Baidu Scholar]
Ye Y, Li X, Sun Z et al. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters)[J], 2018, 31: 1272 [Baidu Scholar]
Lee C S, Park I G, Pyoun Y S et al. International Journal of Modern Physics B[J], 2010, 24(15): 3065 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu Y, Wang L, Wang D. Advanced Materials Research[J], 2011, 189-193: 2112 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu Y, Zhao X, Wang D. Materials Science & Engineering A[J], 2014, 600: 21 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhao X, Liu Y. Advanced Materials Research[J], 2014, 834-836: 640 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhou B, Fu X L, Xie A R et al. Journal of Physics: Conference Series[C], 2018, 1087(4): 42 068 [Baidu Scholar]
Li F, Zhao B, Lan S et al. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology[J], 2020, 106: 1893 [Baidu Scholar]
Shi Y, Liu Y, Li X et al. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering[J], 2018, 394(3): 32 058 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang P, Li S X, Zhang Z F. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2011, 529: 62 [Baidu Scholar]
Estrin Y, Vinogradov A. Acta Materialia[J], 2013, 61: 782 [Baidu Scholar]
Lu K, Lu L, Suresh S. Science[J], 2009, 324: 349 [Baidu Scholar]
Toth L S, Gu C. Materials Characterization[J], 2014, 92: 1 [Baidu Scholar]
Lu K. Materials Science Forum[J], 2005, 475-479: 21 [Baidu Scholar]
Meyers M A, Mishra A, Benson D J. Progress in Materials Science[J], 2006, 51: 427 [Baidu Scholar]
Zheng J, Liu H, Ren Y et al. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology[J], 2020, 106: 503 [Baidu Scholar]
Lu K. Science[J], 2014, 345(6203): 1455 [Baidu Scholar]
Ye H, Sun X, Liu Y et al. Surface & Coatings Technology[J], 2019, 372: 288 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang H, Song G, Tang G. Materials Science & Engineering A[J], 2016, 662: 456 [Baidu Scholar]
Ao N, Liu D, Liu C et al. Materials Characterization[J], 2018, 145: 527 [Baidu Scholar]
Panin A V, Kazachenok M S, Kozelskaya A I et al. Materials Science & Engineering A[J], 2015, 647: 43 [Baidu Scholar]
Ye X, Ye Y, Tang G. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials[J], 2014, 40: 287 [Baidu Scholar]
Qin H, Ren Z, Zhao J et al. Wear[J], 2017, 392-393: 29 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Z B, Lu J, Lu K. Surface & Coatings Technology[J], 2006, 201: 2796 [Baidu Scholar]
Li G, Qu S, Xie M et al. Surface & Coatings Technology[J], 2017, 316: 75 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Z, Xiao Z, Huang C et al. Materials[J], 2017, 10: 1203 [Baidu Scholar]
Li G, Qu S G, Pan Y X et al. Applied Surface Science[J], 2016, 389: 324 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Z, Liu Z, Gao C et al. Surface & Coatings Technology[J], 2020, 381: 125 122 [Baidu Scholar]
Amanov A, Cho I S, Kim D E et al. Surface & Coatings Technology[J], 2012, 207: 135 [Baidu Scholar]
Padilla H A, Boyce B L. Experimental Mechanics[J], 2010, 50: 5 [Baidu Scholar]
Dong J, Liu W C, Song X et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2010, 527: 6053 [Baidu Scholar]
Xin C, Sun Q, Xiao L et al. Journal of Materials Science[J], 2018, 53: 12 492 [Baidu Scholar]
Cheng M, Zhang D, Chen H et al. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology[J], 2016, 83: 123 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhao X, Xue G, Liu Y. Results in Physics[J], 2017, 7: 1845 [Baidu Scholar]
Murakami Y. Metal Fatigue: Effects of Small Defects and Nonmetallic Inclusions[M]. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd, 2002 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang H, Chiang R, Qin H et al. International Journal of Fatigue[J], 2017, 103: 136 [Baidu Scholar]
Cao X J, Pyoun Y S, Murakami R. Applied Surface Science[J], 2010, 256: 6297 [Baidu Scholar]
Guo Y B, Warren A W, Hashimoto F. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology[J], 2010, 2: 129 [Baidu Scholar]
Yasuoka M, Wang P, Zhang K et al. Surface & Coatings Technology[J], 2013, 218: 93 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu C, Liu D, Zhang X et al. International Journal of Fatigue[J], 2019, 125: 249 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu C, Liu D, Zhang X et al. Journal of Materials Science & Technology[J], 2019, 35: 1555 [Baidu Scholar]
Yang J, Liu D, Zhang X et al. International Journal of Fatigue[J], 2020, 133: 105 373 [Baidu Scholar]
Xu X, Liu D, Zhang X et al. International Journal of Fatigue[J], 2019, 125: 237 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Q, Sun Q, Xiao L et al. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance[J], 2016, 25: 241 [Baidu Scholar]
Hanlon T, Kwon Y N, Suresh S. Scripta Materialia[J], 2003, 49: 675 [Baidu Scholar]
Miyamoto H. Materials Transactions[J], 2016, 57(5): 559 [Baidu Scholar]
Ralston K D, Birbilis N, Davies C H J. Scripta Materialia[J], 2010, 63: 1201 [Baidu Scholar]
Ralston K D, Birbilis N. Corrosion[J], 2010, 66: 75005 [Baidu Scholar]
Xia T, Zeng L, Zhang X et al. Surface & Coatings Technology[J], 2019, 363: 390 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu L, Li Y, Wang F. Journal of Materials Science & Technology[J], 2010, 26(1): 1 [Baidu Scholar]
Chui P, Sun K, Sun C et al. Applied Surface Science[J], 2011, 257: 6787 [Baidu Scholar]
Abdulstaar M, Mhaede M, Wollmann M et al. Surface & Coatings Technology[J], 2014, 254: 244 [Baidu Scholar]
Cui Z, Qin Z, Dong P et al. Materials Letters[J], 2020, 259: 126 769 [Baidu Scholar]
Shahryari A, Kamal W, Omanovic S. Materials Letters[J], 2008, 62: 3906 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang H, Song G, Tang G. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2016, 681: 146 [Baidu Scholar]
Sun Y, Wang H, Liu W et al. Surface & Coatings Technology[J], 2019, 368: 215 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang B, Wang J, Wu B et al. Nature Communications[J], 2018, 1: 1 [Baidu Scholar]
Xu X, Liu D, Zhang X et al. Journal of Materials Science & Technology[J], 2020, 40: 88 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang B, Yin Y, Gao Z et al. RSC Advances[J], 2017, 7: 36 876 [Baidu Scholar]
Li C, Zhu R, Zhang X et al. Surface & Coatings Technology[J], 2020, 383: 125 280 [Baidu Scholar]
Sauvage X, Wilde G, Divinski S V et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2012, 540: 1 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu D, Liu D, Zhang X et al. Materials Science & Engineering A[J], 2020, 773: 138 720 [Baidu Scholar]
She D, Yue W, Kang J et al. Tribology Transactions[J], 2018, 61(4): 612 [Baidu Scholar]
Ren K, Yue W, Zhang H. Surface & Coatings Technology[J], 2018, 349: 602 [Baidu Scholar]
Tong W P, Tao N R, Wang Z B et al. Science[J], 2003, 299: 686 [Baidu Scholar]
Ren S, Zhang Y, Zhao Y et al. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance[J], 2019, 28: 1132 [Baidu Scholar]