+高级检索
网刊加载中。。。

使用Chrome浏览器效果最佳,继续浏览,你可能不会看到最佳的展示效果,

确定继续浏览么?

复制成功,请在其他浏览器进行阅读

Properties of Cu-P Brazing Filler Metal After Hot-Dip Tinning  PDF

  • Dong Bowen
  • Zhong Sujuan
  • Pei Yinyin
  • Shen Yuanxun
  • Long Weimin
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Brazing Filler Metals & Technology, Zhengzhou Research Institute of Mechanical Engineering Co., Ltd, Zhengzhou 450001, China

Updated:2021-10-28

  • Full Text
  • Figs & Tabs
  • References
  • Authors
  • About
CN CITE
OUTLINE

Abstract

The CuPSn brazing filler metal was prepared on the basis of Cu93P brazing filler metal by hot-dip tinning. The interface morphology of tin coating was observed by scanning electron microscope. The tensile strength, microhardness, melting temperature and wettability of the brazing filler metal were investigated by universal mechanical testing machine, micro-hardness tester, differential thermal analyzer, resistance furnace and stereomicroscope. The results indicate that the liquid tin reacts with the brazing filler metal to form Cu6Sn5 intermetallic compound during hot-dip tinning, which means that the brazing filler metal and tin coating form good metallurgical bonding. The tensile strength and microhardness of brazing filler metal decrease with the increase of hot-dipping temperature and time. The decrease of tensile strength is due to the formation of Cu6Sn5 brittle compound and pores at the interface, and the decrease of microhardness is due to the stress-relieving annealing effect of hot-dip. Hot-dip tinning can reduce the melting temperature and improve the wettability of the brazing filler metal. The wetting area of brazing filler metal increases by about 43.15% compared with that of the matrix when 5.20wt% tin is hot dipped in it, and the Cu88.16P6.64Sn5.20 brazing filler metal possesses a good wettability.

Science Press

Pure copper is an important functional material of non-ferrous metals, which has excellent conductivity, heat conduction, corrosion resistance and processing performance, but the high melting temperature greatly restricts its application in the field of brazing[

1,2]. The addition of phosphorus to copper can significantly reduce its melting temperature and improve its brazing performance. Cu-P series filler metals are widely used for brazing copper and copper alloys, silver and silver alloys, molybdenum and molybdenum alloys[3].

The addition of silver in Cu-P alloy can further reduce its melting temperature and improve its processability. Therefore, Cu-P-Ag filler metal has become the most widely used filler metal for Cu-P series filler metals in refrigeration, motor and other industries. However, silver is a rare metal with limited resources. On the premise of ensuring the performance of brazing filler metal, replacing silver with other elements has become a hot research topic [

4].

The melting point of tin is 231.89 ℃, which is much lower than that of copper. Tin can be added into Cu-P filler metal to reduce the melting temperature. The formability of Cu-P-Sn prepared by a traditional melting method is poor when the content of tin is more than 4.0%. It can only be used as cast rod, powder or amorphous foil, so the application range is greatly limited. With the development of remanufacturing technology and brazing technology, new manufacturing technology can be used to improve the quality and performance of brazing filler metal [

5-10]. The author applied the hot-dip technology to the preparation of CuZnSn filler metal in the early stage, and achieved good results[11]. However, to prepare Cu-P-Sn filler metal with no silver and high tin content using hot-dip tinning has seldom been reported.

The hot-dip technology was used to improve the brazing performance of filler metal in this work. The CuPSn brazing filler metal was prepared on the basis of Cu93P brazing filler metal by hot-dip tinning. The effect of hot-dip tinning process on the properties of Cu93P filler metal was discussed. The interface morphology between tin coating and the substrate, the mechanical properties, melting temperature and wettability of CuPSn filler metal were investigated.

1 Experiment

The base material used in this experiment was strip-shaped Cu93P filler metal (Φ2.5 mm×1000 mm), and the chemical composition was 93.04wt% Cu and 6.96wt% P. The hot-dip tinning process was carried out in a self-made test device, and the principle is shown in Fig.1. The composition of flux (wt%) was 52ZnCl2+48NH4Cl. The hot-dip temperature was 250, 270, 290, 310 and 330 ℃. The hot-dip time was controlled by adjusting the drawing speed of Cu93P filler metal, and the hot-dip time was 10, 20 and 30 s. The tin content of brazing filler metal was controlled by adjusting the size of drawing die aperture. The etchant was used to remove tin layer on the surface of Cu93P filler metal to expose the interface compound grains, and the etchant was composed of 5%HCl+3%HNO3+CH3OH. The microstructure and micro fracture morphology of the samples were observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The tensile test of samples was referred to “GB /T228.1-2010 Tensile Test of Metallic Materials Part 1: Test Method at Room Tempe-rature”, and the tensile strength of samples was tested at the speed of 10 mm/min by MTS C45.105 electronic universal testing machine. The tensile strength of the samples was the average of 5 samples. The microhardness of the samples was analyzed by HV-1000A microhardness meter. The load was 100 g, and the loading time was 10 s.At least 10 points were selected for each sample, and the arithmetic mean value was taken as the microhardness of the substrate. The influence of tin content on the melting temperature of filler metal was analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The equipment was STA449F3 produced by Netzsch company of Germany. The test process was completed in an alumina crucible under nitrogen atmosphere. According to the melting temperature of Cu-P brazing alloy, the scanning temperature ranged from 30 ℃ to 850 ℃. The heating rate was 15 ℃/min, and the temperature measuring accuracy was ±0.5 ℃. The scanning results of DSC were analyzed by Proteus software. Test method of wettability for brazing filler metals was referred to GB/T11364-2008 test method of wettability for brazing filler metals. Before the wetting test, the pure copper plate (4 cm×4 cm×0.2 cm) should be polished by 100# and 400# sandpaper to ensure that the surface of the plate was smooth, and then it was cleaned with CH3OH. Afterwards 200 mg of brazing filler metal was placed in the center of the pure copper plate and covered with FB102 flux. The samples were heated in SX2-10-12G resistance furnace. Then they were held for 40~50 s after the filler metal was melted, and then cleaned after natural cooling at room temperature. The spreading samples were scanned in SteREO Discovery.V8, and the wetting area of brazing filler metal was calculated.

Fig.1 Principle of hot-dip tinning for Cu-P brazing filler metal

2 Results and Discussion

2.1 Microstructure

Fig.2 shows the interface morphology between tin coating and Cu93P filler metal when the hot-dip temperature is 250 ℃ and the hot-dip time is 10 s. It can be seen from Fig.2a that the tin coating is uniform, flat and dense. A rod-shaped continuous compound layer is formed at the interface, and the surface morphology of the interface compound is shown in Fig.2b. The interaction between tin and the elements in Cu93P filler metal can be characterized by chemical affinity. The larger the chemical affinity between two elements, the more easily the compounds are formed. On the contrary, the lower the che-mical affinity, the less likely the compounds will be formed[

12].

Fig.2 Interface morphologies between tin coating and Cu93P filler metal (a) and surface morphology of the rod interface compound (b)

The chemical affinity between two elements can be calculated by Eq.(1)[

12],

η=ZrKA/ZrKB+ΔX (1)

where η is the chemical affinity parameter, Z/rK is the ratio of the charge number of element to the atomic radius, and ΔX is the difference between XA and XB which is the electronegativity of elements. It should be noted that the equation of (Z/rK)A/(Z/rK)B always takes the smaller (Z/rK) as the denominator, so the value of (Z/rK)A/(Z/rK)B is always greater than 1.

The chemical affinity parameters of Cu-Sn and P-Sn can be calculated according to Eq.(1), as shown in Table 1. The results in Table 1 show that the chemical affinity parameter of tin to copper is greater than that to phosphorus. The greater the chemical affinity between two elements, the more likely the formation of compounds[

13]. It can be seen that the tendency to form Cu-Sn compound is greater than that to form P-Sn compound at the interface during hot-dip tinning, so tin and copper are more likely to interact to form Cu6Sn5 intermetallic compound[14]. This is consistent with the results of energy spectrum analysis, as shown in Table 2.

Table 1 Chemical affinity parameters between copper, phos-phorus and tin
Chemical element(Z/rK)A(Z/rK)BXAXBΔXη
Cu-Sn 5.64 1.04 1.96 1.90 0.06 5.48
P-Sn 14.7 5.64 2.19 1.96 0.23 2.84
Table 2 Element content of compound layer at the interface
Cu content/wt%Sn content/wt%Phase
37.58 62.42 Cu6Sn5

2.2 Mechanical Properties

2.2.1 Tensile strength

The effect of different hot-dip temperatures and time on the tensile strength of filler metal is shown in Fig.3. When the hot-dip temperature is higher than 250 ℃, the tensile strength of filler metal decreases significantly compared with Cu93P brazing filler metal with the increase of hot-dip temperature. The tensile strength of filler metal decreases with the extension of hot-dip time at the same hot-dip temperature. The initial tensile strength of Cu93P brazing filler metal is 783.34 MPa. The tensile strength of brazing filler metal remains unchanged with the extension of hot-dip time when the hot-dip temperature is 250 ℃, which indicates that Cu93P brazing filler metal maintains good thermal stability when hot-dip tinning is performed at 250 ℃. Cu93P brazing alloy is hypoeu-tectic according to the Cu-P phase diagram, which is composed of α(Cu) plastic phase and Cu3P brittle phase. The dispersed Cu3P brittle phase improves the tensile strength of α(Cu). Both α(Cu) and Cu3P maintain good thermal stability at 250 ℃, quasi-cleavage fracture occurs during the tensile pro-cess, and a large number of dimples and tearing edges appear on the fracture surface, as shown in Fig.4a. The tensile strength of filler metal decreases greatly when the hot-dip temperature is 270 ℃ or above. The tensile strength of filler metal is 569.14 MPa when the hot-dip temperature is 270 ℃ and the hot-dip time is 10 s, which is about 27.34% lower than that of Cu93P filler metal. Cleavage fracture occurs during tensile process, as shown in Fig.4b. The sharp decrease of tensile strength is due to the formation of a large amount of Cu6Sn5 brittle compound along the cross-section of the filler metal during hot-dip tinning. Cu6Sn5 brittle compounds are connected with Cu3P brittleness, which become new crack sources, as shown in Fig.5. When the hot-dip temperature is 290 ℃ and the hot-dip time is 10 s, holes begin to appear at the interface, as shown in Fig.6a. These holes increase the crack sources, and the tensile strength of solder decreases. The holes increase in amount with the increase of hot-dip temperature to 310 °C, as shown in Fig.6b, and the tensile strength of filler metal further decreases.

Fig.4 Fracture morphologies of Cu93P brazing filler metal after hot-dip tinning: (a) 250 ℃, 10 s; (b) 270 ℃, 10 s

Fig.5 Interfacial reaction between tin coating and Cu93P filler metal

Fig.6 Microstructures of filler metal in longitudinal section under different hot-dip parameters: (a) 290 ℃, 10 s; (b) 310 ℃, 10 s

2.2.2 Microhardness

The effect of different hot-dip temperatures and time on the microhardness of the filler metal is shown in Fig.7. The microhardness of the filler metal after hot-dip tinning decreases obviously. The initial microhardness of Cu93P filler metal is 1961 MPa. The microhardness of the filler metal is 1755 MPa when the hot-dip temperature is 250 ℃ and the hot-dip time is 10 s, and it is decreased by 10.51% compared to that of the matrix. The microhardness of the filler metal is 1532 MPa when the hot-dip temperature is 330 ℃ and the hot-dip time is 10 s, which is 21.89% lower than that of the matrix. The microhardness of the filler metal gradually decreases as the hot-dip temperature increases, and the microhardness of the filler metal slowly decreases with the extension of the hot-dip time. This is mainly due to the fact that the Cu93P filler metal is drawn and straightened, and these processes have an effect of work hardening. The hot-dip tinning exerts a stress-relieving annealing effect on the Cu93P filler metal, and the microhardness of the filler metal decreases. The higher the hot-dip temperature or the longer the hot-dip time, the stronger the stress-relieving annealing effect of the matrix, and the lower the microhardness[

15].

2.3 Melting temperature and wettability

Fig.8 shows the DSC curves of Cu93P brazing filler metal before and after hot-dip tinning. The solidus temperature and liquidus temperature of the solder are set as the starting point temperature and the ending point temperature of the endothermic peak on the DSC curve, respectively. The characteristic temperature of endothermic peak corresponding to the filler metal in Fig.8 is shown in Table 3. The melting temperature of Cu93P filler metal ranges from 721.05 ℃ to 736.31 ℃, and that of Cu88.16P6.64Sn5.20 filler metal ranges from 660.51 ℃ to 695.78 ℃. The solid and liquid phase lines of Cu93P filler metal after hot-dip tinning decrease, which means that hot-dip tinning on the surface of Cu93P filler metal can reduce the melting temperature.

Table 3 Characteristic temperature of endothermic peak in Fig.8 (°C)
SpecimenSolids, TSLiquidus, TLTemperature range, ΔT
Cu93P 721.05 736.31 15.26
CuPSn 660.51 695.78 35.27

The brazability was evaluated by the wettability. The wettability comparison between Cu93P filler metal and Cu88.16P6.64Sn5.20 filler metal after hot-dip tinning is shown in Fig.9. The wetting area of Cu88.16P6.64Sn5.20 filler metal increases by 43.15% compared to that of Cu93P after 5.20wt% tin is hot dipped in it. The reason is that actual liquid metal is viscous liquid whose flow performance can be measured by the viscosity of liquid metal. The viscosity is inversely proportional to the superheat of liquid metal. Therefore, when the brazing temperature is fixed, the lower the melting temperature of the filler metal, the higher the superheat of the liquid filler metal, which causes the decrease of viscosity of the liquid metal and the increase of fluidity[

16-18]. Tin is a low melting-point element which can reduce the melting temperature of the filler metal and increase the superheat, and then the wettability and spreading properties of the filler metal can be improved.

3 Conclusions

1) The liquid tin can react with the brazing filler metal to form Cu6Sn5 intermetallic compound during hot-dip tinning, which means that the brazing filler metal and tin coating form good metallurgical bonding.

2) The tensile strength and microhardness of brazing filler metal decrease with the increase of hot-dipping temperature and time. The decrease of tensile strength is due to the formation of Cu6Sn5 brittle compound and pores at the interface, and the decrease of microhardness is due to the stress-relieving annealing effect of hot-dip.

3) Hot-dip tinning can reduce the melting temperature and improve the wettability of the brazing filler metal. The wetting area of brazing filler metal increases by about 43.15% compared with the matrix when 5.20wt% tin is hot dipped, and the Cu88.16P6.64Sn5.20 brazing filler metal possesses a good wettability.

References

1

Huang Boyun. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals[J], 2004, 14(S1): 122 [Baidu Scholar

2

Huang Boyun, Li Chenggong, Shi Likai et al. Handbook of Nonferrous Metals Materials[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2009: 217 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar

3

Davis J R. Metals Handbook[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2011: 890 [Baidu Scholar

4

Ma Chaoli, Xue Songbai, Zhang Tao et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2017, 46(9): 2565 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar

5

Long Weimin, Zhang Guanxing, Zhang Qingke et al. Transac-tions of the China Welding Institution[J], 2015, 36(11): 1 [Baidu Scholar

6

Long Weimin, Li Shengnan, Du Dong et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2019, 48(12): 3781 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar

7

Wang Xingxing, Du Quanbin, Long Weimin et al. Transactions of the China Welding Institution[J], 2015(3): 47 [Baidu Scholar

8

Wang Xingxing, Wang Bo, Han Linshan et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2018, 47(1): 367 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar

9

Wang Xingxing, Peng Jin, Cui Datian et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2017, 46(9): 2583 [Baidu Scholar

10

Wang Xingxing, Zhang Guanxing, Long Weimin et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2013, 42(11): 2394 [Baidu Scholar

11

Dong Bowen, Deng Xiaojun, He Peng et al. Welding & Joining[J], 2015(7): 34 [Baidu Scholar

12

Chen Nianyi. Bond Parameter Functions and Their Applications [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1976: 12 [Baidu Scholar

13

Li Zhuoran, Jiao Ning, Feng Jicai et al. Transactions of the China Welding Institution[J], 2008(3): 65 [Baidu Scholar

14

Zhang Q K, Zhang Z F. Acta Materialia[J], 2011, 59(15): 6017 [Baidu Scholar

15

Yao Xiaofei, Tian Wei, Li Nan et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2019, 48(11): 3651 [Baidu Scholar

16

Lai Zhongmin, Xue Songbai, Lu Fangyan et al. China Welding[J], 2009, 18(4): 33 [Baidu Scholar

17

Chen Y, Yun D, Sui F et al. Materials Science and Technology[J], 2013, 29(10): 1267 [Baidu Scholar

18

Bao Li, Long Weimin, Pei Yinyin et al. Transactions of the China Welding Institution[J], 2013(10): 55 [Baidu Scholar