Abstract
The effects of cold deformation on the evolution of the microstructure and mechanical properties of pure nickel N6 were investigated. Samples of pure nickel N6 were deformed by cold rolling (CR) to different thickness reductions (20%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 90%). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), X-ray diffraction (XRD), microhardness measurements, and tensile tests were used to characterize the microstructure and mechanical properties of the cold-rolled samples. The results show that the grains of pure nickel N6 are refined, and the grain with irregular orientation transforms into a strip-like grain with a preferred orientation parallel to the rolling direction. Micro- and nano-grains of pure nickel N6 are obtained under CR reduction of 90%, at which the grain diameter is mainly below 10 μm, accounting for 94% of the entire grain size. The distribution of low-angle grain boundaries (LAGBs) in the rolled samples is uniform, with a relatively high fraction of misorientation angles of 10° from neighboring points. Upon increasing the cold rolling reductions, the tensile strength and microhardness increase, but the elongation decreases. At a CR thickness reduction of 90%, the tensile strength is 837 MPa, and the microhardness is 2479 MPa, which are 2.32 and 2.7 times higher than those in the unrolled condition, respectively. The fracture morphology of pure nickel N6 at various CR reductions include equiaxed dimples, ridges, and a step morphology, which indicate ductile fracture.
Science Press
With excellent mechanical properties, high-temperature resistance, oxidation resistance, and corrosion resistance in concentrated alkali solution
Most research on pure nickel has focused on coatings, thermal deformation and corrosion resistance. For example, Genova et a
However, there is a lack of available reported data concerning the possible usage of CR method to fabricate high strength nickel sheets and foils. Therefore, the objective of the present study is to investigate the effect of cold rolling on the microstructure and mechanical properties of pure nickel N6 through the analysis of microstructural evolution, mechanical properties, and fracture behavior.
The experimental material was a forged pure nickel N6 (99.6wt%) slab, whose chemical composition is listed in

Fig.1 Illustration of the micro-hardness test (a) and size of the tensile test specimen (b)

Fig.2 XRD patterns (a) and texture coefficient Tc of each crystal plane (b) of pure nickel N6 under various CR reductions

Fig.3 SEM microstructures of pure nickel N6 under various CR deformation reductions: (a) 0%, (b) 20%, (c) 30%, (d) 50%, (e) 70%, and (f) 90%
The crystal structure of pure nickel N6 before and after CR deformation was investigated using a D8-ADVANCE X-ray diffractometer, equipped with Cu-Kα radiation (incident wavelength λ was 0.154 06 nm). The tube current was 40 mA, the tube voltage was 40 kV, the 2θ Bragg angle varied from 30° to 90°, and the scanning step was 0.02°.
Microstructure observations were performed on rolled specimens that were cut from cross-section of samples with different cold rolled reductions. The cross-sectional metallographic specimens were ground using sandpapers (from 400# to 3000#). Afterward, the specimens were polished using a 0.5 μm diamond solution and etched in a solution of 3 mL HNO3+5 mL C2H4O2 for 30 s. The metallographic specimens were observed by a FEI Nova NanoSEM 430 scanning electron microscope (SEM). For electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) analysis, rolled samples were polished by electro polishing in a solution of 90 mL C2H5OH and 10 mL HClO 4 at -20 °C with a voltage of 50 V. EBSD analysis was performed on a FEI NovaNano SEM 430 equipped with an Oxford Instruments Nordlys 2S detector.
Microhardness measurements were performed using the Vickers hardness tester under a load of 0.05 kg, and the number of measurement on each sample is 9 to create a microhardness polar coordinate nephogram. The illustration of the microhardness test is shown in
In the XRD patterns, the texture coefficient (Tc) of the pure nickel (hkl) crystal plane is used to characterize the preferred orientation level of the pure nickel crystal plane:
(1) |
where I(hkl) is the measured diffraction intensity, and I0(hkl) is the relative intensity of the nickel (hkl) crystal plane without a preferential orientation in the PDF (04-0850) card. The diffraction peak data of each crystal plane of pure nickel with different amounts of deformation and the crystal plane diffraction peak data corresponding to the standard nickel sample were inserted into

To further explore the effect of cold rolling deformation on the microstructure evolution, EBSD analysis was performed on the samples under 20%, 50%, and 90% deformation. Fig.4 displays the inverse pole figures (IPFs) and corresponding image quality maps, as well as the distribution of misorientation angles and grain sizes under different CR thickness reductions. The index of the inverse pole figures of selected regions is given in Fig.4a, in which red is the [001] orientation, green is the [101] orientation, and blue is the [111] orientation. The EBSD map of the 20% cold-rolled pure nickel N6 (Fig.4a) shows a microstructure that is very similar to the original material, with a relatively large grain size and more twins. The average grain size of 20% cold-rolled pure nickel N6 is 23.7 μm (Fig.4b). In the grain misorienta- tion angle maps, the high-angle grain boundaries (HAGBs) are >15°, marked by black lines, and the low-angle grain boundaries (LAGBs) are <15°. The green is sub-granular boundaries (SBs, <5°) and the red is Σ3 boundaries. Fig.4c shows the misorientation angle distributions and the average angle is 17.39°. Furthermore, the fraction of LAGBs is 68.73% and a relatively high fraction (11.7%) of twin boundaries is observed in 20% cold-rolled sample. With further cold-rolling to 50% (Fig.4d), the grains are gradually elongated along the main rolling direction, and broken fine grains appear. From Fig.4e and 4f, it can be seen that the grain size and misorientation angle are smaller than those of the 20% rolled specimen. Fig.4h shows the grain size distribution at a rolling thickness reduction of 90%. It can be seen that most grains have a size below 10 μm, accounting for 94% of the entire grain size and average grain size is 3.864 μm. From Fig.4g, the grains are severely broken, and the grain boundaries are fuzzy, because the grain boundaries inside the crystals are gradually transformed into LAGBs due to the fracture and rotation of the crystal grains under severe plastic deformation. The fraction of the LAGBs accounts for 81.1% at a rolling thickness reduction of 90% (Fig.4i).

Fig.5 Microhardness polar coordinate nephograms under various cold rolled reductions: (a) 0%, (b) 20%, (c) 30%, (d) 50%, (e) 70%, and (f) 90%
The microhardness variation as a function of cold rolling reduction is shown in Fig.6. The average microhardness of forged pure nickel N6 is 916 MPa, which increases upon increasing the cold rolling reduction. The experimental results reveal that the average microhardness reaches 2479 MPa when the cold rolling reduction is 90%, which is 2.7 times higher than that of as-annealed sample due to the dislocation density variation as a function of the strain hardening due to cold rolling
Fig.7 shows the tensile stress-displacement curves of pure nickel N6 under various cold rolling reductions. The inset shows the fracture of tensile specimens at various cold rolling reductions. The as-annealed pure nickel N6 has excellent plasticity with a displacement of 16.93 mm. It can be seen from the inset in Fig.4 that the length of the original tensile specimens after fracture is longer than that of other specimens. In addition, the tensile stress-displacement curve of samples with 0% CR reduction has an obvious yield plateau, but the sample with high cold rolling reductions does not.


Fig.8 shows the mechanical properties of pure nickel N6 under various cold rolling reductions. Upon increasing the deformation reduction, the tensile strength gradually increases. When the deformation reduction is 90%, the tensile strength sharply increases and reaches a maximum of 837 MPa, which is 2.32 times higher than that of original pure nickel N6. However, the elongation rapidly decreases from 50.7% to 5.5% upon increasing the CR reduction to 90%.

There are three main reasons why the tensile strength increases upon increasing CR reduction. Firstly, the grain size decreases upon increasing CR reduction, which contributes to the strengthening. According to the Hall-Petch relationshi

Fig.9 Tensile fracture morphologies of N6 under 0% (a~c) and 90% (d~f) cold rolled reduction
specimens are composed of two parts. The middle part is convex, exhibits an obvious necking phenomenon, and mainly consists of the equiaxed dimples with different sizes and a little bit of cleavage plane. Dimple-rupture ductile fractur
The two sides were shear planes with 45° inclinations, composed of protrusion pattern resembling ridges, the step morphology, and river pattern, which indicate that the fracture mode of the two sample fractures is plastic deformation. In addition, the fractured dimple size and depth of the original sample are larger and deeper than those of sample under 90% CR reduction, which indicates that the plasticity of the original N6 sample is better. The tensile samples under various CR reductions all exhibit different degrees of necking, indicating the ductile fracture of the N6 samples during tensile loading. The necking of the original pure nickel N6 is more pronounced than that of the rolled tensile samples. Compared with specimens before tensile tests, the widths of the original and rolled alloys under 90% reduction are reduced by 23.4% and 4.8%, respectively.
1) The grains with random orientation gradually exhibit preferential distribution for pure nickel N6 during the rolling process. Rolled pure nickel changes from the (111) crystal faces to (200) upon increasing the cold-rolling reduction. The grain size of pure nickel N6 under a rolling reduction of 90% reaches the micro and nano level. Under the action of rolling stress, the grain boundaries of pure nickel N6 bear the stress concentration, and the HAGBs gradually change to the LAGBs.
2) Upon increasing the CR reduction, the microhardness and tensile strength of the rolled N6 samples significantly increase due to work hardening, but the elongation decreases. At a thickness reduction of 90%, the tensile strength is 837 MPa, and the microhardness is 2479 MPa, which are 2.32 and 2.7 times higher than those in the unrolled condition; however, the elongation decreases from 50.7% to 5.5%.
3) The specimens exhibit roughly the same tensile fracture morphology which consists of two parts. The middle part is convex and consists of equiaxed dimples with different sizes, and the two sides are shear planes with 45° inclinations composed of ridges and a step morphology. Moreover, the tensile samples at various CR reductions all display different degrees of necking. These two points indicate ductile fracture.
References
Gao Zexi, Jia Zhi, Ji Jinjin et al. Physics and Engineering of Metallic Materials[J], 2019, 217: 201 [Baidu Scholar]
Gopala Rao Thellaputta, Pulcharu Subhash Chandra, Rao C S P et al. Materials Today: Proceedings[J], 2017, 4(2): 3712 [Baidu Scholar]
Palumboa G, Gonzaleza F, Brennenstuhla A M et al. Nanostruc-tured Materials[J], 1997, 9(1-8): 737 [Baidu Scholar]
Pimpin Alongkorn, Charoenbunyarit Ittipol, Srituravanich Werayut et al. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical[J], 2017, 253: 49 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhong X Y, Wu X Q, Han E H et al. Engineering Failure Analysis[J], 2010, 17(6): 1404 [Baidu Scholar]
Harris C, Despa M, Kelly K. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems[J], 2000, 9: 502 [Baidu Scholar]
Polkowski Wojciech, Polkowska Adelajda, Zasadab Dariusz et al. Materials Characterization[J], 2017, 130: 173 [Baidu Scholar]
Genova V, Paglia L, Marra F et al. Surface and Coatings Technology[J], 2019, 357: 595 [Baidu Scholar]
Lv Jinlong, Liang Tongxiang, Wang Chen et al. Journal of Solid State Chemistry[J], 2016, 240: 109 [Baidu Scholar]
Wan Zhipeng, Hu Lianxi, Yu Sun et al. Journal of Alloy & Compounds[J], 2018, 769: 367 [Baidu Scholar]
Allart M, Christien F, Gall R Le et al. Acta Materialia[J], 2013, 61(20): 7938 [Baidu Scholar]
Chen X P, Chen X, Zhang J P et al. Materials Science & Engineering A[J], 2013, 585, 66 [Baidu Scholar]
Neishi K, Horita Z, Langdon T G et al. Materials Science & Engineering A[J], 2002, 325: 54 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhilyaev A P, Nurislamova G V, Valiev R Z et al. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A[J], 2002, 33: 1865 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhilyaev A P, Lee S, Nurislamova G V et al. Scripta Materialia[J], 2001, 44: 2753 [Baidu Scholar]
Li Xiao, Guan Bo, Jia Yunfei et al. Acta Metallurgica Sinica[J], 2019, 32(8): 951 [Baidu Scholar]
Chen Lan, Ren Xudong, Zhou Wangfan et al. Materials Science & Engineering A[J], 2018, 728: 20 [Baidu Scholar]
Shabani Ali, Toroghinejad Mohammad Reza, Shafyeia Ali et al. Materialia[J], 2018, 1: 175 [Baidu Scholar]
Duan Huiping, Xu Hongxia, Su Wenhuang et al. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials[J], 2012, 19(12): 1128 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Z, Gao M C, Ma S G et al. Materials Science & Engineering A[J], 2015, 645: 163 [Baidu Scholar]
Lian Yong, Huang Jinfeng, Zhang Jin et al. Materials Science & Engineering A[J], 2018, 712: 663 [Baidu Scholar]
Li Y, Li J Y, Liu M et al. Journal of Alloy & Engineering A[J], 2015, 653: 156 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Liqiang, Yang Guanjun, Yang Huabin et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2009, 38(4): 579 [Baidu Scholar]
Lan Chunbo, Wu Yu, Guo Lili et al. Materials Science & Engineering A[J], 2017, 690: 170 [Baidu Scholar]
Gali A, George E P. Intermetallics[J], 2013, 39: 74 [Baidu Scholar]
Guo Junhang, Zhao Shendun, Murakami Ri-ichi et al. Computational Materials Science[J], 2013, 71: 115 [Baidu Scholar]