Abstract
To improve the bonding strength of the chromium-doped diamond-like carbon (Cr-DLC ) films on the surface of the copper alloy, multilayer structure films of Cr/CrN/Cr-DLC with different thickness of Cr interlayer were designed and prepared on the copper alloy samples by magnetron sputtering and plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition. The microstructure, residual stress, nanohardness, elastic modulus, bonding strength and impact toughness of the film were tested by high-resolution Raman spectrometer, film stress meter, nanoindenter, scratch tester and repetitive impact tester. The results show that the residual stress of Cr-DLC film on the surface of copper alloy decreases from -1.92 GPa to -0.47 GPa with increasing the thickness of Cr interlayer, reduced by 75.5%. When the thickness of Cr interlayer reaches 1.01 μm, the bonding strength between the Cr-DLC film and the substrate is the best, which is 69% and 67% higher than the first (Lc1) and the second (Lc2) critical loads of Cr-DLC film without Cr adhesive layer, respectively. After 20 000 times of repetitive impact tests, there is no elastic recovery in the impact depth for all Cr-DLC coated samples, and exfoliation of a certain area for the film is observed at the center of the impact pit. Among all samples, Cr-DLC coated sample with Cr interlayer of 1.01 μm in thickness has the smallest peeling area, and shows the best performance of repetitive impact resistance. Therefore, Cr interlayer with a certain thickness can significantly reduce the residual stress of the Cr-DLC film while improve the bonding strength and repetitive impact resistance.
Science Press
Chromium-doped diamond-like carbon films (Cr-DLC) prepared by physical vapor deposition (PVD) are widely used in protective coatings because of their excellent mechanical properties. Mechanical properties of hard thin films on soft metals such as copper and aluminum are strongly affected by working load and residual stress. To satisfy the functional requirements for different applications, the interlayer of Cr/CrN can be introduced into Cr-DLC multilayer films for controlling residual stress, improving the adhesion and increasing the thickness and impact toughness.
Films with a single layer are prone to severe brittle fracture or even peel off the substrate under heavy load. The hardness of single-layer films is not high, and the bearing capability is poor; when the substrate yields but the film does not yield and deform, it will break; the poor adhesion between the film and the substrate makes it easily to peel off the substrate; meanwhile, poor toughness of the film leads to the propagation of the crack along the cross section, as shown in

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of bearing capacity of single-layer (a) and multilayer (b) carbon based composite films
The failure of hard thin films on soft substrates is caused by delamination and fractur
Multilayer structure with addition of metal or ceramics interlayer can improve interface adaptability and reduce the effect of residual stress. Metals of chromium and titanium are usually considered as the interlayer, and materials of the interlayer should have a thermal expansion coefficient similar to that of the substrate and also an elastic modulus similar to that of the carbon based film. It can effectively control the residual stress and improve adhesion between films and substrates by introducing multilayer structure such as the combination of metals and ceramics (Cr/CrN). Increase in the thickness of the metal layer can reduce the residual stress on surface, but may degrade the performance of multilayer films. Large plane residual stress is detected near the substrate when the thickness of CrN layer is relatively large, and concentrated columnar growth is found at the beginning, and finally the film fails due to the crack propagation. Therefore, an interlayer with a certain thickness is needed for each single CrN film. Metal Cr layer with an optimal thickness can further improve the adhesion and the toughness of multilayer films.
A model of multilayer structure for Cr-DLC film was designed, and effects of hard film with metal interlayer on soft metals on internal stress and adhesion performance was investigated by varying thickness of Cr interlayer and keeping thickness of working layer constant. As shown in

Fig.2 Multilayer structure model of Cr-DLC films: (a) Cr-DLC-1, (b) Cr-DLC-2, (c) Cr-DLC-3, and (d) Cr-DLC-4
Films were prepared by multi-functional ion plating system. As shown in

Fig.3 Multi-functional ion plating system
Φ30 mm×5 mm samples of KK3 copper alloy were used as substrates, which were treated by polishing and had a surface roughness of 0.8 μm. These samples were subjected to multi-process ultrasonic cleaning for 30 min, and put into an 80 °C oven for drying after cleaning. The samples were placed in the vacuum chamber with a vacuum degree of 5×1
The microstructure of the film was measured and analyzed by LabRAM HR Evolution high resolution Raman spectrometer, 514 nm laser was used for exciting the film, the beam spot diameter was 1.25 μm, the power was 150 μW/c
where Es is the elastic modulus of the substrate; νs is the Poisson's ratio of the substrate; hs and hc are the substrate and film thicknesses, respectively; R0 and R are the radii of curvature of the substrate before and after deposition, respectively.
The adhesion force of film and substrate was tested by MFT-4000 multifunctional material surface performance tester, where the ending load was set at 100 N, the loading rate was 100 N/min, and the scratch length was 5 mm. The impact toughness of the film was measured by GP-100k continuous impact testing machine. WC ball with diameter of 5 mm was chosen as the punch. The distance between the punch and the sample was 1.0 mm, the impact frequency was 10 Hz, the load was 500 N, and the test cycle was 20 000 times. The scratch shape and impact pit morphology were observed by LY-WN-YH 3D full freedom microscopic imaging system. The coating hardness and Young's modulus were determined with a nano-indention testing system (Agilent G200). A fixed indentation depth of 400 nm was used to record the load after the maximum depth. At the same time, the significant influence on the hardness measured by the substrate was avoided. Each sample was indented 10 times to obtain the average value.

Fig.4 Raman spectra of the Cr-DLC films with different interlayers
As shown in

Fig.5 Thickness and cross section morphologies of Cr-DLC films with different interlayers: (a) Cr-DLC-1, (b) Cr-DLC-2, (c) Cr-DLC-3, and (d) Cr-DLC-4
Mechanical properties for Cr-DLC films are shown in

Fig.6 Intrinsic hardness and elastic modulus in multilayer configura-tions of Cr-DLC samples
The stress state for thin films is significant, which affects many properties, including adhesion between films and substrates, internal cracks, wear resistance, fatigue failure, stress corrosion and hardness. The residual stress caused by mismatch of thermal expansion for films and substrates and large temperature deviation between deposition temperature and operation temperature is called thermal stres

Fig.7 L-D relationships of Cr-DLC films with different interlayers: (a) Cr-DLC-1 (b) Cr-DLC-2 (c) Cr-DLC-3 (d) Cr-DLC-4
According to the standard of ASTM C1623-2005, the load at which the first crack appears in the film during a scratch test is considered as Lc1, and with increasing load, continuous film spalling occurs, it is considered as Lc2, which is the bonding strength between the film and the substrate. As shown in

Fig.8 OM images of the first failure in Cr-DLC films with different interlayers: (a) Cr-DLC-1, (b) Cr-DLC-2, (c) Cr-DLC-3, and (d) Cr-DLC-4

Fig.9 OM images showing continuous spalling failure of Cr-DLC films with different interlayers: (a) Cr-DLC-1, (b) Cr-DLC-2, (c) Cr-DLC-3, and (d) Cr-DLC-4
Fig.10 shows relationship between the adhesion strength at which the film is failed and the adhesion force between the film and the substrate. It is found that Lc1 for sample Cr-DLC-1, Cr-DLC-2, Cr-DLC-3 and Cr-DLC-4 is 26, 29, 44 and 31 N, respectively. And corresponding Lc2 is 30, 32, 50 and 37 N, respectively. Increasing thickness of Cr interlayer improves the adhesion between films and substrates, but when the interlayer reaches a certain thickness, the adhesion becomes poor due to reduced support of over thick interlayer and forms “eggshell effect”. Results show the first critical load and the second critical load for Cr-DLC films with Cr interlayer is increased by 69% and 67%, respectively. Compared with Cr-DLC films without Cr interlayer, Cr-DLC shows the best performance when the thickness of Cr interlayer is 1.01 μm.

As shown in

Fig.11 Morphologies of impact pits for repetitive impact tests after 20 000 times: (a) Cr-DLC-1, (b) Cr-DLC-2, (c) Cr-DLC-3, and (d) Cr-DLC-4
In the initial process of impact, the yielding stress of KK3 substrate is exceeded, impact depth increases with larger area of contact region, so the contact stress decreases due to plastic deformation. Multilayer structure of four kinds of Cr-DLC films shows good ability of deformation with the substrate, and no ring cracking is observed. When the contact area of the punch increases to the extent that the substrate no longer yields, the change in the depth of each continuous impact is the minimum. During each impact, films must bend significantly to accommodate the elastic and plastic deformation of the film, which increases the possibility of cracking. As the hardness of Cr-DLC film is increased by 3~4 times compared with KK3 substrate, the depth decreases little with continuous impacts, which may be the beginning of the film damage. As the film is damaged by cracking, the impact depth increases further. There is no Cr interlayer for Cr-DLC-1, and its resistance against crack propagation is worse than other three samples. According to
1) The hardness of Cr-DLC film decreases slightly with increasing the Cr interlayer thickness, but still remains above 11 GPa when the thickness of working layer keeps constant.
2) Compressive residual stress can be detected for four kinds of Cr-DLC films with different Cr interlayer thicknesses, and the stress first decreases and then increases with increasing the thickness of Cr interlayer. When the thickness of Cr interlayer is 1.01 μm, the residual stress decreases to -0.47 GPa, which has a reduction of 75.5%.
3) Films show better adhesion to the substrate as the Cr interlayer thickness increases. The first critical load and the second critical load of Cr-DLC films with Cr interlayer is improved by 69% and 67%, respectively compared with films without Cr interlayer, and Cr-DLC-3 film shows the best performance when the thickness of interlayer reaches 1.01 μm.
4) Repetitive impact strongly affects four kinds of samples. After the impact load is released, no elastic recovery can be observed for impact depth at the impact pits. At the center of the impact pits, a certain area of spalling can be found, and Cr-DLC-3 shows the least area of spalling, which represents the best resistance against repetitive impacts.
References
Holmberg K, Matthews A, Ronkainen H. Tribology International [J], 1998, 31(1-3): 107 [Baidu Scholar]
Li Z D. Study of Low Temperature Preparation and Properties of Long Life Thin Films on High Speed and Heavy Load Bearing[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Mechanization Sciences, 2017 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Zhan H. Design and Preparation of Element Doping Carbon- based Thin Films for Marine Atmosphere Environment Applications[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Mechanization Sciences, 2018 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Holmberg K, Ronkainen H, Laukkanen A et al. Surface & Coatings Technology [J], 2007, 202(4-7): 1034 [Baidu Scholar]
Deng J, Manuel B. Diamond and Related Materials[J], 1996, 5: 478 [Baidu Scholar]
Freund L B, Suresh S. Thin Film Materials-Stress, Defect Formation and Surface Evolution[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004 [Baidu Scholar]
Shao W, Zhou Y F, Shi Z J et al. Materials Today Communications [J], 2020, 23: 100 946 [Baidu Scholar]
Stoney G G. Proceedings of the Royal Society A[J], 1909, 82: 172 [Baidu Scholar]
Kenneth H, Helena R, Anssi L et al. Wear[J], 2009, 267: 2142 [Baidu Scholar]
Karaseov P A, Podsvirov O A, Karabeshkin K V et al. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B[J], 2010, 268: 3107 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang P, Wang X, Xu T et al. Thin Solid Films[J], 2007, 515: 6899 [Baidu Scholar]
Oka Y, Kirinuki M, Nishimura Y et al. Surface & Coatings Technology[J], 2004,186: 141 [Baidu Scholar]
Miki Y, Nishimoto A, Sone T et al. Surface & Coatings Technology[J], 2015, 283: 274 [Baidu Scholar]
Lei Y, Jiang J L, Wang Y B et al. Applied Surface Science[J], 2019, 479: 12 [Baidu Scholar]
Mei H J, Zhao S S, Chen W et al. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China[J], 2018, 28: 1368 [Baidu Scholar]
Baida H A, Kermouche G, Langlade C. Mechanics of Materials [J], 2015, 86: 11 [Baidu Scholar]
Attar F, Johannesson T. Surface and Coatings Technology[J], 1996, 78: 87 [Baidu Scholar]
Bull S J. Tribology International [J], 1997, 30(7): 491 [Baidu Scholar]
Stallard J, Poulat S, Teer D G. Tribology International[J], 2006, 39: 159 [Baidu Scholar]
Bull S J, Berasetegui E G. Tribology International[J], 2006, 39: 99 [Baidu Scholar]
Beake B D, Goodes S R, Smith J F et al. Diamond and Related Materials[J], 2002,11: 1606 [Baidu Scholar]
Sui X D, Liu J Y, Zhang S T et al. Applied Surface Science[J], 2018, 439: 24 [Baidu Scholar]
Kermouche G, Grange F, Langlade C. Materials Science & Engineering A[J], 2013, 569: 71 [Baidu Scholar]
Cinca N, Beake B D, Harris A J et al. International Journal of Refractory Metals & Hard Materials[J], 2019, 84: 105 045 [Baidu Scholar]
Beake B D, Isern L, Endrino J L et al. Wear[J], 2019, 418-419: 102 [Baidu Scholar]
Beake B D, Bird A, Isern L et al. Thin Solid Films[J], 2019, 688: 137 358 [Baidu Scholar]