Abstract
The arc characteristics and droplet transfer behavior in plasma-GMAW-P hybrid welding were investigated. The effect of plasma arc current on GMAW-P arc shape and metal transfer was discussed. The results indicate that the plasma arc will change the electrical conductivity and stress state of GMAW arc to affect the morphology of GMAW arc and droplet transfer behavior. When the plasma arc current is small, the GMAW arc in the base current period basically burns along the wire axis, and the bell-shaped GMAW arc in the peak current period is compressed due to two opposite forces (the electromagnetic force generated by the plasma arc and the wire) in the welding direction. At this time, the drag force of plasma flow and its downward component increase, the droplet transition is promoted, and the detached time of droplet is shortened. When the plasma arc current reaches a certain value, the metal vapor in the atmosphere near the plasma arc increases, and the conductive path of the GMAW arc will be changed to bias the GMAW arc to the plasma arc. At this time, the downward component of the drag force of the plasma flow on the droplet decreases, the promotion of the droplet transition is weakened, and the detached time of droplet is increased.
Science Press
For aluminum alloy welding, gas metal arc welding (GMAW) has the advantages of easy automation and high production efficienc
GMAW-P welding is a modified spray transfer process, which can provide the optimal short-circuiting and spray tran-sfer by a low base current to maintain the arc and a high peak current to melt the electrode wire and detach the drople
The effect of plasma arc current on GMAW-P arc shape and metal transfer was analyzed in plasma-GMAW-P hybrid welding. The arc shape and droplet transfer were obtained with images from a high-speed camera.
Plasma-GMAW hybrid welding system consists of plasma welding power supply (Fronius MagicWave3000), GMAW power supply (Fronius TPS4000), SUPER-MIG welding torch, and KUKA robot. The experimental setup including data acquisition system is schematically illustrated in

Fig.1 Experimental setup including data acquisition system for plasma-GMAW welding
Bead weld with various parameters was performed on the flat position by plasma-GMAW process. 7075 aluminum alloys with thickness of 10 mm and ER5356 with diameter of 1.6 mm were employed as base metal and welding wire, respectively. The orifice and GMAW shielding gas was surrounded by the overall shielding gas. Pure argon (99.9%) was used as the three gases, with gas flow rates of 2.3, 23, and 40 L·mi
As shown in

Fig.2 High-speed photographs of hybrid arc under different plasma arc currents

Fig.3 Schematic of magnetic field distribution in plasma-GMAW hybrid welding
The current of GMAW arc is small in the base current period, the plasma jet effect is weak, and the electromagnetic force is also small. At this time, the plasma arc reaching a certain current value has a strong heating effect on the aluminum alloy test plate, which will produce a large amount of metal vapor. The thermal ionization formula proposed by Saha can be applied as follows:
(1) |
in which, when the temperature T is constant, the lower the ionization potential Vi, the greater the ionization degree. The ionization potential of Al vapor is 5.96 V, which is much smaller than that of Ar (15.7 V). Therefore, a large number of free electrons in the anode region of plasma arc will provide a stable cathode spot for GMAW arc. It is shown that partial GMAW arc plasma is biased to plasma arc in the base current period. Divide GMAW arc during base current period into two regions (“1” and “2”), as shown in

Fig.4 Schematic of plasma-GMAW hybrid arc during the base current period of GMAW
The electrons natural path effect is mainly related to the conductivity, and the conductivity σ can be expressed by the following formul
(2) |
where e is the charge of electrons, T is the temperature, nn and ne represent the density of neutral particles and electrons, respectively; Qn and Qi represent the effective cross-sections of neutral particles and cations, respectively. As the GMAW arc current increases, the arc temperature and the ionization will increase, and when the temperature is enough to ionize the gas medium sufficiently, there will occur neQi>>nnQn, according to
(3) |
At this time, the ionization of gas medium is sufficient, the density and effective cross-section of cation increase, resulting in the decrease of conductivity. Therefore, when the GMAW current is large enough, even if there is a certain amount of metal vapor in the atmosphere, the arc conductivity will not decrease. However, the welding arc has thermal inertia. When the current increases or decreases rapidly, the change of arc column temperature lags, and the faster the current changes, the more significant this phenomenon is. The GMAW arc current increases rapidly from the base to the peak (up to 330 A·m

Fig.5 Force schematic of bell-shaped GMAW arc during peak current period in plasma-GMAW hybrid welding

Fig.6 High-speed photographs of single GMAW arc (a) and plasma-GMAW (b)

Fig. 7 High-speed photographs of droplet transfer under different plasma arc currents

Fig.8 Time of droplet formation t and number of “two pulses and one drop” per 20 cyclesunder different plasma arc currents
The droplet stress in plasma-GMAW hybrid welding is shown in
(4) |

Fig.9 Schematic of forces affecting droplet in hybrid welding
where vf is fluid velocity, ρf is plasma density, rd is radius of sphere and Cd is plasma flow coefficient. The greater the arc pressure Pr, the greater the fluid velocity vf, and arc pressure can be calculated by
(5) |
where R is the radius of GMAW arc column and r is the vertical distance from any point in the arc column to the arc axis. According to

Fig.10 Schematics of the drag force of plasma flow under different GMAW arc shapes during peak current period: (a) single GMAW, (b) GMAW arc is compressed, and (c) GMAW arc expands in the direction of biasing to the plasma arc
plasma flow (Fd) on droplet transfer is improved. When the plasma of GMAW arc expands in the direction of biasing to the plasma arc at the peak current, the promoting effect of the drag force of plasma flow (Fd) on droplet transfer is weakened. Therefore, the phenomenon shown in
1) Plasma arc current will affect the GMAW arc shape. When the plasma arc current is large enough, a large amount of metal vapor will be generated near the plasma arc to change the conductive path of the GMAW arc. At this time, the GMAW arc burns near the plasma arc direction during the pulse base current period. And the GMAW arc also expands in the direction of biasing to the plasma arc at the peak current due to the thermal inertia. When the plasma arc current is small, the GMAW arc basically burns along the wire axis during the base current period, and the bell-shaped GMAW arc plasma is compressed in the welding direction during the peak current period.
2) With the increase of plasma arc current, the detached time of droplet decreases first and then increases. When the GMAW arc is still bell-shaped during the peak current period, the downward component of the drag force of plasma flow increases. At the same time, the drag force of plasma flow also increases due to the arc compression, which makes the droplet transition in hybrid welding easier than in single GMAW. However, when the GMAW arc is biased towards the plasma arc during the peak current period, the downward component of the drag force of plasma flow on the droplet is reduced, and the effect of promoting the droplet transition is weakened, which is the reason why the droplet transition in hybrid welding is more difficult than that in single GMAW.
References
Thomsen Sandberg J. International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control[J], 2006, 1(2): 115 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang X W, Huang Y, Zhang Y M. Int J Adv Manuf Tech[J], 2013, 64(1-4): 207 [Baidu Scholar]
Jian Haigen, Tang Xianmin, Ou Ling et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2016, 45(2): 415 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Mao Y Q, Ke L M, Liu F C et al. Int J Adv Manuf Tech[J], 2015, 81(5-8): 1419 [Baidu Scholar]
Balasubramanian V, Ravisankar V, Reddy G M. Int J Adv Manuf Tech[J], 2008, 36(3-4): 254 [Baidu Scholar]
Sun Z, Han Y, Du M et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2020, 49(8): 130 [Baidu Scholar]
Choi S, Yoo C, Kim Y. J Phys D: Appl Phys[J],1999, 31(2): 207 [Baidu Scholar]
Wu C, Chen M, Lu Y. Meas Sci Technol[J], 2005, 16(12): 2459 [Baidu Scholar]
Gao Z G, Wu Y X, Huang J. Int J Adv Manuf Tech[J], 2009, [Baidu Scholar]
44(9-10): 870 [Baidu Scholar]
Ton H. J Phys D: Appl Phys[J], 1975, 8(8): 922 [Baidu Scholar]
Terasaki H, Simpson S W. Sci Technol Weld[J], 2005, 10(1): 120 [Baidu Scholar]
Essers W G, Walter R. Welding Research Supplyment[J], 1981, 60(2): 37 [Baidu Scholar]
Bai Y, Gao H M, Lu H. Trans China Weld Inst[J], 2006, 27(8): 59 [Baidu Scholar]
Bai Y, Gao H M, Qiu L. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China[J], 2010, 20(12): 2234 [Baidu Scholar]
Chen S J, Wang X P, Liang Z et al. Welding & Joining[J], 2014, 5(2): 3 [Baidu Scholar]
Hong H, Han Y, Tong J, Pang S. Transactions of the China Welding Institution[J], 2016, 37(9): 65 [Baidu Scholar]
Han Y Q, Tong J H, Hong H T et al. Int J Adv Manuf Tech[J], 2019, 101: 989 [Baidu Scholar]
Hong H T, Han Y Q, Du M H et al. Int J Adv Manuf Tech[J], 2016, 86(5): 2301 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Z, Hua X, Wei L et al. Int J Adv Manuf Tech[J], 2014, [Baidu Scholar]
72(5), 935 [Baidu Scholar]
Chen C, Fan C X, Cai X Y et al. Welding Journal[J], 2020, [Baidu Scholar]
99(7): 203 [Baidu Scholar]
Hu J, Tsai H. Journal of Heat Transfer[J], 2007, 129(8): 1025 [Baidu Scholar]
Reis R P, Souza D, Scotti A. Welding in the World[J], 2011, [Baidu Scholar]
55(3-4): 24 [Baidu Scholar]
Ando Kohei. Welding Arc Phenomenon[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 1985 [Baidu Scholar]