Abstract
Friction stir processing (FSP) was applied to process a 2 mm thick Al-Mg-Si (6061-T6) alloy plate. The influence of the FSP with the same speed ratio on microstructure evolution, microhardness distribution, tensile properties and corrosion performances of the stirred zone (SZ) in the 6061-T6 alloy was investigated. Results show that there are obvious differences in the microstructure, such as grain morphologies, mean grain size, grain boundary distributions and precipitate distributions of the SZ prepared using the FSP with different processing speeds, which in turn affects the mechanical properties and corrosion resistance. The mean grain size of the equiaxed recrystallized grains of the SZ sample prepared by high speed (8000 r/min, 800 mm/min) is 9.5 μm, which is significantly refined compared to 23.2 μm of the conventional speed (1000 r/min, 100 mm/min) and 13.6 μm of the as-received 6061-T6 alloy. In addition, the distribution characteristics of the precipitates are more similar to that of the as-received 6061-T6 alloy. As a result, in addition to the slight change in corrosion resistance, the SZ sample prepared using the high speed FSP exhibits excellent mechanical properties. The maximum tensile strength and elongation of the SZ sample are 281.5 MPa and 34.8%, which are 86.3% and 122.1% of that of the as-received 6061-T6 alloy, respectively.
Science Press
Al-Mg-Si (6061-T6) alloys have been widely applied in structural components, such as aerospace, train and shipbuilding, for reducing mass due to their low densities and relatively high strengt
Friction stir processing (FSP), as a solid-state processing technology, can change the grain size and precipitate distributions by adjusting the processing condition
The present work aimed to prepare the sound SZ in 6061-T6 alloy with excellent mechanical properties and corrosion performances by high rotating speed FSP technology. At the same time, the microstructure evolution of the SZ in the FSP process was studied to elucidate the mechanical properties and corrosion behavior.
The as-received material used in the present work was 2 mm thick commercial 6061-T6 alloy with a chemical compo-sition (wt%) of 0.40~0.80 Si, 0.7 Fe, 0.15~0.40 Cu, 0.15 Mn, 0.80~1.20 Mg, 0.04~0.35 Cr, 0.25 Zn, 0.15 Ti, and Al balance. The FSP samples with dimensions of 180 mm in length and 100 mm in width were prepared using a wire electro-discharge machining (WEDM). The FSP operation was conducted using a dedicated high-speed FSW-TS-F08-DZ FSW machine. A tool used in the present FSP was made of H13 tool steel, which comprised a 10 mm diameter shoulder with a three helical concave surface of 5° and a 1.5 mm long cone-shaped pin. The top and root diameters of the pin were 3 and 2 mm, respectively. A single pass FSP with the same speed ratio was performed along the rolling direction with a tool inclination angle of 0°, and the processing parameters applied in this study are listed in
After FSP operation, the SZ was sectioned perpendicular to the processing direction and then prepared by standard metallographic techniques. Then, the sample obtained from the central portion of the SZ was used for microstructure exa-mination, corrosion and hardness tests. Texture development was examined using an electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD, HKL Channel 5 System). The precipitate evolution in the SZ was observed using a transmission electron microscope (TEM, FEI TECANI-F30) operated at 200 kV after electro-polishing. The electrochemical testing was performed using a VERSASTAT 400 three-electrode electrochemical workstation, which was conducted on the SZ surface with a 1 c

Fig.1 shows the surface morphologies of the SZ on 6061-T6 alloy prepared using FSP with the same speed ratio. In addition to the defect-free, it can be also seen that the sound SZ on 6061-T6 alloy becomes smooth and flat with increasing the rotating speed and travelling speed. It means that the selected rotating speed and travelling speed used in this study are reasonable, which can produce a sufficient heat input to enhance a balanced material flo
The microstructure characteristics, including grain morphologies, grain size distributions, grain boundary distributions, grain type distributions and precipitate evolution, of the 6061-T6 alloy and SZ prepared by FSP with the same speed ratio are presented in Fig.2~5. It can be seen that the grains in the as-received 6061-T6 alloy are elongated along the rolling direction and presents a pancake-shaped grain morphology, as shown in Fig.2a. The mean grain size and high angle grain boundaries (HAGBs) of the as-received 6061-T6 alloy are 13.6 μm and 92.2% according to the grain size distributions and grain boundary distributions, as shown in Fig.2b and 2c, respectively. The grain type distributions indicate that the as-received 6061-T6 alloy is mainly composed of recrystallized grains, which is about 96.0%, as shown in Fig.3a. After FSP, the SZ of the 6061-T6 alloy is characterized by equiaxed grains, as shown in Fig.2d, 2g and 2j. With the increase of the rotating speed and travelling speed, the mean grain size of the SZ gradually decreases (Fig.2e, 2h and 2k), whereas the proportions of the HAGBs and recrystallized grains gradually increase, as shown in Fig.2f, 2i, 2l, respectively. The mean grain sizes of the SZ on the 1000-100, 4000-400 and 8000-800 samples are 23.2, 10.5 and 9.5 μm, respectively. And the SZ of the 1000-100 sample prepared by conventional processing speed consists of 31.4% recrystallized grains, but the SZ of the 4000-400 and 8000-800 samples prepared by high processing speed consists of 42.7% and 65.1% recrystallized grains, respectively, as shown in Fig.4. The number and size of the Mg2Si, Al8Fe2Si and Al2CuMg precipitates significantly increase with the increase of the rotating speed and travelling speed with the same speed ratio, as shown in Fig.5. The precipitates in the as-received 6061-T6 alloy are Mg2Si, Al8Fe2Si and Al2CuMg, as shown in Fig.5a. The specific characteristics of the Mg2Si, Al8Fe2Si and Al2CuMg precipitates have been determined in our previous researche


It is well known that the microstructure evolution of the SZ during FSP mainly depends on the processing heat input, which is mainly caused by the rotating speed and travelling speed. The peak temperature (T) of the SZ can be evaluated by the rotating speed (ω), travelling speed (ν) and the melting temperature (Tm) of the 6061-T6 allo
(1) |
where K and α are constants.
Based on

The microhardness distributions and tensile strength significantly smaller of the 6061-T6 and SZ samples prepared by FSP with the same speed ratio are shown in Fig.6. The mean microhardness value of the SZ is significantly smaller than that of the as-received 6061-T6 alloy, as shown in Fig.6a. The mean microhardness value of the SZ produced using high rotating speed FSP is obviously greater than that of the SZ prepared using conventional rotating speed FSP. However, the microhardness distribution of the SZ prepared using high rotating speed FSP exhibits little difference. The average microhardness value of the SZ of the 1000-100 sample is 610 MPa, but the mean microhardness value of the SZ of the 4000-400 and 8000-800 samples are 860 and 868 MPa, respectively. The tensile test results indicate that the tensile strength of the SZ sample is smaller than that of the 6061-T6 alloy, whereas the elongation of the SZ produced by high rotating speed FSP is greater than that of the 6061-T6 alloy, as shown in Fig.6b. The SZ of the 8000-800 sample exhibits excellent tensile properties. The maximum tensile strength of 281.5 MPa and elongation of 34.8% are obtained in the SZ of the 8000-800 sample, which are 86.3% (326.0 MPa) and 122.1% (28.5%) of the 6061-T6 alloy, respectively. The minimum tensile strength of 195.1 MPa and elongation of 22.7% are obtained in the SZ of the 1000-100 sample, which are 59.8% and 79.6% of the 6061-T6 alloy, respectively. According to the tensile properties of the SZ, it can be inferred that high rotating speed FSP is more conducive to enhancing the mechanical properties of the 6061-T6 alloy compared to conventional rotating speed FSP.

According to the existing research results, the micro-hardness and tensile strength of the 6061-T6 alloy, as a precipitation-strengthened aluminum alloy, mainly depend on the distribution characteristics of precipitates, while its elongation mainly depends on the mean grain siz


Fig.7 presents potentiodynamic polarization and Nyquist curves of the 6061-T6 alloy and SZ produced using FSP with the same speed ratio in 3.5 wt% NaCl aqueous solution. The self-corrosion potential and self-corrosion current of the 6061-T6 alloy and SZ are estimated according to the cathodic extrapolation method of Tafel curv
The corrosion resistance of the 6061-T6 alloy is mainly affected by the precipitate distribution and grain siz
1) FSP with the same speed ratio is successfully applied to process 6061-T6 alloy plate. The sound stirred zone (SZ) is obtained using high rotating speed FSP or conventional rotating speed FSP. The SZ sample prepared using high rotating speed FSP is smoother and flatter than using conventional rotating speed FSP.
2) Compared with conventional rotating speed FSP, the SZ in the process of high rotating speed FSP is subjected to greater heat input and stronger plastic strain, resulting in more complete recrystallization. As a result, there are finer mean grain sizes, a larger proportion of HAGBs and more precipitates with more uniform distribution in the SZ.
3) In addition to the slight change in corrosion resistance, the SZ sample prepared using high rotating speed FSP exhibits greater microhardness value, larger tensile strength and elongation compared to that of the SZ sample prepared using conventional rotating speed FSP.
References
Dursun T, Soutis C. Materials Design[J], 2014, 56(4): 862 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang X, Chen Y, Hu J. Progress in Aerospace Sciences[J], 2018, 97: 22 [Baidu Scholar]
Mahto R P, Gupta C, Kinjawadekar M et al. Journal of Manufacturing Processes[J], 2019, 38: 370 [Baidu Scholar]
Nourani M, Milani A S, Yannacopoulos S. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology[J], 2015, 79(9): 1425 [Baidu Scholar]
Woo W, Balogh L, Ungár T et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2008, 498(1-2): 308 [Baidu Scholar]
Xiao W, Wang Y. Materials Letters [J], 2021: 129 932 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang W, Han P, Peng P et al. Journal of Materials Research and Technology[J], 2020, 9: 5252 [Baidu Scholar]
Gao X, Zhang Z, Wang W et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2016, 45(7): 1857 [Baidu Scholar]
Cao G H, Liu Y X, Zhang D T et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2018, 47(10): 3179 [Baidu Scholar]
Chen Y, Wang H, Ding H et al. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance[J], 2019, 28(5): 2845 [Baidu Scholar]
Chen Y, Li H, Wang X et al. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance[J], 2020, 29(2): 1185 [Baidu Scholar]
Satyanarayana M V N V, Kumar A. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C-Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science[J], 2020, 234(22): 4520 [Baidu Scholar]
Chen Y, Jiang Y, Ding H et al. Journal of Materials Science and Technology[J], 2018, 34(2): 153 [Baidu Scholar]
Moustafa E B, Melaibari A, Basha M. Ceramics International[J], 2020, 46(10): 16 938 [Baidu Scholar]
Guo J, Lee B Y, Du Z et al. JOM[J], 2016, 68(8): 2268 [Baidu Scholar]
Mohamadigangaraj J, Nourouzi S, Jamshidi A H. Measurement[J], 2020, 165: 108 166 [Baidu Scholar]
Woo W, Choo H, Brown D W et al. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A[J], 2007, 38(1): 69 [Baidu Scholar]
Chen Y, Jiang Y, Zhang F et al. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals[J], 2018, 71(12): 3077 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhao Y, Huang X, Li Q et al. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology[J], 2015, 78(9-12): 1437 [Baidu Scholar]
Barati M, Abbasi M, Abedini M. Journal of Manufacturing Processes[J], 2019, 45: 491 [Baidu Scholar]
Mazaheri Y, Heidarpour A, Jalilvand M M et al. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance[J], 2019, 28(8): 4826 [Baidu Scholar]
Arbegast W J. Scripta Materialia[J], 2008, 58: 372 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu F J, Fu L, Chen H Y. Science and Technology of Welding & Joining[J], 2018, 23(4): 333 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu F J, Fu L, Chen H Y. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance[J], 2018, 27: 3590 [Baidu Scholar]
Commin L, Dumont M, Masse J E et al. Acta Materialia[J], 2009, 57(2): 326 [Baidu Scholar]
Chang C I, Lee C J, Huang J C. Scripta Materialia[J], 2004, 57: 509 [Baidu Scholar]
İpekoğlu G, Erim S, Çam G. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A[J], 2014, 45(2): 864 [Baidu Scholar]
Huang Y X, Wan L, Lv Z L et al. Science and Technology of Welding & Joining[J], 2016, 21(8): 638 [Baidu Scholar]
Huang Y X, Xie Y M, Meng X C et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2019, 740: 211 [Baidu Scholar]
Humphreys F J. Acta Materialia[J], 1997, 45(10): 4231 [Baidu Scholar]
Humphreys F J. Acta Materialia[J], 1997, 45(12): 5031 [Baidu Scholar]
Jandaghi M R, Pouraliakbar H, Saboori A et al. Materials[J], 2021, 14(5): 1290 [Baidu Scholar]
Li J R, Jiang Q T, Sun H Y et al. Corrosion Science[J], 2016, 111: 288 [Baidu Scholar]
King A D, Birbilis N, Scully J R. Electrochimica Acta[J], 2014, 121: 394 [Baidu Scholar]
Torbati-Sarraf H, Torbati-Sarraf S A, Chawla N et al. Corrosion Science[J], 2020, 174: 108 838 [Baidu Scholar]