Abstract
La0.8Ce0.2Fe11.7-xMnxSi1.3 master alloys were prepared by medium frequency induction furnace, then annealed, saturatedly hydrogenated, and finally crushed into powders. The multiple components of La0.8Ce0.2Fe11.7-xMnxSi1.3H1.8 (x=0.23, 0.26, 0.29, 0.32, wt%) powders with the Curie temperature (TC) interval of 5 K were mix-bonded by epoxy resin to extend the full width at half maximum of magnetic entropy of alloy. The magnetic properties of the mix-bonded specimens were measured by VersaLab and adiabatic temperature change direct test device. The maximal magnetic entropy change of the mix-bonded specimens is decreased, whereas the full width at half maximum of magnetic entropy and the relative cooling power are increased, compared with those of the single-component-bonded specimens. The maximal relative cooling power is 139.2 J/kg for the four-component-bonded specimen.
Science Press
As La(Fe, Si)13 materials have characteristics of large magnetocaloric effect, continuously adjustable Curie temperature (TC), and low cost, they are regarded as one of the most promising magnetocaloric materials for room-temperature refrigeratio
In this research, various La0.8Ce0.2Fe11.7-xMnxSi1.3Hy alloys of the first-order phase transition with the Curie temperature interval of 5 K were mix-bonded by epoxy resin to expand the ΔT. The magnetic properties of the composites were investigated.
The industrially pure raw materials (99.5wt% La, 99.5wt% Ce, 99wt% Fe, 99.7wt% Mn, 99.9wt% Si) were cast to prepare the La0.8Ce0.2Fe11.7-xMnxSi1.3 master alloys by medium frequency induction furnace. Afterwards, the alloys were annealed at 1363 K for 144 h in Ar atmosphere. The bulk alloys were crushed into irregular particles and hydrogenated in a hydrogen atmosphere of 0.13 MPa at 593 K for 5 h until they were hydrogen-saturated. Then the La0.8Ce0.2Fe11.7-x-MnxSi1.3H1.8 alloys were obtained and subsequently ground into powders with particle size<0.15 mm. All the powders consisting of different components were bonded by 1.8wt% epoxy resin, then pressed into cylinders at the pressure of 557 MPa, and finally annealed at 175 °C for 45 min. The La0.8Ce0.2Fe11.7-xMnxSi1.3H1.8 alloys with Mn contents of x= 0.23, 0.26, 0.29, 0.32 (wt%) are denoted as specimen A, B, C, and D, respectively. The composition of mix-bonded La0.8Ce0.2Fe11.7-xMnxSi1.3H1.8 alloys is listed in
The phase components of specimens were determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD). The magnetic properties were measured by VersaLab with VSM option, and the magnetic entropy changes were calculated by Maxwell relation. The adiabatic temperature changes were tested by the home-made adiabatic temperature change direct test device. The compressive strength was tested by the electronic universal testing machine (WDW3200).

Fig.1 XRD patterns of specimen A, B, C, and D at room temperature

Fig.2 Relationships between magnetization and temperature of different specimens: (a) single-component specimens A~D; (b) two-component-bonded specimens MAB, MBC, and MCD; (c) three-component-bonded specimens MABC and MBCD; (d) four-component-bonded specimen MABCD
The area of magnetic phase transition from the ferromagnetic state to the paramagnetic state of the mix-bonded specimens is larger than that of the single-component-bonded specimens, indicating that the maximal magnetic entropy change of the mix-bonded specimens reduces, compared with that of the single-component-bonded specimens. With increasing the components in mix-bonded specimens, the temperature range of magnetic phase transition becomes wider, and the maximum magnetic entropy change is decreased.

Fig.3 Isothermal magnetization curves at magnetic strength of 0~2 T (a~c) and Arrott plots (d~f) of specimen C (a, d), specimen D (b, e), and specimen MCD (c, f)
The maximum magnetic entropy ΔSM of mix-bonded specimens at the magnetic strength of 0~2 T can be calculated based on the isothermal magnetization curves by Maxwell relatio
(1) |
where T is the temperature; H is the magnetic field intensity; M is the magnetization.
In order to further study the refrigeration capacity of the materials, the relative cooling power (RCP) is calculated by
(2) |
where ∆T=T2-T1 (the values of T1 and T2 are listed in

Fig.4 Magnetic entropy changes of different specimens at magnetic strength of 0~2 T: (a) specimens A, B, and MAB; (b) specimens B, C, D, and MBCD; (c) specimens A, B, C, D, and MABCD

Fig.5 Relationships between adiabatic temperature change and temperature of different specimens at the magnetic strength of 0~1.5 T: (a) single-component specimens A~D; (b) two-component-bonded specimens MAB, MBC, and MCD; (c) three-component-bonded specimens MABC and MBCD; (d) four-component-bonded specimen MABCD
The max ∆Tad is 2.25, 2.33, 2.65, 2.45, 2.24, 2.01, 2.30, 1.67, 1.89, and 1.42 K for specimen A, B, C, D, MAB, MBC, MCD, MABC, MBCD, and MABCD, respectively. It can be seen that the max ∆Tad of four-component-bonded specimen MABCD is the smallest, but its cooling temperature zone is the widest, compared with those of other specimens, which is consistent with the magnetic entropy change results.

Fig.6 Compressive stress-strain curve of four-component-bonded specimen MABCD
1) The first-order magnetic transformation in the mix-bonded La0.8Ce0.2Fe11.7-xMnxSi1.3H1.8 (x=0.23, 0.26, 0.29, 0.32) alloys is weakened, the hysteresis and magnetocaloric effect decrease, and the cooling temperature range is widened, compared with those of the single-component-bonded alloys.
2) The cooling temperature range of the four-component-bonded specimen is the widest, and its relative cooling power is optimal of 139.2 J·k
3) The mix-bonding preparation of La0.8Ce0.2Fe11.7-xMnx-Si1.3H1.8 alloy is an effective way to widen the cooling temperature range and to increase the relative cooling power.
References
Hu F X, Shen B G, Sun J R et al. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics[J], 2001, 37(4): 2328 [Baidu Scholar]
Fujieda S, Hasegawa Y, Fujita A et al. Journal Magnetism and Magnetic Materials[J], 2004, 272-276(3): 2365 [Baidu Scholar]
Fan Wenbing, Hou Yuhua, Huang Youlin et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2019, 48(1): 323 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Hu F X, Shen B G, Sun J R et al. Applied Physics Letters[J], 2001, 78(23): 3675 [Baidu Scholar]
Balli M, Fruchart D, Gignoux D et al. Journal of Physics-Condensed Matter[J], 2007, 19(23): 236 230 [Baidu Scholar]
Fukamichi K, Fujita A, Fujieda S et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2006, 408-412: 307 [Baidu Scholar]
Lyubina J, Nenkov K, Schultz L et al. Physical Review Letters[J], 2008, 101(17): 177 203 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang J W, Chen Y G, Tang Y B et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2009, 485(1-2): 313 [Baidu Scholar]
Krautz M, Moore J D, Skokov K P et al. Journal of Applied Physics[J], 2012, 112(8): 83 918 [Baidu Scholar]
Zimm C B, Jacobs S A. Journal of Applied Physics[J], 2013, [Baidu Scholar]
113(17): 17A908 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang H, Sun Y J, Niu E et al. Applied Physics Letters[J], 2014, 104(6): 62 407 [Baidu Scholar]
Pan W J, Zhang H G, Xu L et al. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials[J], 2019, 476: 608 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang H, Liu J, Zhang M X et al. Scripta Materialia[J], 2016, 120: 58 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Y X, Zhang H, Liu E K et al. Advanced Electronic Materials[J], 2018, 4(5): 1 700 636 [Baidu Scholar]
Pang W K, Chen Y G, Tang Y B et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2017, 46(9): 2384 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu Z G, Zhang Z Q, Ding Z et al. Materialia[J], 2019, 5: 100 170 [Baidu Scholar]
Radulov I A, Karpenkov D Y, Skokov K P et al. Acta Materialia[J], 2017, 127: 389 [Baidu Scholar]
Provenzano V, Shapiro A J, Shull R D et al. Nature[J], 2004, [Baidu Scholar]
429(6994): 853 [Baidu Scholar]
Yamada H. Physical Review B[J], 1993, 47(17): 11 211 [Baidu Scholar]
Pecharsky V K, Gschneidner K A. Journal of Applied Physics[J], 1999, 86(1): 565 [Baidu Scholar]