+高级检索
网刊加载中。。。

使用Chrome浏览器效果最佳,继续浏览,你可能不会看到最佳的展示效果,

确定继续浏览么?

复制成功,请在其他浏览器进行阅读

Pore Structure and Compressive Properties of Open-Cell Aluminum Foams Prepared by Infiltration Casting Based on NaCl Space-Holder  PDF

  • Wang Zhaoming 1,2
  • Liu Yuan 2,3
  • Xu Fating 1,2
  • Wan Tan 2
  • Jin Yunxue 1
1. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China; 2. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 3. Key Laboratory for Advanced Materials Processing Technology, Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Updated:2023-02-09

  • Full Text
  • Figs & Tabs
  • References
  • Authors
  • About
CN CITE
OUTLINE

Abstract

Nearly spherical NaCl particles prepared by a disc granulator were used to produce open-cell aluminum foams via infiltration casting. The average compressive strength of the salt balls is 3.9 MPa, and they can be completely collapsed within 5 min in the ultrasonic cleaner. By controlling the hot-pressure sintering duration as 0.5‒2 h and the hot-pressing temperature at 700 °C, the preforms with bulk density of 0.66‒0.83 g/cm3 can be prepared. Prolonging the duration of hot-pressure sintering can increase the pore size of the open-cell aluminum foams from 0.48 mm to 1.16 mm, and also increase the porosity from 64% to 82%. Compression test results show that the macroscopic deformation characteristics of the foams with different pore structures are basically the same, and they all exhibit the deformation characteristic of layer-by-layer collapse. In addition, the densification strain value, elastic modulus, plateau yield stress, and energy absorption capacity of open-cell aluminum foams are al decreased with increasing the porosity. The energy absorption capacity is the largest (15.0 MJ·m-3) when the porosity is 64%.

Porous materials have been widely applied into the engineering fields and play an important role in the engineering structural materials[

1]. Open-cell metal foam (reticular metal foam) is one of the important porous materials. In engineering application, the metal foams present good controllability in mechanical and physical properties, including the electrical conductivity, tensile strength, elongation, elastic modulus, biaxial tension, multiaxial tension/compression, fatigue performance, specific surface area, bending property, torsion property, and shearing property[2‒3]. The open-cell aluminum foam is a lightweight material with unique structure and function integration, which has metal elasticity, high temperature resistance, superb corrosion resistance, low density, high specific surface area, and excellent damping due to its foam structure. Because of its excellent performance in energy absorption, sound absorption, electromagnetic shielding, and heat insulation/dissipation, the open-cell aluminum foam can be used in lightweight manufacture, energy absorption, shock absorption, buffering, electromagnetic shielding, and other multifunctional integration[4‒8]. Therefore, the open-cell aluminum foam has a broad application prospect in aerospace, automobile manufacture, petrochemical, and other fields[9‒10].

Infiltration casting method is a common method to prepare open-cell aluminum foam. High-temperature-resistant water-soluble salts, such as NaCl, MgSO4, and CaCl2, are usually used as the pore-forming materials. These salts are cheap and easy to obtain with stable high temperature performance and good collapsibility. However, the low porosity and difficulty in elimination of salt particles of open-cell aluminum foams severely restrict their application. Since the performance of open-cell aluminum foam is affected by the matrix properties and the cell structure, and the pore structure of the open-cell aluminum foam prepared by the infiltration casting method is heavily dependent on the filler structure, it is of great significance to optimize the infiltration casting method to prepare open-cell aluminum foam with high porosity.

The open-cell aluminum foams with porosity of 90% can be fabricated by the soft ceramic balls which are easily compressed. The ceramic balls contain alumina particles, polyvinyl alcohol, water, a small amount of bentonite, and carboxymethyl/hydroxypropyl-methyl cellulose. However, the granulation process is complicated and these insoluble ceramic granules are difficult to remove[

11]. Wang et al[12] prepared the mixed salt powder and flour to produce weakly corrosive porous spherical particles with a pan-type pelletizer, which were then used as the space-holder particles for the preparation of magnesium foams. These porous particles are easy to remove, but they may be infiltrated by the melt, resulting in the fact that they can only be used in the powder metallurgy process. Wan et al[13] prepared CaCl2 preform particles via the hot-pressure deformation and obtained open-cell aluminum foams with high porosity, which provided a reference for the preparation of high-bulk-density preforms.

In this research, the nearly spherical space-holder particles were prepared by a disk granulator and then used to manufacture the open-cell aluminum foams with uniform structure and good three-dimensional connectivity. The space-holder particles consisted of NaCl powder, kaolin, bentonite, and binder. These particles were then sprayed with water in the disc granulator for granulation, producing salt balls with size of 1‒5 mm. Preforms with different densities were prepared by controlling the hot-pressure sintering duration. The open-cell aluminum foams with controllable structure were prepared by the infiltration casting method, and their structure and compressive properties were studied.

1 Experiment

The preparation process of open-cell aluminum foams by infiltration casting method based on NaCl space-holder is shown in Fig.1. Step 1: 70wt% NaCl powder (size of 75 μm), 20wt% kaolin (size of 45 μm), 10wt% bentonite (size of 45 μm), and binder were mixed together. Step 2: the mixture was granulated into salt balls with size of 3‒3.5 mm by water spraying in the disc granulator, and then air-dried or dried at low temperature. Step 3: the salt balls were then placed into a hot-pressure sintering mold for compaction at 9‒10 kPa for different sintering durations. Step 4: the sintered salt ball preform and the ZL102 aluminum were placed in a heat-resistant stainless steel crucible for infiltration casting at 700 °C and 202.3 kPa for 2 h. The aluminum salt ball com-posite was produced in this process. Step 5: the top surface of the composite was removed by lathe, and the composite was placed in water for soaking and washing. Step 6: the open-cell aluminum foams were obtained after the salt particles were completely dissolved and removed.

Fig.1  Schematic diagram of preparation process of open-cell aluminum foams by infiltration casting method based on NaCl space-holder

An electronic AGX-V 50KN universal material testing machine was used to analyze the compressive strength of the salt balls and the quasi-static compression performance of the open-cell aluminum foams. The crushing force of one salt ball with diameter of 5 mm was determined by twenty times and the average compressive strength of the salt ball was calculated. The porosity of the open-cell aluminum foams was determined by measuring the foam volume and mass. Image-Pro software was used to analyze the images obtained by optical microscope (OM) of the open-cell macrostructures and interconnected holes. The specimens of 20 mm×20 mm×21 mm for compressive tests were cut by a wire-cut electric discharge machine, and the compression rate was 2 mm/min.

2 Results and Discussion

2.1 Nearly spherical salt balls

The preparation process of nearly spherical particles is shown in Fig.2. The powder is sufficiently mixed with the liquid in the granulator, forming discontinuous concave liquid bridges around the contact points between the powder particles and resulting in loose aggregates. During the mixture, the aggregates are compressed, which reduces the gap between the particles. Because the liquid is sprayed onto the local area, the particles are in contact with each other. Under the capillary effect of liquid and the mechanical force, a large aggregate easily forms, namely cue ball, which indicates the nucleation stage. In the nucleus (cue ball), the liquid between the aggregates is evenly distributed in the gaps, and the formed aggregates are still plastic. Because the excess liquid film exists on the aggregate surface, the aggregate deforms when it collides with other small particles. Some aggregates with weak bonding may break into small pieces and then fill in the surface of other aggregates. The nearly spherical particles are obtained by reciprocating rotation. When the aggregates collide with other aggregates of similar size and bonding strength, they are gradually compressed and densified because of the mutual surface friction, therefore forming the high-strength particles. The particle growth ends as the liquid supply stops, and the content of liquid between particles reaches about 90% theoretical saturation content. The excess liquid diffuses from the granular surface to the interior of particles, which increases the surface capillary force and enhances the internal bonding force of the granules. The liquid volume is reduced owing to the volatilization during rotation. By this time, the particles do not deform or adhere to other particles when they collide with other particles. Therefore, the particle stops growing and the particle formation is completed.

Fig.2  Schematic diagram of preparation process of nearly spherical particles

The strength and collapsibility of the salt ball are the key factors for its application as space-holder, which are influenced by the amount of added liquid, binder, granulation process, and the physical and chemical properties of raw materials. The optimum addition of water is crucial for granulation. If the addition amount of liquid is too low, the speed of particle formation is slow, and the particles are small and fragile. If the addition amount of liquid is too high, the particles may easily bond with each other, forming excessively large particles. The bottom and surrounding areas of the plate may easily stick to the material, which is difficult to form cue balls. For some materials that are difficult to pelletize or have low strength after particle formation, the binder can be added during the preparation. The binder can increase the capillary cohesive force and the molecular force of the particles, stabilize the bridge between the particles, and thereby increase the particle formation rate and low-temperature strength. After the particles are formed, they further roll in the granulator at a faster speed, which improves the particle strength due to the action of mechanical force, extrusion, and rubbing between particles. The optimal process parameters are as follows: the added water is 25wt% of the powder, the granulator speed is 50 r/min, and the granulation duration is 5 min. Thus, the average compressive strength of the obtained salt balls is 15 N, which sufficiently satisfies the requirement of particle strength. Therefore, the nearly spherical salt balls with size of 1‒5 mm can be prepared, and their average compressive strength is 3.9 MPa. The bulk density of preforms is 0.66‒0.83 g/cm3.

Particle collapsibility is related to the physical and chemical properties of the raw materials and the collapse agent. The salt balls contain 70wt% NaCl and therefore they are highly soluble in water. The dissolution rate of NaCl particles with size of 3 mm and salt balls in water was characterized by the immersion tests. Results show that the dissolution time of the granular NaCl particle is more than 20 min, whereas the salt balls can completely collapse within 5 min in an ultrasonic cleaner. Thus, the collapsibility of the salt balls is better than that of granular NaCl particles.

2.2 Pore structure of open-cell aluminum foams

Fig.3 shows macrostructures of open-cell aluminum foams obtained by NaCl space-holder after hot-pressure sintering at 700 °C for 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. It is found that there is no clear difference between the salt ball preforms after hot-pressure sintering for 2 and 12 h. Thus, the longest sintering duration was set as 120 min for simplification. It can be seen that the interconnected cells are at the touch zones formed by hot-pressure sintering between particles, and the cell size directly determines the difficulty of salt ball removal. The larger the size of interconnected cells, the easier the salt ball removal from the open-cell aluminum foams.

Fig.3  Macrostructures of open-cell aluminum foams prepared by NaCl space-holder after hot-pressure sintering for 30 min (a), 60 min (b), 90 min (c), and 120 min (d)

According to Fig.3, with prolonging the hot-pressing sintering duration, the contact area between the particles is gradually increased, the connected pores also become larger, and the opening degree of the open-cell aluminum foam is also increased. When the opening degree increases, the pore edges and pore walls become thinner, the porosity is increased, and the three-dimensional connectivity is improved. The porosity of open-cell aluminum foams prepared by NaCl space-holder after hot-pressure sintering for 30, 60, 90, and 120 min is 64%, 69%, 76%, and 82%, respectively.

Fig.4 shows the distributions of interconnected pore sizes in different open-cell aluminum foams. When the hot-pressure sintering duration was 30 min, the diameter of nearly 80% interconnected pores is less than 0.6 mm, and their average diameter is only 0.48 mm. When the sintering duration is 120 min, the size of the interconnected pores is increased and the average pore size is 1.16 mm. Hence, the interconnected pore sizes and the cell structure of the open-cell aluminum foams can be controlled by the hot-pressure sintering duration. In a certain range, the longer the hot-pressure sintering duration, the greater the porosity of the open-cell aluminum foam. When the hot-pressure sintering reaches a certain time, the salt ball preform barely deforms, and thus the porosity of open-cell aluminum foam hardly changes.

Fig.4  Secondary pore size distributions in open-cell aluminum foams prepared by NaCl space-holder after hot-pressure sintering for 30 min (a), 60 min (b), 90 min (c), and 120 min (d)

In Fig.5, the compressive stress-strain curves of aluminum foams with different porosities (ρ=64%, 69%, 76%, 82%) exhibit three typical metal-foam stages: elasticity, plateau, and densification. The yield stress and plateau region of open-cell aluminum foams are decreased with increasing the porosity. In the aluminum foams with low porosity, the voids become less and the foam becomes more. In the area perpendicular to the loading direction, the wall of bearing hole is thicker, thereby withstanding greater stress. Thus, a higher yield stress and a higher plateau region are obtained for the open-cell aluminum foams with low porosity. In the open-cell aluminum foams with high porosity, the voids are more and the foam is less. Thus, in the area perpendicular to the loading direction, the wall of bearing hole is thinner, and less stress can be withstood. Hence, a lower stress yield and a lower plateau region are obtained for the open-cell aluminum foams with high porosity.

Fig.5  Quasi-static compressive stress-strain curves of different open-cell aluminum foams

As shown in Fig.6, the deformation characteristics of open-cell aluminum foams with different porosities are basically the same during quasi-static compression, and they all exhibit the layer-by-layer collapse[

14‒17]. After a rapid elastic deformation, the cell begins to plastically deform. When the strain exceeds the plastic strain limit of cell wall, the cell begins to collapse. The plastic deformation of the cells usually starts in the weakest area and forms a localized deformation zone. The cell collapse occurs only in the deformation zone, and the area outside the deformation zone does not deform. With increasing the compressive strain, the deformation zone expands outward, and new deformation zones are continually formed. The formation of deformation zones and layer-by-layer collapse and the compaction of cells are the main deformation characteristics during the plastic platform stage of compression. The appearance of the stress plateau during compression is closely related to the deformation mode of the layer-by-layer cell collapse. Finally, when the deformation zone extends all over the cell, the cell collapses and is compacted, i.e., the compression process enters into the densification stage. Then the compression further deforms the base metal and the stress rises sharply with increasing the strain.

Fig.6  Deformation morphologies of different open-cell aluminum foams during compression: (a) ρ=64% and (b) ρ=82%

The energy absorbed by the open-cell aluminum foam during compression can be obtained by integrating the stress-strain curve, as follows:

Wε0=0ε0σεdε (1)

where ε represents the instantaneous strain; σ represents the stress (MPa); ε0 represents the given strain value; W is the energy absorption (MPa·m-3).

The specific compression performance of open-cell aluminum foam is the plateau region: the stress changes a little in a long period, thereby increasing the energy absorption capacity. Generally, the energy absorption of open-cell aluminum foams is characterized by the strain energy of compaction, namely the energy absorbed before compaction. The energy absorption efficiency of open-cell aluminum foams during compression[

18‒19] can be expressed, as follows:

ηε=0εσεdεσε (2)

where σ(ε) and η(ε) are the stress value and energy absorption efficiency when the strain is ε, respectively. The strain corresponding to the maximum value of the energy absorption efficiency curve is defined as the densification strain εd[

18‒19], as follows:

dηεdε=εd=0 (3)

Then, the energy absorption capacity W(εd) can be calculated by Eq(4), as follows:

Wεd=0εdσεdε (4)

Furthermore, the plateau stress σp of the open-cell aluminum foams during compression can be calculated by Eq.(5)[

18‒19], as follows:

σp=ε0εdσεdεεd-ε0 (5)

According to Fig.7, the energy absorption capacity of open-cell aluminum foams is increased with increasing the strain. Under the same compressive strain condition, the energy absorption capacity is decreased with increasing the porosity of aluminum foam. As listed in Table 1, the densification strain, elastic modulus, plateau stress, and energy absorption

Fig.7  Energy absorption capacity-strain curves of different open-cell aluminum foams

Table 1  Compressive properties of different open-cell aluminum foams

Porosity,

ρ/%

Relative

density,

ρrel

εd

Elastic

modulus,

E/MPa

Plateau

stress,

σp/MPa

Energy absor-

ption capacity,

W(εd)/MJ·m-3

64 0.36 0.49 449 30.6 15.0
69 0.31 0.48 284 21.4 12.0
76 0.24 0.47 187 13.4 6.3
82 0.18 0.45 92 6.2 2.8

capacity are all increased with decreasing the porosity, i.e., with increasing the relative density of aluminum foam. According to Fig.5 and Fig.7, the densification strain of open-cell aluminum foam is increased with increasing the relative density, because of the increase in the volume fraction of solid phase and the thickening of the pore edges and pore walls which increases the plateau stress. All these phenomena cause the late entry of densification stage during the compression process. It is found that the energy absorption capacity is maximum of 15.0 MJ·m-3 when the porosity is 64%.

3 Conclusions

1) The nearly spherical salt balls with size of 1‒5 mm can be prepared, their average compressive strength is 3.9 N/mm2, and they completely collapse within 5 min in an ultrasonic cleaner.

2) The porosity of the salt ball preforms can be adjusted by controlling the hot-pressure sintering duration, so the open-cell aluminum foams with porosity of 64%‒82% can be prepared under the optimized process conditions.

3) The deformation characteristics of open-cell aluminum foams with different pore structures are basically the same, and they all show the layer-by-layer collapse. The densification strain value, elastic modulus, plateau stress, and energy absorption capacity are all increased with increasing the relative density. Under the same compressive strain condition, the energy absorption capacity is decreased with increasing the porosity. The energy absorption capacity is maximum of 15.0 MJ·m-3 when the porosity is 64%.

References

1

Liu P S, Chen G F. Porous Materials: Processing and Applica-tions[M]. Cambridge: Elsevier, 2014 [Baidu Scholar] 

2

Liu P S, Ma X M. Materials and Design[J], 2020, 188: [Baidu Scholar] 

108

413 [Baidu Scholar] 

3

Liu P S, Ma X M. Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures[J], 2021, 17(4): 814 [Baidu Scholar] 

4

Hamadouche A, Nebbali R, Benahmed H et al. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science[J], 2016, 71: 86 [Baidu Scholar] 

5

Navacerrada M A, Fernández P, Díaz C et al. Applied Acous- [Baidu Scholar] 

tics[J], 2013, 74(4): 496 [Baidu Scholar] 

6

Kong C H, Chen L B, Wu X L et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2018, 47(4): 1049 [Baidu Scholar] 

7

Shunmugasamy V C, Mansoor B. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2018, 715: 281 [Baidu Scholar] 

8

Kumar R, Jain H, Sriram S et al. Materials Chemistry and Physics[J], 2020, 240: 122 274 [Baidu Scholar] 

9

Banhart J.Progress in Materials Science[J], 2001, 46(6): [Baidu Scholar] 

559 [Baidu Scholar] 

10

Wan T, Liu Y, Zhou C X et al. Journal of Materials Science and Technology[J], 2021, 62: 11 [Baidu Scholar] 

11

Chou K S, Song M A. Scripta Materialia[J], 2001, 46(5): [Baidu Scholar] 

379 [Baidu Scholar] 

12

Wang X F, Li Z D, Huang Y J et al. Materials and Design[J], 2014, 64: 324 [Baidu Scholar] 

13

Wan T, Liu Y, Zhou C X et al. Materials Letters[J], 2021, [Baidu Scholar] 

284(1): 129 018 [Baidu Scholar] 

14

Wang N Z, Maire E, Chen X et al. Materials Characteriza- [Baidu Scholar] 

tion[J], 2019, 147: 11 [Baidu Scholar] 

15

Qiao J C, Xi Z P, Tang H P et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2010, 39(3): 561 [Baidu Scholar] 

16

Cheng Y, Li Y X, Chen X et al. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance[J], 2018, 27(8): 4016 [Baidu Scholar] 

17

Xu Yangli, Zhang Dongyun, Hu Songtao et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2020, 49(5): 1736 [Baidu Scholar] 

18

Krishna B V, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A. Materials Science and Engineering[J], 2007, 452: 178 [Baidu Scholar] 

19

Yang Bin, Liu Yuan, Xu Fating et al. Special Casting and Nonferrous Alloys[J], 2021, 41(3): 389 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]