Abstract
Nearly spherical NaCl particles prepared by a disc granulator were used to produce open-cell aluminum foams via infiltration casting. The average compressive strength of the salt balls is 3.9 MPa, and they can be completely collapsed within 5 min in the ultrasonic cleaner. By controlling the hot-pressure sintering duration as 0.5‒2 h and the hot-pressing temperature at 700 °C, the preforms with bulk density of 0.66‒0.83 g/c
Porous materials have been widely applied into the engineering fields and play an important role in the engineering structural material
Infiltration casting method is a common method to prepare open-cell aluminum foam. High-temperature-resistant water-soluble salts, such as NaCl, MgSO4, and CaCl2, are usually used as the pore-forming materials. These salts are cheap and easy to obtain with stable high temperature performance and good collapsibility. However, the low porosity and difficulty in elimination of salt particles of open-cell aluminum foams severely restrict their application. Since the performance of open-cell aluminum foam is affected by the matrix properties and the cell structure, and the pore structure of the open-cell aluminum foam prepared by the infiltration casting method is heavily dependent on the filler structure, it is of great significance to optimize the infiltration casting method to prepare open-cell aluminum foam with high porosity.
The open-cell aluminum foams with porosity of 90% can be fabricated by the soft ceramic balls which are easily compressed. The ceramic balls contain alumina particles, polyvinyl alcohol, water, a small amount of bentonite, and carboxymethyl/hydroxypropyl-methyl cellulose. However, the granulation process is complicated and these insoluble ceramic granules are difficult to remov
In this research, the nearly spherical space-holder particles were prepared by a disk granulator and then used to manufacture the open-cell aluminum foams with uniform structure and good three-dimensional connectivity. The space-holder particles consisted of NaCl powder, kaolin, bentonite, and binder. These particles were then sprayed with water in the disc granulator for granulation, producing salt balls with size of 1‒5 mm. Preforms with different densities were prepared by controlling the hot-pressure sintering duration. The open-cell aluminum foams with controllable structure were prepared by the infiltration casting method, and their structure and compressive properties were studied.
The preparation process of open-cell aluminum foams by infiltration casting method based on NaCl space-holder is shown in

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of preparation process of open-cell aluminum foams by infiltration casting method based on NaCl space-holder
An electronic AGX-V 50KN universal material testing machine was used to analyze the compressive strength of the salt balls and the quasi-static compression performance of the open-cell aluminum foams. The crushing force of one salt ball with diameter of 5 mm was determined by twenty times and the average compressive strength of the salt ball was calculated. The porosity of the open-cell aluminum foams was determined by measuring the foam volume and mass. Image-Pro software was used to analyze the images obtained by optical microscope (OM) of the open-cell macrostructures and interconnected holes. The specimens of 20 mm×20 mm×21 mm for compressive tests were cut by a wire-cut electric discharge machine, and the compression rate was 2 mm/min.
The preparation process of nearly spherical particles is shown in

Fig.2 Schematic diagram of preparation process of nearly spherical particles
The strength and collapsibility of the salt ball are the key factors for its application as space-holder, which are influenced by the amount of added liquid, binder, granulation process, and the physical and chemical properties of raw materials. The optimum addition of water is crucial for granulation. If the addition amount of liquid is too low, the speed of particle formation is slow, and the particles are small and fragile. If the addition amount of liquid is too high, the particles may easily bond with each other, forming excessively large particles. The bottom and surrounding areas of the plate may easily stick to the material, which is difficult to form cue balls. For some materials that are difficult to pelletize or have low strength after particle formation, the binder can be added during the preparation. The binder can increase the capillary cohesive force and the molecular force of the particles, stabilize the bridge between the particles, and thereby increase the particle formation rate and low-temperature strength. After the particles are formed, they further roll in the granulator at a faster speed, which improves the particle strength due to the action of mechanical force, extrusion, and rubbing between particles. The optimal process parameters are as follows: the added water is 25wt% of the powder, the granulator speed is 50 r/min, and the granulation duration is 5 min. Thus, the average compressive strength of the obtained salt balls is 15 N, which sufficiently satisfies the requirement of particle strength. Therefore, the nearly spherical salt balls with size of 1‒5 mm can be prepared, and their average compressive strength is 3.9 MPa. The bulk density of preforms is 0.66‒0.83 g/c
Particle collapsibility is related to the physical and chemical properties of the raw materials and the collapse agent. The salt balls contain 70wt% NaCl and therefore they are highly soluble in water. The dissolution rate of NaCl particles with size of 3 mm and salt balls in water was characterized by the immersion tests. Results show that the dissolution time of the granular NaCl particle is more than 20 min, whereas the salt balls can completely collapse within 5 min in an ultrasonic cleaner. Thus, the collapsibility of the salt balls is better than that of granular NaCl particles.

Fig.3 Macrostructures of open-cell aluminum foams prepared by NaCl space-holder after hot-pressure sintering for 30 min (a), 60 min (b), 90 min (c), and 120 min (d)
According to

Fig.4 Secondary pore size distributions in open-cell aluminum foams prepared by NaCl space-holder after hot-pressure sintering for 30 min (a), 60 min (b), 90 min (c), and 120 min (d)
In

Fig.5 Quasi-static compressive stress-strain curves of different open-cell aluminum foams
As shown in

Fig.6 Deformation morphologies of different open-cell aluminum foams during compression: (a) ρ=64% and (b) ρ=82%
The energy absorbed by the open-cell aluminum foam during compression can be obtained by integrating the stress-strain curve, as follows:
(1) |
where ε represents the instantaneous strain; σ represents the stress (MPa); ε0 represents the given strain value; W is the energy absorption (MPa·
The specific compression performance of open-cell aluminum foam is the plateau region: the stress changes a little in a long period, thereby increasing the energy absorption capacity. Generally, the energy absorption of open-cell aluminum foams is characterized by the strain energy of compaction, namely the energy absorbed before compaction. The energy absorption efficiency of open-cell aluminum foams during compressio
(2) |
where σ(ε) and η(ε) are the stress value and energy absorption efficiency when the strain is ε, respectively. The strain corresponding to the maximum value of the energy absorption efficiency curve is defined as the densification strain ε
(3) |
Then, the energy absorption capacity W(εd) can be calculated by Eq(4), as follows:
(4) |
Furthermore, the plateau stress σp of the open-cell aluminum foams during compression can be calculated by
(5) |
According to

Fig.7 Energy absorption capacity-strain curves of different open-cell aluminum foams
Porosity, ρ/% | Relative density, ρrel | εd | Elastic modulus, E/MPa | Plateau stress, σp/MPa | Energy absor- ption capacity, W(εd)/MJ· |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
64 | 0.36 | 0.49 | 449 | 30.6 | 15.0 |
69 | 0.31 | 0.48 | 284 | 21.4 | 12.0 |
76 | 0.24 | 0.47 | 187 | 13.4 | 6.3 |
82 | 0.18 | 0.45 | 92 | 6.2 | 2.8 |
capacity are all increased with decreasing the porosity, i.e., with increasing the relative density of aluminum foam. According to
1) The nearly spherical salt balls with size of 1‒5 mm can be prepared, their average compressive strength is 3.9 N/m
2) The porosity of the salt ball preforms can be adjusted by controlling the hot-pressure sintering duration, so the open-cell aluminum foams with porosity of 64%‒82% can be prepared under the optimized process conditions.
3) The deformation characteristics of open-cell aluminum foams with different pore structures are basically the same, and they all show the layer-by-layer collapse. The densification strain value, elastic modulus, plateau stress, and energy absorption capacity are all increased with increasing the relative density. Under the same compressive strain condition, the energy absorption capacity is decreased with increasing the porosity. The energy absorption capacity is maximum of 15.0 MJ·
References
Liu P S, Chen G F. Porous Materials: Processing and Applica-tions[M]. Cambridge: Elsevier, 2014 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu P S, Ma X M. Materials and Design[J], 2020, 188: [Baidu Scholar]
413 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu P S, Ma X M. Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures[J], 2021, 17(4): 814 [Baidu Scholar]
Hamadouche A, Nebbali R, Benahmed H et al. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science[J], 2016, 71: 86 [Baidu Scholar]
Navacerrada M A, Fernández P, Díaz C et al. Applied Acous- [Baidu Scholar]
tics[J], 2013, 74(4): 496 [Baidu Scholar]
Kong C H, Chen L B, Wu X L et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2018, 47(4): 1049 [Baidu Scholar]
Shunmugasamy V C, Mansoor B. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2018, 715: 281 [Baidu Scholar]
Kumar R, Jain H, Sriram S et al. Materials Chemistry and Physics[J], 2020, 240: 122 274 [Baidu Scholar]
Wan T, Liu Y, Zhou C X et al. Journal of Materials Science and Technology[J], 2021, 62: 11 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang X F, Li Z D, Huang Y J et al. Materials and Design[J], 2014, 64: 324 [Baidu Scholar]
Wan T, Liu Y, Zhou C X et al. Materials Letters[J], 2021, [Baidu Scholar]
284(1): 129 018 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang N Z, Maire E, Chen X et al. Materials Characteriza- [Baidu Scholar]
tion[J], 2019, 147: 11 [Baidu Scholar]
Qiao J C, Xi Z P, Tang H P et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2010, 39(3): 561 [Baidu Scholar]
Cheng Y, Li Y X, Chen X et al. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance[J], 2018, 27(8): 4016 [Baidu Scholar]
Xu Yangli, Zhang Dongyun, Hu Songtao et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2020, 49(5): 1736 [Baidu Scholar]
Krishna B V, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A. Materials Science and Engineering[J], 2007, 452: 178 [Baidu Scholar]
Yang Bin, Liu Yuan, Xu Fating et al. Special Casting and Nonferrous Alloys[J], 2021, 41(3): 389 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]