Abstract
The effect of hot extrusion with different extrusion temperatures (340, 360, 380, and 400 °C) on the microstructure evolution and properties of the as-cast Mg-1Zn-0.3Zr-1Y-2Sn magnesium alloy was investigated by optical microscopy (OM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), immersion experiments, electrochemical experiment, and tensile test. The results show that after hot extrusion, the second phase of the alloy is broken into particles along the extrusion direction, while the grain size is significantly reduced, and dynamic recrystallization and deformation grains exist in the microstructure. As the extrusion temperature increases, the content of the second phase changes less, and the size of the dynamic recrystallization grain gradually increases. The mechanical properties of the extruded alloys are improved, but their corrosion resistance is weakened. The hot extrusion treatment can improve the corrosion resistance of the alloy in the early stage of corrosion, while as the corrosion proceeds, the corrosion resistance of the alloy in the later stage is weakened. When the hot extrusion temperature is 360 °C, the extruded alloy has relatively good mechanical properties and corrosion resistance.
As a degradable biomaterial, magnesium alloys have good biocompatibility and application prospects in the field of bone repai
At present, the methods to improve the mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of magnesium alloys mainly include alloying, heat treatment, hot deformation, and surface treatment. Among them, alloying and hot extrusion treatments are more widely used. In terms of alloying, Zn is a common alloying element, which can effectively improve the mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of the magnesium allo
The ideal biodegradable materials should have the following characteristics: (1) good biocompatibility and degradability; (2) degradation products are harmless; (3) high strength; (4) degradation rate and the performance of the cell function match well; (5) the material can guide or induce tissue regeneratio
According to the present research, hot extrusion can improve the mechanical properties of magnesium alloys, but its effects on the corrosion resistance of the alloys are still uncertai
Commercially pure Mg (99.95%), pure Zn (99.99%), Mg-30wt% Zr, Mg-20wt% Y, and Mg-20wt% Sn master alloys were used to prepare the as-cast Mg-1Zn-0.3Zr-1Y-2Sn alloys. The melting was performed in a vacuum induction melting furnace (ZGJL0.01-40-4) under a protective gas of CO2 (99vol%) and SF6 (1vol%). The melting temperature was 750 °C and the casting temperature was 720 °C. Before casting, the mold was preheated to 200 °C. After that, the ingots were cut into a billet of Ф49 mm×36 mm. Hot extrusion was conducted at 340, 360, 380, and 400 °C, with an extrusion ratio of 10:1 and an extrusion rate of 5 mm/min. The size of the billet after the hot extrusion treatment was Ф16 mm×260 mm.
The microstructures of the as-cast alloy and the extruded alloys in the parallel extrusion direction were observed by optical microscope (OM), and the corrosive agent was the picric acid solution, whose main components were 4.5 g picric acid+100 mL anhydrous ethanol+9 mL deionized water+5 mL glacial acetic acid. The grain sizes of the alloys were measured by Nano-Measurer software. The morphologies and composition of the second phase of the alloys were characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM, JSM-5610LV) equipped with energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS).
The mechanical properties of the tensile specimen parallel to the extrusion direction were measured at room temperature by an electronic universal testing machine (DNS100). Based on the GB/T228.1-2010 standard, the tensile specimens were processed into the ones with 54.11 mm in length, 3.1 mm in width, 2 mm in thickness, and 15 mm in scale distance. The tensile rate was 1 mm/min. Three specimens were selected for each group of experiments, and the average value was calculated. The fracture morphology of the specimens after stretching was observed by SEM.
The mass-loss corrosion test sample was parallel to the extrusion direction, the size of the sample was Ф14 mm×5 mm, the corrosion solution was simulated body fluid (SBF), and the main components of the SBF were: 8 g/L NaCl, 1 g/L glucose, 0.06 g/L MgSO4·7H2O, 0.06 g/L KH2PO4, 0.06 g/L Na2HPO4, 0.35 g/L NaHCO3, 0.14 g/L CaCl2, 0.4 g/L KCl, 0.1 g/L MgCl2·6H2O. According to the ASTM-G01-03 standard, the ratio of SBF volume (mL) to specimen area (c
V=KW/ATρ | (1) |
where K is the time conversion factor (K=8.76×1
Specimen with sizes of Ф11.3 mm×8 mm were selected for the hydrogen evolution experiment. First, the sample was ground and polished, ultrasonically cleaned with acetone and alcohol for 2 min, and then placed in a 150 mL beaker of SBF at 37 °C. The data was recorded every 24 h, the immersion time was from 0 h to 120 h and the SBF was replaced every 24 h. Three specimens were selected for each group of experiments and their average values were calculated.
The electrochemical corrosion properties of the alloys were tested using an electrochemical workstation. A standard three-electrode system was used, in which the specimen was the working electrode (test area of 1 c

Fig.1 OM microstructures of as-cast alloy (a) and the extruded alloys with different extrusion temperatures: (b) 340 °C, (c) 360 °C, (d) 380 °C, and (e) 400 °C

Fig.2 Grain size distribution of the extruded alloys with different extrusion temperatures: (a) 340 °C, (b) 360 °C, (c) 380 °C, and (d) 400 °C

Fig.3 SEM images of as-cast alloy (a) and the extruded alloys with different extrusion temperatures: (b) 340 °C, (c) 360 °C, (d) 380 °C, and
(e) 400 °C
Position | Element content/wt% | Element content/at% | Sn/Y | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mg | Sn | Y | Mg | Sn | Y | ||
A | 52.23 | 29.26 | 18.5 | 82.53 | 9.47 | 8 | 1.18 |
B | 81.43 | 11.47 | 7.10 | 94.99 | 2.74 | 2.27 | 1.20 |
C | 71.42 | 15.98 | 12.60 | 91.40 | 4.19 | 4.41 | 0.95 |
D | 64.30 | 19.18 | 16.51 | 88.39 | 5.40 | 6.21 | 0.87 |
E | 63.50 | 22.33 | 14.17 | 88.26 | 6.36 | 5.38 | 1.18 |

Fig.4 Mechanical properties of as-cast alloy and extruded alloys with different extrusion temperatures

Fig.5 Fracture morphologies of as-cast alloy (a) and extruded alloys with different extrusion temperatures: (b) 340 °C, (c) 360 °C, (d) 380 °C, and (e) 400 °C

Fig.6 Corrosion rates of the as-cast alloy and the extruded alloys with different extrusion temperatures after immersion in SBF for 120 h

Fig.7 Hydrogen evolution curves of as-cast alloy and extruded alloys with different extrusion temperatures after immersion in SBF from 0 h to 120 h

Fig.8 Corrosion morphologies of as-cast alloy (a) and extruded alloys with different extrusion temperatures: (b) 340 °C, (c) 360 °C, (d) 380 °C, and (e) 400 °C

Fig.9 Corrosion morphologies of the as-cast alloy (a) and the extruded alloys with different extrusion temperatures (without corrosion products): (b) 340 °C, (c) 360 °C, (d) 380 °C, and (e) 400 °C
The main reason for the weakened corrosion resistance of the alloys after hot extrusion is that the hot extrusion causes the second phase in the as-cast alloy to break into granular shape

Fig.10 EIS diagrams and equivalent circuits of as-cast alloy and extruded alloys with different extrusion temperatures: (a) Nyquist diagram, (b, c) Bode diagrams, and (d) equivalent circuits
Temperature/°C | Rs/Ω | CPE1 | R1/Ω·c | CPE2 | R2/×1 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y01/×1 | n1 | Y02/×1 | n2 | ||||
As-cast | 25.12 | 7.06 | 0.8 | 43.27 | 1.72 | 0.8 | 1.97 |
340 | 33.71 | 5.47 | 0.78 | 52.97 | 1.04 | 0.89 | 3.78 |
360 | 38.78 | 8.23 | 0.70 | 140.4 | 1.28 | 0.87 | 5.44 |
380 | 40.08 | 5.95 | 0.76 | 90.74 | 1.10 | 0.88 | 5.06 |
400 | 31.62 | 8.60 | 0.72 | 98.32 | 0.141 | 0.85 | 3.99 |
The above results show that in the early stage of corrosion, hot extrusion treatment can promote the formation of a denser protective film on the surface of the alloy, which plays a major role in corrosion resistance enhancement. With the corrosion proceeding, the structure of the protective film is gradually destroyed, and galvanic corrosion plays a major role in the corrosion resistance of the alloy. Therefore, the hot extrusion treatment can improve the corrosion resistance of the alloy in the early stage of corrosion, and as the corrosion proceeds, the corrosion resistance of the alloy is weakened. In contrast, when the extrusion temperature is 360 °C, the alloy has relatively good corrosion resistance.
1) After hot extrusion of the as-cast Mg-1Zn-0.3Zr-1Y-2Sn alloy, the second phase is broken into granular shapes and mainly distributed along the extrusion direction. Dynamically recrystallized and deformed grains exist in the microstructure. With the increase in extrusion temperature, the content, size, and distribution of the second phase change less, the size of dynamically recrystallized grains increases gradually, the distribution is more uneven, and the proportion of deformed grains gradually decreases. When the extrusion temperature is 360 °C, the alloy has a relatively uniform microstructure,
and its average grain size of dynamically recrystallized grain is 15 μm.
2) Hot extrusion treatment can significantly improve the mechanical properties of the as-cast alloy. As the extrusion temperature increases from 360 °C to 400 °C, the mechanical properties of the alloy increase first and then decrease. When the extrusion temperature is 360 °C, the alloy has relatively high mechanical property, with YS, UTS, and EL of 222±12 MPa, 277±10 MPa, and 22.3%±0.5%, respectively.
3) The effect of hot extrusion treatment on the corrosion resistance of the alloy is related to the corrosion time. The hot extrusion treatment can improve the corrosion resistance of the alloy in the early stages of corrosion, but it reduces the corrosion resistance of the alloy as the corrosion proceeds. When the extrusion temperature is 360 °C, the alloy has relatively good corrosion resistance, and its corrosion rate after corrosion in SBF for 120 h is 1.37±0.06 mm/a.
References
Bowen P K, Drelich J, Goldman J. Mater Sci Eng C[J], 2013, [Baidu Scholar]
33(8): 5064 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang J, He Y, Maitz M F et al. Acta Biomater[J], 2013, 9(10): 8678 [Baidu Scholar]
Gu X N, Zheng Y F. Front Mater Sci China[J], 2010, 4(2): 111 [Baidu Scholar]
Zheng Y F, Gu X N, Witte F et al. Sci Eng R Rep[J], 2014, 77: 1 [Baidu Scholar]
Xu D, Han E, Xu Y. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int[J], 2016, 26(2): 117 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu T, Yang Q, Guo N et al. J Magnes Alloy[J], 2020, 8(1): 66 [Baidu Scholar]
Ahmadkhaniha D, Fedel M, Heydarzadeh Sohi M et al. Surf Eng Appl Electrochem[J], 2017, 53(5): 439 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang W, Wang Y L, Chen M et al. Sci Rep[J], 2016, 6(1): 37 401 [Baidu Scholar]
Doernberg E, Kozlov A, Schmid-Fetzer R. J Phase Equilibria Diffus[J], 2007, 6(28): 523 [Baidu Scholar]
Munir K, Lin J, Wen C et al. Acta Biomater[J], 2020, 102: 493 [Baidu Scholar]
Cai C, Song R, Wang L et al. Surf Coat Technol[J], 2018, 342: 57 [Baidu Scholar]
Qin H, Zhao Y, An Z et al. Biomaterials[J], 2015, 53: 211 [Baidu Scholar]
Yu X, Jiang B, Yang H et al. Appl Surf Sci[J], 2015, 353: 1013 [Baidu Scholar]
Luo D, Wang H Y, Chen L et al. Mater Lett[J], 2013, 94: 51 [Baidu Scholar]
Sasaki T T, Yamamoto K, Honma T et al. Scr Mater[J], 2008, [Baidu Scholar]
59(10): 1111 [Baidu Scholar]
Sasaki T T, Oh-ishi K, Ohkubo T et al. Scr Mater[J], 2006, [Baidu Scholar]
55(3): 251 [Baidu Scholar]
Chen Y, Dou J, Yu H et al. J Biomater Appl[J], 2019, 33(10): 1348 [Baidu Scholar]
Riaz U, Shabib I, Haider W. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater[J], 2019, 107(6): 1970 [Baidu Scholar]
Mani G, Feldman M D, Patel D et al. Biomaterials[J], 2007, [Baidu Scholar]
28(9): 1689 [Baidu Scholar]
Ibrahim H, Esfahani S N, Poorganji B et al. Mater Sci Eng C[J], 2017, 70: 870 [Baidu Scholar]
Zreiqat H, Howlett C R, Zannettino A et al. J Biomed Mater [Baidu Scholar]
Res[J], 2002, 62(2): 175 [Baidu Scholar]
Meng S J, Yu H, Fan S D et al. Engl Lett[J], 2019, 32(2): 145 [Baidu Scholar]
Song Y, Han E H, Shan D et al. Corros Sci[J], 2012, 65: 322 [Baidu Scholar]
Li T, Chai L H, Shi S H et al. Mater Sci Forum[J], 2017, 898: 579 [Baidu Scholar]
She J, Pan F, Zhang J et al. J Alloy Compd[J], 2016, 657: 893 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang T, Shao Y, Meng G et al. Corros Sci[J], 2011, 53(5): 1960 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang T, Meng G, Shao Y et al. Corros Sci[J], 2011, 53(9): 2934 [Baidu Scholar]
Yang H, Wu L, Jiang B et al. J Electrochem Soc[J], 2020, 167: 121 503 [Baidu Scholar]
Abuleil T, Hort N, Dietzel W et al. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China[J], 2009, 19(1): 40 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang B J, Xu D K, Dong J H et al. Scr Mater[J], 2014, 88: 5 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang B J, Xu D K, Xin Y C et al. Sci Rep[J], 2017, 7(1): 16 014 [Baidu Scholar]
Khorasani F, Emamy M, Malekan M et al. Mater Charact[J], 2019, 147: 155 [Baidu Scholar]
Xin Y, Liu C, Zhang X et al. J Mater Res[J], 2007, 22: 2004 [Baidu Scholar]
Tian Y, Huang H, Yuan G et al. J Alloy Compd[J], 2015, 626: 42 [Baidu Scholar]
Bazhenov V E, Li A V, Komissarov A A et al. J Magnes [Baidu Scholar]
Alloy[J], 2021, 9(4): 1428 [Baidu Scholar]
Zheng K Y, Dong J, Zeng X Q et al. Mater Sci Eng A[J], 2007, 454: 314 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang X B, Yuan G Y, Wang Z Z. Mater Sci Technol[J], 2013, 29(1): 111 [Baidu Scholar]
Jin S Y, Ma X C, Wu R Z et al. Int J Min Met Mater[J], 2022, [Baidu Scholar]
29(7): 1453 [Baidu Scholar]
Ding J, Liu X, Wang Y et al. Materials[J], 2019, 12(13): 2069 [Baidu Scholar]
Zeng R, Kainer K U, Blawert C et al. J Alloy Compd[J], 2011, 509(13): 4462 [Baidu Scholar]
Ma X C, Jin S Y, Wu R Z et al. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc [Baidu Scholar]
China[J], 2021, 31: 3228 [Baidu Scholar]
Peng Q, Huang Y, Zhou L et al. Biomaterials[J], 2010, 31(3): 398 [Baidu Scholar]
Chen J, Wang J, Han E et al. Corros Sci[J], 2008, 50(5): 1292 [Baidu Scholar]
Chen J, Dong J, Wang J et al. Corros Sci[J], 2008, 50(12): 3610 [Baidu Scholar]