Abstract
The undercooled solidification of (Co60Sn40)100-xNbx(x=0, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, at%) single phase alloys was performed to investigate the changes of Co3Sn2 phase growth morphology.Results show that the Co3Sn2 phase grows with fractal seaweed morphology at small undercooling (x=0, 0.4), and transits to dendrite as the content of added Nb increases to 0.6at%, and then returns to fractal seaweed (x=0.8) as a response to the changes in interfacial energy anisotropy and kinetic anisotropy. With the increase in undercooling, the growth morphology of Co3Sn2 phase in (Co60Sn40)99.4Nb0.6 alloys returns from dendrite back to factual seaweed at undercooling larger than 28 K and then transits to compact seaweed at undercooling more than 143 K. The minor Nb addition slightly increases the growth velocity of Co3Sn2 phase at low and intermediate undercooling but obviously decreases the growth velocity at large undercooling. The sharp increase in the growth velocity is corresponding to the transition of Co3Sn2 phase growth morphology from fractal seaweed to compact seaweed.
Solidification of alloy melts involves the selection of crystal growth pattern, which has a significant effect on the mechanical properties of material
Despite aforementioned researches, our understanding about the seaweed growth morphology of crystal in metallic alloy melts is still limited. The Co-Sn alloy is different from most of other binary alloys as it solidifies with a seaweed morphology in undercoolin
In the present study, 0.4at%, 0.6at% and 0.8at% of Nb were added to the base Co60Sn40 single phase alloy to investigate the crystal growth morphology evolution. The samples were alloyed from high purity Co (99.99wt%), Sn (99.999wt%) and Nb (99.99wt%), each about 5 g, and then prepared by induction melting furnace under the protection of high purity argon. In the process of undercooling experiment, the alloy ingot was placed into a quartz glass crucible, and put in a vacuum chamber back-filled with ultrapure argon, then subjected to cyclic induction superheating and cooling under the protection of glass purifier that was made of 50% B2O3, 30% Na2SiO3 and 20% Na2B4O7 until the desired undercooling was obtained. The thermal history during solidification of each sample was monitored by an infrared pyrometer with a relative accuracy of 1 K and a response time of 1 m

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of the undercooling experiment (a) and growth velocity measurement by dual probe method (b)
The growth velocity of Co3Sn2 phase in undercooled (Co60Sn40)100-xNbx (x=0, 0.6) alloys was measured by dual probe method (
During the rapid solidification process of bulk undercooled alloy melts, the crystal grows rapidly, and the latent heat of crystallization is released instantly to form temperature recalescence, which will result in the partial remelting of the primarily solidified phase, so that the initial growth morphology of the primarily solidified phase will be destroyed inside the sample. During the undercooled solidification of some eutectic alloys, such remelting is the main reason for the formation of anomalous eutecti

Fig.2 Surface microstructures of Co60Sn40 single phase alloy with different Nb additions solidified at an undercooling of about 5 K: (a) 0at%,
(b) 0.4at%, (c) 0.6at%, and (d) 0.8at%
As shown in


Fig.3 gives XRD patterns of the (Co60Sn40)100-xNbx alloy. There are two phases identified in all microstructures: β- Co3Sn2 and α-Co3Sn2, in which the α-Co3Sn2 is the partial solid-state phase transformation products of β-Co3Sn2 during cooling process after solidification. The growth morphology of crystals in the microstructure is mainly determined by β- Co3Sn2, and two of them cannot be distinguished in the SEM observation. Fig.4 shows the results of DSC analysis of (Co60Sn40)100-xNbx alloys at a heating rate of 20 K/min. The specimens used in the experiment were cut from the master ingots which were solidified under small undercooling, and it is considered to be an equilibrium structure. In DSC curves, there is only one endothermic or exothermic peak on the heating and cooling curve, so it is considered to be a single phase alloy. The addition of Nb does not result in the formation of new phase, and only changes the growth behavior of Co3Sn2 phase.
The strength of interfacial energy anisotropy is an important factor affecting the crystal growth morphology during solidification. In undercooled solidification, the stronger interfacial energy anisotropy will lead to dendritic growth of crystal. Instead, the crystal adopts a seaweed morphology. However, it is difficult to directly measure the interfacial energy anisotropy in experiments, so we calculated the surface energy of Co3Sn2 phase and its anisotropy parameter according to the empirical electron theory of solids and molecule
(1) |
where A is a constant related to the crystal plane, a and c are the lattice constants, Iα is the number of equivalent dangling bonds on the given crystal plane, and Eα is the bond energy between the atoms. The anisotropy strength between (hkil) plane and the (0001) basal plane is:
(2) |
where γ0 is the average value of γ(hkil) and γ(0001).
The calculated maximum anisotropy strength of hexagonal Co3Sn2 phase is between (100) plane and (0001) plane, and the value is only 0.204. Compared to the surface energy anisotropy of other metals, the value is 0.252 for Al phas
Because the mixing enthalpy of Nb-Co and Nb-Sn is ‒25 and ‒1 kJ/mol, respectively, the value of Nb-Co is more negative than Nb-S
With the addition of Nb to Co60Sn40 alloy, the concentration of Nb in the solid Co3Sn2 also increases. The entropy of this phase rises. On the basis of DSC analysis (Fig.4), when 0.8at% Nb is added, the enthalpy of fusion of Co3Sn2 decreases from 95325 J/mol to 79845 J/mol. Therefore, the entropy of fusion of Co3Sn2 decreases, which will cause a rough solid/liquid interface, and thus weakens the atomic attachment kinetic anisotrop
Fig.5 gives the growth velocity of Co3Sn2 phase in Co60Sn40 and (Co60Sn40)99.4Nb0.6 alloys under various undercooling conditions. In the range of experimental undercooling, the growth velocity (V) of Co3Sn2 phases increases with undercooling (ΔT). A power law trend is fitted to the data sets and expressed as:, where e is the exponent of undercooling. As for Co60Sn40 and (Co60Sn40)99.4Nb0.6 alloys, the crystal growth velocity increases slowly up to 129 and 143 K undercooling, with the exponent of 2.14 and 1.71, respectively, and then increases rapidly, thereafter a breakdown in this trend is observed. The values of exponent increase to 5.31 and 5.74. This change of Co3Sn2 phase growth velocity under the critical undercooling corresponds to its growth morphology transition from fractal to compact seaweed, as shown in

Fig.6 SEM surface micrographs of the Co60Sn40 alloys solidified at different undercooling: (a) 25 K, (b) 122 K, (c) 129 K, and (d) 213 K

Fig.7 SEM surface micrographs of (Co60Sn40)99.4Nb0.6 alloy solidified at different undercooling: (a) 23 K, (b) 28 K, (c) 138 K, (d) 143 K, and
(e) 207 K

The redistribution coefficient of Nb in the Co3Sn2 phase is 0.44, less than unit
The effect of undercooling on the growth morphology of Co3Sn2 phase is related to crystal growth kinetics. The crystal growth velocity is faster with the increase in undercooling, as shown in Fig.5. The atoms in the liquid phase deposit to the solid phase in a freer manner, resulting in a rougher solid/liquid interface in atomic-level at large undercooling.
Hence, the effect of interfacial energy anisotropy on branching the interface is partially offset, and the effective dynamic anisotropy in undercooled solidification is weakene
1) When Nb content is 0.6at%, the seaweed growth morphology of Co3Sn2 phase changes to dendritic morphology, and returns back to seaweed with an addition of 0.8at% Nb. The addition of Nb enhances the interfacial energy anisotropy and weakens the kinetic anisotropy, resulting in the changes of growth morphology.
2) In undercooled solidification of (Co60Sn40)99.4Nb0.6 alloys, with the increase in undercooling, the growth morphology of Co3Sn2 phase successively transits from dendrite, factual seaweed then to compact seaweed. Compared to Co60Sn40 alloy, the added 0.6at% Nb increases the critical undercooling for the Co3Sn2 phase transformation from fractal to compact seaweed.
3) The addition of 0.6at% Nb to Co60Sn40 alloy results in an increase in the growth velocity of Co3Sn2 phases when the solidified undercooling is less than 116 K, but the growth velocity obviously decreases at larger undercooling. The sharp increase in the growth velocity is corresponding to the transition of Co3Sn2 phase growth morphology from fractal seaweed to compact seaweed.
References
Pu D M, Chen X H, Ye J L et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2022, 51(12): 4436 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Y M, Li S M, Yang B et al. Materials Science & Engineering A[J], 2020, 771: 138 665 [Baidu Scholar]
Brener E, Muller-Krumbhaar H, Temkin D. Physical Review [Baidu Scholar]
E[J],1996, 52: 2714 [Baidu Scholar]
Strickland J, Nenchev B, Dong H. Crystals[J], 2020, 10: 627 [Baidu Scholar]
Ihle T, Müller Krumbhaar H. Physical Review E[J], 1994, 49: 2972 [Baidu Scholar]
Provatas N, Wang Q, Haataja M et al. Physical Review [Baidu Scholar]
Letters[J], 2003, 91: 155 502 [Baidu Scholar]
Xing H, Ji M Y, Dong X L et al. Materials and Design[J], 2020, 185: 108 250 [Baidu Scholar]
Pocheau A, Deschamps J, Georgelin M. Journal of the Minerals Metals & Materials society[J], 2007, 59: 71 [Baidu Scholar]
Haque N, Cochrane R F, Mullis A M. Intermetallics[J], 2016, 76: 70 [Baidu Scholar]
Jiang A, Wang X. Acta Materialia[J], 2020, 200: 56 [Baidu Scholar]
Haxhimali T, Karma A, Gonzales F et al. Nature Materials[J], 2006, 5: 660 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang L, Hoyt J J, Wang N et al. Nature Communications[J], 2020, 11: 724 [Baidu Scholar]
Castle E G, Mullis A M, Cochrane R F. Acta Materialia[J], 2014, 66: 378 [Baidu Scholar]
Castle E G, Mullis A M, Cochrane R F. Acta Materialia[J], 2014, 77: 76 [Baidu Scholar]
Kang J L, Li J F, Wei X X et al. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A[J], 2016, 47: 6187 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu L, Li J F, Zhou Y H. Acta Materialia[J], 2011, 59: 5558 [Baidu Scholar]
Kang J L, Li J F. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A[J], 2020, 51: 6346 [Baidu Scholar]
Kang J L, Zhao M. Materials Science and Technology[J], 2022, 38: 191 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu L J, Wei X X, Ferry M et al. Scripta Materialia[J], 2020, 174: 72 [Baidu Scholar]
Guo Y Q, Yu R H, Zhang R L et al. Journal of Physical Chemistry B[J], 1998, 102: 9 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang J M, Ma F, Xu K W. Applied Surface Science[J], 2004, 229: 34 [Baidu Scholar]
Fu B Q, Liu W, Li Z L. Applied Surface Science[J], 2009, 255: 9348 [Baidu Scholar]
Senkov O N, Miracle D B. Materials Research Bulletin[J], 2001, 36: 2183 [Baidu Scholar]
Assadi H, Oghabi M, Herlach D M. Acta Materialia[J], 2009, 57: 1639 [Baidu Scholar]
Karma A, Langer J S. Physical Review A[J], 1984, 30: 3147 [Baidu Scholar]