+高级检索
网刊加载中。。。

使用Chrome浏览器效果最佳,继续浏览,你可能不会看到最佳的展示效果,

确定继续浏览么?

复制成功,请在其他浏览器进行阅读

Preparation and Properties of Large-Size Titanium-Steel Composite Plates  PDF

  • Wang Ding 1
  • Sun Yunan 1
  • Xue Zhiguo 1
  • Zhang Penghui 1
  • Wu Jiangtao 1,2
  • Fan Keshe 1,2
  • Huang Xingli 1
1. Xi'an Tianli Clad Metal Materials Co., Ltd, Xi'an 710201, China; 2. Shaanxi Engineering Research Center of Metal Clad Plate, Xi'an 710201, China

Updated:2023-11-23

  • Full Text
  • Figs & Tabs
  • References
  • Authors
  • About
CN CITE
OUTLINE

Abstract

Titanium-steel composite plates with large sizes of 4260 mm×4260 mm×(6.5+32) mm were prepared by explosive welding technique. Ultrasonic nondestructive testing, phased-array waveform microscopy, optical microscope, and scanning electron microscope were used to analyze the mechanical properties and interface morphologies of the composite plates. Results show that when the detonation velocity, density, explosive height, and stand-off distance are 2200–2270 m/s, 0.80–0.82 g/cm3, 45.0–46.0 mm, and 8.0–11.0 mm, respectively, the mechanical properties of the prepared plates can satisfy ASTM B898-2020 technical requirements. The interface waveform presents a typical periodic combination morphology and the interface is clear and uniform. A small amount of solidified melt exists in the vortex area of waveform. The ratio of amplitude to wavelength ranges from 0.15 to 0.25, and the optimal shear strength can be achieved when the ratio is approximately 0.20. This research provides preparation technique for the large-size titanium-steel composite plates and theoretical guidance for the subsequent optimization of the explosive welding process of composite plants.

To prepare functional materials with different physical, chemical, and mechanical properties, more and more attention has been paid on the special processes[

1–4]. As an important structural connection method, the explosive welding technique has the characteristics of diffusion welding, melt welding, and pressure welding. The explosive welding technique can possess different materials with controllable sizes, superior interface bonding strength, and reprocessing performance[5–7]. Therefore, it is widely used in aerospace, nuclear power, atomic energy, and other fields.

Titanium has the characteristics of high strength and excellent corrosion resistance at different temperatures. To save titanium resources, reduce equipment cost, improve equipment quality, and shorten the maintenance time, titanium-steel composite plates are widely used in the fields of pure terephthalic acid preparation, oxidation reactors, solvent dehydration towers, and heat exchanger in the modern chemical industry and pressure vessel industry[

8–11]. The composite materials containing titanium and titanium alloys have high deformation resistance and low impact toughness, therefore being difficult to process[12]. However, the adiabatic shear line easily appears on the titanium layer after the explosive welding, which restricts the manufacture of large-size composite plates, the optimization of interface quality, and the performance improvement. Fig.1 shows the dynamic change of interface during explosive welding.

Fig.1  Dynamic change of interface during explosive welding

The materials, explosives, and interface-forming mechan-isms of small plates have been extensively researched[

13–19]. Due to the difference in properties between base and flyer materials, the resultant explosive welding windows are different[12]. In the actual production preparation, the quality of finished product cannot satisfy the requirements based on explosive welding theory. The ripple of the bonding interface formed by explosive welding can directly affect the final quality of products, which is affected by many factors[20–23]. With increasing the size of composite plates, the uniformity of explosive composite, and the stability of detonation wave in production, longer duration is required to exhaust air at a fixed detonation velocity during the manufacture process. The more difficult the air exhaustion, the more difficult the process control. Therefore, it is critical to study the interface characteristics of titanium-carbon steel composite plates in large specifications. The theory formula of detonation pressure is P=ρ0(ρ-ρ0)/ρVd2 (P is detonation pressure; Vd is the detonation velocity; ρ0 is the initial density of explosives; ρ is the density of explosive products). During the explosion reaction, the superposition of detonation wave and explosive products result in the increase in pressure as well as plate width and the decrease in stability. Thus, the detonation velocity and detonation pressure are the key factors to prepare high-quality composite plates[24–25].

1 Experiment

Industrial titanium B265 Gr.1 (namely Gr.1) and carbon steel A516 Gr.70 (namely Gr.70) were selected as the flyer plate and base plate with the size of 4550 mm×4550 mm×(6.5+32) mm. The chemical composition and mechanical properties of titanium plate and carbon steel plate are shown in Table 1Table 3.

Table 1  Chemical composition of Gr.1 plate (wt%)
FeCNOHTi
0.021 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.0009 Bal.
Table 3  Mechanical properties of Gr.1 plate and Gr.70 plate
PlateTensile strength/MPaYield strength/MPaElongation/%Density/kg·m-3Vickers hardness, HV/ ×9.8 MPaElastic modulus/GPa

Poisson's

ratio, υ

Gr.1 304 275 44 4510 139 116 0.34
Gr.70 567 336 35 7830 160 200 0.33
Table 2  Chemical composition of Gr.70 plate (wt%)
CrMnNiPSiTiCFe
0.084 1.48 0.17 0.017 0.32 0.013 0.169 Bal.

In the process parameter design, the long-distance detonation wave and the low bonding strength during the explosive welding should be comprehensively considered, thereby resulting in low detonation energy and difficulties in air exhaustion. These two factors can be affected by gap height, explosive thickness, explosive burst speed, explosive density, and other process parameters. Additionally, the interface over-melting phenomenon should be avoided, because the high energy may cause tear at the composite plate edge. Fig.2 shows the device of explosive welding at operation site.

Fig.2  Device of explosive welding at operation site

According to the preparation characteristics of large-size titanium-steel composite plate, the parallel installation conditions in the explosive welding process are Vp=2sin(Ф/2) and Vp=Vd. The detonator was placed in the geometric center and the explosives were laid evenly on the flyer plate. Then, the minimum velocity Vm of the collision point should satisfy the relationship, as follows:

Vm=2Re(H1+H2)ρ1+ρ21/2 (1)

where Reynolds number Re is 8.9; H1 and H2 are the Vickers hardness of cladding and base plates, respectively; ρ1 and ρ2 are the densities of cladding and base plates, respectively. To ensure the formation of stable reentry jet, VP should be less than the sound volume velocity of cladding material (Vs), as follows:

Vs=E3(1-2υ)ρ1/2 (2)

where E is the elastic modulus of titanium plate, ρ is the material density, and υ is Poisson's ratio.

Therefore, the moving speed of the collision point should satisfy Vm<Vp<Vs. Based on the calculated Vm values, the collision rate can be expressed, as follows:

Vp =Vm+200 Vm<2000 m/s

Vp =Vm+100 2000<Vm<2500 m/s (3)

Vp =Vm+50 Vm>2500 m/s

The explosive velocity is a key parameter in theoretical calculation. The calculated explosive velocity is Vm=2077 m/s. Therefore, the optimal theoretical detonation velocity is 2177 m/s. In this research, the detonation velocity is the same as the moving speed of the interface collision point of titanium-steel composite plate. To ensure the lower limit of weldability window requirements of the detonation velocity, the velocity should be controlled within 2200–2270 m/s. Additionally, by adding diluents into the industrial powdered ammonium nitrate explosives, the explosives can satisfy the requirements and have a stable physical and chemical state.

In the preparation process, the contact surfaces of the base plate and cladding plate should be polished until they are flat, smooth, and clean. The average roughness of the base and cladding plate surfaces Ra should be less than 1.6 μm. Before the explosive welding, the surface is evenly coated with a butter layer to prevent the surface burning caused by high pressure and high temperature. Large-size titanium plates have inferior flatness and uniformity, which results in bending and subsidence phenomena. The decrease in spacing reduces the acceleration time of cladding plate and also decreases the impact velocity. Jet cannot be generated unless the impact velocity of the cladding plate reaches the critical value, which is obtained by the theoretical calculation and practical production[

25]. Six processes of different explosive and support heights for areas A and B were designed, as shown in Fig.3. After the detonation tube was ignited, the explosion velocity increased and gradually reached the stability within an area of 1800 mm in radius in a very short time. Fig.3 shows the schematic diagram of explosive welding site, and Table 4 presents the explosive parameters of explosive welding site.

Fig.3  Schematic diagram of explosive welding site

Table 4  Explosive parameters of explosive welding sites
Process No.Detonation velocity/m·s-1Density/g·cm-3Explosive height/mmDistance of stand-off/mm
Area AArea B
1 2200–2230 0.80–0.81 45.0–46.0 8.0 8.0
2 2200–2230 0.80–0.81 45.0–46.0 8.0 9.0
3 2200–2230 0.80–0.81 45.0–46.0 9.0 9.0
4 2230–2270 0.81–0.82 41.0–42.0 9.0 10.0
5 2230–2270 0.81–0.82 41.0–42.0 10.0 10.0
6 2230–2270 0.81–0.82 41.0–42.0 10.0 11.0

After explosive welding, the ultrasonic nondestructive test, phased array interface imaging, interface ripple metallography, and shear strength test were conducted for six composite plates. The mechanical properties of annealed materials were tested. The interface hardness of the explosive and annealed states was measured, and the typical interface structure was observed by the scanning electron microscope (SEM). Anyscan-31 ultrasonic flaw detector was used for the nondestructive testing of composite plates, and an Olympus flaw detector was used for the interface imaging. The standard of ASTM B898-2020 Class A[

26] was employed to evaluate the composite plate. Tensile test was conducted according to ASTM E8/E8M-17A standard by the electronic universal testing machine (CMT5105). The impact test was conducted by MRIE-F1432 750J pendulum impact testing machine based on ASTM E23-2017 standard. The specimens for shear strength tests were pre-treated according to ASTM B898-2020 standard. The microstructures were analyzed by optical microscope (OM, MIRIE-F2573), the Vickers hardness tester was MIRIe-F1433, and the interface structures were analyzed by VEGA 3 XMU tungsten filament SEM.

2 Results and Discussion

2.1 Ultrasonic nondestructive test

For ultrasonic nondestructive testing of six composite plates, the coupling agent conditions were 2.5 P, single probes (Φ20 mm), and water. The direct contact method was used for ultrasonic testing of the whole plate through the diffraction time difference method, which is in accordance with the requirements of ASTM B898-2020 Class A. The minimum overall sound bond area should be 99% of the total area. Except for the detonator area within the area of Φ25 mm on the composite plate, the bonding rate of effective areas reached 100%, and the result of ultrasonic nondestructive testing could satisfy the technical requirements.

During the phased array interface imaging of composite plate, 10L128 probe was used. Fig.4 shows the phased array imaging morphology of bonding interface of titanium-steel composite plate. It can be found that the bonding interface of the composite plate presents the typical wave-like bonding with a uniform ripple.

Fig.4  Phased array imaging morphology of bonding interface of titanium-steel composite plate

2.2 Interface morphology characteristics

Fig.5 show OM morphologies of interface structures of titanium-steel composite plates after processing with different parameters. It can be found that under the impact of detonation velocity, large plastic deformation occurs in the cladding layer, base layer, and bonding interface. The bonding interface of titanium-steel composite plate presents a typical wave-like bonding, which repeats periodically along the direction of detonation wave propagation at the titanium-steel interface. The waveform has vortex characteristics. There is no obvious melting phenomenon. Only a small number of melting blocks exist in the vortex region.

Fig.5  OM morphologies of interface structures of titanium-steel composite plates after processing with different parameters: (a) process 1; (b) process 2; (c) process 3; (d) process 4; (e) process 5; (f) process 6

The melt originates from the bonding interface and the inside vortex. Based on the mechanism of explosive welding formation, it is necessary to produce metal jets for the successful implementation of explosive welding. Therefore, the melting and partial melting phenomena are inevitable. When the collision speed is low, the material softening and explosive welding cannot be achieved. When the interface temperature is too high, too much melt is generated and a large number of holes or a large amount of melt exists in the bonding interface. The wave amplitude and wavelength of the interface of different composite plates were measured three

times to obtain the average value by metallographic test. Table 5 shows the calculation results of the wave amplitude ratio R (the ratio of wave amplitude to wavelength) of the six plates, which are all between 0.15 and 0.25.

Table 5  Wave amplitude ratio (R) of different composite plates
Process123456
1st measurement 0.188 0.194 0.156 0.196 0.226 0.230
2nd measurement 0.186 0.191 0.156 0.190 0.221 0.241
3rd measurement 0.187 0.196 0.161 0.194 0.224 0.240

2.3 Mechanical properties

2.3.1 Tensile and impact results

After heat-treatment of the titanium-steel composite plates, tensile and impact tests were conducted. The testing position was at the middle of the side line of the composite plates. Table 6 shows the results of the tensile tests at room temper-ature and impact tests at -46 °C, which satisfy the require-ments of ASTM B898-2020 standard. Therefore, for the preparation of large-size titanium-steel composite plates, the detonation velocity, density, explosive height, and distance of stand-off should be 2200–2270 m/s, 0.80–0.82 g/cm3, 45.0–46.0 mm, and 8.0–11.0 mm, respectively. The resultant pro-duct has excellent mechanical properties, which satisfy the requirements of ASTM B898-2020 standard.

Table 6  Experiment results of tensile tests at room temperature and impact tests at -46 °C
BatchTensile strength/MPaYield strength/MPaElongation/%Impact energy/J
1 534 358 33.5 128, 132, 148
2 537 350 31.0 183, 169,179
3 526 346 31.0 128, 132, 148

2.3.2 Shear strength

The shear tests were conducted at the plate corner, which was away from the end of the plate detonation point. Each plate was subjected to three shear tests. The results of shear strength are shown in Table 7. The results range from 170 MPa to 240 MPa, with an average value of 211 MPa, which are all higher than the required shear strength (137.9 MPa) in ASTM B898-2020 for composite plates. The amplitude ratio results are in good agreement with the shear strength results, and their relationship is shown in Fig.6.

Table 7  Experiment results of shear strength of different composite plates (MPa)
Process123456
1st measurement 211 217 176 233 214 213
2nd measurement 208 214 177 237 212 212
3rd measurement 211 217 178 238 216 214

Fig.6  Relationship between shear strength and amplitude ratio R of different composite plates

2.3.3 Interface Hardness

Fig.7 presents the Vickers hardness results of both sides of the interface of the explosive-welded and annealed composite plates at the bonding zone. It can be seen that the smaller the distance between the titanium plate and steel plate, the more obvious the deformation. The hardening effect is obvious. Additionally, the cooling rate during the explosive welding is extremely high. Due to the local high temperature and high pressure, the carbon elements from the titanium plate and steel plate cannot diffuse. Therefore, the supersaturated solid solutions or hard and brittle intermetallic compounds are formed, resulting in high hardness of the interface.

Fig.7  Vickers hardness HV of explosive-welded and annealed titanium-steel composite plates

After low-temperature annealing treatment, the hardening effect induced by explosive welding is released. At the place with the same distance from the interface, the hardness of the annealed composite plate is significantly less than that of the explosive one. The change near the interface deformation zone is particularly obvious. The farther the distance away from the interface, the more stable the hardness and the more uniform the hardness distriouthion. Thus, the plastic deformation of the composite plate is enhanced and the workability is improved. In conclusion, after the explosive welding, the maximum hardness (HV) of composite plate is 2548–2646 MPa, and the hardening effect is obvious. After annealing treatment, the stress and the hardness decrease, whereas the plasticity improves, which is beneficial to the deformation.

2.4 Interface organization characteristics

Fig.8 shows OM image of interface structure of titanium-steel composite plate after process 4, which is typical and similar to that of other composite plates. On the titanium side, there is no regular deformation near the interface, but a large number of adiabatic shear lines are generated. Under the high-speed impact, plastic deformation starts from the local area of the material. The heat of local plastic deformation cannot be transferred immediately, and the heat accumulation reduces the local yield strength. When the dynamic yield strength is lower than the shear stress generated by the impact load, the instantaneous shear deformation occurs. On the carbon steel side, the closer the distance to the interface, the greater the grain deformation. The original equiaxial crystal along the deformation direction gradually elongates, and the degree of grain elongation is significant. When the deformation is very large, the grains are difficult to distinguish, presenting the shape of fibrous stripes. Fig.9 shows SEM image of interface structure of titanium-steel composite plate after process 4. It can be found that both sides of the titanium plate and steel plate maintain their respective organizational components. The interface formation of the titanium-steel composite plate is mainly dominated by the plastic deformation. The microstructure characteristics of both sides of the titanium-steel composite plate are consistent with the hardness results of the interface.

Fig.8  OM image of interface structure of titanium-steel composite plate after process 4

Fig.9  SEM image of interface structure of titanium-steel composite plate after process 4

Through the non-destructive test results, mechanical properties, and interface composition analyses of the composite plates, it can be found that there is no combination for the detonation area with diameter of 25 mm, and the effective areas are well combined. The shear strength, tensile strength, and impact properties of the composite plate can satisfy the requirements of ASTM B898-2020 standard. The interface ripples of the titanium-steel composite plate are uniform. The wave amplitude ratio, namely interface ripple ratio, is between 0.15 and 0.25. With increasing the wave amplitude ratio, the shear strength is increased gradually, then decreased, and finally stabilized. The composite plate after process 4 has the highest shear strength at wave amplitude ratio=0.2. Reducing the explosive height and increasing the edge gap height are beneficial to exhaust air of the explosive welding process. These results all provide guidance for the combination of large-size composite plates by explosive welding process.

3 Conclusions

1) For the preparation of large-size titanium-steel composite plates, the detonation velocity, density, explosive height, and distance of stand-off should be 2200–2270 m/s, 0.80–

0.82 g/cm3, 45.0–46.0 mm, and 8.0–11.0 mm, respectively. The resultant product has excellent mechanical properties, which satisfy the requirements of ASTM B898-2020 standard.

2) After explosive welding, the maximum Vickers hardness(HV) of composite plate is 2548–2646 MPa, and the hardening effect is obvious. After annealing treatment, the stress and the hardness decrease, whereas the plasticity improves, which is beneficial to the deformation.

3) The bonding interface presents the typical wave-like bonding, the shear strength is between 170 and 240 MPa, and the wave amplitude ratio is between 0.15 and 0.25. When the detonation velocity, density, explosive height, and distance of stand-off are 2230–2270 m/s, 0.81–0.82 g/cm3, 41.0–42.0 mm, and 9–10 mm, respectively, the composite plate has the optimal shear strength at wave amplitude ratio=0.2.

References

1

Feng J R, Dai K D Zhou Q et al. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter[J], 2019, 31(41): 415 403 [Baidu Scholar] 

2

Feng J R, Liu R, Liu K Y et al. Journal of Applied Physics[J], 2022, 131(2): 25 903 [Baidu Scholar] 

3

Ren B, Tao G, Wen P et al. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials[J], 2019, 84: 105 005 [Baidu Scholar] 

4

Vaidyanathan P V, Ramanathan A. Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J], 1992, 32(1–2): 439 [Baidu Scholar] 

5

Li Y, Liu C R, Yu H B et al. Metals[J], 2017, 7(10): 407 [Baidu Scholar] 

6

Zu G, Xi S, Zhang J G. Rare Metal Materials and Engi- [Baidu Scholar] 

neering[J], 2017, 46(4): 906 [Baidu Scholar] 

7

Acarer M, B. Gülen B, Findik F. Journal of Materials Science[J], 2004, 39(21):6457 [Baidu Scholar] 

8

Kahraman N, BehetGülen, Findik F. Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J], 2005, 169(2): 127 [Baidu Scholar] 

9

Manikandan P, Hokamoto K, Fujita M et al. Journal of Mate-rials Processing Technology[J], 2008, 195(1–3): 232 [Baidu Scholar] 

10

Gloc M, Wachowski M, Plocinski T et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2016, 671: 446 [Baidu Scholar] 

11

Borchers C, Lenz M, Deutges M et al. Materials and Design[J], 2015, 89(8): 369 [Baidu Scholar] 

12

Shi C G, Yang X, Ge Y H et al. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, International[J], 2017, 24(8): 852 [Baidu Scholar] 

13

Zlobin B S, Kiselev V V, Shtertser A A. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves[J], 2022, 58(1): 121 [Baidu Scholar] 

14

Zhang Z L, Liu M B. Journal of Manufacturing Processes[J], 2019, 41: 208 [Baidu Scholar] 

15

Yang M, Xu J F, Ma H H et al. Composites Part B: Engi- neering[J], 2021, 212: 108 685 [Baidu Scholar] 

16

Acarer M, Gülenç B, Findik F. Materials & Design[J], 2003, [Baidu Scholar] 

24(8): 659 [Baidu Scholar] 

17

Durgutlu A, Okuyucu H, Gulenc B. Materials and Design[J], 2008, 29(7): 1480 [Baidu Scholar] 

18

Jaramillov D, Inal O T, Szecket A. Journal of Materials Sci- ence[J], 1987, 22(9): 3143 [Baidu Scholar] 

19

Jaramillo D, Szecket A, Inal O T. Materials Science and Engineering[J], 1987, 91(87): 217 [Baidu Scholar] 

20

Greenberg B A, Ivanov M A, Inozemtsev A V et al. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A[J], 2015, 46: [Baidu Scholar] 

3569 [Baidu Scholar] 

21

Wang Xinyu,Li Xiaojie, Wang Xiaohong et al. Explosion and Shock Waves[J], 2014, 34(6): 716 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar] 

22

Shi Changgen, Wang Yaohua, Li Zhiquan et al. Explosive Materials[J], 2004, 33(5): 25 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar] 

23

Reid S R, Sherif N H S. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science[J], 1976, 18(2): 87 [Baidu Scholar] 

24

Stivers S W, Wittman R H. High Energy Rate Fabrication[M]. Colorado: University of Denver Research Institute, 1975 [Baidu Scholar] 

25

An Lichang. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants[J], 2003, 26(3): 68 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar] 

26

ASTM International. ASTM B898-2020[S], 2020 [Baidu Scholar]