Abstract
Titanium-steel composite plates with large sizes of 4260 mm×4260 mm×(6.5+32) mm were prepared by explosive welding technique. Ultrasonic nondestructive testing, phased-array waveform microscopy, optical microscope, and scanning electron microscope were used to analyze the mechanical properties and interface morphologies of the composite plates. Results show that when the detonation velocity, density, explosive height, and stand-off distance are 2200–2270 m/s, 0.80–0.82 g/c
To prepare functional materials with different physical, chemical, and mechanical properties, more and more attention has been paid on the special processe
Titanium has the characteristics of high strength and excellent corrosion resistance at different temperatures. To save titanium resources, reduce equipment cost, improve equipment quality, and shorten the maintenance time, titanium-steel composite plates are widely used in the fields of pure terephthalic acid preparation, oxidation reactors, solvent dehydration towers, and heat exchanger in the modern chemical industry and pressure vessel industr

Fig.1 Dynamic change of interface during explosive welding
The materials, explosives, and interface-forming mechan-isms of small plates have been extensively researche
Industrial titanium B265 Gr.1 (namely Gr.1) and carbon steel A516 Gr.70 (namely Gr.70) were selected as the flyer plate and base plate with the size of 4550 mm×4550 mm×(6.5+32) mm. The chemical composition and mechanical properties of titanium plate and carbon steel plate are shown in
Fe | C | N | O | H | Ti |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.021 | 0.004 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.0009 | Bal. |
Plate | Tensile strength/MPa | Yield strength/MPa | Elongation/% | Density/kg· | Vickers hardness, HV/ ×9.8 MPa | Elastic modulus/GPa | Poisson's ratio, υ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gr.1 | 304 | 275 | 44 | 4510 | 139 | 116 | 0.34 |
Gr.70 | 567 | 336 | 35 | 7830 | 160 | 200 | 0.33 |
Cr | Mn | Ni | P | Si | Ti | C | Fe |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.084 | 1.48 | 0.17 | 0.017 | 0.32 | 0.013 | 0.169 | Bal. |
In the process parameter design, the long-distance detonation wave and the low bonding strength during the explosive welding should be comprehensively considered, thereby resulting in low detonation energy and difficulties in air exhaustion. These two factors can be affected by gap height, explosive thickness, explosive burst speed, explosive density, and other process parameters. Additionally, the interface over-melting phenomenon should be avoided, because the high energy may cause tear at the composite plate edge.

Fig.2 Device of explosive welding at operation site
According to the preparation characteristics of large-size titanium-steel composite plate, the parallel installation conditions in the explosive welding process are Vp=2sin(Ф/2) and Vp=Vd. The detonator was placed in the geometric center and the explosives were laid evenly on the flyer plate. Then, the minimum velocity Vm of the collision point should satisfy the relationship, as follows:
(1) |
where Reynolds number Re is 8.9; H1 and H2 are the Vickers hardness of cladding and base plates, respectively; ρ1 and ρ2 are the densities of cladding and base plates, respectively. To ensure the formation of stable reentry jet, VP should be less than the sound volume velocity of cladding material (Vs), as follows:
(2) |
where E is the elastic modulus of titanium plate, ρ is the material density, and υ is Poisson's ratio.
Therefore, the moving speed of the collision point should satisfy Vm<Vp<Vs. Based on the calculated Vm values, the collision rate can be expressed, as follows:
Vp =Vm+200 Vm<2000 m/s
Vp =Vm+100 2000<Vm<2500 m/s | (3) |
Vp =Vm+50 Vm>2500 m/s
The explosive velocity is a key parameter in theoretical calculation. The calculated explosive velocity is Vm=2077 m/s. Therefore, the optimal theoretical detonation velocity is 2177 m/s. In this research, the detonation velocity is the same as the moving speed of the interface collision point of titanium-steel composite plate. To ensure the lower limit of weldability window requirements of the detonation velocity, the velocity should be controlled within 2200–2270 m/s. Additionally, by adding diluents into the industrial powdered ammonium nitrate explosives, the explosives can satisfy the requirements and have a stable physical and chemical state.
In the preparation process, the contact surfaces of the base plate and cladding plate should be polished until they are flat, smooth, and clean. The average roughness of the base and cladding plate surfaces Ra should be less than 1.6 μm. Before the explosive welding, the surface is evenly coated with a butter layer to prevent the surface burning caused by high pressure and high temperature. Large-size titanium plates have inferior flatness and uniformity, which results in bending and subsidence phenomena. The decrease in spacing reduces the acceleration time of cladding plate and also decreases the impact velocity. Jet cannot be generated unless the impact velocity of the cladding plate reaches the critical value, which is obtained by the theoretical calculation and practical productio

Fig.3 Schematic diagram of explosive welding site
Process No. | Detonation velocity/m· | Density/g·c | Explosive height/mm | Distance of stand-off/mm | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Area A | Area B | ||||
1 | 2200–2230 | 0.80–0.81 | 45.0–46.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 |
2 | 2200–2230 | 0.80–0.81 | 45.0–46.0 | 8.0 | 9.0 |
3 | 2200–2230 | 0.80–0.81 | 45.0–46.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 |
4 | 2230–2270 | 0.81–0.82 | 41.0–42.0 | 9.0 | 10.0 |
5 | 2230–2270 | 0.81–0.82 | 41.0–42.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
6 | 2230–2270 | 0.81–0.82 | 41.0–42.0 | 10.0 | 11.0 |
After explosive welding, the ultrasonic nondestructive test, phased array interface imaging, interface ripple metallography, and shear strength test were conducted for six composite plates. The mechanical properties of annealed materials were tested. The interface hardness of the explosive and annealed states was measured, and the typical interface structure was observed by the scanning electron microscope (SEM). Anyscan-31 ultrasonic flaw detector was used for the nondestructive testing of composite plates, and an Olympus flaw detector was used for the interface imaging. The standard of ASTM B898-2020 Class
For ultrasonic nondestructive testing of six composite plates, the coupling agent conditions were 2.5 P, single probes (Φ20 mm), and water. The direct contact method was used for ultrasonic testing of the whole plate through the diffraction time difference method, which is in accordance with the requirements of ASTM B898-2020 Class A. The minimum overall sound bond area should be 99% of the total area. Except for the detonator area within the area of Φ25 mm on the composite plate, the bonding rate of effective areas reached 100%, and the result of ultrasonic nondestructive testing could satisfy the technical requirements.
During the phased array interface imaging of composite plate, 10L128 probe was used.

Fig.4 Phased array imaging morphology of bonding interface of titanium-steel composite plate

Fig.5 OM morphologies of interface structures of titanium-steel composite plates after processing with different parameters: (a) process 1; (b) process 2; (c) process 3; (d) process 4; (e) process 5; (f) process 6
The melt originates from the bonding interface and the inside vortex. Based on the mechanism of explosive welding formation, it is necessary to produce metal jets for the successful implementation of explosive welding. Therefore, the melting and partial melting phenomena are inevitable. When the collision speed is low, the material softening and explosive welding cannot be achieved. When the interface temperature is too high, too much melt is generated and a large number of holes or a large amount of melt exists in the bonding interface. The wave amplitude and wavelength of the interface of different composite plates were measured three
times to obtain the average value by metallographic test.
Process | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st measurement | 0.188 | 0.194 | 0.156 | 0.196 | 0.226 | 0.230 |
2nd measurement | 0.186 | 0.191 | 0.156 | 0.190 | 0.221 | 0.241 |
3rd measurement | 0.187 | 0.196 | 0.161 | 0.194 | 0.224 | 0.240 |
After heat-treatment of the titanium-steel composite plates, tensile and impact tests were conducted. The testing position was at the middle of the side line of the composite plates.
Batch | Tensile strength/MPa | Yield strength/MPa | Elongation/% | Impact energy/J |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 534 | 358 | 33.5 | 128, 132, 148 |
2 | 537 | 350 | 31.0 | 183, 169,179 |
3 | 526 | 346 | 31.0 | 128, 132, 148 |
The shear tests were conducted at the plate corner, which was away from the end of the plate detonation point. Each plate was subjected to three shear tests. The results of shear strength are shown in
Process | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st measurement | 211 | 217 | 176 | 233 | 214 | 213 |
2nd measurement | 208 | 214 | 177 | 237 | 212 | 212 |
3rd measurement | 211 | 217 | 178 | 238 | 216 | 214 |

Fig.6 Relationship between shear strength and amplitude ratio R of different composite plates

Fig.7 Vickers hardness HV of explosive-welded and annealed titanium-steel composite plates
After low-temperature annealing treatment, the hardening effect induced by explosive welding is released. At the place with the same distance from the interface, the hardness of the annealed composite plate is significantly less than that of the explosive one. The change near the interface deformation zone is particularly obvious. The farther the distance away from the interface, the more stable the hardness and the more uniform the hardness distriouthion. Thus, the plastic deformation of the composite plate is enhanced and the workability is improved. In conclusion, after the explosive welding, the maximum hardness (HV) of composite plate is 2548–2646 MPa, and the hardening effect is obvious. After annealing treatment, the stress and the hardness decrease, whereas the plasticity improves, which is beneficial to the deformation.

Fig.8 OM image of interface structure of titanium-steel composite plate after process 4

Fig.9 SEM image of interface structure of titanium-steel composite plate after process 4
Through the non-destructive test results, mechanical properties, and interface composition analyses of the composite plates, it can be found that there is no combination for the detonation area with diameter of 25 mm, and the effective areas are well combined. The shear strength, tensile strength, and impact properties of the composite plate can satisfy the requirements of ASTM B898-2020 standard. The interface ripples of the titanium-steel composite plate are uniform. The wave amplitude ratio, namely interface ripple ratio, is between 0.15 and 0.25. With increasing the wave amplitude ratio, the shear strength is increased gradually, then decreased, and finally stabilized. The composite plate after process 4 has the highest shear strength at wave amplitude ratio=0.2. Reducing the explosive height and increasing the edge gap height are beneficial to exhaust air of the explosive welding process. These results all provide guidance for the combination of large-size composite plates by explosive welding process.
1) For the preparation of large-size titanium-steel composite plates, the detonation velocity, density, explosive height, and distance of stand-off should be 2200–2270 m/s, 0.80–
0.82 g/c
2) After explosive welding, the maximum Vickers hardness(HV) of composite plate is 2548–2646 MPa, and the hardening effect is obvious. After annealing treatment, the stress and the hardness decrease, whereas the plasticity improves, which is beneficial to the deformation.
3) The bonding interface presents the typical wave-like bonding, the shear strength is between 170 and 240 MPa, and the wave amplitude ratio is between 0.15 and 0.25. When the detonation velocity, density, explosive height, and distance of stand-off are 2230–2270 m/s, 0.81–0.82 g/c
References
Feng J R, Dai K D Zhou Q et al. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter[J], 2019, 31(41): 415 403 [Baidu Scholar]
Feng J R, Liu R, Liu K Y et al. Journal of Applied Physics[J], 2022, 131(2): 25 903 [Baidu Scholar]
Ren B, Tao G, Wen P et al. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials[J], 2019, 84: 105 005 [Baidu Scholar]
Vaidyanathan P V, Ramanathan A. Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J], 1992, 32(1–2): 439 [Baidu Scholar]
Li Y, Liu C R, Yu H B et al. Metals[J], 2017, 7(10): 407 [Baidu Scholar]
Zu G, Xi S, Zhang J G. Rare Metal Materials and Engi- [Baidu Scholar]
neering[J], 2017, 46(4): 906 [Baidu Scholar]
Acarer M, B. Gülen B, Findik F. Journal of Materials Science[J], 2004, 39(21):6457 [Baidu Scholar]
Kahraman N, BehetGülen, Findik F. Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J], 2005, 169(2): 127 [Baidu Scholar]
Manikandan P, Hokamoto K, Fujita M et al. Journal of Mate-rials Processing Technology[J], 2008, 195(1–3): 232 [Baidu Scholar]
Gloc M, Wachowski M, Plocinski T et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2016, 671: 446 [Baidu Scholar]
Borchers C, Lenz M, Deutges M et al. Materials and Design[J], 2015, 89(8): 369 [Baidu Scholar]
Shi C G, Yang X, Ge Y H et al. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, International[J], 2017, 24(8): 852 [Baidu Scholar]
Zlobin B S, Kiselev V V, Shtertser A A. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves[J], 2022, 58(1): 121 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang Z L, Liu M B. Journal of Manufacturing Processes[J], 2019, 41: 208 [Baidu Scholar]
Yang M, Xu J F, Ma H H et al. Composites Part B: Engi- neering[J], 2021, 212: 108 685 [Baidu Scholar]
Acarer M, Gülenç B, Findik F. Materials & Design[J], 2003, [Baidu Scholar]
24(8): 659 [Baidu Scholar]
Durgutlu A, Okuyucu H, Gulenc B. Materials and Design[J], 2008, 29(7): 1480 [Baidu Scholar]
Jaramillov D, Inal O T, Szecket A. Journal of Materials Sci- ence[J], 1987, 22(9): 3143 [Baidu Scholar]
Jaramillo D, Szecket A, Inal O T. Materials Science and Engineering[J], 1987, 91(87): 217 [Baidu Scholar]
Greenberg B A, Ivanov M A, Inozemtsev A V et al. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A[J], 2015, 46: [Baidu Scholar]
3569 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Xinyu,Li Xiaojie, Wang Xiaohong et al. Explosion and Shock Waves[J], 2014, 34(6): 716 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Shi Changgen, Wang Yaohua, Li Zhiquan et al. Explosive Materials[J], 2004, 33(5): 25 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Reid S R, Sherif N H S. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science[J], 1976, 18(2): 87 [Baidu Scholar]
Stivers S W, Wittman R H. High Energy Rate Fabrication[M]. Colorado: University of Denver Research Institute, 1975 [Baidu Scholar]
An Lichang. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants[J], 2003, 26(3): 68 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
ASTM International. ASTM B898-2020[S], 2020 [Baidu Scholar]