Abstract
To improve the hard and brittle mechanical characteristics of single crystal germanium (Ge), the molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was used to study the mechanism of surface modification on single crystal Ge by ion implantation with three different doses. Results show that the ion implantation causes amorphous phase damage to Ge matrix, and the nano-indentation process shows the lattice evolution. The nano-indentation results reveal that the existence of amorphous phase can reduce the hardness and brittleness of single crystal Ge and enhance its plasticity. Additionally, the degree of amorphous phase damage and the hardness of Ge matrix are related to the ion dose. With increasing the ion dose, the amorphous damage is deepened, and the hardness is decreased.
As one of the infrared optical materials, single crystal germanium (Ge) is widely used to manufacture various optical devices, such as infrared lenses and infrared detector
Miao et a
Pelaz et a
Ion implantation technique can be used for various hard and brittle materials, but it is rarely used for single crystal Ge. Therefore, in this research, the influence of different doses of ion implantation on the mechanical properties of single crystal Ge was investigated through MD analysis. The relationship between ion dose and amorphous damage was analyzed by visualization software (ovito). In addition, the nano-indentation simulations were conducted, and the results demonstrate that the ion implantation can improve the mechanical properties of single crystal Ge.
Large-scale atomic/molecular massively-parallel simulator (LAMMPS
1) The workpiece was single crystal Ge and it was split into three layers along Z-axis direction: boundary layer, thermostat layer, and Newton layer. The periodic boundary condition was adopted along X-axis and Y-axis directions. Z-axis direction was set as the fixed boundary condition.
2) The atoms of boundary layer were neglected in the cal-culation of time integral and load in order to preserve station-ary, therefore decreasing the boundary effects. To dissipate the heat from system, the thermostat layer was maintained at 300 K. The motion of the atoms of Newton layer followed the Newton's second law.
3)

Fig.1 Schematic diagrams of 3D simulation models of ion implantation (a) and nano-indentation (b)
The schematic diagram of ion implantation simulation model is shown in
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Workpiece size |
16.971 nm×16.971 nm× 28.285 nm |
Implantation energy/eV | 5000 |
Implantation ion dose/×1 | 1.0, 2.5, 6.25 |
Implantation direction | (100) |
Indenter radius/nm | 4 |
Loading depth/nm | 4 |
Loading speed/m· | 50 |
Initial temperature/K | 300 |
In this simulation, there were three types of atomic interactions: (1) interactions between the workpiece atoms; (2) interactions between the workpiece atoms and implanted ions; (3) interactions between workpiece and spherical indenter. Firstly, Tersoff potentia
Atomic interaction | Parameter | Value |
---|---|---|
Ge-C | Cohesion energy, D/eV | 0.125 78 |
Elastic modulus, α/n | 25.821 90 | |
Equilibrium distance, r0/nm | 0.223 24 |
Implanted ions with specific energy can hit the material surface at a certain initial velocity, as shown in

Fig.2 Interaction between implanted ions and matrix
The collision can be caused just after the implanted ions come into contact with the substrate or enter the substrate, resulting in the defects, such as clusters and vacancies in the substrate. Cascade collision leads to energy exchange, and the energy of implanted ions gradually decreases to zero and eventually stays inside the substrate. Ge atoms in the matrix can gain energy by the collision, therefore causing more damage. The depth and degree of the modified layer are related to the type of implanted ion, ion energy, ion incident angle, ion dose, and the properties of matrix material, which can be adjusted to satisfy the modification requirements.
Due to the cascade collision generated by implanted ions, the matrix particles are displaced, resulting in point defects, dislocations, and other damages. It is reported that the ion implantation depth is possibly related to the ion energy. The injection depth is roughly proportional to the injection energy, i.e., the greater the energy, the deeper the injection depth. Fig.

Fig.3 3D (a–c) and cross-sectional (d–f) morphologies of matrix after ion implantation with different ion doses: (a, d) 1.0×1
According to
Nano-indentation MD simulations were conducted on modified and unmodified single crystal Ge. Considering the model size, the radius of the selected spherical indenter is 40 nm, and the indentation depth is 40 nm. It is reported that the indentation speed is generally 1–100 m/s in simulation, which is different from the actual experiment speed. The selected indentation speed is 50 m/s in this simulation.
The indenter is regarded as a rigid body, so the force between C and C atoms is neglected during the simulation process. The Morse potential was used to calculate the loading force imposed by workpiece atoms on a spherical indenter. Before simulation, the spherical indenter was located above the model with a certain distance, and then it quickly moved to the plane with the distance of 0.2 nm above the substrate surface. After sufficient relaxation of the matrix material, the indenter was pressed into the matrix at a fixed speed until the depth reached 4 nm.

Fig.4 Morphologies of unmodified (a–c) and modified (d–f) Ge during nano-indentation simulation under ion dose of 1.0×1
During the indentation process, the indenter exerts hydrostatic pressure on the workpiece. With increasing the indentation depth, the hydrostatic pressure is increased. It is known that when the hydrostatic pressure exceeds a certain value, the lattice slip occurs, and the crystal begins to undergo the amorphous phase transition. The atoms around the indenter become disordered, as shown in Fig.
At the beginning of nano-indentation for modified Ge, the amorphous structure damage caused by ion implantation leads to the disordered arrangement of Ge atoms and the internal structure loose. Therefore, during the nano-indentation process, these damages can effectively absorb the hydrostatic pressure induced by the indenter, thereby effectively preventing the lattice distortion. Fig.
The load-displacement curves of nano-indentation process are shown in

Fig.5 Load-displacement curves of nano-indentation process under different ion doses
1) Ion implantation on single crystal Ge matrix can result in the cascade collision between particles and matrix atoms, which causes lattice damage of a certain depth and leads to amorphization.
2) The amorphization degree of single crystal Ge is related to the implantation ion dose: with increasing the ion dose, the amorphization degree is increased correspondingly.
3) The mechanical properties of single crystal Ge can be improved by ion implantation. The hardness is decreased and the plasticity is increased with increasing the ion dose.
References
Luo Liang, Yang Xiaojing, Liu Ning et al. Rare Metal Materials [Baidu Scholar]
and Engineering[J], 2019, 48(4): 1130 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Leng Z Y, Yang X J. Materials Science and Engineering[J], 2020, [Baidu Scholar]
740: 12 007 [Baidu Scholar]
Miao Shi, Shi Guoquan, Shi Guangfeng et al. Mechanical Sci- [Baidu Scholar]
ence and Technology[J], 2017, 36(1): 89 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Yang Xiaojing, Liu Yanrong, Yang Xiaojiang et al. Journal of [Baidu Scholar]
Agricultural Machinery[J], 2014, 45(5): 322 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Liu N, Yang X D, Yu Z et al. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals [Baidu Scholar]
Society of China[J], 2020, 30(1): 181 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu Ning, Yang Xiaojing, Liu Hao et al. Aerospace Materials [Baidu Scholar]
Technology[J], 2019, 49(4): 67 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Pelaz L, Marqués L A, Barbolla J. Journal of Applied Physics[J], [Baidu Scholar]
2004, 96(11): 5947 [Baidu Scholar]
Guo Y J, Yang X J, Qin S Y et al. Rare Metal Materials and [Baidu Scholar]
Engineering[J], 2022, 51(2): 436 [Baidu Scholar]
Fang F Z, Chen Y H, Zhang X D et al. CIRP Annals[J], 2011, [Baidu Scholar]
60(1): 527 [Baidu Scholar]
Chen Y H, Fang F Z, Zhang X D et al. Transactions of Tianjin [Baidu Scholar]
University[J], 2014, 20(3): 203 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang J S, Fang F Z, Zhang X D. Precision Engineering[J], [Baidu Scholar]
2015, 39: 220 [Baidu Scholar]
Fan Y X, Song Y, Xu Z W et al. Ceramics International[J], [Baidu Scholar]
2021, 47(17): 24 534 [Baidu Scholar]
Plimpton S. Journal of Applied Physics[J], 1995, 117(1): 1 [Baidu Scholar]
Lai M, Zhang X D, Fang F Z. Nanoscale Research Letters[J], [Baidu Scholar]
2013, 8(1): 353 [Baidu Scholar]
Kosai K, Yan J. Materials Research Express[J]. 2019, 6(7): 75 065 [Baidu Scholar]
Mao Jiewei, Liu Wenhao, Wang Zengpeng. Nanotechnology and [Baidu Scholar]
Precision Engineering[J], 2015, 13(6): 454 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Ma Yiming, Li Shan, Yang Xiaojing et al. Ordnance Material [Baidu Scholar]
Science and Engineering[J], 2020, 43(4): 50 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]