+高级检索
网刊加载中。。。

使用Chrome浏览器效果最佳,继续浏览,你可能不会看到最佳的展示效果,

确定继续浏览么?

复制成功,请在其他浏览器进行阅读

Thermal Stability and Crystallization Behavior of Zr-Al-Ni-Cu-Ag Metallic Glasses with Multicomponent Replacement  PDF

  • Pu Yongliang 1
  • Qian Yiqi 1
  • Liu Yuxin 1
  • Liu Cong 2
  • Ding Jing 3
  • Zhu Shengli 4,5
1. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China; 2. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China; 3. School of Energy and Machinery, Dezhou University, Dezhou 253023, China; 4. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; 5. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Composite and Functional Materials, Tianjin 300350, China

Updated:2024-01-25

  • Full Text
  • Figs & Tabs
  • References
  • Authors
  • About
CN CITE
OUTLINE

Abstract

In order to improve the thermal stability and to obtain a large supercooled liquid region of metal glasses, the Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5) metallic glasses were investigated. The effects of component concentrations on the thermal stability, heat-induced precipitate phases, and mechanical properties were analyzed. Results show that with increasing the component concentrations, the peak position of the broad diffraction pattern shifts towards higher angles, indicating the occurrence of glass transition phenomenon. With increasing the glass transition temperature (Tg) and crystallization temperature (Tx), the liquidus temperature (Tl) is decreased, leading to decrease in the temperature difference (namely supercooled liquid region, ΔTx) between Tx and Tg and resulting in the increase in reduced glass transition range (Trg). Additionally, the nucleation activation energy (Ex) and the growth activation energy (Ep1) are increased with increasing the solute concentration. The primary crystal changes from the combination of tetragonal Zr2Ni, Zr2(Cu, Ag), ZrAg, and hexagonal Zr5Al3 phases into the single tetragonal ZrAg phase. The Vickers hardness is also increased with increasing the solute concentration. In this research, a novel metallic glass, Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29-Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=7.5), is developed, which presents a large ΔTx of 141 K, high thermal stability, and strong crystallization resistance. This research adopting the multicomponent replacement strategy is of great significance to improve the thermal stability of metallic glasses.

Multicomponent metallic glasses attract much attention due to their excellent properties, such as high strength, high hardness, extensive elastic limit, and good corrosion resistance[

1–4]. However, the prerequisite for the possession of these excellent properties is that the alloy must have high glass formation ability (GFA). Thus, the composition design of amorphous alloy is crucial. Inoue et al[5] proposed three fundamental criteria for conventional metallic glasses: (1) the system should comprise more than three elements; (2) there should be a substantial difference in the ratios of atomic sizes (approximately 12% or more) of the three primary constituent elements; (3) negative heats of mixing should be observed among the three primary constituent elements.

Recently, a subclass of multicomponent metallic glasses has been elaborated: the clustered glassy phase alloys[

1]. These alloys have remarkable thermal stability and crystallization resistance, and the majority of the glass phases can remain even after the initial thermal peak vanishes. The clustered metallic glasses commonly have a supercooled liquid region (ΔTx) and multiple exothermic peaks in their differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves. Icosahedral phase tends to precipitate at the first exothermic peak during annealing. Nonetheless, the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern shows minimal change after annealing process due to the small size of precipitates. Moreover, in order to synthesize the clustered glassy alloys with high thermal stability, introducing solute elements with positive mixing heats and significant atomic size mismatches is also a promising method[3]. The presence of immiscible solute elements facilitates the formation of medium-range-ordered atomic configurations, which is primarily attributed to the impeded long-range diffusion.

The clustered glassy alloys have been widely researched, such as Ti-based[

6], Fe-based[7–8], and Zr-based[9–15] alloys. In the Zr-based clustered metallic glass system, several components have been developed, including the ZrAlCoAg[12], ZrAlNiCuAg[11,16], and ZrCuNiAlNb[9]. The investigation of Zr65Al7.5Co27.5-xAgx (x=5–20, at%) and Zr65Al7.5Ni10Cu17.5-xAgx (x=0–17.5, at%) alloys involves the substitution of Ag with the solute elements[11–12], whereas the development of Zr70-x-Cu13.5Ni8.5Al8Nbx (x=0–10, at%) and Zr70-xCu12.5Ni10All7.5Agx (x=0–16, at%) alloys is mainly focused on the replacement of the solvent (Zr) with Nb or Ag[9,16]. XRD patterns of Zr65Al7.5-Co27.5-xAgx (x=5–20, at%) alloy after annealing at the first exothermic peak are similar to those of the as-quenched amorphous alloys[12]. Particularly, icosahedral phase is precipitated in the Zr65Al7.5Co12.5Ag15 alloy after annealing at the first exothermic peak. This phenomenon is similar to that of other alloy systems.

In addition, with increasing the concentration of solute atoms, the glass transition temperature (Tg) of Zr-based cluster metallic glass is gradually increased, which is beneficial to im-prove the thermal stability of metallic glass. In the Zr65-Al7.5Ni10Cu17.5-xAgx (x=0–17.5, at%) alloy system, Tg is in-creased with increasing the Ag concentration, and the alloys with 65at% Zr and 17.5at% Ag show no significant precipi-tation[

11]. For the Zr70-xCu13.5Ni8.5Al8Nbx (x=0–10, at%) alloys, the icosahedral phase can be precipitated by annealing at the first exothermic peak with the maximum Nb concentration of 8at%. Besides, Tg is increased with increasing the Nb concen-tration[9]. In Zr70-xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx (x=0–16, at%) alloys, the glass transition phenomenon can be clearly observed, and the main precipitate is the icosahedral phase when Ag concen-tration reaches 10at%. Both Tg and crystallization temperature (Tx) are increased with raising the Ag concentration[16].

In order to investigate the formation mechanism of clustered glassy alloys with high thermal stability, an alloy system, Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5), was developed in this research. This study focused on the thermal properties and crystallization behavior of clustered metallic glasses under different temperature conditions.

1 Experiment

The Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x alloys were synthesized by the arc-melting technique under the high-purity argon atmosphere. This method ensured the precise composition control and minimized the impurity introduction. Metallic glass ribbons were obtained by the single roller melt spinning method (VF-RQT50)[

17], which had the thickness of approxi-mately 40 μm and the width of 1 mm. Precise preparation of these ribbons could ensure the uniformity and consistency for subsequent analyses.

The microstructure of the alloy ribbons was analyzed by XRD tests (DX-2700BH) with Cu Kα radiation. The thermal stability and crystallization behavior of the alloys were investigated through DSC tests (METTLER TGA/DSC 1). By monitoring the thermal behavior, the stability of metallic glass ribbons and the crystallization kinetics could be analyzed.

Vickers hardness measurements were conducted to evaluate the mechanical properties of the alloy system. The indentation size was measured, and the hardness value was calculated accordingly. These results also provided information about the deformation resistance of metallic glass.

2 Results and Discussion

The Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x alloys with x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5 are denoted as 65.0Zr, 57.5Zr, 50.0Zr, and 42.5Zr specimens, respectively. The specific composition of Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5) alloys are presented in Table 1. XRD patterns of the as-spun Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5) alloy ribbons are shown in Fig.1. It can be seen that all patterns have a single broad peak, indicating the amorphous characteristics. Notably, the position of the broad diffraction peak shifts towards higher angles with increasing the solute concentration. This phenomenon suggests the increasing incorporation of solute atoms (Al, Ni, Cu, Ag) into the amorphous phase, leading to the contraction of the first nearest neighbor distance[

18]. Consequently, a higher degree of densely packed atomic configuration can be achieved, which hinders the atomic rearrangement and enhances the viscosity of the supercooled liquid. These factors ultimately promote the thermal stability of the supercooled liquid and facilitate the formation of a large supercooled liquid region.

Table 1  Specific composition of Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5) alloys
SpecimenSpecific composition
65.0Zr Zr65Al7.5Ni10Cu1.5Ag16
57.5Zr Zr57.5Al9Ni12Cu2Ag19.5
50.0Zr Zr50Al11Ni14Cu2Ag23
42.5Zr Zr42.5Al12Ni16.5Cu2.5Ag26.5

Fig.1  XRD patterns of as-spun Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5) alloy ribbons (arrows indicate the summit positions of main broad peak)

Fig.2 shows DSC curves of the as-spun Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29-Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 10.0, 12.5, 15.0, 22.5) alloy ribbons under the heating rate of 40 K/min. For the 65.0Zr specimen during crystallization process, neither the glass transition nor the supercooled liquid region can be identified, which is similar to the results in Ref.[

11]. When x=7.5–22.5, the supercooled liquid region is reduced with increasing the solute concentration. The decomposition of the glassy phase occurs in two stages and three stages for the 65.0Zr and 57.5Zr specimens. In contrast, the crystallization stage occurs in the 50.0Zr and 42.5Zr specimens. The change in the number of decomposition stages reflects the change in crystallization mode, which is influenced by the primary precipitate phase with different solute concentrations.

Fig.2  DSC curves of as-spun Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x alloy ribbons under heating rate of 40 K/min: (a) crystallization process and (b) melting process

In the high temperature range of DSC curves, the endothermic peak indicates the melting process, as shown in Fig.2b. Before the complete melting of the alloys, the number of endothermic peaks is decreased with increasing the solute concentration, suggesting that the 50.0Zr and 42.5Zr specimens have eutectic regions[

19–20].

Table 2 shows the thermal properties obtained from DSC curves of Zr-based glassy alloys in this research and other reports. Among the thermal properties, ΔTx=Tx-Tg and Trg= Tg/Tl. In this research, both Tg and Tx are increased, whereas ΔTx is decreased with increasing the solute concentration. It is worth noting that the 57.5Zr specimen exhibits a remarkably high ΔTx value of 141 K, which is higher than that of the Zr65Al7.5Ni10Cu17.5 alloy, indicating the exceptional thermal stability. Tl is firstly increased and then decreased with increa-sing the solute concentration. As a result, Trg gradually increa-ses, indicating an improved GFA at higher solute concentra-tions. The 42.5Zr specimen has a high Trg value of 0.558. Compared with the alloys with good GFA in the formation of bulk metallic glasses, such as Zr65Al7.5Ni10Cu17.5[

20] and Zr54Al7.5Ni10Cu12.5Ag16[16] alloys, all specimens in this research are good glass formers based on their ΔTx and Trg values.

Table 2  Glass transition temperature (Tg), crystallization temperature (Tx), liquidus temperature (Tl), supercooled liquid region (ΔTx), and reduced glass transition temperature (Trg) of different Zr-Al-Ni-Cu-Ag glassy alloys
AlloyTg/KTx/KTl/KΔTx/KTrgRef.
Zr65Al7.5Ni10Cu17.5 622 749 1180 127 0.527 [20]
Zr60Al15Ni15Cu10 690 794 1225 104 0.563 [21]
Zr65Al7.5Ni10Ag17.5 - 701 1400 - - [10]
Zr56Al16Ni16.8Ag11.2 713 783 1285 70 0.555 [22]
Zr56Al16Ni19.6Ag8.4 714 791 1274 77 0.560 [22]
Zr65Al7.5Ni10Cu1.5Ag16 - 701 1338 - - [10]
Zr65Al7.5Ni10Cu1.5Ag16 - 703 1310 - - This research
Zr57.5Al9Ni12Cu2Ag19.5 614 755 1335 141 0.460 This research
Zr50Al11Ni14Cu2Ag23 701 801 1295 100 0.541 This research
Zr42.5Al12Ni16.5Cu2.5Ag26.5 703 782 1260 79 0.558 This research
Zr57Al10Ni8Cu20Ag5 668 779 1135 111 0.589 [23]
Zr54Al7.5Ni10Cu12.5Ag16 678 788 - 110 - [16]
Zr49.5Al18.6Co18.6Cu6.3Ag7 753 806 1222 53 0.616 [24]
Zr48Al8Cu33Ag11 706 770 1218 64 0.580 [25]

The stability of the supercooled liquid phase in metallic glasses is strongly associated with the presence of medium-range-ordered atomic clusters[

22]. It is reported that Zr-Al-Ni-Cu-Ag glassy alloys are composed of Zr-Al-Ni and Zr-Al-Cu/Zr-Al-Ag units[11]. Because Ag has a larger atomic size than Cu does, the volume of the Zr-Al-Ag unit is greater than that of the Zr-Al-Cu unit, resulting in the difficult atomic rearrangement within the Zr-Al-Ag unit. Consequently, the supercooled liquid phase consisting of Zr-Al-Ni and Zr-Al-Ag units has lower precipitation rate. Even when the overall solute concentration of the Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5) alloys increases, the number of Cu atoms is still much smaller than that of Al, Ni, and Ag atoms. Thus, the Zr-Al-Ni and Zr-Al-Ag clusters are still the main components in the supercooled liquid phase. Moreover, the Zr-Al-Ni units have stronger bonding effect due to their larger negative heats of mixing between Zr-Ni and Al-Ni pairs[14], thereby pro-moting the thermal stability of the glassy phase. In the 57.5Zr specimen, the number and proportion of Zr-Al-Ni and Zr-Al-Ag clusters reach the maximum values, leading to the optimal thermal stability. However, with increasing the solute con-centration, the Zr concentration in the Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04-Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5) alloys is decreased. Therefore, the total number of Zr-Al-Ni and Zr-Al-Ag clusters in the supercooled liquid decreases, indicating the reduction in the stability of the supercooled liquid phase.

Fig.3 presents DSC curves of as-spun Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04-Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5) alloy ribbons at different heating rates (10–80 K/min). Tp1, Tp2, and Tp3 are the maximum temperatures corresponding to the first, second, and third exothermic peaks, respectively. DSC curves of 65.0Zr and 57.5Zr specimens have two and three exothermic peaks, respectively, whereas the 50.0Zr and 42.5Zr specimens only have one exothermic peak. Except for the 65.0Zr specimen, substantial difference in ΔTx can be observed in all other alloy specimens, indicating the high thermal stability of the supercooled liquid phase.

Fig.3  Non-isothermal DSC curves of as-spun Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x alloy ribbons at different heating rates: (a) 65.0Zr specimen, (b) 57.5Zr specimen, (c) 50.0Zr specimen, and (d) 42.5Zr specimen

Fig.4 illustrates the variations of characteristic temperatures under different heating rates for as-spun Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04-Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5) alloy ribbons. As shown in Fig.4a, the glass transition ceases in the 65.0Zr specimen, whereas it reemerges in other three specimens with lower Zr concentrations. Tg is increased gradually with increasing the solute concentration, and the highest Tg value is obtained for the 42.5Zr specimen. As shown Fig.4b and 4c, Tx and Tp1 present the similar variation trends: both Tx and Tp1 are signifi-cantly increased with increasing the solute concentration.

Fig.4  Variation of glass transition temperature Tg (a), crystallization temperature Tx (b), maximum temperature of the first exothermic peak Tp1 (c), and supercooled liquid region ΔTx (d) under different heating rates of as-spun Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x alloy ribbons

Tg, Tx, and Tp1 of Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5) alloys shift towards higher temperatures with increasing the heating rate. The variation of Tx is closely related to that of Tg, leading to the increase in ΔTx. Therefore, the increase in solute concentration primarily contributes to the increment of all characteristic temperatures. It is widely known that a larger ΔTx value indicates a stronger capability of the supercooled liquid to inhibit crystallization, thus reflecting greater thermal stability in the glassy alloy. Thus, increasing the solute concentration is beneficial to hinder the crystallization process.

It should be noted that Tg suddenly drops to 614 K at heating rate of 40 K/min for Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=7.5, 15.0, 22.5) alloy ribbons, whereas Tx increases slightly, causing the rapid rise of ΔTx to the maximum value of 141 K. This is inconsistent with kinetics of amorphous materials. Normally, when the heating rate increases, Tg and Tx should increase accordingly. The experiments were conducted by both METTLER TGA/DSC 1 and NETZSCH STA 449 C instruments to avoid experiment errors. The experiment and simulation results are in good agreement. This phenomenon indicates that the sudden decrease in Tg and the rapid increase in ΔTx at heating rate of 40 K/min are objective.

The activation energies of glass transition and crystalli-zation during continuous heating can be calculated by Kissinger equation[

23], as follows:

ln ΦT2=-ERT+C (1)

where Φ represents the heating rate, E denotes the activation energy, R is the universal gas constant, T represents the characteristic temperature (Tg, Tx, and Tp1) corresponding to the glass transition and crystallization processes, and C is a constant. The activation energy (Eg, Ex, and Ep) can be determined by the slope of the Kissinger plots. Fig.5 shows the Kissinger plots of as-spun Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5) alloy ribbons. The activation energies Ex and growth activation energy Ep1 associated with the nucleation and growth processes of amorphous alloys[

24] are listed in Table 3.

Fig.5  Kissinger plots of as-spun Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5) alloy ribbons: (a) activation energy Ex and (b) growth activation energy Ep1

Table 3  Activation energies of Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5) alloy ribbons
Specimen

Activation energy, Ex/

kJ·mol-1

Growth activation energy,

Ep1/kJ·mol-1

65.0Zr 60 ± 8 52 ± 6
57.5Zr 63 ± 9 62 ± 3
50.0Zr 101 ± 35 77 ± 9
42.5Zr 89 ± 13 101 ± 16

According to the activation barrier energy of the glass transition through Kissinger analysis[

25], the variation of the glass transition activation energy is not analyzed through Kissinger plots in this research. Both Ex and Ep1 activation energies are increased with increasing the solute concentra-

tion, indicating the existence of higher barriers for nucleation and growth processes. Fig.6 presents XRD patterns of the glassy alloy ribbons after annealing for 600 s at the temperatures slightly above the ones corresponding to the first, second, and third exothermic peaks. After annealing at the temperatures above the one corresponding to the first exothermic peak, XRD patterns of 65.0Zr and 57.5Zr specimens are mainly composed of broad peaks, indicating the significant resistance against the primary precipitation and the high thermal stability in the glassy phase.

Fig.6  XRD patterns of Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x alloy ribbons after annealing at temperatures above the ones corresponding to different exothermic peaks for 600 s: (a) x=0, (b) x=7.5, (c) x=10.0, (d) x=12.5, (e) x=15.0, and (f) x=22.5

After annealing at temperatures above the ones corresponding to the second exothermic peaks, it can be seen that the tetragonal Zr2Ni+tetragonal Zr2(Cu, Ag)+hexagonal Zr5Al3 phases exist in the 65.0Zr specimen, whereas the 57.5Zr specimen consists of tetragonal Zr2Ni, tetragonal ZrAg, and hexagonal Zr5Al3 phases. Additionally, for the 57.5Zr specimen after annealing at the temperatures above the ones corresponding to the third exothermic peak, a mixed structure consisting of tetragonal Zr2Ni+tetragonal ZrAg+hexagonal Zr5Al3+tetragonal Zr2(Cu, Ag) phases can be observed. In the 50.0Zr and 42.5Zr specimens, only the single tetragonal ZrAg phase can be detected.

The types of precipitates is increased firstly from three to four and subsequently decreased to one with increasing the solute concentration. The existence of multiple precipitates in the nucleation and growth processes enhances the stability of glassy alloys[

26]. Consequently, the 57.5Zr specimen shows the highest thermal stability because it has the most precipitates. This result is consistent with the variations in ΔTx.

Fig.7 shows XRD patterns of Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5) glassy alloys after annealing for 3600 s at the temperatures above the ones corresponding to the first exothermic peaks. With prolonging the annealing duration, XRD peaks of amorphous phase, tetragonal Zr2Ni, tetragonal Zr2(Cu, Ag), and hexagonal Zr5Al3 phases can be observed in the 65.0Zr specimen. Similarly, the 57.5Zr specimen consists of amorphous phase, tetragonal Zr2Ni, tetragonal ZrAg, and hexagonal Zr5Al3 phases. This result suggests that the primary precipitation of the 57.5Zr specimen is postponed due to the improved stability of the supercooled liquid phase.

Fig.7  XRD patterns of Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5) alloy ribbons after annealing at temperatures above the ones corresponding to the first exothermic peaks for 3600 s

Fig.8 shows the continuous cooling transformation (CCT) and continuous heating transformation (CHT) diagrams, highlighting significant disparities in the crystallization behavior of these alloys. The cooling curves with labels A, B, and C represent the distinct cooling rates during quenching, whereas label D represents the heating curve during annealing of the amorphous phase. The curve A corresponds to the amorphous ribbons obtained at a rapid cooling rate, and the curve D represents the crystalline phase obtained at various temperatures corresponding to the crystallization peaks in Fig.6. The curves B and C are derived from the curve D. In the Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5) alloys, the ratios of solute atoms (Al, Ni, Cu, and Ag) remain consistent. Thus, the primary variation lies in the proportions of Zr/Al, Zr/Ni, Zr/Cu, and Zr/Ag, as listed in Table 4. Notably, with increasing the solute concentration, the atomic ratio between solvent and solute atoms is decreased. Consequently, a denser atomic configuration and the elevated activation energy barriers can be obtained, and the long-range diffusion, which is vital for solute redistribution and crystalline phase formation, becomes more difficult[

27].

Fig.8  Schematic diagrams of CCT and CHT curves of Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x alloy ribbons: (a) x=0; (b) x=7.5–12.5; (c) x≥15

Table 4  Atom ratios between solution atom Zr and solute atom Al, Ni, Cu, and Ag of Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x alloy ribbons
SpecimenZr/AlZr/NiZr/CuZr/Ag
65.0Zr 8.67 6.50 43.33 4.06
57.5Zr 6.39 4.79 28.75 2.95
50.0Zr 4.55 3.57 25.00 2.17
42.5Zr 3.54 2.58 17.00 1.60

The crystallization process was conducted on the glassy ribbons with Zr concentration of 65%[

11]. After subsequent annealing at 703 K (slightly above the temperature corresponding to the first exothermic peak) for 600 s, no primary precipitate phase can be observed. Nevertheless, after annealing at 723 K for 3600 s, a combination structure of dispersed phases within the glassy matrix, including the tetragonal Zr3Ag, tetragonal Zr2Ni, and hexagonal Zr4Al3 phases, can be observed. Additionally, after annealing at 823 K (above the temperature corresponding to the second exothermic peak) for 600 s, the glassy phase completely vanishes, and the tetragonal Zr2(Cu, Ag), tetragonal Zr2Ni, and hexagonal Zr5Al3 phases can be observed[11]. In this research, the annealing at 750 K for 600 s cannot cause any noticeable precipitation. However, with prolonging the annealing time to 3600 s, the precipitation of tetragonal Zr2(Cu, Ag), tetragonal Zr2Ni, and hexagonal Zr5Al3 phases can all be observed, even at the temperature below the one corresponding to the second exothermic peak. Furthermore, the broad peaks corresponding to the glassy phase remain unchanged.

Large supercooled liquid region has a significant impact on the phase transition behavior. The primary clusters in the supercooled liquid of Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5) alloys consist of Zr-Al-Ni and Zr-Al-Ag. These clusters facilitate the formation of icosahedral-like medium-range-ordered atomic configurations, which enhance the thermal stability of the supercooled liquid and GFA of the alloys[

28]. With increasing the solute concentration, the Zr/Ag ratio gradually reaches to 1, indicating that the composition of the supercooled liquid is close to ZrAg, whereas the residual amorphous phase becomes enriched with Al and Ni elements. Owing to the considerably lower viscosity of the supercooled

liquid, compared with the case of the amorphous phase, these alloys exhibit a higher tendency to precipitate the ZrAg phase from the supercooled liquid. Additionally, the positive mixing heat of Ni-Cu, Ni-Ag, and Cu-Ag pairs leads to the repulsive interactions among these elements in the amorphous phase. As a result, the glassy phase presents distinct crystal phases, tetragonal Zr2(Cu, Ag), tetragonal Zr2Ni, and hexagonal Zr5Al3 phases.

Fig.9 shows the Vickers hardness of Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04-Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5) alloy ribbons before and after annealing. TP1, TP2, and TP3 represent the maximum temperatures corresponding to the first, second, and third exothermic peaks. All the alloy ribbons were annealed for 600 s. Initially, the Vickers hardness of the as-spun alloy ribbons increases from 3939.6 MPa to 4478.6 MPa, then decreases to 3675.0 MPa, and finally rises to the maximum value of 4900.0 MPa. Clearly, the hardness is increased with increasing the solute concentration. Although the as-spun alloy ribbons are identified as amorphous material, it should be noted that certain medium-range atom clusters still exist in the glassy matrix[

1]. After annealing at the temperature above the one corresponding to the second exothermic peak, these clusters and glassy matrix undergo transformation and change into crystallites. With increasing the solute concentration, the types of precipitates are changed, resulting in the variations of volume fraction and size of these medium-range atom clusters, which leads to hardness change. Subsequently, after annealing at the temperature above the one corresponding to the first exothermic peak for 600 s, the initial favorable bending ductility of Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5) alloy ribbons turns to the brittle state.

Fig.9  Vickers hardness of Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5) alloy ribbons before and after annealing at different temperatures

The Vickers hardness is rapidly increased with increasing the annealing temperature, particularly after the complete decomposition of the glassy phase. This phenomenon can be attributed to the presence of clusters and nanoscale crystallites, which contribute to the precipitation hardening within the glassy phase of the 65.0Zr and 57.5Zr specimens. Moreover, the precipitation of multiple crystallites, including the tetragonal Zr2Ni, tetragonal Zr2(Cu, Ag), tetragonal ZrAg, and hexagonal Zr5Al3 phases, further enhances the hardness of the alloy ribbons. For the 50.0Zr and 42.5Zr specimens, only the tetragonal ZrAg phase is precipitated. But the hardness still rises rapidly.

3 Conclusions

1) Increasing the solute concentrations of Al, Ni, Cu, and Ag can shift the summit position of the broad diffraction peaks to the higher angles. The glass transition phenomenon occurs and the supercooled liquid region (ΔTx) exists in the Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x alloys with x≥7.5.

2) With increasing the solute concentration, the glass transition temperature Tg is increased faster than the crystallization temperature Tx, resulting in the gradual decrease in the supercooled liquid region ΔTx. Conversely, the liquidus temperature Tl is decreased with increasing the solute concentration, leading to the increase in the reduced glass transition temperature Trg.

3) The characteristic temperatures Tg, Tx, and the maximum temperature corresponding to the first exothermic peak Tp1 of Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5) alloys shift to higher temperatures with increasing the heating rate. Furthermore, both activation energy Ex and growth activation energy Ep1 are increased with increasing the solute concentration.

4) The crystallization mode changes from two stages for the Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x alloys with x=0 to three stages for the Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x alloys with x=7.5, and then decreases to one stage for the Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04- Ag0.46)35+x alloys with x=15.0 and 22.5. The Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29-Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x metallic glass with x=7.5 possesses a large supercooled liquid region of ΔTx of 141 K and high thermal stability, indicating the excellent crystallization resistance.

5) Vickers hardness of Zr65-x(Al0.21Ni0.29Cu0.04Ag0.46)35+x (x=0, 7.5, 15.0, 22.5) alloy ribbons are increased with increasing the solute concentration, and it is increased rapidly with the variation of precipitates at higher annealing temperatures.

References

1

Inoue A, Kong F L, Zhu S L et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2020, 820: 153164 [Baidu Scholar] 

2

Inoue A, Kong F L, Zhu S L et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2017, 707: 12 [Baidu Scholar] 

3

Inoue A, Kong F L, Zhu S L et al. MRS Bulletin[J], 2019, [Baidu Scholar] 

44(11): 867 [Baidu Scholar] 

4

Koga G Y, Travessa D, Zepon G et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2021, 884: 161090 [Baidu Scholar] 

5

Inoue A. Acta Materialia[J]. 2000, 48(1): 279 [Baidu Scholar] 

6

Oak J J, Louzguine-Luzgin D V, Inoue A et al. Materials Science and Engineering C[J], 2009, 29(1): 322 [Baidu Scholar] 

7

Hirata A, Hirotsu Y, Amiya K et al. Physical Review B[J], 2008, 78(14): 144205 [Baidu Scholar] 

8

Li X, Makino A, Yubuta K et al. Materials Transactions[J], 2009, 50(6): 1286 [Baidu Scholar] 

9

Zhu Z W, Gu L, Xie G Q et al. Acta Materialia[J], 2011, 59(7): 2814 [Baidu Scholar] 

10

Inoue A, Wang Z, Louzguine-Luzgin D V et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2015, 638: 197 [Baidu Scholar] 

11

Li M M, Inoue A, Han Y et al. Journal of Alloys and Com-pounds[J], 2018, 735: 1712 [Baidu Scholar] 

12

Guo Y N, Inoue A, Han Y et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2019, 783: 545 [Baidu Scholar] 

13

Jin Y, Inoue A, Kong F L et al. Acta Materialia[J], 2020, 199: 1 [Baidu Scholar] 

14

Wan Y X, Li H S, Chen C J et al. Intermetallics[J], 2021, 135: 107 233 [Baidu Scholar] 

15

Ding Ruixian, Kou Shengzhong, Li Xiaocheng et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, 2022, 51(6): 2267 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar] 

16

Zhou W, Hou J X, Zhong Z Z et al. Journal of Non-crystalline Solids[J], 2015, 411: 132 [Baidu Scholar] 

17

Zhang J Y, Teng X Y, Xu S M et al. Materials Letters[J], 2017, 189: 17 [Baidu Scholar] 

18

Wang F, Inoue A, Han Y et al. Journal of Alloys and Com- pounds[J], 2017, 711: 132 [Baidu Scholar] 

19

Zeng Y Q, Yu J S, Tian Y et al Acta Materialia[J], 2020, 200: 710 [Baidu Scholar] 

20

Zhang Q S, Zhang W, Inoue A. Materials Transactions[J], 2006, 47(11): 2804 [Baidu Scholar] 

21

Zhang T, Inoue A, Masumoto T. Materials Transactions, JIM[J], 1991, 32(11): 1005 [Baidu Scholar] 

22

Saida J, Matsushita M, Zhang T et al. Applied Physics Letters[J], 1999, 75(22): 3497 [Baidu Scholar] 

23

Kissinger H E. Analytical Chemistry[J], 1957, 29(11): 1702 [Baidu Scholar] 

24

Hu X, Qiao J, Pelletier J M et al. Journal of Non-crystalline Solids[J], 2016, 432: 254 [Baidu Scholar] 

25

Dong Q, Pan Y J, Tan J et al. Journal of Alloys and Com- pounds[J], 2019, 785: 422 [Baidu Scholar] 

26

Lu Z P, Liu C T. Physical Review Letters[J], 2003, 91(11): 115505 [Baidu Scholar] 

27

Wang Q, Lu J, Gu F J et al. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics[J], 2006, 39(13): 2851 [Baidu Scholar] 

28

Matsushita M, Saida J, Zhang T et al. Philosophical Magazine Letters[J], 2000, 80(2): 79 [Baidu Scholar]