Abstract
Low-cycle fatigue crack initiation behavior of nickel-based single crystal superalloy at 530 °C was investigated. Results show that the behavior of crack initiation is closely related to the maximum strain. When the maximum strain is 2.0%, the fatigue crack is originated at the position of persistent slip bands on the surface of specimen, which is located on the {111} slip plane. No defects are observed at the crack initiation position. When the maximum strain is lower than 1.6%, the cracks are initiated at the casting defects on sub-surface or at interior of the specimen. The casting defects are located on the {100} slip plane vertical to the axial force. The crack is initiated along the {100} slip plane and then expanded along different {111} slip planes after a short stage of expansion. As the maximum strain decreases, the position of crack initiation gradually changes from the surface to the interior. Moreover, the secondary cracks extending inward along the fracture surface appear in the crack initiation area, and there is obvious stress concentration near the secondary cracks. The dislocation density is high near the fracture surface in the crack initiation zone, where a lot of dislocations cutting into the γ' phase exist. An oxide layer of 50‒100 nm is presented on the fracture surface, and Ni, Al, Cr and Co elements are mainly segregated into the oxide layer of the surface.
Nickel-based single crystal (SC) superalloys have been widely used as turbine blade materials in aircraft engines due to their excellent creep resistance and thermal fatigue performance at elevated temperature
Turbine blades are easily affected by structural factors due to their complex shapes. Therefore, the data of standard fatigue test rod are generally referred to when studying the fatigue performance of SC superalloy. Temperature always plays an important role in the low-cycle fatigue behavior of SC superallo
Traditional research mainly focuses on the cyclic hardening and softening behavior of materials during low-cycle fatigue processe
In order to simulate the low-cycle fatigue crack initiation behavior of the tenon part of the real turbine blade, the actual temperature field and load of the blade tenon were analyzed. The test temperature of 530 °C and the strain ratio of 0.05 were chosen as test conditions. By investigating the characteristics of fatigue crack initiation under different loads, the mechanism of low-cycle fatigue crack initiation in SC superalloy was studied. The results of this study will provide support for the service damage behavior of turbine blades in practical engineering.
The second-generation of nickel-based SC superalloys was used in this work. SC test bar with its length direction parallel to the [001] direction was prepared by spiral crystal selection method in a directional solidification vacuum furnace (ZDG-2). Meanwhile, SC test bar with a deviation less than 15° to the main axis direction was selected as the raw material for the test. The nominal composition of the SC superalloy is listed in
Cr | Co | W | Mo | Al | Ta | Re | Hf | Nb | Ti | Ni |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.8 | 9.5 | 9.0 | 2.5 | 6.2 | 8.5 | 2.4 | 0.15 | 1.2 | 0.1 | Bal. |
Heat treatments of 1290 °C/1 h+1300 °C/2 h+ 1315 °C/4 h (air cooling, AC) +1120 °C/4 h (AC) + 870 °C/32 h (AC) were carried out on the SC test bar. After heat treatment, the γ' phase with typical cubic morphology was uniformly dispersed in the matrix. Macromorphology of SC test bar and micro-structure of the matrix are illustrated in Fig.

Fig.1 Processing diagram of SC test bar (a) and microstructure of the matrix (b)
After the fatigue test, the surface morphology of the fracture was observed by Gemini SEM300 field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM). After low-cycle fatigue tests, longitudinal-section specimens were prepared by wire electrical discharge machining. The longitudinal section of the fracture was mechanically polished to mirror-like state without cracks, followed by vibration polishing for 8 h to remove surface stress. The deformation characteristics near the fracture were obtained by electron back scatter diffraction (EBSD) technique. FEI Scios2 focused ion beam (FIB) was utilized to take microscopic longitudinal section (5 μm×5 μm) on the surface of the fracture, and then it is observed by the transmission electron microscope (TEM). The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns and energy dispersive spectroscope (EDS) spectra were obtained by Talos f200s TEM.
In strain-controlled low-cycle fatigue tests, the relationship between strain and the fatigue cycles is generally analyzed. Meanwhile, the role of other test parameters in fatigue testing is always ignored. The results and process parameters of low-cycle fatigue test are recorded in
Specimen | f/Hz | σmax/MPa | σmin/MPa | εmax/% | εmin/% | Nf/cycle |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
200-1 | 0.132 | 997 | ‒982 | 2.000 | 0.103 | 61 |
180-1 | 0.146 | 971 | ‒955 | 1.800 | 0.091 | 558 |
160-1 | 0.164 | 980 | ‒729 | 1.600 | 0.080 | 1 542 |
140-1 | 0.188 | 965 | ‒510 | 1.400 | 0.070 | 3 563 |
120-1 | 0.219 | 900 | ‒412 | 1.200 | 0.060 | 28 525 |
090-1 | 0.292 | 898 | ‒53 | 0.900 | 0.045 | 34 294 |
075-1 | 0.351 | 892 | ‒38 | 0.750 | 0.037 | 42 481 |
Maximum strain control was adopted in low-cycle fatigue testing in this study, with the strain ratio of R=0.05. The range of maximum strain is 0.75%‒2.0%.

Fig.2 Low-cycle fatigue testing results of nickel-based SC superalloys: (a) maximum strain-cycle life; (b) stress-cycle life; (c) actual stress ratio-cycle life; (d) test frequency-cycle life
Generally, crack propagation of fatigue fracture can be divided into three stages: crack initiation stage, crack propagation stage, and final fracture stage. For low-cycle fatigue fracture of SC superalloys, fatigue life is relatively short during the stage of crack propagation. At the stage of crack initiation, fatigue life accounts for the majority.

Fig.3 Fracture morphologies and crack initiation characteristics with εmax=2.0%: (a) various stages of crack propagation, (b) crack initiation area, and (c‒d) PSBs

Fig.4 Fracture morphologies and crack initiation characteristics with εmax=1.6% (a‒b), εmax=1.4% (c‒d), and εmax=0.9% (e‒f)

Fig.5 Morphologies of crack initiation and characteristics of secondary cracks with εmax=1.6%: (a) fracture of the initiation area and (b) secondary crack morphology

Fig.6 Characteristics of crack initiation and propagation in vertical axial small planes with εmax=1.4%: (a) fracture of the initiation area; (b) fracture characteristic of cracks along other slip plane; (b1) microscopic morphology of {111} slip plane; (c) casting defect characteristic of crack initiation area
Take the longitudinal section specimens along the fracture surface near the crack initiation area to observe the characteristics. From

Fig.7 SEM image (a), band contrast map (b), IPF map (c), and KAM map (d) of crack initiation region of specimen with εmax=1.6%
In the crack initiation area, FIB technique is used to take a micro-area specimen from the surface of the fracture towards the inside, and the sampling location is shown in

Fig.8 TEM images near the crack initiation area with εmax=1.6%: (a) FIB sampling location; (b) longitudinal section with corresponding SAED pattern; (c) enlarged image of the region marked by the box in Fig.8b; (d) dislocation of the matrix
At the same time, a large number of dislocations enter the γ' phase in a climbing manner, causing severe deformation of the γ' phase.

Fig.9 Microstructure (a) and EDS mappings of elements (b‒h) in micro-areas near the fracture surface with εmax=1.6%
According to the distribution of elements, the oxide layer on the fracture surface mainly include elements of Ni, Al, Cr and Co, with a higher content of Ni and slightly lower content of Al, Cr and Co elements. This phenomenon is because the fracture surface is fractured along the γ' phase, and the structure of the intermetallic compound Ni3Al in the γ' phase is disrupted. Meanwhile, the reduction ability of Ni element is greater than that of Al element, so the Ni element is more easily oxidized. The driving force for the segregation of Ni element towards the surface is greater. Therefore, the distribution of Ni element is predominant within the oxide layer. Due to the fact that Cr and Co elements are mainly distributed in the γ phase, the surface segregation path of Cr and Co elements is blocked by γ' phase during the oxidation process. Therefore, the segregation degree of Cr and Co elements in the oxide layer is slightly lower. As the strengthening phase of superalloy, Ni3Al structure undergoes local segregation of Ni and Al elements due to the influence of temperature and alternating stress, leading to the destruction of the strengthening phase structure and further propagation of cracks during fatigue. No significant element changes are observed near the dislocation and slip lines.
1) Under the condition of 530 °C with a strain ratio of 0.05, the number of low-cycle fatigue cycles gradually increases as the maximum strain value decreases. The SC superalloy actually undergoes the cyclic load of tensile and compressive stress during the test. The variation process of actual stress ratio can be divided into two stages at the boundary of 1×1
2) Under large strain conditions, fatigue cracks are initiated at the PSBs on the surface of the specimen located on the {111} slip plane. No defect features are observed at the crack initiation area. When the maximum strain is below 1.6%, cracks are initiated at the casting defects inside the specimen. The casting defect is located on a small plane perpendicular to the axial force. With the decrease in the maximum strain, the crack initiation position gradually changes from the surface to the sub-surface.
3) The crack initiation zone reveals a slight oxidation of the fatigue fracture surface, with segregation of Ni, Al, Cr and Co elements towards the oxide layer. The presence of stress concentration in the vicinity of the fatigue crack leads to elevated dislocation density on the fracture surface. A large number of dislocations cut into the γ' phase, resulting in the disruption of its reinforced structural integrity and further propagation of the fatigue crack. EBSD results indicate a substantial presence of secondary cracks in the crack initiation zone, accompanied by localized strain behavior near these secondary cracks.
References
Arakere N K, Swanson G. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power[J], 2002, 124(1): 161 [Baidu Scholar]
Hong H U, Kang J G, Choi B G et al. International Journal of Fatigue[J], 2011, 33(12): 1592 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhou H, Ro Y, Harada H et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2004, 381(1–2): 20 [Baidu Scholar]
Vasudevan A K, Sadananda K, Iyyer N et al. International Journal of Fatigue[J], 2016, 82(2): 120 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang J, Guo Y Y, Zhang M et al. Acta Metallurgica Sinica[J], 2020, 33(10): 10 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang L, Zhao L, Jiang R et al. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures[J], 2020(10): 1769 [Baidu Scholar]
Stoltz R E, Pineau A G. Materials Science and Engineering[J], 1978, 34(3): 275 [Baidu Scholar]
Hu C Y, Li X L, Liu C K et al. Failure Analysis and Preven- [Baidu Scholar]
tion[J], 2023, 18(1): 8 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu L, Meng J, Liu J L et al. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters)[J], 2019, 32(2): 381 [Baidu Scholar]
Povarova K B, Bazyleva O A, Gorbovets M A et al. Russian Metallurgy[J], 2019, 2019: 687 [Baidu Scholar]
Sundararaman M, Chen W, Wach R P et al. Acta Metallurgica and Materialia[J], 1992, 40(5): 1023 [Baidu Scholar]
Golubovskiy E R, Svetlov I L, Petrushin N V et al. Russian Metallurgy[J], 2010, 2010: 941 [Baidu Scholar]
Segersaell M, Leidermark D, Moverare J et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2015, 623: 68 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu L, Meng J, Liu J et al. Materials & Design[J], 2017, 131: 441 [Baidu Scholar]
Li P, Li Q, Jin T et al. International Journal of Fatigue[J], 2014, 63(1): 137 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang X, Gao H, Wen Z et al. Advanced Engineering Mate- rials[J], 2019, 21(2): 647 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu L, Meng J, Liu J L et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2018, 734: 1 [Baidu Scholar]
Li L Y, Tian F Z, Li Z et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2024, 53(7): 1874 [Baidu Scholar]
Gabb T P, Welsch G, Miner R V et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 1989, 108(1): 189 [Baidu Scholar]
Brien V, Décamps B. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2001, 316(1‒2): 18 [Baidu Scholar]
Yu J J, Sun X F, Jin T et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2010, 527(9): 2379 [Baidu Scholar]