+Advanced Search
网刊加载中。。。

使用Chrome浏览器效果最佳,继续浏览,你可能不会看到最佳的展示效果,

确定继续浏览么?

复制成功,请在其他浏览器进行阅读

New Preparation Method for Ti6Al4V Powder by Multistage Depth Reduction Process  PDF

  • Yan Jisen
  • Dou Zhihe
  • Zhang Tingan
  • Fan Shigang
  • Niu Liping
Key Laboratory for Ecological Metallurgy of Multimetallic Mineral, Ministry of Education, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China

Updated:2021-09-26

DOI:XX.XXXX/j.issn.1002-185X.2021.09.009

  • Full Text
  • Figs & Tabs
  • References
  • Authors
  • About
CN CITE
OUTLINE

Abstract

Using TiO2, V2O5, and Al as raw materials and Mg and Ca as reducing agents, a novel method for preparing Ti6Al4V alloy powder through multistage deep reduction process was introduced. This new process has higher productivity and less pollution than traditional metallurgical process does. The results of self-propagating primary reduction experiments show that Mg is a more suitable reducing agent than Ca in the specific stage, and the porous Ti-Al-V-O precursor material with 6.74wt%~16.4wt% oxygen can be obtained when the amount of reducing agent Mg is appropriate. The Ti6Al4V powder with 0.24wt% oxygen can be obtained after the further calciothermic deep reduction (holding at 1173 K for 3.5 h).

Science Press

Titanium alloys are commonly used in aerospace, medical industry, nuclear industry, and other fields because of their superior properties[

1-3]. At present, Ti6Al4V alloy is the most widely used titanium alloy. With the rapid development of powder metallurgy and 3D printing industries, the demand for titanium alloy powder is increased significantly. However, the high cost of production restricts its application. Modifications for low cost, such as Ti-5Al-2.5Sn, and Ti-2Al-2.5Zr, have been considered and investigated. But none of them can share the equal performance of Ti6Al4V.

Currently, the main production methods of titanium alloy powders are atomization and hydrogenation-dehydrogenation which are all based on the Kroll process. Although the atomization method has the advantages of narrow particle size distribution and high sphericity, its production cost is high. The hydrogenation-dehydrogenation method can reduce the cost, but it has disadvantages such as excessive hydrogen content and difficult controlling of oxygen content. For example, Azevedo et al[

4] prepared Ti6Al4V powder by hydrogenation-dehydrogenation method, but the hydrogen content was as high as 0.027wt%.

Various new processes have been investigated to replace the Kroll process. Chen et al[

5,6] used the molten metal electrolysis method (proposed by Fray, Farthing, and Chen, namely FFC method), which used graphite, TiO2, and molten CaCl2 as the anode, cathode, and electrolyte, respectively, to produce titanium. Shi[7] and Du[8] et al also prepared TiV and TiFe alloy powders by FFC process. However, due to the low efficiency of the molten-salt process and the poor quality of products, FFC method still remains in the experimental research stage. To overcome the technical difficulties of FFC process, Suzuki[9] and Park[10] et al used the Ono-Suzuki (OS) method and electronically mediated reaction method, respectively. But none of the methods can be used for industrial production. Jiao et al[11] used the method proposed by researchers of University of Science and Technology Beijing, namely USTB method. Firstly, TiO2 is reduced and sintered into Ti-C-O composite material of good conductivity, and then it is used as an anode in an electrolysis process. The technique overcomes the problems of low current density and low current efficiency which commonly exist in FFC and OS method. The experimental current efficiency of USTB method is generally about 90%, and the purity of metal titanium is over 99.90%. The method has a huge advancement in current electrolytic titanium process. In addition to electrolytic preparation of titanium, metallothermic reduction (MRC) is another promising low-cost method to prepare titanium. MRC method aims to reduce titanium oxide or titanium chloride by alkali sodium salt or alkaline earth metal, such as Mg and Ca, to obtain titanium and titanium alloy powders. Chen[12] and Weil[13] et al used TiCl4, AlCl3, and VCl4 as raw materials, and sprayed the materials into molten Na or Mg for reduction to obtain Ti6Al4V powder. However, this kind of method is based on the preparation of TiCl4 by Kroll method. Froes[14] and Wei[15] et al studied the reduction of TiO2 with H2 and CaH2 to obtain titanium powder. Titanium alloy powders are synthesized by adding alloying elements. These methods need to solve some technical problems, such as difficult deoxidation of titanium oxide and control of trace impurities.

The preparation process of Ti and TiAlV alloys using Mg and Ca as reducing agents in different reduction stages was proposed by Nersisyan[

16,17], but AlCl3 and a large amount of Ca(OH)2 as additive agent were used in the process. According to the thermodynamic characteristics of step-by-step reduction of high valent metal oxides and the thermodynamic transmutation of different equilibrium phases in the reduction process[18,19], a novel method of preparing Ti6Al4V alloy powder by multistage reduction of metal oxides (TiO2, V2O5) was proposed in this research. A high productivity and pollution-free metallurgical method for preparing Ti6Al4V powder was introduced. The law of phase transformation in the reduction process was studied. The products were characterized and some important experimental parameters were investigated.

1 Experiment

Raw materials used in this research were listed as follows: titanium dioxide (TiO2, purity>98.5%, particle size: 200~500 nm, Kemiou, China), vanadium pentoxide (V2O5, purity>99%, particle size: <10 µm, Macklin, China), aluminum powder (Al, purity>99%, particle size: <200 µm, Macklin, China), magnesium powder (Mg, purity>99%, particle size: 74~1500 µm, Sinopharm, China), calcium granules (Ca, purity>99%, particle size: <200 µm, Sinopharm, China), hydrochloric acid (HCl, 36vol%, Sinopharm, China). TiO2 and V2O5 were dried at 373~423 K for 24 h in order to remove water and some volatile impurities before experiment.

Firstly, TiO2, V2O5, Al, and Mg (Ca was used to replace Mg for investigating the effect of different reducing agents during the self-propagating primary reduction process) were mixed evenly according to the molar ratio of TiO2:V2O5:Mg (or Ca):Al=1.88:0.0393:3.96α:0.222 (α=1 indicates the theoretical addition of Mg). Then the mixture was pressed into a billet of Φ33 mm×40~50 mm. The pressed specimen was put into the self-propagating reactor, and high-purity argon was inflated into the reactor and the inner pressure was kept at 0.5 MPa. Then the 0Cr21Al6Nb resistance wire was heated and reaction began. The obtained products were leached with dilute HCl solution (2 mol/L) to remove the by-products and to obtain the primary reduction products. Then the primary reduction products were reduced by Ca at different temperatures for different time under high-purity argon atmosphere. Then the calciothermic reduction products were leached with acid to remove CaO by-products, washed, and vacuum dried. Finally, the Ti6Al4V alloy powder was obtained. The experiment process is shown in Fig.1.

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of experiment process

Factsage 7.05 software package was used to calculate the equilibrium phase and adiabatic temperature according to the principle of minimum Gibbs free energy variation. The phase of the reaction products was characterized using a copper target X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Bruker, D8, Germany). The microstructure of the products was characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, SU8010, Hitachi, Japan) coupled with energy disperse spectroscopy (EDS). The particle size of the products was characterized using a laser particle size analyzer (Mastersizer, 2000, UK). The specific surface area (SSA) of the products was characterized by a SSA analyzer (ASAP2020M, US). The oxygen content of the products was analyzed using an oxygen-nitrogen analyzer (Bruker, D8, Germany). Other chemical components were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma spectrometry (ICP-AES, Leeman, Prodigy XP, US).

2 Results and Discussion

2.1 Thermodynamic analysis

The calculated phase equilibria of the self-propagating reaction systems are as follows: (1) TiO2:V2O5:Mg:Al=1.88: 0.0393:3.96:0.222; (2) TiO2:V2O5:Ca:Al=1.88:0.0393:3.96: 0.222 (the ratio of reactants is designed according to the composition of Ti6Al4V). Assuming that the starting tempe-rature of the reaction is 298.15 K, the equilibrium pressure in the system at the end of the reaction is P(Mg/Ca)=0.01, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 MPa, and the enthalpy change of the chemical reaction is ΔH=0, the phase of the products at equilibrium and the reaction temperature of the system are calculated according to the Gibbs free energy minimum principle. The results are shown in Fig.2.

As shown in Fig.2, when Mg is used as the reducing agent in the self-propagating reaction systems, the main phases of the reaction products are Ti, TiO, by-products MgO, and Mg (g). The titanium sub-oxide phase TiO in the reduction products disappears when Ca is used as the reducing agent, whreras the by-product phase Ca3Ti2O6 is formed. Whether Mg or Ca is used as the reducing agent, almost all metal Al in the compound is combined with Ti and transformed into TiAl intermetallic compound, and V2O5 is completely reduced to V.

It is known from Fig.2a that when the equilibrium pressure of Mg vapor in the reaction system increases from 0.01 MPa to 0.4 MPa, the TiO content in the reduced products decreases from ~20mol% to ~10mol%, indicating that it is difficult to completely break through the thermodynamic bottleneck of TiO→Ti by Mg as the reducing agent. Compared with the results shown in Fig.2b, it is known that when Ca is used as the reducing agent, TiO2 can be completely reduced to Ti. However, the by-product phase Ca3Ti2O6 exists in all systems of different vapor pressures. Because of the significant difference between CaO and titanium oxides in acidity and basicity, once CaO and Ti2O3 are formed during the reduction process, Ca3Ti2O6 can be formed in the reduction in high-temperature environment. The Ca3Ti2O6 can deteriorate the mass transfer conditions and decrease the reduction efficiency of the reduction reaction, and it is difficult to completely remove in the subsequent purification process. When Mg is used as the reducing agent, the composite oxide by-product phases (MgTiO3, MgTi2O5, etc.) are not formed. Because the alkalinity of MgO is much weaker than that of CaO, the thermodynamic and kinetic conditions are insufficient for the formation of MgTiO3 and MgTi2O5 in the transient large gradient temperature field of the self-propagating rapid reduction.

2.2 Self-propagating primary reduction process

The raw materials of TiO2:V2O5:Ca:Al=1.88:0.0393:3.96: 0.222 were used in the experiment of primary reduction process. The XRD patterns of the products before and after acid leaching are shown in Fig.3. When Ca is used as the reducing agent, CaTiO3, unreduced TiO2, and a small amount of titanium sub-oxide phase Ti2O can be detected. However, a distinct metal Ti phase appears, which is different from the product results when Mg is used as the reducing agent under the same experiment conditions. Besides, Mg cannot completely reduce TiO2 to Ti (as shown in Fig.4). This result is consistent with the thermodynamic theory predicted in Fig.2. The existence of the TiO2 phase in the reduction products is due to the deterioration of mass transfer kinetics of the reaction caused by the appearance of CaTiO3 during the reduction process. CaTiO3 appears, as shown in Fig.3, and Ca3Ti2O6 appears in the thermodynamic calculation results, because the instantaneous high temperature formed by the self-propagating rapid reaction causes local excess of TiO2 and the preferential combination of TiO2 with CaO is more obvious. To obtain high-purity titanium powder, the Ca reduction of CaTiO3 requires that the system temperature increases to 1273 K with holding for 6 h[

20]. Setting the system temperature at 1173 K for 3.5 h shows an obvious energy-saving effect. Therefore, Mg is selected as the reducing agent in the self-propagating primary reduction process.

The raw materials of TiO2:V2O5:Mg:Al=1.88:0.0393:3.96α:0.222 were used for the experiment of primary reduction in order to investigate the influence of Mg dosage. Fig.4a and 4b show the XRD patterns of the reduction products before and after acid leaching. It can be seen from Fig.4a that phases of the products before acid leaching are composed of MgO, TiO, and Ti2O phases, and there is no significant difference among the results of products of different Mg ratios, indicating that the primary reduction processes are consistent under different Mg dosages. As shown in Fig.4b, when α increases from 0.8 to 1, the TiO diffraction peak gradually weakens, while the Ti2O diffraction peak gradually increases; when α increases from 1 to 1.2, the Ti6O diffraction peak gradually increases. Both Ti2O and Ti6O phases have the hexagonal crystal form, but TiO has the cubic crystal form. The diffusion rate of O2- ions in the hexagonal crystal form is much lower than that in the cubic crystal form. Fig.4c and 4d show the TiO phase content calculated by JADE 7.0 software and oxygen content of products of different Mg ratios after acid leaching, respectively. The curves in Fig.4c and 4d have the similar trend and can be divided into two stages: α≤1 and α≥1. When α≤1, the decline trend is obvious. But when α≥1, the curve tends to be gently fluctuant around a stable value. This is because the magnesiothermic self-propagating reaction has the characteristics of fast reaction speed, which deviates reaction greatly from the theoretical reaction equilibrium. Therefore, when α increases to a certain degree, the oxygen content in the product tends to be stable. The porous Ti-Al-V-O precursor material with 6.74wt%~16.4wt% oxygen content can be obtained, as shown in Fig.4d. The thermodynamic bottleneck in the TiO2 reduction process of TiO→Ti has not been com-pletely overcome, which is consistent with the thermodynamic calculation results shown in Fig.2. Fig.4e shows the element contents of Ti, Al, and V. It is worth noting that as Mg ratio increases, the proportion of Ti in the product also increases. Although different researches reported nearly opposite conclusions[

21,22], this phenomenon is probably due to different acid solubility of different types of titanium oxides.

XRD analysis shows that no substance contains V and Al elements, which can be explained by two reasons: (1) the amount of added V2O5 and Al is small; (2) V and Al elements are dissolved in Ti oxides, as shown in Fig.5.

In order to better observe the original morphology of the magnesiothermic self-propagating products, the products (α=1, before acid leaching) were embedded in an industrial gel and then polished. The dark colored part in Fig.5a is the industrial gel, and the bright colored areas are the products. Through the EDS results of point A, unreacted Mg can be found in Fig.5a. Fig.5b also shows the light and dark areas. According to the EDS results of area B (Fig.5c), it can be found that the distribution regions of Mg and O are basically the same, and the distribution regions of Ti, Al, and V are basically the same. It shows that Ti-Al-V-O precursor material was obtained by the self-propagating primary reduction process. Fig.6 shows the porous morphology of magnesio-thermic self-propagating products after acid leaching. These pore sizes are 3~5 μm, which is consistent with the mor-phology in Fig.5b, indicating that these voids are caused by the reaction of MgO and hydrochloric acid. The porous particles provide abundant channels for the mass transfer of Ca reductant in the next calciothermic deep reduction process, and the reduction reaction can only occur gradually from the outmost surface to the interior of the particles.

Fig.6 SEM image of magnesiothermic self-propagating products (α=1) after acid leaching

2.3 Calciothermic deep reduction process

As it was difficult for magnesiothermic self-propagating primary reduction to reduce oxygen content in the products, calcium with stronger metallic properties was used to continuously reduce the oxygen. Because the proportion of alloy elements (Ti, Al, V) in the magnesiothermic self-propagating products meets the requirement of Ti6Al4V alloy when α=1~1.2 and their oxygen contents are not much diffe-rent, the products of α=1 was selected to conduct the further experiment.

The magnesiothermic self-propagating primary reduction products were mixed with Ca according to the mass ratio of 1:1. The reaction was conducted at different reduction tempe-ratures (973~1373 K) for different durations (1~5 h). Fig.7 shows the oxygen content and XRD patterns of the products at different conditions. The oxygen content in the products after reduction for 3.5 h is decreased firstly and then increased with increasing the reduction temperature, reaching a minimum value of 0.24wt% at 1173 K. The oxygen content in the products after reduction at 1173 K is decreased firstly and then remains stable with increasing the reduction time, reaching a minimum value at 3.5 h. These results are the consequence of the interaction between thermodynamics and kinetics. The calciothermic deep reduction process is an exothermic reaction, and increasing the reduction temperature is not conducive to the production. However, increasing the reduction temperature can change the crystal form of the titanium sub-oxides (Ti2O, Ti6O) from hexagonal to cubic, which is conducive to the migration of O2- ions. In addition, a higher reduction temperature can increase the kinetics of the consumption of titanium sub-oxides. The cell parameters of products after acid leaching at different calciothermic deep reduction temperatures for different durations were calculated by JADE 7.0 software: a=0.292 26 nm, b=0.466 03 nm. The elements Al and V enter α-Ti, resulting in the smaller α-Ti unit cell parameters. Therefore, the phase peak of products (6.2wt% Al, 3.64wt% V, 0.24wt% O, 0.01wt% Mg, <0.01wt% Ca) shifts to a higher angle, as shown in Fig.7b.

Fig.9 shows the SEM morphologies of calciothermic deep reduction products. The products before acid leaching were embedded in an industrial gel and then polished, as shown in Fig.9a and 9b. Table 1 is EDS analysis results of different points in Fig.9. According to Table 1, the lightest part in Fig.9a and 9b is the TiAlV alloy. The cross-section of the products exhibits an irregular shape, and the product is embedded in the substrate formed by the condensation of excess molten Ca. The internal filling of TiAlV alloy is CaO and a small amount of Ca. Combined with the morphology of the products in Fig.6, it can be determined that when the calciothermic deep reduction temperature is 900 °C, Ca pene-trates the void of the titanium sub-oxides in a liquid form, and deoxidation occurs after the contact between liquid Ca and titanium sub-oxides. The generated CaO is precipitated as a solid phase. Excess Ca remains in the voids of TiAlV alloy phase. The final products form a dense contracted smooth morphology. Fig.9c shows the microstructure of TiAlV alloy powder after acid leaching, which is a typical porous hollow shape. Fig.9d distinctly shows an incompletely sintered diffu-sion phase. From the results of EDS analysis in Table 1, it can

Fig.8 shows the analysis results of the particle size distribution of the products at different stages during the preparation of Ti6Al4V alloy powders. The magnesiothermic self-propagating primary reduction products before and after leaching and the calciothermic deep reduction products after leaching at 1173 K are marked as product A, B, and C, respectively. The average particle size of product B and C does not change significantly, indicating that the calciothermic deep reduction process does not cause excessive growth of the final products. The D10, D50, and D90 values of the calciothermic deep reduction products after acid leaching are 7.52, 34.6 and 81.0 μm, respectively. SSA of product A, B, and C is 0.173, 0.461, 0.328 m2·g-1, respectively.

Table 1 EDS analysis results of of point 1~5 in Fig.9 (wt%)
PointTiAlVMgCaO
1 2.94 0.47 0.18 - 96.41 -
2 91.93 4.14 1.64 - 2.29 -
3 3.38 0.1 0.25 - 71.24 25.03
4 77.65 0.86 19.26 - 0.23 -
5 92.90 6.82 0.04 0.25 - -

be concluded that V and Al elements in the calciothermic deep reduction products are not evenly distributed in Ti, but form Ti-V-rich phase and Ti-Al-rich phase.

2.4 Production cycle assessment

The new method proposed in this research involves four main production steps: self-propagating primary reduction process, deep reduction process, and two times of acid leaching and drying processes, as shown in Fig.1. The required time for each process is shown in Table 2. This method makes full use of the huge chemical energy contained in the raw materials. In the self-propagating primary reduction stage, only a small amount of electrical energy is required to initiate the reaction. The deep reduction stage consumes electric energy, but the energy consumption is not large.

Table 2 Process duration of main production processes (h)
ProcessDuration
Self-propagating primary reduction 5~6
Deep reduction 15
Acid leaching and drying 12

Therefore, this novel method can complete a production cycle within 48 h, which has huge industrial production potential and is much shorter than the production cycle of Kroll process[

23].

3 Conclusions

1) A multistage depth reduction process, i. e., magnesio-thermic self-propagation primary reduction and calciothermic deep reduction can obtain low-oxygen Ti6Al4V alloy powder using TiO2, V2O5, and Al as raw materials.

2) During the magnesiothermic self-propagating primary reduction process, as the Mg content increases, the TiO content in the products gradually decreases, indicating that the deoxidation reaction becomes more difficult. The porous

Ti-Al-V-O precursor material with 6.74wt%~16.4wt% oxygen content can be obtained, and no composite metal oxide appears in this process.

3) After reduction at 1173 K for 3.5 h in the calciothermic deep reduction process, high-purity Ti6Al4V alloy powder can be obtained.

4) This novel method has the characteristics of short production cycle and non-pollution, and is expected to be used for industrial production.

References

1

Guo Shibo, Qu Xuanhui, Duan Bohua et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2005, 34(7): 1123 [Baidu Scholar

2

Song Yulai, Dou Zhihe, Zhang Tingan et al. Journal of Alloys & Compounds[J], 2019, 789: 266 [Baidu Scholar

3

Zai Xiongfei, Chen Shiqi. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2019, 48(5): 1461 [Baidu Scholar

4

Azevedo C R F, Rodrigues D, Neto F B. Journal of Alloys & Compounds[J], 2003, 353(1-2): 217 [Baidu Scholar

5

Chen G Z, Fray D J, Farthing T W. Cheminform[J], 2010, 32(2): 361 [Baidu Scholar

6

Chen G Z, Fray D J. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy[J], 2006, 115(1): 49 [Baidu Scholar

7

Shi Ruimeng, Bao Longfei, Zhang Bo. Advanced Materials Research[J], 2011, 40(11): 2043 [Baidu Scholar

8

Du Jihong, Li Qingyu, Yang Shenghong et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J] 2009, 38(12): 2230 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar

9

Suzuki P O, Ono K, Teranuma K. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B[J], 2003, 32(3): 287 [Baidu Scholar

10

Park I, Abiko T, Okabe T H. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids[J], 2005, 66(2-4): 410 [Baidu Scholar

11

Jiao Shuqiang, Zhu Hongming. Journal of Alloys & Compounds[J], 2007, 438(1-2): 243 [Baidu Scholar

12

Chen W, Yamamoto Y, Peter W H et al. Powder Technology[J], 2011, 214(2): 194 [Baidu Scholar

13

Weil K S, Hovanski Y, Lavender C A. Journal of Alloys & Compounds[J], 2009, 473(1): 39 [Baidu Scholar

14

Froes F H, Eranezhuth B G, Senkov O N. US Patent, US6152982[P], 2000 [Baidu Scholar

15

Wei Xuemei, Lu Xionggang, Xiao Wei. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals[J], 2013, 23(11): 3248 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar

16

Nersisyan H H, Won H I, Won C W et al. Chemical Engineering Journal[J], 2014, 235: 67 [Baidu Scholar

17

Nersisyan H H, Won H I, Won C W et al. Powder Technology[J], 2014, 254: 57 [Baidu Scholar

18

Zhang Tingan, Dou Zhihe, Liu Yan et al. China Patent, CN107236869A[P], 2017 [Baidu Scholar

19

Fan Shigang, Dou Zhihe, Zhang Tingan et al. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B[J], 2019, 50(1): 282 [Baidu Scholar

20

Lei Xianjun, Xu Baoqiang, Yang Guobo et al. Materials Science & Engineering C[J], 2018, 91: 125 [Baidu Scholar

21

Mo Wei, Deng Guozhu, Luo Fangcheng. Titanium Metallurgy[M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 1998 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar

22

Sahu K K, Alex T C, Mishra D et al. Waste Management & Research[J], 2006, 24(1): 74 [Baidu Scholar

23

Li Liang, Li Kaihua, Miao Qingdong et al. Noneferrous Metals: Extractive Metallurgy[J], 2015(8): 27 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar