Abstract
The effects of micro-alloying treatment on corrosion resistance and mechanical properties of biomaterial magnesium alloy were investigated by optical microscope (OM), scanning electron microscope (SEM), immersion test, electrochemical test, and tensile test. The results show that after successively adding Zn, Zr, and Dy, the grain of magnesium alloys is refined and the second phase is generated and grows up. When Zn, Zr, and Dy are simultaneously added into magnesium alloy, the grain size of alloy is decreased from 1087 μm to 70 μm and the microstructure becomes more uniform. Moreover, the addition of Zn, Zr, and Dy significantly improves the corrosion resistance and mechanical properties of magnesium alloy: the corrosion rate decreases from 2.01 mm/a to 0.92 mm/a; the self-corrosion current density decreases from 4.22 μA/c
Science Press
Magnesium alloys can avoid stress shielding effect because their elastic modulus and density are similar to those of human bone. Moreover, magnesium ion is one of the fundamental elements of life activit
To overcome the disadvantages of fast corrosion rate during the service life of magnesium alloys, many studies have been conducted to improve the corrosion resistance, such as micro-alloying, heat treatment, and thermal deformatio
Zhang et a
Different contents of elements Zn, Zr, and Dy were added into magnesium (99.95wt%) to obtain Mg-2Zn, Mg-2Zn-0.5Zr, and Mg-2Zn-0.5Zr-1.5Dy alloys. The alloys were melted in a ZGJL0.01-40-4 type furnace, and the mixed gas of SF6+CO2 was used as the protective gas. When the alloys were heated to 740 °C in a graphite crucible and kept at 720 °C for 5 min, the melted alloys were then poured into a preheated steel mold with the size of 160 mm×45 mm×100 mm at 200 °C. Mg (99.95wt%) and Zn (99.99wt%) were added as pure metals, Zr was added as Mg-Zr with 30wt% Zr, and Dy was added as Mg-Dy with 20wt% Dy.
The alloys were machined by cutting-wire into specimens of Φ11.3 mm×8 mm in size. The specimen surface was firstly polished by sandpaper of 800#, 1000#, 1500#, and 2000# and then by the polishing machine. Finally the specimens were washed by pure water and ethanol to observe the micro-structure of the specimen by scanning electron microscope(SEM, JSM-5610LV, JEOL, JAPAN) equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS). The specimen surface was etched and polished by 4vol% nitric acid alcohol solution, and the microstructure was observed by Zeiss optical micro-scope (OM, OLYMPUS PMG3, JAPAN). D8 ADVANCE X-ray diffractometer (XRD) equipped with Cu target Kα rays was used to analyze the phases of alloys. The angle range was set as 15°~85°, and the scanning speed was set as 2°/min.
Specimens with a size of Φ18 mm×5 mm were obtained for the immersion test, and the corrosion was conducted in the simulated body fluid (SBF) solution. The ratio of the SBF volume to the specimen area was 30 mL/c
CR=8.76W×1 | (1) |
where CR is the corrosion rate of alloy (mm/a); W is the mass loss after immersion (g); A is the area of specimen (c
The specimen size for electrochemical test was Φ11.3 mm×8 mm. The polarization curve and impedance were obtained by NOVA Autolab electrochemical workstation (AUT84580). The electrochemical test started after the specimen was immersed in SBF solution for 1 h. The potential range of the polarization curve was set as -1.9~-1.2 V, and the scan rate was 0.005 V/s. The impedance frequency range was set as 1
The specimen size for tensile test was set according to the GB6397-86 standard. Shimadzu AG-1250KN material testing machine was used for tensile test at room temperature. The tensile rate was 1 mm/min, and each type of alloys was tested 5 times.

Fig.1 OM microstructures of Mg (a), Mg-2Zn (b), Mg-2Zn-0.5Zr (c), and Mg-2Zn-0.5Zr-1.5Dy (d) alloys

Fig.2 SEM microstructures of Mg (a), Mg-2Zn (b), Mg-2Zn-0.5Zr (c), and Mg-2Zn-0.5Zr-1.5Dy (d) alloys
XRD patterns of different alloys are shown in Fig.3. Mg-Zn-Dy appears after Dy addition, but the second phase of Mg-Zn cannot be detected because the content is too small. There is little second phase in the alloys, so it can be inferred that some added elements are dissolved into the alloys. Zn and Dy have a good solid solubility in magnesium alloys, which can lead to solid solution strengthening of the alloys and improve the corrosion resistance and mechanical properties of the alloy

Fig.4a shows the results of immersion experiment. The corrosion rate of Mg is 2.01 mm/a. With gradually increasing the number of alloying elements, the corrosion rate of alloys is decreased. The corrosion rate of Mg-2Zn-0.5Zr-1.5Dy alloy is the lowest of 0.92 mm/a, and it is reduced by 63.7% compared with that of magnesium matrix. The change trend of corrosion rate result is consistent with that of the hydrogen evolution result, as shown in Fig.4b.

Fig.4b shows the results of hydrogen evolution of Mg and different alloys. With gradually increasing the number of alloying elements, the volume of released hydrogen is decreased. According to the chemical reaction of Mg+2


Fig.5 Appearances of Mg (a) and different alloys after immersion for 120 h: (b) Mg-2Zn, (c) Mg-2Zn-0.5Zr, and (d) Mg-2Zn-0.5Zr-1.5Dy

Fig.6 Corrosion morphologies of Mg (a) and different alloys after immersion for 120 h: (b) Mg-2Zn, (c) Mg-2Zn-0.5Zr, and
(d) Mg-2Zn-0.5Zr-1.5Dy

Table 2 Related experiment results from polarization curves
The polarization curves of different alloys after immersion for 1 h are shown in Fig.7. Based on the polarization curves, the self-corrosion potential (Ecorr) and self-corrosion current density (Icorr) of Mg and alloy specimens can be estimated. As shown in Table 2, Icorr of Mg specimen is 4.22 μA/c
As shown in Fig.8a~8c, the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) diagrams show that the reaction capacity of the alloys in solution is usually based on the magnitude of the arc resistance modulus. The larger the modulus, the greater the reaction resistance and the slower the corrosion rate of anode allo
Fig.8d shows the equivalent circuit obtained from the impedance arc. Since two capacitive arcs appear in the impedance spectrum, there are two time constants in the equivalent circuit. CEP1 represents the capacitive reactance between the SBF solution and the substrate, and CEP2 represents the double-layer capacitive reactance between the substrate and the solution. Rs, R1, and R2 denote the solution resistance, corrosion product layer resistance, and Faraday resistance, respectively. Table 3 shows the soft fitting results of the corresponding equivalent circuits of Mg and different alloy specimens. It can be seen from the results that when Zn, Zr, and Dy elements are added, the sum of R1 and R2 is the largest, indicating that the exchange of electronegative ions is difficult and the corrosion rate of the alloy is the lowest.

Table 3 Soft fitting results of EIS circuit of Mg and different alloy specimens in SBF solution
Fig.9 shows the tensile test results of Mg and different alloys. The yield strength (YS), ultimate tensile strength (UTS), and elongation (EL) of Mg specimen are 30.5 MPa, 69.5 MPa, and 6%, respectively. With gradually increasing the number of alloying elements, the comprehensive mechanical properties of magnesium alloys are gradually optimized. Mg-2Zn-0.5Zr-1.5Dy alloy has the best comprehensive mechanical properties and its YS, UTS, and EL are 84 MPa, 154 MPa, and 8.6%, which are 83%, 121.6%, and 43.3% higher than those of Mg specimen, respectively.
The pitting corrosion occurs due to the potential difference between the particles in the alloy and the magnesium matrix, which alleviates the corrosion of magnesium in SBF solution. The greater the potential difference, the faster the corrosion rate. When the magnesium matrix around the particles is dissolved in SBF solution, the particles fall off to form pits. The pitting corrosion can be formed deeply in the alloy, so it has a great influence on the mechanical properties of the alloy. Filiform corrosion is formed because the protective film can be easily formed on the surface of magnesium alloys. The surface with initial protective film cannot be easily corroded in SBF solution, but the surface without protection can be easily corroded. Therefore, the corrosion occurs along the edge of the film layer and a new film layer can be continuously formed after corrosion, which can slow the corrosion rate of alloy

Magnesium alloy contains impurity particles which may easily cause a potential difference between impurity particles and the magnesium matrix, and accelerate the corrosion of the magnesium matrix around the impurity particle
Zr element can purify the impurity elements in magnesium, thereby improving the corrosion resistance of alloys. The standard electrode potential of Zn (-0.76 V) and Dy (-2.35 V) is higher than that of the Mg matrix (-2.37 V
The characteristic of Icorr and Eb from the electrochemical test system can reflect the corrosion rate of alloys. The lower the Icorr, the better the corrosion resistance of the allo
The UTS is increased from 69.5 MPa to 154 MPa, and the YS is increased from 30.5 MPa to 84 MPa because of the addition of Zn, Zr, and Dy elements. During the tensile deformation of alloys, lattice distortion occurs at the grain boundaries. Slippage needs to overcome the hindrance of the grain boundarie
Besides, the pinning of the second phase particles can also hinder the slippage. Due to the addition of alloying elements, the grain is refined and the second phase are generated, thereby improving the overall mechanical properties of the alloys. In addition to the strengthening effects of the intermetallic phase, the addition of Dy may also contribute to the solid solution strengthening of the Mg matri
1) The addition of Zn, Zr, and Dy elements can refine the grain size, reduce the self-corrosion current density, and enhance the corrosion resistance of magnesium alloys.
2) As for magnesium-based alloys, the strengthening effect of Mg-Zn and Mg-Zn-Dy phases and the solid solution strengthening effect caused by Dy element can lead to the enhancement of yield strength of alloys. Mg-2Zn-0.5Zr-1.5Dy alloy shows the highest yield strength.
3) With the addition of Zn, Zr, and Dy elements, the corrosion resistance and mechanical properties of alloys are greatly improved.
References
Zhang Jia, Zong Yang, Yuan Guangyin et al. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals[J], 2010, 20(10): 1989 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Moussa M E, Mohamed H I, Waly M A et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds [J], 2019, 792: 1239 [Baidu Scholar]
Chen Yang, Dou Jiehe, Yu Huijun et al. Journal of Dental Biomaterials[J], 2019, 33(10): 1348 [Baidu Scholar]
Banerjee P C, Saadi S A, Choudhary L et al. Materials[J], 2019, 12(1): 136 [Baidu Scholar]
Nurettin S, Zafer E, Said M K et al. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys[J], 2018, 6(1): 23 [Baidu Scholar]
Li H, Wen J B, He J G et al. Advanced Engineering Materials[J], 2020, 22(4): 1 901 360 [Baidu Scholar]
Xu D Z, He J G, Wen J B et al. Mater Res Exp[J], 2019, 6(12): 125 411 [Baidu Scholar]
Chen J X, Tan L L, Yu X M et al. J Mech Behav Biomed[J], 2018, 87: 68 [Baidu Scholar]
Li Y C, Wen C E, Mushahary D et al. Acta Biomaterialia[J], 2012, 8(8): 3177 [Baidu Scholar]
Cai C, Song R, Wang L et al. Surf Coat Technol[J], 2018, 342: 57 [Baidu Scholar]
Qin Hui, Zhao Yaochao, An Zhiquan et al. Biomaterials[J], 2015, 53: 211 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang Shaoxiang, Zhang Xiaonong, Zhao Changli et al. Acta Biomaterialia[J], 2010, 6(2): 626 [Baidu Scholar]
Peng G S, Wang Y, Fan Z. Metall Mater Trans A[J], 2018, 49(6): 2182 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang Jinyang, Jia Peng, Xu Shumin et al. Mater Res Exp[J], 2018, 5(1): 16 506 [Baidu Scholar]
Li Huan, Wen Jiuba, He Junguang et al. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment[J], 2019, 40(7): 6 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Munir K, Lin J X, Wen C E et al. Acta Biomaterialia[J], 2020, 102: 493 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhao Xu, Shi Lingling, Xu Jian. J Mater Sci Technol[J], 2013, 29(9): 781 [Baidu Scholar]
Yang L, Hort N, Laipple D et al. Acta Biomaterialia[J], 2013, [Baidu Scholar]
9(10): 8475 [Baidu Scholar]
Ding Yunfei, Lin Jixing, Wen Cuie et al. J Biomed Mater Res Part B[J], 2018, 106(6): 2425 [Baidu Scholar]
Ding Y F, Wen C, Hodgson P et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry B[J], 2014, 2(14): 1912 [Baidu Scholar]
Gandel D S, Easton M A, Gibson M A et al. Corrosion Science[J], 2014, 81: 27 [Baidu Scholar]
Bi Guangli, Jiang Jing, Zhang Fan et al. J Rare Earths[J], 2016, 34(9): 931 [Baidu Scholar]
Bi G L, Li Y D, Huang X F et al. Mater Sci Eng A[J], 2015, 622: 52 [Baidu Scholar]
Yao Huai, Wen Jiuba, Xiong Yi et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2019, 48(6): 1982 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang B P, Wang Y, Geng L et al. Mat Sci Eng A[J], 2012, 539: 56 [Baidu Scholar]
Long T, Zhang X H, Huang Q L et al. Virtual and Physical Prototyping [J], 2018, 13(2): 71 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang Xiaobo, Yuan Guangyin, Wang Zhangzhong. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals[J], 2013, 23(4): 905 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Esmaily M, Svensson J E, Fajardo S et al. Progress in Materials Science[J], 2017, 89: 92 [Baidu Scholar]
Yang Chubin, Zhang Zhen, Jiang Xinyi et al. Foundry[J], 2019, 68(7): 684 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Zong Y, Yuan G Y, Zhang X B et al. Mater Sci and Eng B[J],2012, 177(5): 395 [Baidu Scholar]
Bordbar-Khiabani A, Yarmand B, Mozafari M. Emerging Materials Research[J] 2019, 8(3): 305 [Baidu Scholar]
Yang L, Ma L G, Huang Y D et al. Materials Science & Engineering C[J], 2017, 75: 1351 [Baidu Scholar]
Li T, Zhang H L, He Y et al. Journal of Materials Science and Technology[J], 2015, 31(7): 744 [Baidu Scholar]
Chen Junxiu, Tan Lili, Yang Ke et al. Bioactive Materials[J], 2017, 2(1): 19 [Baidu Scholar]
Lin D J, Hung F Y, Liu H J et al. Advanced Engineering Materials[J], 2017, 19(11): 1 700 159 [Baidu Scholar]
Yang L, Huang Y D, Feyerabend F et al. J Mech Behav Biomed[J], 2012, 13: 36 [Baidu Scholar]
Chen L X, Sheng Y Y, Wang X J et al. Materials[J], 2018, [Baidu Scholar]
11(4): 55 [Baidu Scholar]