+Advanced Search
网刊加载中。。。

使用Chrome浏览器效果最佳,继续浏览,你可能不会看到最佳的展示效果,

确定继续浏览么?

复制成功,请在其他浏览器进行阅读

Microstructure and Magnetocaloric Effect of Spark Plasma Sintered LaFeSi Magnets with LaAl Addition  PDF

  • Fu Xiaokun 1
  • Shu Rong 2
  • Hou Yuhua 1
  • Liu Yanying 1
  • Huang Youlin 1
  • Li Wei 1
  • Fan Wenbing 1
1. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, China; 2. School of Aeronautical Manufacturing Engineering, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, China

Updated:2022-04-28

  • Full Text
  • Figs & Tabs
  • References
  • Authors
  • About
CN CITE
OUTLINE

Abstract

Using LaFe11.3Si1.7 and La0.77Al0.23 alloys as precursors, the bulk LaFeSi samples with excellent magnetocaloric performance were synthesized through the spark plasma sintering (SPS) technology. The results show that the La0.77Al0.23 compound with a low melting point is helpful in facilitating peritectic reaction, and NaZn13-type phase with high content can be achieved. A slight itinerant-electron-metamagnetic transition is observed. The increased thermal annealing time facilitates magnetic transition from the first order to the second order, which is ascribed to the excessive Al diffusion into the 1:13 phase. Under the thermal treatment condition of 1000 °C/6 h, the maximum entropy change (-ΔSM) max of 12.40 J∙kg-1K-1 can be obtained, and the highest refrigerating capacity, up to 318.40 J∙kg-1, is achieved under thermal annealing condition of 1000 °C/10 h.

Science Press

Giant magnetocaloric effect materials are widely concerned for their energy conservation and high efficiency, and are potential candidates for gas compression refrigeration materials[

1-5]. Several families of magnetocaloric materials have been found such as Mn-based alloys with Fe2P-type structure[6], Gd5(SixGe1-x)4 [7] and LaFe13-xSix with 1:13 phase[8-10], among which the LaFeSi-based alloys have the advantages of low cost, non-toxicity, giant magnetocaloric effect and tunable operating temperature, which has been widely concerned[3,11-14]. Generally, when 1.0⩽x⩽1.6, the LaFe13-xSix compounds demonstrate the characteristics of first order transition, and excellent magnetocaloric performance can be obtained, accompanied by itinerant-electron-metamagnetic transforma-tion from paramagnetism to ferromagnetism and the large change of cell volume approaching TC [15-18]. However, due to the large thermal hysteresis loss and narrow operating temperature scope, the application of first order materials is greatly limited. For x>1.6[19,20], LaFeSi materials generally exhibit almost no magnetic and thermal hysteresis loss, and possess wide operating temperature scope, thus showing great potential application, although having the disadvantage of smaller magnetic entropy change. In the previous study, through adding LaAl alloy during sintering, LaFeSi samples with first order transition were prepared, and it is found that the peritectic reaction can be facilitated, and meanwhile the densification of samples is also improved significantly[21]. In this work, based on the SPS technique, LaFeSi magnets with second order transition were synthesized, and microstructure evolution and magnetocaloric performance optimization were studied.

1 Experiment

La0.77Al0.23 and LaFe11.3Si1.7 alloys were fabricated through arc melting followed by melt spinning in the argon atmos-phere with high purity, under the optimal speed of 35 m/s. The purity of initial materials for Fe, Si, La and Al was 99.95wt%, 99.9wt%, 99.5wt% and 99.996wt%, respectively. Additional 5wt% of La was appended to compensate the La loss during arc melting. The mass ratio of blended powders for LaFe11.3Si1.7 and La0.77Al0.23 was 0.95:0.05 according to the optimized processes[

21]. Using the optimized process parameter (1000 °C/50 MPa/10 min), the bulk samples were prepared by SPS. Afterwards, magnetocaloric performance was adjusted by thermal annealing at 1000 °C for 6~12 h, in an evacuated quartz tube cleaned by argon, followed by water quenching. For comparison, the La0.77Al0.23-free sintered samples were also prepared, and the optimized thermal annealing process was determined (1000 °C/10 h). The microstructural morphology of samples was characterized through a QUANTA-200 scanning electron microscope. The compositional constituent was determined using the energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS). Magnetic performance was tested by a PPMS-DynaCool system in the temperature interval from 50~380 K with a maximum 5 T magnetic field.

2 Results and Discussion

XRD patterns of LaFe11.3Si1.7/La0.77Al0.23 samples annealed at 1000 °C for 6~12 h are demonstrated in Fig.1, and for comparison, XRD pattern of La0.77Al0.23-free sintered LaFe11.3Si1.7 sample annealed at 1000 °C for 10 h is also supplied. One can see from Fig.1 that sintered samples all contain 1:13 phase and α-Fe phase, whether or not La0.77Al0.23 alloy is added. For sintered samples with and without La0.77Al0.23 addition, it is found that in comparison with the diffraction peak intensity of 1:13 phase, that of residual α-Fe phase reduces significantly, indicating that the added La0.77Al0.23 alloy is helpful in elevating the content of 1:13 phase, which is due to the fact that the introduction of La element from La0.77Al0.23 is helpful in facilitating the peritectic reaction[

2]. For LaFeSi/La0.77Al0.23 samples, when annealing was at 1000 °C for 6 h, compared to the intensity for α-Fe phase diffraction peak, the maximum peak intensity of 1:13 phase can be observed among samples, indicating that the maximum content of NaZn13-type phase has been achieved. However, upon increasing thermal treatment time to 10 h, in comparison with the diffraction peak intensity of 1:13 phase, that of the α-Fe phase increases significantly. With enhancing thermal annealing time to 12 h, the diffraction peak corresponding to the 1:1:1 phase can be observed, indicating that the 1:13 phase may have been decomposed[21].

Fig.1  XRD patterns of LaFe11.3Si1.7 samples with and without LaAl addition annealed at 1000 °C for 6, 10 and 12 h

SEM image of sintered LaFe11.3Si1.7 sample is illustrated in Fig.2a. One can see that there are three zones with various contrasts, i.e. grey zone, black zone and white zone, represented by point 1, 2, and 3, respectively. From EDS results listed in Table 1, it can be seen that for the point 1 in gray zone, the elemental composition of La, Fe and Si is 7.66at%, 78.46at%, and 13.89at%, respectively, indicating that the gray zone should be 1:13 phase. As to the black zone, the Fe content of 88.55at% is determined, meaning that it is α-Fe phase. For point 3, the elemental composition consists of 60.61at% La, 31.45at% Fe and 7.49at% Si, demonstrating the La-rich phase. The microstructure of LaFe11.3Si1.7/La0.77Al0.23 samples are displayed in Fig.2b~2d. It is found that equally sintered LaFeSi samples with La0.77Al0.23 addition are also composed of three zones with the same contrast, as represented by point 4, 5 and 6 in Fig.2b, i.e. La-rich phase, α-Fe phase and 1:13 phase, respectively. The difference is that the Al element can all be observed in three different zones as demonstrated in Table 1, which ascribes to the addition of La0.77Al0.23 in sintering, suggesting that the Al element has diffused into La-rich phase, α-Fe phase and 1:13 phase. Comparing Fig.2a with Fig.2c, it is shown that the surface fraction of black zone decreases from 13.1% to 5.7%, indicating that the addition of La0.77Al0.23 intergranular phase can reduce the α-Fe phase content in sintered samples. The introduction of La element to the promotion of peritectic reaction should be responsible for this[

2]. This is also in accordance with the discussion of XRD in Fig.1.

Fig.2  Microstructural morphologies of LaFe11.3Si1.7 samples without (a) and with (b~d) LaAl addition annealed at 1000 °C for different time:

(a) 10 h, (b) 6 h, (c) 10 h and (d) 12 h

Table 1  EDS results for different zones represented by points 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 in Fig.2a and Fig.2b (at%)
PointAlLaFeSi
1 - 7.66 78.46 13.89
2 - 4.16 88.55 7.28
3 - 60.61 31.45 7.94
4 1.25 40.99 53.16 4.60
5 1.76 0.33 90.41 7.50
6 4.33 7.69 74.23 13.75

The thermal treatment processes have an important influence on magnetocaloric performance and microstructure. When annealing is at 1000 °C for 6 h, La-rich phase, 1:13 phase and a little of α-Fe phase can be found in LaFe11.3Si1.7/La0.77Al0.23 sample. When the annealing time of 10 h is adopted, the surface fraction of black zone increases from 0.9% to 5.7%, indicating the rise of α-Fe phase content. Prolonging the annealing time to 12 h, a large number of white zones consisting of La-rich phase (the volume fractions of around 7.1%) are formed, and some lamellar microstructures are also observed, as shown in dotted line circles in Fig.2d, generally signifying the decomposition of 1:13 phase[

10].

Fig.3 shows the magnetization (M) vs temperature (T) curves for sintered LaFe11.3Si1.7 sample annealed at 1000 °C for 10 h and LaFe11.3Si1.7/La0.77Al0.23 samples annealed at 1000 °C for 6, 10, and 12 h, under 4×104 A/m magnetic field over a temperature range of 50~380 K. It can be seen that compared with La0.77Al0.23-free LaFe11.3Si1.7 magnet, the lower residual magnetization is observed in the case of paramagnetism above TC for LaFe11.3Si1.7/La0.77Al0.23 samples, meaning that the addition of La0.77Al0.23 is helpful in reducing α-Fe phase content, which is also in agreement with the previous discussion of XRD patterns and SEM images. Meanwhile, it is found that LaFe11.3Si1.7/La0.77Al0.23 magnet annealed for 6 h possesses the minimum value of residual magnetization above Curie temperature and the steepest transition from ferromagnetism to paramagnetism, which suggests that 1:13 phase of the highest content can be obtained, and excellent magnetocaloric performance will be achieved. Upon increasing annealing time to 12 h, the higher residual magnetization in the paramagnetic state indicates that much more α-Fe phase will exist in comparison with samples produced for 6 and 10 h.

Fig.3  Magnetization (M) vs temperature (T) curves for LaFe11.3Si1.7 samples with and without La0.77Al0.23 addition annealed at 1000 °C for 6, 10 and 12 h

Fig.4 displays isothermal magnetization curves for LaFe11.3Si1.7 samples with and without La0.77Al0.23 addition. For all the samples, upon measured temperature is lower than the respective TC, the saturation magnetization is reached rapidly in a small magnetic field, showing a ferromagnetic characterization. While the tested temperature is higher than the corresponding TC, the samples demonstrate the paramagnetic character. During this transition of FM-PM process, a slight itinerant-electron-metamagnetic transition and magnetic hysteresis can be observed in Fig.4b, which is attributed to the high Si content of initial compositional design [

19, 20].

Fig.4  Isothermal magnetization curves of LaFe11.3Si1.7 samples without La0.77Al0.23 (a) and with 5wt% La0.77Al0.23 (b~d) annealed at 1000 °C for 6, 10 and 12 h

Arrott curves can be determined according to Laudau theory. Generally, the first order transition presents S-shape characteristics in Arrot curves, and the linear relationship above Curie temperature implies the second order magnetic transition. Arrott curves of sintered samples with and without La0.77Al0.23 addition are displayed in Fig.5. It is seen that the La0.77Al0.23-free magnet shows the characteristics of the second order transition, caused by the initial compositional design. However, in the sintered LaFe11.3Si1.7/La0.77Al0.23 sample annealed for 6 h, the weak S-type characteristics in Arrott curves are observed, demonstrating the first order magnetic transition characteristics, which is attributed to the diffusion of La into 1:13 phase. Meanwhile, with the increase of annealing time, the characteristics of S-shape for Arrott curves vanish, showing the linear relationship above TC. It means that a magnetic behavior changes from the first toward the second order, which should be attributed to the excessive Al diffusion into 1:13 phase [

21].

Fig.5  Arrott curves of LaFe11.3Si1.7 samples without (a) and with (b~d) La0.77Al0.23 annealed at 1000 °C for 6, 10 and 12 h

Based on the Maxwell relation, the magnetic entropy change ∆SM can be determined. Fig.6 shows (-ΔSM)-T curves for LaFe11.3Si1.7 samples without and with La0.77Al0.23 addition under different annealing time, within a 0~5 T magnetic field range. Refrigeration properties, Curie temperature and thermal hysteresis are shown in Table 2. As for sintered magnet with-out La0.77Al0.23 addition, the highest value of 10.26 J∙kg-1K-1 for (-∆SM)max can be obtained. Through adding La0.77Al0.23 alloy during sintering, the highest (-∆SM)max value of 12.40 J∙kg-1K-1 is achieved, which suggests that the added La0.77Al0.23 alloy is helpful in elevating magnetocaloric performance. For LaFe11.3Si1.7/La0.77Al0.23 samples, upon raising the annealing time, the obtained low maximum magnetic entropy change may be attributed to the dissolution of excess Al in 1:13 phase. However, the maximum refrigeration capacity (RC) of 318.40 J∙kg-1 is found in the sample annealed for 10 h, which is ascribed to its low thermal hysteresis. Curie temperature TC of LaFeSi samples can be determined according to the inset in Fig.3, as listed in Table 2, and it changes between 215 and 235 K. As analyzed above, Al element has dissolved into NaZn13-type phase to replace the Fe. As a result, the antiferromagnetic interaction between Fe-Al atoms is enhanced, and meanwhile, the elevated volume of unit cell aroused by Al replacing Fe can increase exchange coupling between Fe-Fe atoms. Therefore, the variation of Curie temperature between 215~222 K should be ascribed to this.

Fig.6  SM vs T curves of LaFe11.3Si1.7 samples without La0.77Al0.23 and with 5wt% La0.77Al0.23 annealed at 1000 °C for different time within the field range of 0~5 T

Table 2  Curie temperature, thermal hysteresis, and refrigera-tion properties for the La0.77Al0.23-free magnet and LaAl added LaFe11.3Si1.7 samples annealed at 1000 °C for various time
SampleTC/KThermal hysteresis/K

(∆SM)max/

J∙kg-1K-1

RC/J∙kg-1
10 h/LaAl-free 225 10 10.26 299.50
6 h/LaAl 215 15 12.40 299.83
10 h/LaAl 235 10 6.85 318.40
12 h/LaAl 220 5 8.12 306.69

3 Conclusions

1) Through adding La0.77Al0.23 alloy during sintering, the bulk LaFe11.3Si1.7/La0.77Al0.23 samples can be prepared by SPS technology.

2) The addition of La0.77Al0.23 is facilitated to the rise of 1:13 phase content, and can suppress the formation of α-Fe phase, which is due to the fact that the introduction of La element from La0.77Al0.23 is helpful in promoting peritectic reaction.

3) The thermal treatment processes have an important influence on the magnetocaloric effect and microstructure. A tendency of magnetic transformation from the first order toward the second order can be induced by prolonging annealing time. The highest (-∆SM)max, up to 12.40 J∙kg-1K-1, and the maximum refrigeration capacity of 318.40 J∙kg-1 can be achieved when thermal treatment time is 6 and 10 h, respectively. Meanwhile, a slight magnetic hysteresis loss and itinerant-electron-metamagnetic phenomenon can be observed.

References

1

Skokov K P, Karpenkov D Y, Kuz'min M D et al. Journal of Applied Physics[J], 2014, 115(17): 941 [Baidu Scholar] 

2

Krautz M, Funk A, Skokov K P et al. Scripta Materialia[J], 2015, 95: 50 [Baidu Scholar] 

3

Zhang H, Liu J, Zhang M X et al. Scripta Materialia[J], 2016, 120: 58 [Baidu Scholar] 

4

Gschneidnerjr K A, Pecharsky V K, Tsokol A O. Reports on Progress in Physics[J], 2005, 68: 1479 [Baidu Scholar] 

5

Franco V, Blazquez J S, Ingale B et al. Annual Review of Materials Research[J], 2012, 42: 305 [Baidu Scholar] 

6

Tegus O, Brück E, Buschow K H J et al. Nature[J], 2002, 415: 150 [Baidu Scholar] 

7

Pecharsky V K, Gschneidner K A. Physical Review Letters[J], 1997, 78: 4494 [Baidu Scholar] 

8

Liu J, Krautz M, Skokov K et al. Acta Materialia[J], 2011, 59: 3602 [Baidu Scholar] 

9

Zhang H, Zhang M X, Shao Y Y et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2017, 720: 432 [Baidu Scholar] 

10

Lӧwe K, Liu J, Skokov K et al. Acta Materialia[J], 2012, 60: 4268 [Baidu Scholar] 

11

Zhong X C, Feng X L, Huang X W et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2016, 686: 913 [Baidu Scholar] 

12

Zhang M X, Liu J, Zhang Y et al. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials[J], 2015, 377: 90 [Baidu Scholar] 

13

Hu F X, Shen B G, Sun J R et al. Applied Physics Letters[J], 2001, 78: 3675 [Baidu Scholar] 

14

Hou X L, Tian Y, Xue Y et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2016, 669: 205 [Baidu Scholar] 

15

Fujita A, Akamatsu Y, Fukamichi K J. Journal of Applied Physics[J], 1999, 85: 4756 [Baidu Scholar] 

16

Hou X L, Lampen-Kelley P, Xue Y et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2015, 646: 503 [Baidu Scholar] 

17

Ipus J J, Borrego J M, Moreno-Ramirez L M et al. Intermetallics[J], 2017, 84: 30 [Baidu Scholar] 

18

Lyubina J, Gutfleisch O, Kuz'min M D et al. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials[J], 2008, 320: 2252 [Baidu Scholar] 

19

Dong Q Y, Zhang H Y, Chen J et al. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials[J], 2013, 331: 183 [Baidu Scholar] 

20

Shen B G, Sun J R, Hu F X et al. Advanced Materials[J], 2009, 21: 4545 [Baidu Scholar] 

21

Fan W B, Hou Y H, Ge X J et al. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics[J], 2018, 51: 115 003 [Baidu Scholar]