Abstract
The arc erosion behavior of CuCr25 cathode material in oxygen, argon, and carbon dioxide atmospheres under voltage of 9 kV was studied. The arc duration and arc energy are decreased with changing the atmosphere in the order of oxygen, argon, and carbon dioxide, whereas the variation trend of breakdown strength is opposite. The erosion morphologies of molten pools, bulges, holes, splashes, and cracks formed on the CuCr25 material surface under the high temperature and high energy of the arc were analyzed by scanning electron microscope and three-dimensional laser scanning confocal microscope. The results indicate that the most severe erosion occurs in oxygen atmosphere and the slightest erosion occurs in carbon dioxide atmosphere, which can be attributed to the differences in arc energy. According to the results of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis, the oxidation reactions in oxygen and carbon dioxide atmospheres produce CuO, Cr2O3, and CrO3, while no new compounds are formed in argon atmosphere.
Science Press
The electrical contact material has wide applications in the industry fields, because it is the core component of the electrical switch to connect/break the circuit and bear the curren
Currently, the arc erosion performance of Cu-based materials attracts much attention due to their wide applications under medium and high voltage load situation
However, few studies discuss the effect of the environment atmosphere on CuCr materials. The effect of ambient atmosphere on arc erosion performance of electrical contact materials mainly includes two aspects. Firstly, the effect of ambient atmosphere on arc energy and arc duration should be investigated, which directly reflect the arc extinguishing ability of the gas. Secondly, the effect of chemical reactions between the atmosphere and the materials should be studied. Some new compounds generated during the chemical reactions may affect the anti-arc erosion performance of material
In this research, the erosion behavior of CuCr25 material prepared by hot-pressing sintering method was studied in oxygen, argon, and carbon dioxide atmospheres at voltage of 9 kV. The morphologies and composition of the erosion surface were analyzed. The erosion mechanism of CuCr25 material in different ambient atmospheres was discussed.
The Cr powder (purity≥99.99%, particle size of 45 μm, Xing Rongyuan Technology Co., Ltd) and the electrolytic Cu powder (purity≥99.99%, particle size of 38 μm) were mixed in a vacuum ball mill with the ball-to-material ratio of 10:1. The argon was filled as the protective gas, and the anhydrous ethanol was added as the dispersant. The mixed powder was ball-milled at 50 r/min for 10 h with standing interval of 20 min per hour. The well-mixed powders were then loaded into the round graphite mold with diameter of 45 μm. The CuCr25 specimens were prepared in the hot-pressing sintering furnace at 1020 °C for 1.5 h under the pressure of 30 MPa. The argon gas was used as the protective atmosphere throughout the sintering process. After the furnace-cooling to room temperature, the specimens were taken out and cut into small blocks for subsequent tests.
The relative density of the CuCr25 material can be calculated by
(1) |
where ρ is the actual density of specimens and ρ0 is the theoretical density. The actual density can be measured by Archimedes method and the theoretical density can be calculated by
(2) |
where ρ1 is the density of Cu; φ1 is the volume fraction of Cu; ρ2 is the density of Cr; φ2 is the volume fraction of Cr.
The Brinell hardness of CuCr25 material was tested by the Brinell hardness tester (HBV-30A). The pressure head was a quenched steel ball with diameter D=1 mm, the load was 10 kg, and the pressure holding time was 30 s. The value of Brinell hardness (HB) was obtained by
(3) |
where P is the applied load (kg), A is the indentation area (m
The flexural strength of CuCr25 material was measured by the three-point bending method through the Shimadzu universal material testing machine (DCS-5000). The distance of the support endpoint was 30 mm, and the loading rate was 0.5 mm/min. Each specimen was tested for three times, and the average value was used as the obtained strength. The strength of CuCr25 material was calculated by
(4) |
where σb is the flexural strength of CuCr25 material (N/m
The two-arm electric bridge instrument was used to measure the conductivity of the specimen, which can be expressed by
(5) |
where σ is the conductivity of the specimen (MS/m), U is the voltage between two electric potential needles (mV), I is the current through the specimen (A), S is the cross-sectional area of the specimen (m
The CuCr25 specimen after hot-pressing sintering was cut into the cathode specimens with the size of 10 mm×10 mm×3 mm by wire cutting. The tungsten rod was served as the anode with a small cylinder tip with diameter of 2 mm. The specimen was placed above the tungsten anode and the voltage of 9 kV was loaded between the cathode and the anode. The experiment simulated the arc discharge process in different atmospheres, including the oxygen, argon, and carbon dioxide. The vacuum pump was used to vacuum the closed chamber, and then the designed gas was injected into the closed chamber. The cathode specimen was controlled by an automatic stepping machine to move slowly to the anode until the arc was discharged. The digital storage oscilloscope (ADS1102 CAL) was used to record the parameters and waveform of the whole discharge process. The surface morphology of the eroded specimen was observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, SU8020). Three-dimensional morphologies were observed, and relevant data were measured by the three-dimensional laser scanning confocal microscope (3D LSCM, VK-X250, KEYENCE). The element composition of the eroded surface was analyzed by energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) and the chemical composition was analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscope (XPS). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) was also used for analysis.
FE-SEM surface morphology of the polished CuCr25 cathode material is shown in

Fig.1 FE-SEM surface morphology of polished CuCr25 cathode material (a); XRD patterns of mixed powder, ball-milled powder, and sintered specimen of CuCr25 cathode material (b)
The arc discharge parameters recorded by the oscilloscope in the arc erosion tests under the voltage of 9 kV are presented in

Fig.2 Current-time curves of CuCr25 cathode materials under voltage of 9 kV in different atmospheres: (a) oxygen, (b) argon,
and (c) carbon dioxide
The arc energy is an important electrical parameter of the arc. In general, the greater the arc energy, the more serious the
erosion of the material. The arc energy W can be calculated by
W=UIt | (6) |
where U represents the load voltage between the cathode and the anode (kV), I represents the breakdown current (A), and t represents the arc duration (ms). According to
The breakdown strength indicates the maximum electric field strength that materials can withstand without being damaged. The higher the breakdown strength, the more difficult the arc generation between two electrodes. The breakdown strength can be calculated by
E=U/d | (7) |
where E is the breakdown strength (V/m), U is the load voltage (V), and d is the distance between the cathode and the anode during the arc discharge (m). The variation trend of breakdown strength in different atmospheres is opposite to that of the arc duration and arc energy. The breakdown strength in oxygen is the lowest of 0.69×1
The erosion morphologies of CuCr25 materials in different atmospheres are reconstructed by 3D LSCM, as shown in

Fig.3 3D erosion morphologies (a1~c1), bulge heights (a2~c2), and pit depths (a3~c3) of CuCr25 cathode materials in oxygen (a1~a3), argon (b1~b3), and carbon dioxide (c1~c3) atmospheres
The height of bulges and the depth of pits are also measured by the lines marked in Fig.3a1~3c1. It can be seen that the bulge height of the erosion surface in oxygen, argon, and carbon dioxide atmospheres is 24.252, 17.323, and 9.291 μm, respectively, presenting the decreasing trend. Fig.3a3~3c3 show the pit depths of the erosion surface in oxygen, argon, and carbon dioxide atmospheres, which are 9.400, 5.903, and 4.391 μm, respectively. The results indicate that the arc energy significantly affects the erosion morphology of the material surface, and the higher the arc energy, the more serious the erosion.
2.4 Microstructure and composition of CuCr25 cathode materials after arc erosion under different atmo-spheres
The erosion morphologies of the CuCr25 cathode materials in oxygen atmosphere are shown in

Fig.4 Erosion morphologies of CuCr25 cathode material in oxygen atmosphere: (a) overall morphology; (b) erosion edge morphology;
(c) magnified image of white rectangle area in Fig.4a and EDS results of bulge; (d) magnified image of white rectangle area in
;Fig.4c; (e) shallow erosion pit; (f) corresponding EDS element distributions of Fig.4e
In addition to bulges, some heavily eroded shallow pits are scattered on the erosion surface, which are composed of eroded Cr particles, and the surrounding flat area is the Cu matrix. The uniform distribution of O element indicates that the surface is oxidized after erosion. It can be observed that the erosion of Cr is more serious than that of Cu. The extended cracks appear at the interface of Cu and Cr, as shown in Fig.
The surface chemical composition of CuCr25 cathode material after arc erosion in oxygen atmosphere was also analyzed by XPS. As shown in

Fig.5 XPS spectra of CuCr25 cathode materials after arc erosion in oxygen atmosphere: (a) Cu 2p and (b) Cr 2p
The small size bulges and erosion holes form on the erosion surface in argon atmosphere, as shown in

Fig.6 Erosion morphologies of CuCr25 cathode material in argon atmosphere: (a) overall morphology; (b) erosion edge morphology;
(c) magnified image of white rectangle area in Fig.6a; (d) magnified image of white rectangle area in Fig.6c and EDS results
;of stacking particles on bulge
EDS analysis results of stacking particles show that the bulge is composed of only Cu and Cr elements. Therefore, no other compounds are generated during arc discharge in argon atmosphere.

Fig.7 Erosion morphologies of CuCr25 cathode material in carbon dioxide atmosphere: (a) overall morphology; (b) erosion edge morphology; (c) magnified image of white rectangle area in Fig.7a; (d) EDS results of white rectangle area in Fig.7c
The chemical composition of the erosion area is characterized by XPS analysis, as shown in

Fig.8 XPS spectra of CuCr25 cathode material after arc erosion in carbon dioxide atmosphere: (a) Cu 2p and (b) Cr 2p
Arc is a strong gas discharge phenomenon. Under certain conditions of voltage and current, when the electric field between two components exceeds a certain value, the electrons on the cathode surface accelerate and form free electrons in space, namely the strong field emission. The free electrons accelerate towards the anode under the electric field force. In this process, the free electrons collide with the neutral particles in the gas repeatedly, which forms numerous free electrons and positive ions. The neutral gas is insulating and non-conductive, but it can conduct electricity with the presence of these charged electron ions. The electric conductivity increases continuously, finally resulting in the breakdown of gas gap and thus producing the arc. After the arc is formed, the high temperature increases the kinetic energy of gas molecules, resulting in the collision ionization to form electrons and positive ions, namely the thermal ionizatio
Due to the high temperature and high arc energy, the erosion surfaces of the CuCr25 cathode material in oxygen, argon, and carbon dioxide atmospheres all present the typical erosion morphologies, such as bulge, pit, molten pool, splash particles, and cracks. Due to the pseudo-alloy structure in CuCr25 material, the phase separation occurs when hot arc plasma is generated on the cold cathode surfac
The schematic diagrams of arc erosion mechanisms of CuCr25 material in different atmospheres are shown in

Fig.9 Schematic diagrams of erosion mechanisms of CuCr25 cathode materials in different atmospheres: (a) oxygen, (b) argon, and (c) carbon dioxide
The erosion mechanism of CuCr25 cathode material in argon atmosphere is shown in
The erosion mechanism of CuCr25 cathode material in carbon dioxide atmosphere is shown in
(8) |
The decomposition of CO2 causes the short arc duration and low arc energy of the arc process in carbon dioxide atmosphere. Therefore, the erosion morphology in carbon dioxide is the least severe. Because of the production of O2, the subsequent erosion processes are similar to that in oxygen atmosphere. Cu and Cr are oxidized due to the presence of O2.
1) The arc duration and arc energy are increased with changing the atmosphere in the order of carbon dioxide, argon, oxygen. The breakdown strength is decreased with changing the atmosphere in the order of carbon dioxide, argon, oxygen.
2) The erosion morphology is affected by the arc energy. In oxygen atmosphere, the CuCr25 material presents the most severe erosion morphology with the existence of numerous bulges, holes, cracks, and splash particles. In argon atmosphere, the size of bulges is decreased, and less defects can be found. The erosion morphology is the least severe in the carbon dioxide atmosphere with a small number of bulges, splash particles, and pores.
3) In oxygen and carbon dioxide atmospheres, the erosion surface is oxidized with the generation of CuO, CrO3, and Cr2O3. Whereas in argon atmosphere, no new compounds are formed on the erosion surface.
References
He D H, Manory R. Wear[J], 2001, 249(7): 626 [Baidu Scholar]
Cui R, Han Y, Zhu Z X et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2019, 777: 1159 [Baidu Scholar]
Sun Caixin, Wang Jue, Yan Ping. High Voltage Apparatus[J], 2012, 48(1): 82 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Zhou Y J, Song K X, Xing J D. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters)[J], 2016, 29(4): 399 [Baidu Scholar]
Klinski K V, Kowanda C, Heilmaier M et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2015, 631: 237 [Baidu Scholar]
Yang X H, Zhao Y P, Kang D D et al. Engineering Failure Analysis[J], 2020, 118: 104 865 [Baidu Scholar]
Guo Zhongquan, Geng Haoran, Guo Ying et al. Electronic Components and Materials[J], 2009, 28(3): 45 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Qian Gang, Feng Yi, Huang Xiaochen et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2018, 47(6): 1818 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Li Feng, Li Zhinian, Zhong Jingming et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2019, 48(10): 3331 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Rieder W F, Schussek M, Glatzle W et al. IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology[J], 1989, 12(2): 273 [Baidu Scholar]
Guan W M, Yuan J, Lv H et al. Journal of Materials Science and Technology[J], 2021, 81: 1 [Baidu Scholar]
Yang Z M, Zhang Q L, Zhang C Y et al. Physics Letters A[J], 2005, 353(1): 98 [Baidu Scholar]
Xin C, Wu J W, Liu B et al. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science[J], 2014, 42(10): 2722 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhu Qingcheng, Liu Zixun, Liu Wenxuan et al. High Voltage Apparatus[J], 2018, 54(9): 6 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Okamoto H. Journal of Phase Equilibria and Diffusion[J], 2012, 33(4): 342 [Baidu Scholar]
Vadchenko S G, Suvoroav E V, Mukhina N I et al. Russian Journal of Nonferrous Metals[J], 2021, 62(2): 233 [Baidu Scholar]
Chai L J, Zhou Z M, Xiao Z P et al. Science China Technological Sciences[J], 2015, 58(3): 462 [Baidu Scholar]
Ungar T. Scripta Materialia[J], 2004, 51(8): 777 [Baidu Scholar]
Delhez R, Keijser T H, Mittemeijer E J. Fresenius Journal of Analytical Chemistry[J], 1982, 312(1): 1 [Baidu Scholar]
Yang X H, Li X J, Xiao Z et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2016, 686: 648 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhao H, Feng Y, Zhou Z J et al. Journal of the European Ceramic Society[J], 2021, 41(4): 2263 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang J S, Teixeira R A, Zhang H M et al. Analytical Chemistry[J], 2017, 89(16): 8524 [Baidu Scholar]
Pierrick G, Philippe F, Sophie D et al. Fuel Processing Technology[J], 2016, 153: 129 [Baidu Scholar]
Jolley J G, Geesey G G, Haukins M R et al. Applied Surface Science[J], 1989, 37(4): 469 [Baidu Scholar]
Dube C E, Workie B, Kounaves S P et al. Journal of the Electrochemical Society[J], 1995, 142(10): 3357 [Baidu Scholar]
Poulston S, Parlett P M, Stone P et al. Surface and Interface Analysis[J], 1996, 24(12): 811 [Baidu Scholar]
Ren S M, Cui M J, Pu J B et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces[J], 2017, 9(32): 27 152 [Baidu Scholar]
Murphy V, Tofail S A M, Hughes H et al. Chemical Engineering Journal[J], 2009, 148(2-3): 425 [Baidu Scholar]
Aleksandra T, Patryk O, Ryszard D. Environmental Science and Pollution Research[J], 2015, 22(8): 5985 [Baidu Scholar]
Grohmann I, Kemnitz E, Lippitz A et al. Surface and Interface Analysis[J], 1995, 23(13): 887 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhou Z J, Feng Y, Zhao H et al. Ceramics International[J], 2021, 47(2): 2319 [Baidu Scholar]
Tepper J, Seeger M, Votteler T et al. IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies[J], 2006, 29(3): 658 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhu S X, Liu Y, Tian B H et al. Vacuum[J], 2017, 143: 129 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang C Y, Wang Y P, Yang Z M et al. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters)[J], 2003, 16(2): 151 [Baidu Scholar]
Ding B J, Yang Z M, Wang X T. IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology[J], 1996, 19(1): 76 [Baidu Scholar]
Cao W C, Liang S H, Zhang X et al. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials[J], 2011, 29(2): 237 [Baidu Scholar]
Duan Wenxin, Guo Conghui, Yang Zhimao et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2005, 34(6): 998 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Zhao H, Li X W, Zhu K et al. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation[J], 2016, 23(5): 2657 [Baidu Scholar]