Abstract
The high-temperature oxidation experiments were conducted on the micro-arc oxidation film on 2A12 aluminum alloy surface. Results show that the high-temperature oxidation resistance of the micro-arc oxidation film is decreased with increasing the temperature. However, the oxidation index is above 2, indicating that the micro-arc oxidation film has a protective effect for the 2A12 aluminum alloy and can effectively prevent the oxygen diffusion during high-temperature oxidation. The air-cooled thermal shock resistance property of the micro-arc oxidation film layer is better than its water-cooled thermal shock resistance property. After 60 thermal shock cycles, the film falls off at the corners of alloy after water-cooled thermal shock, while only cracks appear on the surface of alloy after air-cooled thermal shock without film shedding. The failure of micro-arc oxidation film after thermal shock is mainly caused by the difference in coefficients of thermal expansion between film and substrate and the formation of hydroxides and oxides through the reactions of film with H2O and oxygen, respectively. The CeO2 inside the film can reduce the pore size and the impact of thermal shock on the film at the initial reaction stage. However, with increasing the thermal shock cycles, the subcarbonate and hydroxide are generated, leading to the failure of micro-arc oxidation film.
Science Press
Aluminum alloys have been widely used in the aerospace industry, automobile industry, and electronic products, owing to their high specific strength, great machinability, and excel-lent heat and electric conductivity. However, the low hardness and toughness, inferior abrasion and shock resistance, rela-tively high heat conductivity coefficient and thermal deforma-tion, and poor thermal stability all restrict the application of aluminum alloys. In order to apply aluminum alloys on engine manufacture, the preparation of film with high-temperature resistance and thermal shock resistance on the aluminum alloy surface is of great importance.
Micro-arc oxidation (MAO) technique can form a layer of ceramic membrane, which mainly consists of the matrix metal oxides on the metal surface. By regulating the electrolyte and corresponding electrical parameters, the instantaneous high temperature and pressure are generated by the arc strike on the metal matrix and the alloy surfac
Rare earth elements are commonly used in the surface treat-ment to enhance the properties of oxidants or catalysts. Tradi-tionally, the alloy is simply immersed in the rare earth saline solution for MAO film preparation, which leads to few rare earth elements on the matrix surface, i.e., the advantages of rare earth element addition cannot be revealed. Therefore, the surface density and corrosion resistance of this kind of MAO film should be further improve
In this research, the rare earth oxide CeO2 was added into the electrolyte for MAO film preparation on the surface of 2A12 aluminum alloy. The mechanisms of high-temperature oxidation and thermal shock resistance of MAO film were investigated to provide guidance for the protection of 2A12 aluminum alloy.
The chemical composition of 2A12 aluminum alloy is shown in
The high-temperature oxidation experiments were conducted in a muffle furnace. Firstly, the ceramic crucible was put into the resistance furnace for preheating, and then the specimens were weighed and put into the crucible. The heating duration was 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 h. The temperature was kept at 400, 450, and 500 °C. After the specimens were air-cooled to room temperature, the specimen mass was measured to calculate the mass gain. The surface morphology was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM
The thermal shock experiments were conducted under the conditions of air-cooling and water-cooling separately. The reaction occurred in the resistance furnace, and the thermal shock stability was evaluated by the number of thermal shock cycles when the alloy surface was damaged. Under the air-cooling condition, the specimen was put into a preheated ceramic crucible, kept for 5 min, and then taken out. After air-cooling for 3 min, the specimen was placed into the ceramic crucible again. The experiment temperature was 550 °C. Under the water-cooling condition, the specimen was put into a preheated ceramic crucible,kept at 550 °C for 5 min, and then immersed in water for quenching.

Fig.1 SEM surface morphologies of MAO films after oxidation at 400 °C for 2 h (a), 4 h (b), 6 h (c), 8 h (d), and 10 h (e)

Fig.2 SEM surface morphologies of MAO films after oxidation at 450 °C for 2 h (a), 4 h (b), 6 h (c), 8 h (d), and 10 h (e)

Fig.3 SEM surface morphologies of MAO films after oxidation at 500 °C for 2 h (a), 4 h (b), 6 h (c), 8 h (d), and 10 h (e)
By adding CeO2 particles into the electrolyte, the pore size of the MAO film surface is effectively reduced, thus decreasing the amount of air or water which is in contact with the matrix. With the oxidation proceeding, the rare earth oxide gradually becomes subcarbonate, thereby losing the efficac
CeO2+CO2+H2O→Ce(CO3)2‧Ce(OH)3 | (1) |
The rare earth oxide can also react with H2O to produce hydroxide, as follows:
CeO2+H2O→CeO(OH) | (2) |
CeO2+H2O→Ce(OH)3 | (3) |
The generated subcarbonate and hydroxide accumulate with prolonging the oxidation duration. When the generated products reach a certain amount, the internal thermal stress will form and expand the microcracks. When the oxidation duration reaches 10 h, the surface film layer is separated by microcracks, which is connected to the crater-formed pores. Therefore, the H2O and CO2 easily enter the inner layer, the accumulation of lamellar oxides is accelerated, and more rare earth oxides are generated at high temperatures. Due to the internal stress, the MAO film layer falls off.

Fig.4 Mass change curves of MAO films after oxidation at different temperatures
After oxidation at 450 °C for 2 h, the mass gain is 0.000 02 g/c
After oxidation at 500 °C for 2 h, the mass gain is 0.000 03 g/c
The oxidation kinetics of MAO aluminum alloy film layer can be expressed by the parabolic velocity equatio
(4) |
where W represents oxidation mass gain, K is oxidation rate constant, and t is the oxidation time.
After revising the Wagner's empirical formula of oxidation,
(5) |
where n is the oxidation index.
Thus, the relationship between oxidation mass gain and oxidation time and the kinetic relationship of high-temperature oxidation of MAO film layer can be obtained. If 1<n<2, the oxidation reaction depends not only on the reaction between MAO film and oxygen, but also on the reaction velocity between oxygen and A
K=K0exp(-Q/RT) | (6) |
where K0 is a constant, Q is the oxidation activation energy, R is gas constant, and T is the temperature. The higher the oxidation activation energy, the higher the energy for O diffusion across MAO film surface, i.e., the better the antioxidation performance of MAO fil
The thermal shock resistance can directly reflect the influence of periodically changing temperature on the binding force between MAO film and matrix. The higher the thermal shock resistance, the higher the stability of MAO film. The thermal shock failure consists of thermal shock fracture and thermal shock damage, which occurs on the MAO surface in instantaneous heating, resulting in the surface crack or crazing after multiple heating-cooling cycles. The thermal shock failure of MAO film is mainly thermal shock damage.

Fig.5 SEM microstructures of MAO films after thermal shock cycles with air-cooling (a) and water-cooling (b)
MAO films after thermal shock cycles with air-cooling show better performance than the ones with water-cooling do. After 30 thermal shock cycles with air-cooling, small black spots and small cracks appear on MAO film surface, which is caused by the entrance of water and oxygen in the air into the inner layer of MAO film. After 60 thermal shock cycles with air-cooling, the surface cracks are expanded, the number of black spots is increased, and no obvious damage or peeling occurs, indicating that the thermal shock resistance of MAO films after thermal shock cycles with air-cooling is better than that with water-cooling.
The thermal shock resistance of MAO films is mainly influenced by the difference in thermal expansion coefficients between MAO film and the matrix, phase transformation, oxidation reaction, and thermal corrosion during the high-temperature oxidation. Among them, the difference in thermal expansion coefficients between MAO film and the matrix is the most influential factor, which generates the thermal stress between layers and induces the crack formation. Thus, MAO film peels off along the direction parallel to the aluminum alloy matrix. The film layer and the matrix can react with H2O and oxygen, continuously producing a series of new substances, such as oxide and hydroxide, with the thermal shock cycles proceeding. When the production accumulates to a certain level, the film cracks and falls off.

Fig.6 Schematic diagram of thermal shock failure models of MAO films
1) The high-temperature oxidation resistance of the micro-arc oxidation film on 2A12 aluminum alloy is decreased with increasing the temperature. The oxidation indexes are all above 2, indicating that the micro-arc oxidation films have ex-cellent antioxidation performance during the high-temperature oxidation and can effectively prevent the oxygen diffusion.
2) The thermal shock resistance of micro-arc oxidation film after thermal shock cycles with air-cooling is better than that with water-cooling. After 60 thermal shock cycles, the micro-arc oxidation film layer suffering water-cooling on the matrix corners begins to fall off, while that suffering air-cooling only has surface cracks without film layer shedding.
3) The thermal shock failure of the micro-arc oxidation film is mainly caused by the difference in thermal expansion coeffi-cients between the film and the matrix and the formation of oxides and hydroxides on the film due to the reaction with H2O and O2. CeO2 in the film layer reduces the pore size, which effectively reduces the influence of thermal shock on the film layer at the initial stage of thermal shock cycles. However, with the thermal shock cycles further proceeding, the subcarbonate and hydroxide are generated, leading to the film failure.
References
Wang P, Hu J, Li R Y et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2021, 50(1): 56 [Baidu Scholar]
Li H, Song Z H, Tang P. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2020, 49(3): 755 [Baidu Scholar]
Shao Z C, Zhang Q F, Yang L et al. Materials and Manufacturing Processes[J], 2015, 30(12): 1505 [Baidu Scholar]
Chen G Q, Liu J P, Shu X et al. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer[J], 2019, 138: 879 [Baidu Scholar]
Shao Zhongcai, Xia Jili, Zhang Yuexiu. Materials and Manu-facturing Processes[J], 2016, 31(1): 53 [Baidu Scholar]
Shang W, Wang Y Y, Wen Y Q et al. International Journal of Electrochemical Science[J], 2017, 12(12): 11 875 [Baidu Scholar]
Ma J. 2016 International Conference on Mechatronics, Manufacturing and Materials Engineering[C]. Les Ulis: EDP Sciences, 2016, 63: 1013 [Baidu Scholar]
Chen Z M, Lu P, Xu J Z et al. Applied Mechanics and Materials[J], 2012, 190-191: 599 [Baidu Scholar]
Kim J H, Song M J, Lee C J et al. Carbon[J], 2013, 52: 398 [Baidu Scholar]
Li S H, Liu X, Liu S J. Journal of Physics: Conference Series[J], 2020, 1570(1): 12 044 [Baidu Scholar]
Pan M Q, Sheng J, Liu J Z et al. Sensors[J], 2020, 20(6): 1736 [Baidu Scholar]
Guneri E, Ulutas C, Kirmizigul F et al. Applied Surface Science[J], 2010, 257(4): 1189 [Baidu Scholar]
Chen X M, Fan Y Y. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering[J], 2020, 768(2): 22 009 [Baidu Scholar]
Hussein R O, Northwood D O. Developments in Corrosion Protection[M]. New York: Intech Open, 2014: 201 [Baidu Scholar]
Yang W, Gao Y, Guo P et al. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials[J], 2020, 101: 103 448 [Baidu Scholar]
Li Hong, Zhang Jin, Peng Li et al. Surface Technology[J], 2015, 44(10): 52 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Fang Z G, Cao J Y, Guan Y. Corrosion Control Technologies for Aluminum Alloy Vessel[M]. Singapore: Springer, 2020 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang W Z, Feng S S, Li Z M et al. Journal of Materials Research and Technology[J], 2020, 9(3): 6014 [Baidu Scholar]
Wen Z, Feng T, Ouyang G et al. International Journal of Precision Engineering & Manufacturing[J], 2018, 19(7): 1081 [Baidu Scholar]
Low I M, Lawrence D, Smith R I. Journal of the American Ceramic Society[J], 2005, 88(10): 2957 [Baidu Scholar]
Yu S, Yu Z T. Biomedical Materials[J], 2008, 3(4): 44 112 [Baidu Scholar]