Abstract
A novel machining method based on the graphene nanoparticles dispersed in canola oil as the cutting fluid to provide lubrication/cooling effect for the processing area was proposed. The effects of the nanofluid on the chip adhesion layer of the cutter were determined. Compared with the dry cutting method, the thicknesses of chip adhesion layers on the flank face and rake face of cutter decrease by 38.8% and 28.8% with the canola oil+graphene nanofluid, respectively. In addition, the cutting force and workpiece surface roughness decrease by 51.4% and 50.1%, respectively. The relatively high thermal conductivity of graphene can reduce the temperature of the cutting zone. In addition, the graphene can penetrate the contact zone between the chip adhesion layer of cutter and the workpiece, which effectively protects the coating of cutting tool and decreases the chip adhering to the workpiece surface. Besides, the graphene can fill the pits on the workpiece surface, thus improving the cutter surface quality.
Science Press
The titanium alloys have high chemical reactivity, excellent strength and hardness, and low thermal conductivity, which lead to the high cutting force and large friction heat during the machinin
The nanofluid minimal quantity of lubricant (NMQL) is an advanced and environmental-friendly precision processing techniqu
Graphene has excellent thermal conductivity, superb lubrication performance, and high thermal conductivit
In the preparation of nanofluid, the mixing of nanoparticles with the base fluid is crucial due to the stability of nanoparticles. The diffusion of nanoparticles in the solution is generally accomplished by the two-step metho
The 0.5vol% nanoparticles were initially added into the botanical-based cutting oil and then mixed to prevent nanoparticle aggregation. Cui et a

Fig.1 Preparation process of cutting nanofluid
The Ti6-Al4-V alloy specimen with the diameter of 30 mm and length of 200 mm was used for experiments. The cutting tool had a carbide blade (DCMT11T304-SMIC907) with the titanium nitride coating. The processing was conducted in turning mode. To compare the chip adhesion layers of cutter under different processing conditions, the cutting tool blades were changed before each test. The parameters of the cutting tool are shown in

Fig.2 Schematic diagram of cutting tool
The turning tests were performed on a numerically con-trolled lathe (CAK4085nj, Shenyang Machine Tool Plant, China). The cutting temperatures were measured by the FLIR T630sc thermal infrared imager. The working temperature was -40~600 °C and the image acquisition frequency was 50~200 Hz. The temperature error of the equipment was less than 0.1 °C. Firstly, the infrared thermal imager was installed at about 1 m away from the lathe. Secondly, adjust the observa-tion area of the infrared thermal imager for clear observation of the contact area between the tool and workpiece. Finally, identify the highest cutting temperature in the processing area. In addition, the chip adhesion layer of cutter was observed by the field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, ZEISS). The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscope (EDS) was used to detect the delamination of the tool adhesion layer. The cutting force was measured by the Kistler9257B three-dimensional measuring cell with supporting Kistler 5070 type charge amplifier. The cutter was installed on the measuring cell by the specially designed clamp. Then, the signal processing software DynoWare was used to acquire and process of force data. The dynamometer collected a lot of force data, and only the average cutting force could represent the stability of the cutting process. The workpiece surface roughness after turning was measured by the surface rough-ness measuring instrument (TR240). The sampling length was 0.8 mm. The bar was divided into four segments with equal length. In each segment, six measurement points were chosen randomly along the circumference of the workpiece. Hence, the surface roughness at 24 points was measured and the mean surface roughness was used for analysis. In this experiment, the outlet temperature of the MQL equipment was -10 °C, the air source pressure of the air compressor was 1 MPa, and the fluid flow of the nozzle was 70 mL/h. To insure the sufficient lubrication and cooling of the cutter point and the sufficient liquid spraying pressure, the distance from the nozzle to the cutter point was 30 mm. Meanwhile, the angle between the nozzle and cutter rake surface was 45°. The experiment equipment setup is shown in

Fig.3 Schematic diagram of experiment equipment setup
The turning tests were conducted under three processing conditions: (1) canola oil+graphene; (2) simple canola oil; (3) dry cutting. The cutting speeds of 60 and 100 m/min were used. The feeding rate f was 0.1 mm/rev, the cutting depth was 0.5 mm, and the turning length was 80 mm. All experiments were conducted at 0.1 MPa and the cutting speed was adjusted by changing the number of lathe turns. Each experiment was repeated at least three times. After the cutting process, the canola oil on the cutter and workpiece surfaces was cleaned for the subsequent surface element detection. In addition, a small part of the workpiece was cut by the linear cutting equipment for surface element detection.
In the process of material removal, the plastic deformation occurs, and 90%~95% mechanical energy is converted into heat. The temperature accumulation in the cutting area can soften the material and reduce the cutting force in the machining process. In addition, the high cutting force is also unfavorable to the mechanical processing. Although the partial heat transfers from the machining area to the tool, it still causes severe tool wear and reduces the surface quality of the workpiece. Therefore, the reduction of heat accumulation in the processing area is crucial.

Fig.4 Temperatures in chip adhesion layer and workpiece contact zone under different processing conditions
According to
The tool wear directly affects the tool life and quality, thereby affecting the processing cos

Fig.5 SEM morphologies and adhesion layer thicknesses of flank face under different conditions

Fig.6 SEM morphologies and adhesion layer thicknesses of rake face under different conditions
Under the dry cutting condition, due to the poor thermal conductivity of titanium alloys, the heat in the contact zone between the cutter and workpiece cannot be released effectively. Due to the high temperature in the cutting zone and the high cutting speed, the workpiece material flows more easily through the tool surface, promoting the adhesion of workpiece material onto the tool, and thereby increasing the thickness of the adhesion layer. However, the fatty acids in canola oil significantly decrease the friction between the cutter and workpiece, therefore eliminating the heat at the interfac
Furthermore, the adhesion layers on the flank face peel off under the canola oil+graphene or the canola oil condition at cutting speed of 100 m/min, as shown in

Fig.7 SEM morphologies of peeling off phenomena of adhesion layers under canola oil (a) and canola oil+graphene (b) conditions at cutting speed of 100 m/min
It can be seen that the canola oil+graphene lubricant can better protect the cutter coating materials than the canola oil lubricant. According to EDS results of the pits caused by the peeling of the adhesion layer under the canola oil condition, the Co, W, and N elements can be detected (

Fig.8 SEM morphologies and corresponding EDS results of peeling areas of adhesion layer under canola oil (a) and canola oil+graphene (b) conditions
Meanwhile, the detection of C element demonstrates the existence of graphene nanoparticles, indicating that the canola oil+graphene lubricant protects the titanium nitride coating effectively. This is because the graphene nanoparticles can be transported to the contact zone between the chip adhesion layer and cutter point by the canola oil which is atomized by the pressurized cold air. Before adhering to the cutter point, the graphene can penetrate the contact zones under the air pressure due to its monolayer-networked structure and very small thickness. Moreover, the graphene can adhere tightly to the cutter surface and provide the lubrication between the cutter and the chip adhesion layer due to the high toughness. The adhesion layer can be pulled out by the external force and immediately transported to other places due to the lubrication effect of the graphene nanoparticles, thus protecting the blade coating effectively.
The cutting force is an important parameter in machining, which is related to the cutting heat, service life, and surface integrity of cutter. For the convenience of measurement and application, the cutting force is usually decomposed into three mutually perpendicular cutting forces. The main cutting force (Fx) is largely related to the cutting speed (Vc) and accounts for 85%~90% of the total cutting force. Fx consumes the main power of the machine tool, which is the basis for the calculation of cutting power, the selection of the motor power of machine tool, and the design of main drive mechanism of the machine tool. In addition, the average cutting force is calculated by DynoWare software, as shown in

Fig.9 Average cutting force in cutting process
According to

Fig.10 Comparison of cutting forces under different processing conditions
Under the dry cutting condition, the tool-chip contact area is large and more heat is generated at the cutting edge, which easily causes the chip adhesion and welding to the tool. In addition, the chip curl diameter is large, which also increases the cutting forc

Fig.11 SEM morphology and EDS results of rake face
The surface roughness is widely used to determine the surface quality of mechanical parts and it is crucial to the functional behavior of the mechanical parts. The chip adhesion to the workpieces has a great influence on the surface roughness. During the processing, the high temperature and high pressure are achieved, the chip adhesion layer on the cutter point may adhere to the workpiece, and the surface quality is thereby influenced.

Fig.12 Average surface roughness under different processing conditions

Fig.13 Surface morphologies of workpieces under dry cutting (a), canola oil (b), and canola oil+graphene (c) conditions

Fig.14 SEM morphology (a) and EDS results (b) of adhesion chips on workpiece surface; schematic diagram of chip adhesion to workpiece surface (c)
Moreover, the chip adhesion layer accumulates and thickens continuously during the turning process and becomes part of the tool to complete the machining process. Hence, an irregularly shaped adhesion layer may lead to the scratching along different directions on the workpiece surface, causing surface damage (

Fig.15 SEM morphologies (a, c) of workpiece surfaces after machining under canola oil+graphene condition; EDS results of marked rectangle area in Fig.15a (b) and Fig.15c (d)
quality of the workpiece, as shown in

Fig.16 Schematic diagram of pits in workpiece surface filled by graphene nanoparticles
1) The thickness of the chip adhesion layer is the shortest under the canola oil+graphene lubrication condition. At the cutting speeds of 100 and 60 m/min, compared with that under the dry cutting condition, the thickness of the chip adhesion layer is 30.4% and 38.8% lower on the flank face, and 28.3% and 28.8% lower on the rake face under the canola oil+graphene lubrication condition, respectively. The lowest cutting temperature is achieved with the canola oil+graphene lubrication. The low-temperature processing zone prevents the adhesion between the cutter layer and workpiece, thus shortening the adhesion layer thickness. Moreover, the graphene can better protect the cutter coating.
2) At the cutting speeds of 60 and 100 m/min, the cutting force under the canola oil+graphene condition is 51.4% and 47.9% lower than that under the dry cutting condition, respectively. The graphene can provide cooling and lubrication effects in the machining area, thereby reducing the tool wear and cutting force. In addition, regardless of the lubrication conditions, with increasing the cutting speed, the cutting force is decreased.
3) The lowest surface roughness is achieved under the canola oil+graphene lubrication condition. At the cutting speed of 60 and 100 m/min, the surface roughness under the canola oil+graphene condition is 50.1% and 48.0% lower than that under the dry cutting condition, respectively. The surface roughness of 0.439 μm is the lowest under the canola oil+graphene condition at 100 m/min. The graphene can penetrate the contact area between the tool and workpiece, which there-fore improves the cooling and lubrication performance of the oil film, hinders the chip adhesion, and ameliorates the surface quality. In addition, the graphene nanoparticles in the pits on the workpiece surface can also improve the surface quality.
References
Bermingham M J, Palanisamy S, Kent D et al. Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J], 2012, 212(4): 752 [Baidu Scholar]
Umbrello D, Pu Z, Caruso S et al. Procedia Engineering[J], 2011, 19: 371 [Baidu Scholar]
Dhar N R, Islam M W, Islam S et al. Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J], 2006, 171(1): 93 [Baidu Scholar]
Yazid M, Cheharon C H, Ghani J A et al. Procedia Engineering[J], 2011, 19: 396 [Baidu Scholar]
Viswanathan R, Ramesh S, Subburam V. Measurement[J], 2018, 120: 107 [Baidu Scholar]
Sun J, Wong Y S, Rahman M et al. Machining Science and Technology[J], 2006, 10(3): 355 [Baidu Scholar]
Gelfi M, Giardini C, Remino C. Wear[J], 2006, 260(3): 333 [Baidu Scholar]
Sreejith P S. Materials Letters[J], 2008, 62(2): 276 [Baidu Scholar]
Hadad M, Sadeghi B. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture[J], 2012, 63: 1 [Baidu Scholar]
Bertolini R, Ghiotti A, Bruschi S. Wear[J], 2021, 476: 203 656 [Baidu Scholar]
Rabiei F, Rahimi A R, Hadad M J. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology[J], 2017, 93(1): 1001 [Baidu Scholar]
Ezugwu E O. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture[J], 2005, 45(12-13): 1353 [Baidu Scholar]
Pusavec F, Deshpande A, Shu Y et al. Journal of Cleaner Production[J], 2014, 81: 255 [Baidu Scholar]
Sales W F, Schoop J, Jawahir I S. Tribology International[J], 2017, 114: 109 [Baidu Scholar]
Mao C, Zhang Y C, Peng X X et al. Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J], 2018, 259: 45 [Baidu Scholar]
Bai X F, Li C H, Dong L et al. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology[J], 2019, 101(9): 2621 [Baidu Scholar]
Gaurav G, Sharma A, Dangayach G S et al. Journal of Cleaner Production[J], 2020, 272: 122 553 [Baidu Scholar]
Ghadimi A, Saidur R, Metselaar H. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer[J], 2011, 54(17-18): 4051 [Baidu Scholar]
Cui X, Li C H, Zhang Y B et al. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology[J], 2019, 104(9): 3943 [Baidu Scholar]
Li M, Yu T B, Zhang R C et al. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology[J], 2018, 99(5): 1735 [Baidu Scholar]
Dhar N R, Paul S, Chattopadhyay A B. Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J], 2002, 123(3): 483 [Baidu Scholar]
Kvak T, Sarkaya M, Yldrm A V et al. Journal of Manufacturing Processes[J], 2020, 56(A): 522 [Baidu Scholar]
Gupta M K, Song Q H, Liu Z Q et al. Journal of Cleaner Production[J], 2021, 287: 125 074 [Baidu Scholar]
Altin A, Nalbant M, Taskesen A. Materials and Design[J], 2007, 28(9): 2518 [Baidu Scholar]
Yldrm A V. Tribology International[J], 2019, 137: 366 [Baidu Scholar]
Liang X L, Liu Z Q. Tribology International[J], 2018, 121: 321 [Baidu Scholar]
Bermingham M J, Kirsch J, Sun S et al. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture[J], 2011, 51(6): 500 [Baidu Scholar]
Gunjal S U, Patil N G. Procedia Manufacturing[J], 2018, 20: 18 [Baidu Scholar]
Xavior M A, Adithan M. Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J], 2009, 209(2): 900 [Baidu Scholar]
Sun S, Harris J, Brandt M P. Advanced Engineering Materials[J], 2010, 10(6): 565 [Baidu Scholar]
Chinchanikar S, Choudhury S K. Measurement[J], 2014, 55: 536 [Baidu Scholar]
Singh R, Dureja J S, Dogra M et al. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology[J], 2019, 105(1): 1685 [Baidu Scholar]
Orra K, Choudhury S K. Journal of Manufacturing Processes[J], 2017, 31: 502 [Baidu Scholar]
Kvak T, Sarkaya M, Yldrm A V et al. Journal of Manufacturing Processes[J], 2020, 56: 522 [Baidu Scholar]
Babu M N, Anandan V, Muthukrishnan N et al. SN Applied Sciences[J], 2019, 1(10): 1202 [Baidu Scholar]
Debnath S, Reddy M M, Yi Q S. Journal of Cleaner Production[J], 2014, 83: 33 [Baidu Scholar]
Li M, Yu T B, Zhang R C et al. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology[J], 2018, 99(5): 1735 [Baidu Scholar]
Yıldırım Ç V, Kıvak T, Sarıkaya M et al. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineeringy[J], 2017, 42(11): 4667 [Baidu Scholar]