Abstract
Dynamic compression tests of Ti6321 titanium alloy were carried out in the temperature range from 193 K to 298 K and strain rate range from 2000
Science Press

Titanium alloys are widely used in deep submersibles, ships, and submarines because of their high specific strength and good corrosion resistanc
The main low-temperature titanium alloys used at present are Ti-5Al-2.5Sn (TA7), Ti-6Al-4V ELI, and CT20 (Ti-Al-Zr- Mo series
Some research has been carried out on the mechanical behavior of titanium alloys at high strain rates or low temperatures. Zhang et a
The existing research show that the strength of near-α tita-nium alloys increases with decreasing temperature and increasing strain rate. However, the mechanical behavior and microstructural evolution of near-α titanium alloys under high strain rate and low temperature conditions is seldom reported. Therefore, considering that the marine titanium alloy sheets need to face impact loads and environmental conditions in engineering applications from 193 K to room temperature, it is of theoretical and engineering significance to experi-mentally investigate the compressive properties of near-α tita-nium alloys under high strain rate and low temperature conditions. The near-α titanium alloy Ti6321 is a medium strength and high toughness titanium alloy with a nominal composition of Ti-6Al-3Nb-2Zr-1Mo, which has good corrosion resistance, fatigue resistance, and low-temperature resistance and is widely used in marine application
Ti6321 titanium alloy sheet in the hot-rolled state was subjected to solid solution treatment at 960 °C for 1 h, followed by air cooling. The obtained microstructure is shown in

Fig.1 Microstructure of Ti6321 titanium alloy after heat treatment
The sample for dynamic compression was a cylinder of Φ5 mm×5 mm. The loading device was a split Hopkinson pressure bar with the addition of a cryogenic device, as shown in

Fig.2 Experimental setup and schematic diagram

Fig.3 Variation of mechanical behavior of Ti6321 alloy at different temperatures and strain rates: (a) true stress-strain curves and
(b) average flow stress and fracture strain
The yield stress and flow stress of Ti6321 alloy are above 1200 MPa under different strain rate loadings. As the strain rate increases, the yield point rises, and both the flow stress and plastic strain increase, showing a certain strain-rate hardening effect, which indicates that Ti6321 titanium alloy is a strain-rate sensitive material. As shown in
The constitutive model is vital for the description of the mechanical behavior under different loading conditions. Several constitutive models have been developed to characterize the mechanical behavior during deformation. Among them, the J-C constitutive model has a simple form, a few parameters, ease of use, and a better description of the strain hardening, strain rate effects, and thermal softening effects of material
(1) |
where σ is equivalent stress, ε is equivalent plastic strain, A is yield stress of the material under reference deformation conditions (MPa), B is strain hardening constant (MPa), n is strain hardening coefficient, C is strain rate strengthening coefficient and m is thermal softening coefficient. is calculated by the division of equivalent strain rate to reference strain rate and is dimensionless temperature, which is defined as:
(2) |
where TR is the reference temperature and TM is the melting temperature. This research focuses on the mechanical behavior of titanium alloys under low temperature and high strain rate loading, so a reference temperature of 193 K and a reference strain rate of 2000
This research is based on the clustering global optimization algorithm for fitting the parameters of the present constitutive equations. The global optimization algorithm constructs a computational method to find the global optimal solution of a multivariate nonlinear function in a constrained region. The problem of determining the parameters of the J-C constitutive equation is actually the optimal solution of nonlinear functions. So the global optimization algorithm is well suited for the determination of the parameters, and it has the advantages of saving time and effort and high accuracy of fitting.
The approximate process of fitting is as follows. Firstly, the corresponding stress-strain curves are obtained experi-mentally, and the curves are processed to remove their elastic and failure segments. Then, the processed data are input into the corresponding software for solving. A, B, n, C, and m in the J-C constitutive equation are used as optimization variables in the clustering global optimization algorithm. For the reference temperature and strain rate of this study, parameter A is 1358 MPa, so four parameters such as B, n, C, and m actually need to be optimized. The software automa-tically fits the experimental and theoretically calculated stress-strain curves by the global optimization algorithm. The optimal solution is obtained when the optimization results reach the set convergence threshold, i.e., when the error between the experiment and the fit is minimized.
The parameters of the fitted J-C constitutive are shown in
A/MPa | B/MPa | n | C | m |
---|---|---|---|---|
1358 | 491 | 0.585 | 0.0754 | 0.917 |
J-C constitutive equation for Ti6321 alloy at low temperature and high strain rate was obtained by substituting the parameters into

Fig.4 Fitting results of the J-C constitutive model parameters of Ti6321 alloy at different strain rates: (a) 2000

Fig.5 TEM images of Ti6321 alloy before (a) and after (b) deformation
Adiabatic shear is an important phenomenon in titanium alloys under high strain rate loading conditions. At different temperatures, a flat shear band develops along the 45° direction (i.e., the direction of maximum shear stress) in Ti6321 titanium alloy. The width of its central shear band is shown in
(3) |

Fig.6 Adiabatic shear bands of Ti6321 alloy under different conditions: (a) 298 K, 2500
where λ is the thermal conductivity, and T, γ, τ are the temperature, shear strain rate, and shear stress in the shear band, respectively. It shows that the width of the shear band decreases with decreasing temperature. This change is attributed to the combined effect of reduced thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity and increased rate of thermal softening. Firstly, it is mainly due to the shorter adiabatic heating process at low temperature. After adiabatic shear, the internal energy decreases sharply, resulting in a reduction in the width of the adiabatic shear band. Secondly, because the temperature decreases, the deformation resistance of the material increases, and the plastic deformation required for the shear zone is not generated inside the grain in time.
The deformation of titanium alloys at low temperatures usually consists of a combination of two mechanisms, namely slip and twin. There are fewer slip systems for titanium alloys with hcp structure in the α phase and bcc structure in the β phase. Therefore, it is difficult to initiate the slip system during plastic deformation. Gao et a

Fig.7 EBSD analysis of band contrast maps and twin identification (a~c) and Euler maps and misorientations of corresponding position (d~f) for Ti6321 titanium alloy at different temperatures: (a, d) 298 K, (b, e) 253 K and (c, f) 193 K
Fig.
Fig.

Fig.8 TEM images of Ti6321 alloy after dynamic compression at different temperatures: (a) dislocations at 298 K (shown by yellow arrow),
(b) twinning with SAED pattern at 253 K, (c) twinning with SAED pattern at 193 K, and (d) HRTEM image of twin crystal regions
In general, the mechanism of compressive deformation of Ti6321 titanium alloy at room temperature (298 K) is mainly dislocation slipping. At 253 and 193 K, the compressive deformation mechanism of Ti6321 titanium alloy is a combination of twinning and slipping. The decrease in temperature makes the twinning active. Plastic deformation where dislocations are difficult to drive is complemented by twin deformation.
1) As the strain rate increases, the yield stress of Ti6321 titanium alloy rises, accompanied by an increase in flow stress and plastic strain, which causes the alloy to show a certain hardening effect under high strain rate loading condition. As the deformation temperature decreases, the strength increases, while the plasticity decreases.
2) The width of the shear band of Ti6321 alloy decreases with decreasing temperature. This difference is due to the combined effect of the decrease in thermal conductivity and heat capacity and the increase in thermal softening rate.
3) The main mechanism of compressive deformation of Ti6321 titanium alloy is dislocation slipping at room temperature (298 K), while it is a combination of twinning and slipping of dislocations at 253 and 193 K.
References
Wang H, Sun Q Y, Xiao L et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2010, 527: 3493 [Baidu Scholar]
Li G R, Qin T, Fei A G et al. Journal of Alloys and Com- [Baidu Scholar]
pounds[J], 2019, 802: 50 [Baidu Scholar]
Lin Junhui, Dan Zhenhua, Lu Jiafei et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2020, 49(3): 1090 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Xu Aijun, Wan Haifeng, Liang Chunzu et al. Precision Forming Engineering[J], 2020, 12(6): 145 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Xiong Jinhui, Li Shikai, Gao Fuyang et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2015, 640: 419 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Q, Ren J Q, Wu Y K et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2019, 789: 249 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang B F, Yao X R, Liu L Y et al. Materials Science & Engineering A[J], 2018, 736: 202 [Baidu Scholar]
Song Dejun, Niu Long, Yang Shengli. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2020, 49(3): 1100 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Lu Zichuan, Sun Yachao, Yao Caogen et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2022, 51(1): 217 [Baidu Scholar]
Stéphane Di Iorio, Laurent Briottet, Edgar F Rauch et al. Acta Materialia[J], 2007, 55: 105 [Baidu Scholar]
Huang Chaowen, Ge Peng, Zhao Yongqing et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2016, 45(1): 254 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Du Yu, Cai Xuezhang, Yang Guanjun. Titanium Industry Progress[J], 2005(6): 14 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang Jun, Wang Yang. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2014, 605: 59 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang Bin, Wang Yang. Key Engineering Materials[J], 2019, 794: 135 [Baidu Scholar]
Gao Lingqing, Zhu Jinhua, Li Hui et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2008, 38(6): 1051 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Ning Zixuan, Wang Lin, Cheng Xingwang et al. Acta Armamentarii[J], 2021, 42(4): 862 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Lu Zichuan, Zhang Xuhu, Ji Wei et al. Materials Science & Engineering A[J], 2021, 818: 141 380 [Baidu Scholar]
Zang M C, Niu H Z, Yu J S et al. Materials Science & Engineering A[J], 2022, 840: 142 952 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhou Dadi, Zeng Weidong, Xu Jianwei et al. Materials Characterization[J], 2019, 151: 103 [Baidu Scholar]
Ning Zixuan, Wang Lin, Cheng Xingwang et al. Ordnance Mate-rial Science and Engineering[J], 2020, 43(6): 26 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Nesar Ahmed Titu, Matt Baucum, Timothy No et al. Procedia Manufacturing[J], 2021, 53: 680 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Yuntian, Zeng Xiangguo, Chen Huayan et al. Results in Physics[J], 2021, 27: 104 498 [Baidu Scholar]
Buzyurkin A E, Gladky I L, Kraus E I. Aerospace Science and Technology[J], 2015, 45: 121 [Baidu Scholar]
He An, Xie Ganlin, Zhang Hailong et al. Materials & Design[J], 2013, 52: 677 [Baidu Scholar]
Li Zezhou, Zhao Shiteng, Wang Bingfeng et al. Acta Materia- lia[J], 2019, 181: 408 [Baidu Scholar]
Dodd B, Bai Y. Materials Science and Technology[J], 1989, [Baidu Scholar]
5(6): 557 [Baidu Scholar]
Chun Y B, Battaini M, Davies C H J et al. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A[J], 2010, 41(13): 3473 [Baidu Scholar]