Abstract
The strategy of sintered closed-hole followed by reopening was proposed to prepare the microporous nickel material with high porosity through the powder metallurgy and subsequential treatments. The carbonyl nickel powder with particle size of 1 μm was used as raw material, and the effects of sintering process parameters on the pore properties and mechanical properties of microporous nickel were studied. Results show that the porosity measured by mercury injection method of microporous nickel is 53.7%, and the average pore diameter is 612.25 nm at the sintering temperature of 400 °C. After machining, the porosity measured by mercury injec-tion method is 54.0%, and the average pore diameter is 511.37 nm, which still satisfies the requirements of engineering application. The strategy provides providing a new approach for the preparation of microporous nickel and other porous metal materials.
Microporous materials with high porosity of >50% and pore diameter of <2 μm have many application potentials in the fields of fuel cells, noise reduction, heat insulation, and heat exchange. As a transition metal, nickel has excellent catalytic performance, good corrosion resistance, and fine machinability. Microporous nickel with high porosity has the excellent characteristics of both porous materials and metal nickel, thereby showing great potential in industr
In the field of heat exchange, the characteristic of high porosity coupled with micro-size can improve the heat transfer efficiency. Higher porosity provides a channel for energy transmission, and the micropore structure can produce large driving force of liquid working medium flow. Meanwhile, the microporous nickel has good corrosion and heat resistance, which can ensure the long service life under different working fluid
In this research, the microporous nickel with satisfying porosity and pore size was prepared under cold isostatic pressing and low sintering temperature without adding pore forming agent and other sintering additives. The strategy of sintered closed-hole followed by reopening was proposed. The original porosity of microporous nickel was retained. This research provided a simple efficient method to prepare microporous nickel with high porosity and other metal porous materials.
Carbonyl nickel powder with catenary morphology was used as raw material. The powder morphology observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) is shown in

Fig.1 SEM morphology of nickel powder
Fisher particle size/μm | Apparent density/ g·c | Tap density/g·c |
---|---|---|
1.02 | 0.58 | 2.60 |
Fe | Co | C | O | S | Ni |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
<0.001 | <0.001 | <0.15 | <0.15 | <0.0015 | Bal. |
The carbonyl nickel powder was put into the package to determine its mass based on the package size. The cold isostatic pressing-sintering process was conducted by LDJ320/1500-300YS equipment. The pressing pressure was 10, 50, and 100 MPa, and the pressure holding time was 30 s. Then, the sintering was conducted in the sintering furnace (HL230) with the high purity hydrogen (purity of 99.99%) at ambient pressure and sintering temperature of 300–650 °C (±10 °C) for 1 h. The heating rate was 10 °C/min.
Porous nickel obtained at different sintering temperature
The microporous nickel specimens after compression at 0, 10, 50, and 100 MPa followed by sintering at low temperature of 400 °C were analyzed. The changes of porosity and shrinkage of specimens under different compressive pressures are compared, as shown in

Fig.2 Porosity and shrinkage of different pressed microporous nickel specimens before and after sintering

Fig.3 Appearances of different pressed microporous nickel specimens before (a) and after (b) sintering
With increasing the compressive pressure from 0 MPa to 100 MPa, the shrinkage of microporous nickel before sintering is gradually increased to 26.4%. The increasing pressure aggravates the deformation of powder particles, which leads to the increase in shrinkage. For the microporous nickel specimens after compression and sintering, the internal stress in the powder particles is released in the sintering process, which increases the shrinkage. However, the increment is little: the shrinkage is increased from 6.5% to 11.8% with increasing the compressive pressure from 0 MPa to 100 MPa. In addition, with increasing the compressive pressure from 0 MPa to 100 MPa, the porosity of pressed microporous nickel specimens before sintering is reduced from 93.5% to 54.0%. This is because the bonding between particles is enhanced during compression, thereby forming the metallurgical bonding and resulting in the further reduction in porosity. After sintering, the porosity of pressed microporous nickel specimens is reduced from 90.4% to 46.5%. The porosity of less than 50% is unqualified. Thus, the optimal compressive pressure is 50 MPa, and the resultant porosity is 53.7%, which is still at the high porosity level. When the compressive pressure is lower than 50 MPa, the porosity cannot be easily controlled and the powder particles are not closely combined, resulting in the easy fall-off of powder particles and difficult shape control of specimens. Therefore, the compressive pressure of 50 MPa is selected as the fixed condition for further analysis of the effect of sintering process.

Fig.4 Effect of sintering temperature on shrinkage and porosity of microporous nickel specimens

Fig.5 SEM morphologies of microporous nickel after sintering at different temperatures: (a) 300 °C, (b) 350 °C, (c) 400 °C, (d) 450 °C, (e) 500 °C, (f) 550 °C, (g) 600 °C, and (h) 650 °C
As shown in Fig.
When the sintering temperature is 400 °C, the porosity of the specimen is 53.7%, which is still at a high porosity level. After sintering at 400 °C, a connected network structure with chain overlapping appears. The sintering neck is well developed. The pore size is 0.6–1.2 μm.

Fig.6 Pore size distributions of microporous nickel sintered at 400 °C: (a) relationship between cumulative mercury intrusion and pore size; (b) relationship between differential mercury intrusion and pore size; (c) pore size distribution
It can be seen from
(1) |
where γ is surface tension of 0.48 J/
As a result, the porosity measured by the mercury intrusion method of microporous nickel sintered at 400 °C is 56.2%, the average pore size is 612.25 nm, and the total specific surface area is 0.969
The microporous nickel is often assembled with dense metal through transition fit, which is subjected to compressive load in the manufacture process. Therefore, the compressive performance of microporous nickel under the actual load was characterized. The compressive stress-compressive strain curves of specimens sintered at different temperatures are shown in

Fig.7 Compressive stress-compressive strain curves (a) and yield strengths (b) of microporous nickel specimens sintered at different temperatures
No obvious fracture occurs at the sintering temperatures of above 400 °C, and the compressive stress continues to rise after reaching a certain value. Even with high porosity, the microporous nickel retains the plastic toughness of the origi-nal metal nickel. The microporous connection structure forms a compressed carrier, exerting the pore buffer effect. The specimens sintered at low temperatures of 300 and 350 °C are fractured during compression. During these sintering process, only the weak bonding occurs between particles. The specimen strength is low, and the fracture occurs under small load. When the sintering temperature is higher than 400 °C, the sintering neck of the specimen is staggered to form a pore structure and a metallurgical combination, which causes good compressive strength and plasticity.
Microporous nickel used in special fields should have good machining performance for assembly accuracy, especially for heat transfer elements. The flow channel in porous elements can facilitate the multiphase flow exchange in the system and play the role of energy transmission. The difficulty of porous material machining is that the chip machining will deform and block the original pores, thus losing material function. Therefore, the porous materials are generally formed into the near-net shape. In this research, the modified processing improves the machinability of microporous nickel components, improves the assembly accuracy, and enhances the material functio

Fig.8 Appearances and SEM morphologies of processed specimens: (a) outer surface and (b, c) inner pores

Fig.9 Selected area (a), axial section (b), and cross section (c) of CT scanning morphologies of microporous nickel after reopening treatment
The pore size analysis by mercury injection method was conducted on the sintered microporous nickel after hole opening treatment, as shown in

Fig.10 Pore size distributions of microporous nickel after hole opening treatment: (a) relationship between cumulative mercury intrusion and pore size; (b) relationship between differential mercury intrusion and pore size; (c) pore size distribution
Property | Before | After |
---|---|---|
Average pore diameter/nm | 612.25 | 511.37 |
Median pore diameter/nm | 652.1 | 557.1 |
Bulk density/g·c | 3.79 | 3.93 |
Apparent density/g·c | 8.67 | 8.55 |
Porosity/% | 56.2 | 54.0 |
Specific surface/ | 0.969 | 1.074 |
1) With increasing the sintering temperature from 300 °C to 650 °C, the porosity of microporous nickel is decreased from 59.1% to 5.2%, and its strength is gradually increased. When the sintering temperature is higher than 400 °C, the yield strength is greater than 82 MPa. When the sintering temperature is 650 °C, the yield strength reaches 287 MPa, and this compressive strength is the highest.
2) After sintering at 400 °C, the porosity measured by mercury injection method is 53.7% and the average pore diameter is 612.25 nm, which can meet the application requirements of high porosity and small pores.
3) After reopening treatment, the pore structure of microporous nickel maintains the original structure, and the porosity maintains the high level. The porosity of microporous nickel sintered at 400 °C after reopening treatment is 54.0%, and the average pore diameter is 511.37 nm, which can also meet the requirements for assembly accuracy.
References
Ezugwu E O, Wang Z M, Machado A R. Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J], 1998, 86(1‒3): 1 [Baidu Scholar]
Ulutan D, Ozel T. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture[J], 2011, 51(3): 250 [Baidu Scholar]
Yang Ruicheng, Nie Furong, Zheng Liping et al. Journal of Gansu University of Technology[J], 2002, 28(4): 29 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Li Meng. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2010, [Baidu Scholar]
39(10): 1858 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang Yi, Wang Senlin, Li Caicai. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2012, 41(3): 457 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Hou Z Y, Yokota O, Tanaka T et al. Catalysis Letters[J], 2003, 89(1–2): 121 [Baidu Scholar]
Lee Y J, Lee Y S, Cha J Y et al. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy[J], 2020, 45(38): 19 181 [Baidu Scholar]
Li Y K, Zhang Q F, Chai R J et al. ChemCatChem[J], 2015, 7(9): 1427 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Qiangbing, Tang Huiping, Yang Baojun. Materials [Baidu Scholar]
China[J], 2016, 35(2): 31 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Tianyao, Zhou Yun, Sun Yadong et al. Chinese Journal of Rare Metals[J], 2018, 42(12): 8 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Bhattacharya A, Calmidi V V, Mahajan R L. International Journal of Heat & Mass Transfer[J], 2002, 45(5): 1017 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhi Hao, Xi Zhengping, Tang Huiping et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2009, 38(S3): 245 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Ye Xinli, Zhang Junxiong, Xiang Junfeng et al. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica[J], 2022, 39(8): 3794 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Wang D D, Wang J X, Liu P J et al. International Journal of Thermal Sciences[J], 2020, 155: 106 445 [Baidu Scholar]
Li Q F, Lan Z, Chun J et al. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer[J], 2021, 121: 105 123 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Dezhi, Wang Xiaoying, Zhou Pan et al. Materials Science and Engineering of Powder Metallurgy[J], 2014, 19(5): 687 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Li Qiang, Gan Xueping, Li Zhiyou et al. Materials Science and Engineering of Powder Metallurgy[J], 2018, 23(4): 361 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Li H, Liu R T, Chen J et al. Journal of Materials Research and Technology[J], 2020, 9(3): 3149 [Baidu Scholar]
Yakomaskin A A, Afanasiev V N, Zubkov N N et al. Journal of Heat Transfer[J], 2013, 135(10): 101 006 [Baidu Scholar]
Maydanik Y F. Applied Thermal Engineering[J], 2005, 25(5–6): 635 [Baidu Scholar]
Putra N, Saputra A N, Bimo M I et al. AIP Conference Proceedings[J], 2012, 1440(1): 612 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang X F, Li X Y, Wang S F. International Journal of Thermal Sciences[J], 2012, 54: 188 [Baidu Scholar]
Singh R, Nguyen T, Mochizuki M. Applied Thermal Engineer-ing[J], 2014, 63(1): 406 [Baidu Scholar]
Li H, Liu Z C, Chen B B et al. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science[J], 2012, 37: 91 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Hao, Yang Kun, Huang Yuanping et al. China Patent, ZL113000841B[P], 2021 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]