Abstract
In order to understand the influence of the different aging parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-3Nb-2Zr-Mo (Ti6321) alloy, the microstructures and mechanical properties under different aging parameters (temperatures ranging from 500 °C to 650 °C, 3–24 h) were investigated by optical microscopy (OM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and mechanical properties tests. The results reveal that the secondary α phase (αs) is more sensitive to the aging parameters than the primary α phase (αp). Moreover, the thickness of αs phase is positively correlated with aging temperature or aging time. As the aging temperature and aging time increase, the segregation of Ti and Al elements in the β transformation phase (βt) becomes obvious, and the αs phase changes from fine needle-like to long rod-like. When the alloy is aged at 600 °C for 12 h, the alloy shows good comprehensive mechanical performance. The tensile strength, yield strength, and elongation are 907 MPa, 796 MPa, and 16%, respectively, and the impact energy is 55 J.
Titanium alloys have a potential application in aerospace and marine engineering due to their high specific strength, excellent mechanical properties and corrosion resistanc
However, titanium alloy has very complex microstructure evolution characteristics during heat treatment. Among them, the evolution of αp phase, αs phase, βt phase and precipitates of titanium alloys have different effects on the strength, hardness, plasticity and toughnes
Therefore, in this work, the influence of aging process parameters on the microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of the Ti6321 alloy was investigated. Furthermore, the tensile and impact fracture mechanisms of the alloy after different aging treatments were analyzed. These findings may have theoretical guiding significance for industrial production.
The materials used in this study consisted of a Φ39 mm×80 mm Ti6321 forged bar, where the chemical composition (wt%) of Ti6321 was 3.01 Nb, 1.00 Mo, 1.95 Zr, 6.02 Al, 0.020 Si, 0.024 Fe, and balanced Ti. The β transus temperature was 990 °C. The solution treatment was carried out at 840 °C for 1.5 h in an electricity-resistant furnace. The microstructure after solution treatment was composed of equiaxed and elongated αp phase and βt phase, which was a typical bimodal structure (as seen in

Fig.1 OM (a) and SEM (b) microstructures of Ti6321 alloy after solution treatment
Ultimate strength/MPa | Yield strength/ MPa | Elongation/ % | Impact energy/J |
---|---|---|---|
887±14 | 763±15 | 15±0.9 | 51±1.5 |
After solution treatment, the cylindrical samples with Φ39 mm×80 mm were aged for 3, 6, 12 and 24 h in an electricity-resistant furnace at 500, 550, 600 and 650 °C. The heat treatment process is shown in

Fig.2 Heat treatment process of Ti6321 alloy
The heat-treated cylindrical samples were processed for tensile and impact tests according to the sampling diagram shown in

Fig.3 Schematics of the sampling for mechanical property test (a): (b) tensile test sample and (c) impact property test sample
The microstructure of Ti6321 alloy, aged under different parameters followed by grinding, polishing, and etching (47 mL H2O+2 mL HNO3+1 mL HF) treatment, was observed through OM and a field-emission SEM. Moreover, the detailed microstructure information was obtained using a FESEM equipped with an energy dispersive spectroscope (EDS). Furthermore, the fracture surface morphologies of the mechanically tested samples were investigated by SEM.

Fig.4 Microstructures of Ti6321 alloy aged at different temperatures for 6 h: (a, a1) 500 °C, (b, b1) 550 °C, (c, c1) 600 °C, and (d, d1) 650 °C

Fig.5 HAADF-STEM images and corresponding EDS mappings of Ti6321 alloy aged at different temperatures for 6 h: (a) 500 °C, (b) 550 °C, (c) 600 °C, and (d) 650 °C

Fig.6 Microstructures of Ti6321 alloy aged at 600 °C for different time: (a, a1) 3 h, (b, b1) 12 h, and (c, c1) 24 h

Fig.7 HAADF-STEM images and corresponding EDS mappings of Ti6321 alloy aged at 600 °C for different time: (a) 3 h, (b) 12 h, and (c) 24 h
In conclusion, the coarsening of αs phase occurs with the increase in aging temperature and aging time. From the perspective of thermodynamics, the coarsening behavior of αs phase is a thermal activation process. Since the βt phase is a metastable phase, the growth driving force of αs phase is provided with the increase in aging temperature, which promotes the coarsening of αs phas

Fig.8 Schematic diagrams of microstructure transformation under different aging parameters

Fig.9 Mechanical properties of Ti6321 alloy after aging treatment: (a) ultimate tensile strength, (b) yield strength, (c) elongation, and (d) impact energy
There are two factors that affect the tensile strength. On the one hand, with the increase in aging temperature, the morphology of αs phase changes from fine needle-like to long rod-like, resulting in the decrease in interface area of αs phase boundar
The impact toughness of titanium alloys has a significant influence on the distribution of αp phase, and size or morphology of αp phase. Generally speaking, αp phase is the channel of crack initiation and propagatio
In summary, the alloy has the best comprehensive mechanical properties when aged at 600 °C for 12 h. The tensile strength, yield strength, and elongation are 907 MPa, 796 MPa, and 16%, respectively. Meanwhile, the impact energy is 55 J.

Fig.10 Impact and tensile fracture morphologies of Ti6321 alloy after aging at different temperatures for 6 h

Fig.11 Impact and tensile fracture morphologies of Ti6321 alloy after aging at 600 °C for different time
1) In the Ti6321 alloy, the αs phase is more sensitive to aging parameters. The thickness of αs phase is positively correlated with aging temperature or time. As the aging temperature and aging time increase, the segregation of Ti and Al elements in βt phase is obvious, and the αs phase in βt phase changes from fine needle-like to long rod-like.
2) Mechanical properties are more sensitive to aging temperature than to aging time. As the aging temperature increases, the yield and tensile strength decrease and the impact energy increases. When the alloy is aged at 600 °C for 12 h, the comprehensive performance reaches to the best. The tensile strength, yield strength, and elongation are 907 MPa, 796 MPa, and 16%, respectively. Meanwhile, the impact energy is 55 J.
3) The tensile and impact toughness fracture of Ti6321 alloy are ductile after aging treatment. The coarsened αs phases increase the crack propagation resistance during the impact process and make the expansion path tortuous, but the coarsened αs phase is not conducive to the tensile properties of the alloy.
References
Zhu Shunpeng, Liu Qiang, Peng Weiwen et al. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences[J], 2018, 142‒143: 502 [Baidu Scholar]
Arba A, Chen Pengwan, Guo Yansong. Mechanics of Mate- [Baidu Scholar]
rials[J], 2019, 137: 103 121 [Baidu Scholar]
Lin Yongcheng, Tang Yi, Zhang Xiaoyong et al. Vacuum[J], 2019, 159: 191 [Baidu Scholar]
Popov A A. Metal Science and Heat Treatment[J],1995, 37: 409 [Baidu Scholar]
Xiong Jinhui, Li Shikai, Gao Fuyang et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2015, 640: 419 [Baidu Scholar]
Guo Kai, Meng Kang, Miao Dun et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2019, 766: 138 346 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Qi, Ren Junqiang, Wu Yukun et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2019, 789: 249 [Baidu Scholar]
Yin Lixia, Liang Shunxing, Zheng Liyun. World Journal of Engineering[J], 2015, 12(4): 319 [Baidu Scholar]
Li Juan, Xu Yaqun, Xiao Wenlong et al. Journal of Materials Science & Technology[J], 2022, 109: 1 [Baidu Scholar]
Bobbili R, Ramudu B V, Madhu V. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2017, 696: 295 [Baidu Scholar]
Wen Xin, Wan Mingpan, Huang Chaowen et al. Materials & Design[J], 2019, 180: 107 898 [Baidu Scholar]
Ei-hadad S, Nady M, Khalifa W et al. Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly[J], 2017, 57(2): 186 [Baidu Scholar]
Du Zhaoxin, Xiao Shulong, Xu Lijuan et al. Materials & De- sign[J], 2014, 55: 183 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Ke, Zhao Yongqing, Jia Weiju et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2021, 50(2): 552 [Baidu Scholar]
Sadeghpour S, Abbasi S M, Morakabati M et al. Materials & Design[J], 2017, 121: 24 [Baidu Scholar]
Xavier C C, Correa D R N, Grandini C R et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2017, 727: 246 [Baidu Scholar]
Wu Songquan, Lu Yanjin, Gan Yiliang et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2016, 672: 643 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhu Yanyan, Chen Bo, Tang Haibo et al. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China[J], 2018, 28: 36 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhou L, Chang M L, Dong L et al. Materials Research Innovations[J], 2014, 19(S4): 929 [Baidu Scholar]
Shekhar S, Sarkar R, Kar S K et al. Materials & Design[J], 2015, 66: 596 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Fang, Lei Liming, Fu Xin et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2020, 782: 139 284 [Baidu Scholar]
Yue Ke, Liu Jianrong, Zhu Shaoxiang et al. Materialia[J], 2018, 1: 128 [Baidu Scholar]
Shi Xiaohui, Zeng Wendong, Long Yu et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2017, 727: 555 [Baidu Scholar]
Chen Yuyong, Du Zhaoxin, Xiao Shulong et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2014, 586: 588 [Baidu Scholar]
Fan Jiangkun, Li Jinshan, Kou Hongchao et al. Materials & Design[J], 2015, 83: 499 [Baidu Scholar]
Wu Chuan, Zhan Mei. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China[J], 2019, 29(5): 997 [Baidu Scholar]
Xu Wujiao, Tan Yuquan, Gong Lihua et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2016, 45(11): 2932 [Baidu Scholar]
Wu Chuan, Zhan Mei. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2019, 805: 1144 [Baidu Scholar]