+Advanced Search
网刊加载中。。。

使用Chrome浏览器效果最佳,继续浏览,你可能不会看到最佳的展示效果,

确定继续浏览么?

复制成功,请在其他浏览器进行阅读

Crystal Structure Prediction, Electronic Structure and Me-chanical Properties of CrB: A First-Principles Investigation  PDF

  • Liu Fei
  • Sun Wei
  • Wang Li
  • Jia Bin
School of Materials Engineering, Tianjin Sino-German University of Applied Science, Tianjin 300350, China

Updated:2023-10-18

  • Full Text
  • Figs & Tabs
  • References
  • Authors
  • About
CN CITE
OUTLINE

Abstract

Different crystal structures of CrB were obtained bythe CALYPSO software. The electronic structure and mechanical properties of CrB were analyzed through first-principles calculations. The results show that the structure of CrB transits from α-CrB to β-CrB phase at 90 GPa. The β-CrB phase exhibits both covalent and ionic bonds, while α-CrB phase is dominated by ionic bonds. The modulus and hardness of both phases increase with increasing pressure. However, the hardness of β-CrB is less than that of α-CrB, indicating that the comprehensive mechanical properties of CrB are optimized at 90 GPa. From the perspective of electronic structure, the reasons for the changes in the mechanical properties of CrB under different pressures were explained.

Superhard materials are widely used in various industries and contribute to national defense and the national economy[

1–5], such as oil and natural gas mining, aerospace, machinery, coal and mineral mining, geological prospecting, due to their higher hardness, higher elastic modulus, and better thermal conductivity. As the service conditions of superhard materials are severer, the requirements for their properties become higher and higher. Diamond is the hardest material known in nature, with a hardness of 60‒120 GPa. But it easily reacts with iron in the process of use, which shortens its service life[6]. Therefore, the design of new hardness materials has become a research field with a high degree of attention. At present, the compounds formed by transition metal elements and light elements, such as N and B, provide more possibilities for the development of hard materials[1, 7–9]. Transition metal atoms have a higher electron concentration, so they have higher bulk modulus. The addition of light elements can form strong hybridization with the d orbital electrons of transition metal atoms to form a quasi-covalent bond, which can greatly improve the shear modulus and achieve higher hardness.

Cr element is a peculiar magnetic element; the number of valence electrons in the outermost layer is 3d54s1, thus it has a high valence electron density. When compressed, the valence electrons in the outer layer of Cr atoms have a strong ability to repel each other and high resistance to compression, so it has an extremely high bulk elastic modulus. Moreover, adding B and Cr atoms to form chromium-boron compounds will make them have higher hardness. The most fundamental factor determining the mechanical properties of materials is the crystal structures. Experiments have verified that there are a large number of crystal structures as knew in the current phase diagram of boron-chromium compounds, such as Cr2B, Cr3B5, CrB, Cr3B4, CrB2, CrB4 [

10]. However, due to a large number of crystal structures in the system, the phase boundary between each structure is blurred, which brings certain difficulties to the synthesis of a single phase. At present, the crystal structure of CrB depends mainly on the research literature and related crystal databases. However, there are few reports on the crystal structure and mechanical properties of CrB under different pressures. Zhang et al[11] studied the crystal structure and electronic properties of CrB4 at 0‒100 GPa using the first-principles method. Therefore, this study aimed to study the crystal structures, electronic properties at pressures ranging from 0 to 150 GPa to understand its properties deeply.

With the development of computational materials science, predicting the possible crystal structure of materials and theoretically designing the structure of materials have critical scientific significance in guiding experimental synthesis. Consequently, the effective combination of theoretical pre-diction methods and experimental methods will considerably reduce the cost of testing as well as the waste of re-sources[

12–13]. At present, the CALYPSO software has become one of the mainstream structure search software in the world for its efficient and accurate crystal structure prediction[14–15]. Its reliability has been extensively verified, especially for structural prediction in the field of superhard materials. The determination of the ground state structure and the phase transition sequence of the structure in a high pressure range have high consistency with the experimental results[16–17].

In summary, based on the first principle method of density functional theory, the crystal structures of CrB were searched via CALYPSO software, and the electronic structure and mechanical properties of the searched structures under different pressures were analyzed and predicted.

1 Computation

The CALYPSO software, based on a particle swarm optimization algorithm, was used to search the structure of CrB with 1 to 8 formula units, and the pressure range was 0‒150 GPa. In the search process, 30 generations were searched, and 30 structures were generated in each generation. A VASP software package was used to optimize the searched structures[

18]. The relation between valence electrons and ionic solids was described by the generalized gradient approxi-mation (GGA) of the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) approach[18–19]. The supersoft pseudopotential was used to describe the interaction between the valence electron and the ionic substance. The valence electron of the Cr atom is 3d54s1, and the valence electron of the B atom is 2s22p1. Under normal circumstances, when 3d54s1 is selected as the valence electron of Cr atom, most of the chemical properties of Cr can be determined. However, as the pressure increases, the inner electron orbitals are “crushed”, and the corresponding inner electrons may be treated as valence electrons. Therefore, different pseudopotentials may be selected for calculation in this study. Related literatures[20] have divided the core states and valence states of Fe atoms under different pressures through first-principles calculation. Based on Ref.[20], by selecting different pseudopotentials, the binding energy of Cr crystal cell with body-centered cubic was calculated at the pressure of 150 GPa. Wherein, the pressures are applied to the supercell based on the original lattice constant. When 3d54s1 and 3p63d54s1 of Cr atoms are selected as valence electrons, the binding energy of Cr crystal is ‒5.9616 and ‒5.9659 eV, respectively. The difference in binding energy is less than 0.01 eV, indicating that the 3p orbital has little effect on the calculation results in the range of 0‒150 GPa. Therefore, the Cr-pv pseudopotential was chosen, which is recommended by the VASP software, for the following calculation. Similarly, by selecting B pseudopotential and B-h pseudopotential, the binding energy of B crystal cell was calculated, which contains 36 atoms with a space group R-3mH (No.166)[21] at the pressure of 150 GPa, and the binding energies of B crystal cells are ‒5.91118 and ‒5.91236 eV, respectively. Therefore, the B pseudopotential was chosen, which is recommended by the VASP software for the following calculation.

The plane wave cutoff energy was 450 eV. The first Brillouin zone integration adopts the Monkhorst-Pack grid method[

22], the grid spacing was 0.3 nm-1. In the geometric optimization process, the total energy change ultimately converges to 1×10-5 eV per atom and the force acting on an atom decreases to 0.1 eV/ nm per atom. Phonon spectrum of CrB crystals was calculated by the PHONOPY software based on the density functional perturbation theory (DFPT) via the supercell method. The supercells of the α-CrB and β-CrB were set to 2×2×2 and 3×3×3, respectively, and the corresponding K points adopt 3×3×3 and 4×4×5 grids, respectively. In the calculation of mechanical properties, the shear modulus, Young’s modulus and bulk modulus were all calculated by the Voigt-Reuss-Hill average algorithm[23].

2 Results and Discussion

2.1 Crystal structure prediction

The CALYPSO software is employed to obtain the crystal structures of CrB at 0 K and 0‒150 GPa. The lattice constants and atomic positions are optimized for the above searched 50 crystal structures with the lowest energy, thus the crystal structure with relatively low energy is determined as the stable crystal structure of CrB. The search results show that when searching one formula unit, two crystal structures with lower energy were consulted in 0‒150 GPa. The space groups are Fm-3m (No.225) and P4/mmm (No.123), marked as α-CrB phase and β-CrB phase, respectively. When searching 2 to 8 formula units at 0‒150 GPa, one crystal structure with lower energy is discovered with the space group Cmcm (No.63), marked as γ-CrB phase.

The relationship between the energy and pressure of the crystal is determined according to the formula G=HTS (G is Gibbs free energy, T is temperature, and H is enthalpy). The enthalpy value can be used to represent the free energy at 0 K. Variation of the thermodynamic enthalpy for different crystal structures with pressure is displayed in Fig.1a.

It can be observed that at 0‒150 GPa, γ-CrB with a space group of Cmcm has a lower enthalpy value, indicating that γ-CrB phase is relatively stable and does not undergo a phase change. For the α-CrB phase with the space group Fm-3m and the β-CrB phase with P4/mmm, since their enthalpy value is higher than that of γ-CrB phase, they may be metastable phases. It is noticeable that when the pressure is less than 90 GPa, α-CrB phase has a lower enthalpy value; if the pressure exceeds 90 GPa, β-CrB phase appears to have a lower enth-alpy value. Therefore, CrB may undergo structural phase transition from α-CrB phase to β-CrB phase at 90 GPa. As related scholars have done a lot of research on the crystal structure and mechanical properties of γ-CrB phase[

24–26], the present study mainly discusses the crystal structure, electronic structure and mechanical properties of α-CrB and β-CrB phases under different pressures.

  

Fig.1b shows the volume changes of α-CrB and β-CrB phases with different pressures. The analysis demonstrates that the volume of the α-CrB phase decreases continuously with an increase in pressure. If the pressure reaches to 90 GPa, the structure of CrB undergoes a phase change to β-CrB, and its volume is decreased by about 4.25% compared with α-CrB.

  Table 1 Optimized equilibrium lattice constants of CrB and atomic positions

PhasePressure/GPaSourcea/×10-1 nmb/×10-1 nmc/×10-1 nmα/(°)β/(°)γ/(°)
α-CrB (Fm-3m) 0 This work 4.16 4.16 4.16 90 90 90
β-CrB (P4/mmm) 90 This work 2.54 2.54 2.19 90 90 90
γ-CrB (Cmcm/mmm) 0 This work 2.91 2.91 7.85 90 90 90
γ-CrB (Cmcm/mmm) 0 Ref.[27] 2.92 2.91 7.84 90 90 90
γ-CrB (Cmcm/mmm) 0 Ref.[26] 2.97 2.93 7.86 90 90 90

Different crystal structures of CrB phase are shown in Fig.2. The optimized equilibrium lattice constants and atomic positions are listed in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. Fig.2a shows the optimized crystal structure of α-CrB at 0 GPa. α-CrB phase has a cubic structure, and the lattice constant is a=b=c=0.416 nm. The Cr and B atoms in the crystal lattice are staggered in the [001], [010], and [100] crystal directions. The distance between each adjacent Cr and B atoms is 0.208 nm, and the distance between each adjacent Cr and Cr atoms, and B and B atoms is 0.294 nm. Fig.2b shows the optimized crystal structure of β-CrB phase at 90 GPa. β-CrB phase has a tetragonal structure, and the lattice constants are a=b=0.254 nm, c=0.219 nm. Due to the higher pressure, the lattice constant is significantly smaller than that of α-CrB. In β-CrB phase, the Cr atoms and B atoms are clearly arranged in layers and stacked in the manner of ABAB. The distance between the Cr atomic layer and the B atomic layer is 0.219 nm. The distance between adjacent Cr atoms in the Cr atomic layer is equal to that of B atoms in the B atomic layer, both are 0.254 nm. Fig. 2c shows the optimized crystal structure of γ-CrB at 0 GPa. γ-CrB has orthogonal lattice with the space group Cmcm, which is composed of single boron layer and double Cr atom layers. It can be seen from Table 1 that the calculated lattice constant of the γ-CrB phase is in good agreement with the results in other literature, indicating that the calculation method used in this study is accurate.

Table 2  Optimized atomic positions of CrB
Phase

Pressure/

GPa

Atom

Wyckoff

position

xyz

α-CrB

(Fm-3m)

0 Cr1 4a 0.5 0 0.5
Cr2 4a 0.5 0.5 0
Cr3 4a 0 0 0
Cr4 4a 0 0.5 0.5
B1 4b 0 0.5 0
B2 4b 0 0 0.5
B3 4b 0.5 0.5 0.5
B4 4b 0.5 0 0

β-CrB

(P4/mmm)

90 Cr1 1c 0.5 0.5 0
B1 1b 0 0 0.5

2.2 Crystal structure stability

By calculating the phonon dispersion relationship, it can judge whether the lattice structure has dynamic stability. The condition for determining the dynamic stability of the lattice structure is that all normal phonon frequencies are finite real values[

28]. If it is an imaginary value, it can judge that the structure has phonon softening and the lattice structure is unstable. In this work, the phonon spectrum of the predicted structure is calculated, as shown in Fig.3. It can be seen from Fig.3a that there is no phonon softening in the whole Brillouin zone of the α-CrB phase at 0 GPa, indicating that the phase has dynamic stability, and the frequency of the maximum optical branch is 20.70 THz. As can be seen from Fig.3b, at 90 GPa, the β-CrB phase has dynamic stability, and the maximum optical branch frequency is 22.35 THz. Therefore, although α-CrB phase and β-CrB phase are metastable phases, they both have dynamic stability.

  

2.3 Electronic structure analysis

  

To illustrate the predicted electronic structure of CrB, the band structures and electronic densities of states of α-CrB and β-CrB phase at 90 GPa are calculated, as shown in Fig.4. It can be seen that the conduction band and the valence band of the two structures overlap near the Fermi surface, indicating that both structures are metallic. We clearly see from Fig.4a that the electronic density of states in α-CrB phase is mainly contributed by the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom, whereas the energy range of the s orbital of Cr atom and B atom is smaller and the peak value of the density of states is low. Therefore, they have smaller contributions to the electronic density of states. In the energy range (eV) of [‒4.42, ‒2.45], and [0.51, 1.92], and [4.03, 8.99], the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom have overlapping orbital energy distributions, indicating that the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom appear to be hybridized, and Cr atoms form bonds with B atoms. In the energy range (eV) of [‒6.18, ‒7.92], there is an overlap in orbital energy distribution at the d orbital of Cr atom and the s orbital of B atom. Cr atoms and B atoms form bonds, but the bonding effect is relatively weak. Therefore, in the α-CrB phase, Cr atoms and B atoms form bonds, mainly due to the contributions of the d orbital of Cr and the p orbital of B. It can be seen from Fig.4b that the electronic density of states of the β-CrB phase is mainly contributed by the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom. The s orbital of B atom also has a certain contribution, but the contribution of s orbital of Cr atom is much smaller. In the entire energy range, the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom have overlapping orbital energy distributions, indicating that the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom appear to be hybridized, and Cr atoms form bonds with B atoms. In the energy range of 3.10‒8.30 eV, the d orbital of Cr atom, p and s orbitals of B atom have overlapping orbital energy distributions, indicating that the d orbital of Cr atom, p and s orbitals of B atom appear to be hybridized, and Cr atoms form bonds with B atoms. Simultaneously, chemical bonds are formed between the B atoms. Compared with Fig.4a and Fig.4b, the density of states energy range in the α-CrB phase is smaller and the peak value is higher, whereas the density of states energy range in the β-CrB phase is wider and the peak value is relatively low. It shows that the band dispersion in the β-CrB phase is strong, and thus the atomic orbital interaction is stronger.

In summary, the bonding effect of atoms in the β-CrB phase is stronger than in the α-CrB phase, which depends on the combined effect of the d orbital of Cr atom, p and s orbitals of B atom. Certainly, according to the results in Fig.1b, when the pressure exceeds 90 GPa, CrB undergoes a phase change, which reduces the volume of β-CrB phase, and the atomic distance is relatively close. Thus, it is the main reason for the strong bonding effect of atoms.

To illustrate the predicted electronic structure of CrB, the band structures and electronic densities of states of α-CrB and β-CrB phase at 90 GPa are calculated, as shown in Fig.4. It can be seen that the conduction band and the valence band in the two structures overlap near the Fermi surface, indicating that both structures are metallic. We can clearly see from Fig.4a that the electronic density of states in α-CrB phase is mainly contributed by the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom, whereas the energy range of the s orbital of Cr atom and the s orbital of B atom is smaller and the peak value of the density of states is low. Therefore, they have smaller contributions to the electronic density of states. In the energy (eV) range of [‒4.42, ‒2.45], [0.51, 1.92], and [4.03, 8.99], the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom have overlapping orbital energy distributions, indicating that the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom appear to be hybridized, Cr atoms form bonds with B atoms. In the energy range from ‒6.18 eV to ‒7.92 eV, there is an overlap in orbital energy distribution at the d orbital of Cr atom and the s orbital of B atom. Cr atoms and B atoms form bonds, but the bonding effect is relatively weak. Therefore, in the α-CrB phase, Cr atoms and B atoms form bonds, mainly due to the contributions of the d orbital of Cr and the p orbital of B. It can be seen from Fig.4b that the electronic density of states of the β-CrB phase is mainly contributed by the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom. The s orbital of B atom also has a certain contribution, but the contribution of s orbital of Cr atom is much smaller. In the entire energy range, the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom have overlapping orbital energy distributions, indicating that the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom appear to be hybridized, Cr atoms form bonds with B atoms. In the energy range of 3.10‒8.30 eV, the d orbital of Cr atom, p and s orbitals of B atom have overlapping orbital energy distributions, indicating that the d orbital of Cr atom, p and s orbitals of B atom appear to be hybridized, and Cr atoms form bonds with B atoms. Simultaneously, chemical bonds are formed between the B atoms. Compared with Fig.4a and Fig.4b, the density of states energy range in the α-CrB phase is smaller and the peak value is higher, whereas the density of states energy range in the β-CrB phase is wider and the peak value is relatively low. It shows that the band dispersion in the β-CrB phase is strong, and thus the atomic orbital interaction is stronger. In summary, the bonding effect of atoms in the β-CrB phase is stronger than that in the α-CrB phase, which depends on the combined effect of the d orbital of Cr atom, p and s orbitals of B atom. Certainly, according to the results in Fig.1b, when the pressure exceeds to 90 GPa, CrB undergoes a phase change, which reduces the volume of β-CrB phase, and the atomic distance is relatively close. Thus, it is the main reason for the strong bonding effect of atoms.

To express the bonding types of atoms in different CrB structures more clearly, the differential charge density of α-CrB phase as well as β-CrB phase at 90 GPa is calculated, as shown in Fig.5.

Fig.5  Differential charge density of the CrB phase: (a) α-CrB phase on the (001) plane, (b) β-CrB phase on the (001) plane, and (c) β-CrB phase on the (110) plane

Fig.5a‒5c show the projections of differential charge density of α-CrB phase on the (001) plane, β-CrB phase on the (001) plane, and β-CrB phase on the (110) plane, respectively. The red area represents the electron-gained area, the blue area represents the electron-loss area, and green area represents the uniform electron gas. It can be seen from Fig.5a that electrons are obtained around B atoms in α-CrB phase, while lost around Cr atoms. This indicates that there is a strong charge transfer between Cr and B atoms, and Cr and B atoms form ionic bonds. In addition, there is no obvious charge effect between Cr and B atoms. It can be seen from Fig.5b that on the (001) plane of the β-CrB phase, that is, in the B atomic layer, electrons are obtained among all B atoms, and the electron clouds overlap each other, which indicates that there are sharing charge among B atoms, and a network of covalent bonds is formed among B atoms. The result of the density of binding states is easily concluded, i.e. the s and p orbitals of the B atom are hybridized, and covalent bonds are formed among B atoms. It can be seen from Fig.5c that on the (110) plane of the β-CrB phase, electrons are obtained around B atoms, while lost around Cr atoms. It indicates that there is a strong charge transfer between Cr and B atoms, and Cr and B atoms form ionic bonds. Therefore, combined with the analysis results of the density of states, it can be concluded that in the β-CrB phase crystal, the s and p orbitals of the B atoms in the B atomic layer are hybridized to form a covalent bond network, and hybridize with the d orbitals of the Cr atoms in Cr atomic layer, forming ionic bonds. The hybridization of these three atomic orbitals to form covalent bonds and ionic bonds is the main way of bonding among atoms in the β-CrB phase.

2.4 Mechanical performance analysis

The mechanical properties of the α-CrB phase and β- CrB phase (bulk modulus B, shear modulus G, Young's modulus E) can be calculated based on the obtained elastic constants. Voigt-Reuss-Hill is the best method to estimate the mechanical properties of crystals from elastic constants.

B=12(BV+BR)=13(C11+2C12) (1)
GV=15(C11-C12+3C44)   GR=5(C11-C12)C44/(4C44+3(C11-C12)) (2)
G=12(Gv+GR); E=9BG/(3B+G) (3)
M=(C11+C12+2C33-4C13C2=(C11+C12)C33-2Ck132 (4)
GV=130(M+(C11M+3C11-3C12+12C44+6C66)BV=19(2C11+2C12+C33+4C13) (5)
GR=15[18Bv/C2+6/(C11-C12)+6/C44+3/C66]-1BR=C2/M (6)
B=12(Bv+BR);G=12(Gv+GR) (7)
E=9BG/(3B+G) (8)

Since the α-CrB phase has a cubic structure, its elastic constant has only three independent variables, that is, C11, C12, and C44. The mechanical properties of α-CrB phase can be calculated according to Eq.(1‒3)[

29].

The β-CrB phase has a tetragonal structure, and its elastic constants have six independent variables, that is, C11, C12, C13, C33, C44 and C66. The corresponding mechanical properties are calculated according to Eq.(4‒8)[

29].

V, R, and B are the bulk moduli obtained by Voigt, Reuss and Voigt-Reuss-Hill, respectively, and GV, GR and G are the shear moduli obtained by Voigt, Reuss and Voigt-Reuss-Hill, respectively. In order to illustrate the accuracy of the calculation results, the author also calculated the elastic constants of the γ-CrB phase at 0 GPa, then compared them with related literature[

28]. The criterion of mechanical stability of cubic crystal systems is shown in Eq.(9), and the criterion of mechanical stability of tetragonal crystal system is shown in Eq.(10). The calculation results are shown in Table 3.

C11>0;C44>0;C11-C44>0;C11+2C12>0 (9)
(C11-C12)>0;(C11+C33-2C13)>0Cii>0(i=1, 3, 4, 6) (10)
Table 3  Calculated elastic constants of CrB
PhasePressure/GPaSourceC11/GPaC12/GPaC13/GPaC22/GPaC23/GPaC33/GPaC44/GPaC55/GPaC66/GPa
α-CrB 0 579.1 104.7 93.1
β-CrB 90 754.6 521.8 410.4 902.8 254.1 455.5
γ-CrB 0 512.3 176.1 177.5 612.7 161.8 606.9 262.8 275.2 236.5
Ref.[30] 503.5 182.8 159.3 588.2 158.9 586.8 237.1 272.6 219.2
Ref.[31] 507.9 176.1 174.5 601.2 160.6 616.3 230.4 276.3 226.0
Ref.[32] 505 170 166 604 147 613 233 278 225

The elastic constant of the γ-CrB phase is in good agreement with the literature values, indicating that the calculated results of this study are more accurate. Substituting the data in Table 3 into study Eq.(9) and Eq.(10), it was con-cluded that both the α-CrB phase and β-CrB phase satisfy the criterion of mechanical stability, indicating that both the α-CrB phase and β-CrB phase are mechanically stable.

From Table 3, obviously, C11 C33 for β-CrB. Generally, C11 and C33 can be used to describe the resistances to linear compression along the [100] and [001] directions, respec-tively. A high value of C11 and C33 indicates a large resistance to linear compression along the [100] and [001] direction[

33]. Thereby, for β-CrB, the resistance to linear compression along the [100] direction is larger than that along the [001] direction. This is due to the fact that the strong bonds are parallel to the (001) plane while the weak bonds are perpendicular to the (001) plane or parallel to the (110) plane. Combining the results of electronic structure analysis in Fig.5b and Fig.5c, for β-CrB, covalent bonds network is formed among B atoms on the (001) crystal plane, while ionic bonds form among Cr atoms and the B atoms on the (110) crystal plane. Obviously, the strong bonds are parallel to the (001) plane while the weak bonds are parallel to the (110) plane. This well explains the reason for C11<C33 from the perspective of electronic structure.

Fig.6 shows the curves that reflect the change of the elastic constants and the elastic moduli of CrB with pressures. The values of elastic moduli are listed in Table 4. It can be seen from Fig.6a that the elastic constants of α-CrB and β-CrB both increase when pressure increases. The C11 value of α-CrB has a significant increasing trend, inferring that pressure is more likely to affect the electron bonding of α-CrB phase in the direction of [100].

Table 4  Elastic modulus values of CrB
Phaseα-CrBβ-CrB
Pressure/GPa0204060809090100120140
B/GPa 262.9 330.0 393.3 453.2 510.8 533.0 969.2 985.5 1029.1 1100.4
G/GPa 136.9 173.0 207.6 241.0 273.8 305.2 242.6 258.7 290.4 318.6
E/GPa 349.8 441.8 529.8 614.2 697.0 769.0 671.8 713.8 796.4 871.8
ν 0.272 0.288 0.301 0.309 0.316 0.318 0.925 0.733 0.357 0.891
C12C44/GPa 3.7 28.8 48.2 71.1 93.9 105.1
C13C44/GPa 213.3 222.8 396.1 264.9
B/G 1.92 1.90 1.89 1.88 1.86 1.75 3.99 3.81 3.54 3.45

When the pressure exceeds 90 GPa to form a phase change, the elastic constant of β-CrB phase changes significantly. The value of C11 decreases from 1287.4 GPa to 754.6 GPa, while C12 increases from 165.9 GPa to 521.8 GPa. The change of elastic constants directly affects the elastic modulus of CrB, as shown in Fig.6b. B value mainly reflects the material's resistance to compression. The larger the value, the stronger the compression resistance. The value of E and G mainly reflects the material's stiffness. The larger value means that the material has stronger stiffness. The bulk modulus B, shear modulus G, and Young's modulus E of both α-CrB and β-CrB phases increase with an increase in pressure. When the pressure exceeds 90 GPa to form a phase change, the elastic modulus of β-CrB phase changes significantly. The bulk modulus B value increases significantly from 533.0 GPa to 969.2 GPa, while the shear modulus G decreases from 305.2 GPa to 242.6 GPa, Young's modulus E decreases from 769.0 GPa to 671.8 GPa. It can be said that when the pressure exceeds 90 GPa to form a phase change, the compression resistance of the CrB phase is greatly increased, whereas the stiffness is slightly reduced.

  

Fig.7 shows the hardness and B/G values of CrB phase calculated under different pressures. Vickers hardness is calculated according to Eq.(11), where k=G/B.

Hv=0.92k1.137G0.708 (11)

Fig.7 Hardness and B/G values of CrB phase calculated under different pressures

With an increase in pressure, the hardness of α-CrB phase gradually increases, reaching the maximum value of 28 GPa at 90 GPa. When the pressure exceeds 90 GPa, the hardness of the β-CrB phase decreases significantly, as low as 9.3 GPa.

With an increase in pressure, the volume incompressibility of the material increases, so the bulk modulus of the material increases. This can be clearly seen from Fig.6b. From Eq.(11), The increase in bulk modulus will reduce the hardness of the material, while increasing shear modulus will increase the hardness of the material. It can be seen from Fig.6b, when the pressure is lower than 90 GPa, with an increase in pressure, the shear modulus and bulk modulus increase at the same time, which eventually increase the hardness of the material. When the pressure exceeds 90 GPa and the phase transition occurs, the shear modulus of β phase decreases, which is the main reason for the decrease in hardness of β-CrB phase.

  

The reason for the change of the elastic modulus and hardness of CrB during the phase change will be discussed in Section 2.6 in conjunction with the analysis of the electronic structures.

Toughness and brittleness are important characteristics of material mechanical properties. In general, the natural ductility and brittleness are predicted by Poisson's ratio[

34], Paugh's ratio B/G[35], and the Cauchy pressure. Cauchy pressures are C12C44 for cubic α-CrB and C13C44 for tetragonal β-CrB. The solid appears to be brittle when ν<0.26, B/G<1.75 and Cauchy pressure<0, otherwise, it is ductile. From Table 4, ν, B/G and Cauchy pressures for both α-CrB and β-CrB meet the ductile requirements of ν>0.26, B/G>1.75 and (C12C44) or (C13C44)>0, thereby suggesting that both α-CrB and β-CrB appear to be ductile at different pressures. From Fig.7, as the pressure increases, B/G value of α-CrB phase decreases slightly, from 1.91 to 1.75. It can be explained by the fact that when the pressure reaches 90 GPa, α-CrB phase has the highest hardness, meanwhile the matching degree of toughness and hardness is the best. That is, the comprehensive mechanical properties of the material are the best in this state. When the pressure exceeds 90 GPa to form a phase change, the B/G value of β-CrB phase increases to 3.9, and the hardness of the material is as low as 9.3 GPa, showing an obvious characteristic of ductility.

2.5 Mechanical anisotropy

For hardness materials, the elastic anisotropy of materials is an important mechanical property. According to Eq.(9), the hardness of CrB depends mainly on the value of shear modulus G and bulk modulus B. Therefore, the anisotropy of the shear modulus and bulk modulus of CrB at 90 GPa was calculated. Based on the single crystal's elastic constant Cij and its inverse matrix elastic flexibility coefficient Sij, the bulk modulus and shear modulus anisotropies of α-CrB and β-CrB phases are characterized. Since the stress and strain of the shear modulus are perpendicular to each other and are not on the same plane, it is difficult to make a true three-dimensional figure. Therefore, the three-dimensional anisotropy of the torsional modulus (GT) is used to approximate the shear modulus. For the cubic structure of α-CrB phase, the anisotropy of bulk modulus and shear modulus are calculated according to Eq.(12) and Eq.(13)[

36]. For β-CrB phase with tetragonal structure, the anisotropy of bulk modulus and shear modulus is calculated according to Eq.(14) and Eq.(15).

1/B=(S11+2S12)(l12+l22)+(S12+2S11)l32 (12)
1/GT=S11+4S44((S11-S12)-0.5)(l12l22+l12l32+l22l32) (13)
1/B=(S11+S12+S13)(l12+l22)+(2S11+2S13)l32 (14)
1/GT=2S11l12(1-l12)+2S11l22(1-l22)+2S33l32(1-l32)-              4S12l12l22-4S13l12l32-4S13l22l32+0.5S44(2-l12-              l22-4l22l32-4l12l32)+0.5S66(1-l32-4l12l22) (15)

where Sij is the elastic compliance matrix, l1, l2, and l3 are the direction cosines. The adoption of the relationship of the direction cosines in spherical coordinates with respect to θ and φ yields l1=sinθcosφ, l2=sinθsinφ, and l3=cosφ. The calculated surface contours and anisotropic properties of bulk modulus and shear modulus are shown in Fig.8 and Fig.9.

Fig.8 shows the anisotropic surface contours and projections of shear modulus of α-CrB and β-CrB at 90 GPa. An important factor that determines the hardness of a material is the ability to resist shear deformation. The maximum and minimum shear modulus of α-CrB phase is 296.9 and 196.8 GPa, respectively, Gmax/Gmin=1.51. The maximum and minimum shear modulus of β-CrB phase is 326.1 and 224.7 GPa, respectively, Gmax/Gmin=1.58. The shear modulus' aniso-tropy of β-CrB phase is not much different from that of α-CrB phase.

  

Fig.9 shows the surface contours and anisotropic properties of bulk modulus of α-CrB and β-CrB at 90 GPa. The maxi-mum and minimum bulk modulus of α-CrB phase is 1602.2 and 662.8 GPa, respectively, Bmax/Bmin=2.42. The maximum and minimum bulk modulus of β-CrB phase is 4479.3 and 1358.8 GPa, respectively, Bmax/Bmin=3.30. The shear modulus' anisotropy of β-CrB phase is not much different from that of α-CrB phase. The anisotropy of bulk modulus of β-CrB is stronger than that of α-CrB phase.

2.6 Discussions

On the one hand, the most fundamental reason that determines the mechanical properties of materials is the strength of the internal atomic bonding of the materials, on the other hand, it is the crystal structures. The calculated results show that when the pressure exceeds 90 GPa, CrB will under-go a structural phase change, from α-CrB phase to β-CrB phase. At this time, the volume of β-CrB phase is reduced, that is, the distance between atoms is closer, which leads to a stronger interaction force between atoms in the β-CrB phase. From the perspective of electronic structure, this is mainly manifested in two aspects. (1) In β-CrB phase, the s and p orbitals of the B atoms in B atomic layer hybridize to form a covalent bond network and hybridize with the d orbitals of the Cr atoms in Cr atomic layer to form ionic bonds. These three atomic orbitals are hybridized, forming covalent bonds and ionic bonds. In α-CrB phase, the d orbital of Cr and p orbital of B are hybridized, and the Cr atoms and the B atoms only form ionic bonds. (2) The density of states energy range in the α-CrB phase is smaller and the peak value is higher, while the density of states energy range in the β-CrB phase is wider and the peak value is relatively low. The band dispersion in the β-CrB phase is strong, and thus the atomic orbital interaction is stronger.

  

Therefore, the stronger interaction of atoms in the β-CrB phase will result in excellent mechanical properties of the crystal. It is not difficult to see from the calculation results of the mechanical properties that after the phase change, the bulk modulus of the β-CrB phase reaches to 969.2 GPa, which is much higher than that of α-CrB phase, indicating that the volume of the β-CrB crystals has greater incompressibility. However, it is not difficult to find that the shear modulus and Young's modulus of β-CrB phase are lower than those of α-CrB phase. This depends on the crystal structures of the α-CrB and β-CrB phase. The α-CrB phase crystal has a cubic structure, in which Cr and B atoms are staggered in the [001], [010], and [100] crystal directions, and form a chemical bond network with each other. While β-CrB phase has a tetragonal structure, in which Cr and B atoms are clearly arranged in layers and stacked in the manner of ABAB. In this way, in the β-CrB phase, covalent bonds network are formed among B atoms on the (001) crystal plane, and on the (110) crystal plane perpendicular to it, ionic bonds are formed among Cr atoms and the B atoms.

Combining the above analysis, it can be concluded that, when a phase change occurs, compared with β-CrB phase, α-CrB phase has lower interatomic force and smaller bulk mo-dulus. But in the crystal structure, the formation of chemical bonds network among atoms reduces the anisotropy of the bulk modulus, so α-CrB phase has relatively high hardness and better comprehensive mechanical properties at 90 GPa.

3 Conclusions

1) Two structures of CrB are searched by one formula unit. α-CrB phase has a cubic structure with a space group Fm-3m (No. 225), in which Cr and B atoms are staggered in the [001], [010], and [100] crystal directions. β-CrB phase has a tetragonal structure with a space group P4/mmm (No. 123), in which Cr and B atoms are clearly arranged in layers and stacked in the manner of ABAB. When the pressure exceeds 90 GPa, CrB will undergo a structural phase change, from

α-CrB phase to β-CrB phase.

2) The analysis result of the electronic structure shows that at 90 GPa, in β-CrB phase, the s and p orbitals of the B atoms in the B atomic layer are hybridized to form covalent bonds network and hybridize with the d orbitals of the Cr atoms in Cr atomic layer, forming ionic bonds. The hybridization of these three atomic orbitals to form covalent bonds and ionic bonds is the main way of bonding among atoms in β-CrB phase. In α-CrB phase, the d orbital of Cr atom and the p or-bital of B atom hybridize, and Cr atoms form bonds with B atoms.

3) The calculated results of mechanical properties show that when pressure increases, the hardness of α-CrB phase gradu-ally increases, reaching the maximum value of 28 GPa at 90 GPa. The matching degree of toughness and hardness is the best, that is, the comprehensive mechanical properties of CrB are the best currently. When the pressure exceeds 90 GPa and the phase transition occurs, the hardness of β-CrB phase decreases significantly to as low as 9.3 GPa, and the B/G value increases to 3.9 currently, showing an obvious toughness characteristic.

4) The calculated results of mechanical anisotropy show that when the pressure exceeds 90 GPa to form a phase change, α-CrB phase has lower interatomic force and smaller bulk modulus. But in the crystal structure, the formation of chemical bonds network among atoms reduces the anisotropy of the bulk modulus, and thus, α-CrB phase has relatively high hardness and better comprehensive mechanical properties at 90 GPa.

References

1

Balasubramanian Karthik, Khare Sanjay V, Gall Daniel. Acta Materialia[J], 2018, 152 (1): 175 [Baidu Scholar] 

2

Beake Ben D, Harris Adrian J. Vacuum[J], 2019, 159: 17 [Baidu Scholar] 

3

Kovalev A I, Wainstein D L, Rashkovskiy A Y et al. Vacuum[J], 2009, 84 (1): 184 [Baidu Scholar] 

4

Puvaneswari S, Rajeswarapalanichamy R, Sudha Priyanga G. Materials Chemistry and Physics[J], 2015, 151: 149 [Baidu Scholar] 

5

Wang Shuanglun, Pan Yong, Lin Yuanhua et al. Computational Materials Science[J], 2018, 146: 18 [Baidu Scholar] 

6

Kapadia B M. Journal of Heat Treating[J], 1987, 5(1): 41 [Baidu Scholar] 

7

Nnamchi Paul S. Materials & Design[J], 2016, 108: 60 [Baidu Scholar] 

8

Xing W, Meng F, Yu R. Sci Rep[J], 2016, 6: 21 794 [Baidu Scholar] 

9

Zhang Jin, Oganov Artem R, Li Xinfeng et al. Physical Review B[J], 2017, 95 (2): [Baidu Scholar] 

10

Liao P K, Spear K E. Bulletin of Alloy Phase Diagrams[J], 1986, 7: 232 [Baidu Scholar] 

11

Zhang Yanwen, Zhang Jidong. Journal of Sichuan University, Natural Science Edition[J], 2018, 55(4): 775 [Baidu Scholar] 

12

Li Xiaohong, Cui Hongling, Zhang Ruizhou. Vacuum[J], 2017, 145: 234 [Baidu Scholar] 

13

Wang Xia, Wang Lan, Pan Yong et al. Vacuum[J], 2017, 135: 121 [Baidu Scholar] 

14

Wang Yanchao, Lv Jian, Zhu Li et al. Physical Review B[J], 2010, 82 (9): [Baidu Scholar] 

15

Wang Yanchao, Lv Jian, Zhu Li et al. Computer Physics Communications[J], 2012, 183(10): 2063 [Baidu Scholar] 

16

Coleman Jonathan N, Lotya Mustafa, O'Neill Arlene et al. Science[J], 2011, 331(6017): 568 [Baidu Scholar] 

17

Zhang Chunli, Yin Huanhuan, Han Min et al. ACS Nano[J], 2014, 8(4): 3761 [Baidu Scholar] 

18

Kresse Georg, Furthmüller Jürgen. Physical Review B[J], 1996, 54(16): 11 169 [Baidu Scholar] 

19

Perdew J P, Ruzsinszky A, Csonka G I et al. Phys Rev Lett[J], 2008, 100(13): 136 406 [Baidu Scholar] 

20

Sun Bo, Liu Shaojun, Zhu Wenjun. 2006, [Baidu Scholar] 

21

Switendick A C, Morosin B. AIP Conference Proceedings[C]. American: American Institute of Physics, 1991: 205 [Baidu Scholar] 

22

Monkhorst Hendrik J, Pack James D. Physical Review B[J], 1976, 13(12): 5188 [Baidu Scholar] 

23

Chung D H, Buessem W R. Journal of Applied Physics[J], 1967, 38(6): 2535 [Baidu Scholar] 

24

Du Xiaodong, Ding Houfu, Xuan Tianpeng. Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals[J], 2005, 15(12): 1980 [Baidu Scholar] 

25

Qin Ping, Gao Zhenbang, Liu Haidi et al. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics[J], 2019, 36(4): 491 [Baidu Scholar] 

26

Zhang Haiming, Dai Fuzhi, Xiang Huimin et al. Journal of Materials Science & Technology[J], 2019, 35(8): 1593 [Baidu Scholar] 

27

Wang Bing, Wang De Yu, Cheng Zhenxiang et al. Chem Phys Chem[J], 2013, 14(6): 1245 [Baidu Scholar] 

28

Born Max, Huang Kun, Lax M. American Journal of Physics[J], 1955, 23(7): 474 [Baidu Scholar] 

29

Chung D H, Buessem W R. Journal of Applied Physics[J], 1967, 38(5): 2010 [Baidu Scholar] 

30

Chong Xiaoyu, Jiang Yehua, Zhou Rong et al. Journal of Alloys and compounds[J], 2014, 610: 684 [Baidu Scholar] 

31

Li Runyue, Duan Yonghua. Philosophical Magazine[J], 2016, [Baidu Scholar] 

96(10): 972 [Baidu Scholar] 

32

Xu Xuewen, Fu Kun, Li Lanlan et al. Physica B: Condensed Matter[J], 2013, 419: 105 [Baidu Scholar] 

33

Sun Yuan, Yang Ancang, Duan Yonghua et al. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials[J], 2022, 103: 105 781 [Baidu Scholar] 

34

Pugh S F. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science[J], 1954, 45(367): 823 [Baidu Scholar] 

35

Pettifor D G. Materials Science and Technology[J], 1992, [Baidu Scholar] 

8(4): 345 [Baidu Scholar] 

36

Hearmon Roy Frederick Stanley, Maradudin Alexei A. Physics Today[J], 1961, 14(10): 48 [Baidu Scholar]