Abstract
Different crystal structures of CrB were obtained bythe CALYPSO software. The electronic structure and mechanical properties of CrB were analyzed through first-principles calculations. The results show that the structure of CrB transits from α-CrB to β-CrB phase at 90 GPa. The β-CrB phase exhibits both covalent and ionic bonds, while α-CrB phase is dominated by ionic bonds. The modulus and hardness of both phases increase with increasing pressure. However, the hardness of β-CrB is less than that of α-CrB, indicating that the comprehensive mechanical properties of CrB are optimized at 90 GPa. From the perspective of electronic structure, the reasons for the changes in the mechanical properties of CrB under different pressures were explained.
Superhard materials are widely used in various industries and contribute to national defense and the national econom
Cr element is a peculiar magnetic element; the number of valence electrons in the outermost layer is 3
With the development of computational materials science, predicting the possible crystal structure of materials and theoretically designing the structure of materials have critical scientific significance in guiding experimental synthesis. Consequently, the effective combination of theoretical pre-diction methods and experimental methods will considerably reduce the cost of testing as well as the waste of re-source
In summary, based on the first principle method of density functional theory, the crystal structures of CrB were searched via CALYPSO software, and the electronic structure and mechanical properties of the searched structures under different pressures were analyzed and predicted.
The CALYPSO software, based on a particle swarm optimization algorithm, was used to search the structure of CrB with 1 to 8 formula units, and the pressure range was 0‒150 GPa. In the search process, 30 generations were searched, and 30 structures were generated in each generation. A VASP software package was used to optimize the searched structure
The plane wave cutoff energy was 450 eV. The first Brillouin zone integration adopts the Monkhorst-Pack grid metho
The CALYPSO software is employed to obtain the crystal structures of CrB at 0 K and 0‒150 GPa. The lattice constants and atomic positions are optimized for the above searched 50 crystal structures with the lowest energy, thus the crystal structure with relatively low energy is determined as the stable crystal structure of CrB. The search results show that when searching one formula unit, two crystal structures with lower energy were consulted in 0‒150 GPa. The space groups are Fm-3m (No.225) and P4/mmm (No.123), marked as α-CrB phase and β-CrB phase, respectively. When searching 2 to 8 formula units at 0‒150 GPa, one crystal structure with lower energy is discovered with the space group Cmcm (No.63), marked as γ-CrB phase.
The relationship between the energy and pressure of the crystal is determined according to the formula G=H‒TS (G is Gibbs free energy, T is temperature, and H is enthalpy). The enthalpy value can be used to represent the free energy at 0 K. Variation of the thermodynamic enthalpy for different crystal structures with pressure is displayed in Fig.1a.
It can be observed that at 0‒150 GPa, γ-CrB with a space group of Cmcm has a lower enthalpy value, indicating that γ-CrB phase is relatively stable and does not undergo a phase change. For the α-CrB phase with the space group Fm-3m and the β-CrB phase with P4/mmm, since their enthalpy value is higher than that of γ-CrB phase, they may be metastable phases. It is noticeable that when the pressure is less than 90 GPa, α-CrB phase has a lower enthalpy value; if the pressure exceeds 90 GPa, β-CrB phase appears to have a lower enth-alpy value. Therefore, CrB may undergo structural phase transition from α-CrB phase to β-CrB phase at 90 GPa. As related scholars have done a lot of research on the crystal structure and mechanical properties of γ-CrB phas

Fig.1b shows the volume changes of α-CrB and β-CrB phases with different pressures. The analysis demonstrates that the volume of the α-CrB phase decreases continuously with an increase in pressure. If the pressure reaches to 90 GPa, the structure of CrB undergoes a phase change to β-CrB, and its volume is decreased by about 4.25% compared with α-CrB.

Table 1 Optimized equilibrium lattice constants of CrB and atomic positions
Phase | Pressure/GPa | Source | a/×1 | b/×1 | c/×1 | α/(°) | β/(°) | γ/(°) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
α-CrB (Fm-3m) | 0 | This work | 4.16 | 4.16 | 4.16 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
β-CrB (P4/mmm) | 90 | This work | 2.54 | 2.54 | 2.19 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
γ-CrB (Cmcm/mmm) | 0 | This work | 2.91 | 2.91 | 7.85 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
γ-CrB (Cmcm/mmm) | 0 |
Ref.[ | 2.92 | 2.91 | 7.84 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
γ-CrB (Cmcm/mmm) | 0 |
Ref.[ | 2.97 | 2.93 | 7.86 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
Different crystal structures of CrB phase are shown in Fig.2. The optimized equilibrium lattice constants and atomic positions are listed in Table 1 and
Phase | Pressure/ GPa | Atom | Wyckoff position | x | y | z |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
α-CrB (Fm-3m) | 0 | Cr1 | 4a | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 |
Cr2 | 4a | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | ||
Cr3 | 4a | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Cr4 | 4a | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||
B1 | 4b | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | ||
B2 | 4b | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | ||
B3 | 4b | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||
B4 | 4b | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | ||
β-CrB (P4/mmm) | 90 | Cr1 | 1c | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 |
B1 | 1b | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
By calculating the phonon dispersion relationship, it can judge whether the lattice structure has dynamic stability. The condition for determining the dynamic stability of the lattice structure is that all normal phonon frequencies are finite real value


To illustrate the predicted electronic structure of CrB, the band structures and electronic densities of states of α-CrB and β-CrB phase at 90 GPa are calculated, as shown in Fig.4. It can be seen that the conduction band and the valence band of the two structures overlap near the Fermi surface, indicating that both structures are metallic. We clearly see from Fig.4a that the electronic density of states in α-CrB phase is mainly contributed by the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom, whereas the energy range of the s orbital of Cr atom and B atom is smaller and the peak value of the density of states is low. Therefore, they have smaller contributions to the electronic density of states. In the energy range (eV) of [‒4.42, ‒2.45], and [0.51, 1.92], and [4.03, 8.99], the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom have overlapping orbital energy distributions, indicating that the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom appear to be hybridized, and Cr atoms form bonds with B atoms. In the energy range (eV) of [‒6.18, ‒7.92], there is an overlap in orbital energy distribution at the d orbital of Cr atom and the s orbital of B atom. Cr atoms and B atoms form bonds, but the bonding effect is relatively weak. Therefore, in the α-CrB phase, Cr atoms and B atoms form bonds, mainly due to the contributions of the d orbital of Cr and the p orbital of B. It can be seen from Fig.4b that the electronic density of states of the β-CrB phase is mainly contributed by the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom. The s orbital of B atom also has a certain contribution, but the contribution of s orbital of Cr atom is much smaller. In the entire energy range, the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom have overlapping orbital energy distributions, indicating that the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom appear to be hybridized, and Cr atoms form bonds with B atoms. In the energy range of 3.10‒8.30 eV, the d orbital of Cr atom, p and s orbitals of B atom have overlapping orbital energy distributions, indicating that the d orbital of Cr atom, p and s orbitals of B atom appear to be hybridized, and Cr atoms form bonds with B atoms. Simultaneously, chemical bonds are formed between the B atoms. Compared with Fig.4a and Fig.4b, the density of states energy range in the α-CrB phase is smaller and the peak value is higher, whereas the density of states energy range in the β-CrB phase is wider and the peak value is relatively low. It shows that the band dispersion in the β-CrB phase is strong, and thus the atomic orbital interaction is stronger.
In summary, the bonding effect of atoms in the β-CrB phase is stronger than in the α-CrB phase, which depends on the combined effect of the d orbital of Cr atom, p and s orbitals of B atom. Certainly, according to the results in Fig.1b, when the pressure exceeds 90 GPa, CrB undergoes a phase change, which reduces the volume of β-CrB phase, and the atomic distance is relatively close. Thus, it is the main reason for the strong bonding effect of atoms.
To illustrate the predicted electronic structure of CrB, the band structures and electronic densities of states of α-CrB and β-CrB phase at 90 GPa are calculated, as shown in Fig.4. It can be seen that the conduction band and the valence band in the two structures overlap near the Fermi surface, indicating that both structures are metallic. We can clearly see from Fig.4a that the electronic density of states in α-CrB phase is mainly contributed by the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom, whereas the energy range of the s orbital of Cr atom and the s orbital of B atom is smaller and the peak value of the density of states is low. Therefore, they have smaller contributions to the electronic density of states. In the energy (eV) range of [‒4.42, ‒2.45], [0.51, 1.92], and [4.03, 8.99], the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom have overlapping orbital energy distributions, indicating that the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom appear to be hybridized, Cr atoms form bonds with B atoms. In the energy range from ‒6.18 eV to ‒7.92 eV, there is an overlap in orbital energy distribution at the d orbital of Cr atom and the s orbital of B atom. Cr atoms and B atoms form bonds, but the bonding effect is relatively weak. Therefore, in the α-CrB phase, Cr atoms and B atoms form bonds, mainly due to the contributions of the d orbital of Cr and the p orbital of B. It can be seen from Fig.4b that the electronic density of states of the β-CrB phase is mainly contributed by the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom. The s orbital of B atom also has a certain contribution, but the contribution of s orbital of Cr atom is much smaller. In the entire energy range, the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom have overlapping orbital energy distributions, indicating that the d orbital of Cr atom and the p orbital of B atom appear to be hybridized, Cr atoms form bonds with B atoms. In the energy range of 3.10‒8.30 eV, the d orbital of Cr atom, p and s orbitals of B atom have overlapping orbital energy distributions, indicating that the d orbital of Cr atom, p and s orbitals of B atom appear to be hybridized, and Cr atoms form bonds with B atoms. Simultaneously, chemical bonds are formed between the B atoms. Compared with Fig.4a and Fig.4b, the density of states energy range in the α-CrB phase is smaller and the peak value is higher, whereas the density of states energy range in the β-CrB phase is wider and the peak value is relatively low. It shows that the band dispersion in the β-CrB phase is strong, and thus the atomic orbital interaction is stronger. In summary, the bonding effect of atoms in the β-CrB phase is stronger than that in the α-CrB phase, which depends on the combined effect of the d orbital of Cr atom, p and s orbitals of B atom. Certainly, according to the results in Fig.1b, when the pressure exceeds to 90 GPa, CrB undergoes a phase change, which reduces the volume of β-CrB phase, and the atomic distance is relatively close. Thus, it is the main reason for the strong bonding effect of atoms.
To express the bonding types of atoms in different CrB structures more clearly, the differential charge density of α-CrB phase as well as β-CrB phase at 90 GPa is calculated, as shown in

Fig.5 Differential charge density of the CrB phase: (a) α-CrB phase on the (001) plane, (b) β-CrB phase on the (001) plane, and (c) β-CrB phase on the (110) plane
The mechanical properties of the α-CrB phase and β- CrB phase (bulk modulus B, shear modulus G, Young's modulus E) can be calculated based on the obtained elastic constants. Voigt-Reuss-Hill is the best method to estimate the mechanical properties of crystals from elastic constants.
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) |
(7) |
(8) |
Since the α-CrB phase has a cubic structure, its elastic constant has only three independent variables, that is, C11, C12, and C44. The mechanical properties of α-CrB phase can be calculated according to Eq.(1‒3
The β-CrB phase has a tetragonal structure, and its elastic constants have six independent variables, that is, C11, C12, C13, C33, C44 and C66. The corresponding mechanical properties are calculated according to Eq.(4‒8
BV, BR, and B are the bulk moduli obtained by Voigt, Reuss and Voigt-Reuss-Hill, respectively, and GV, GR and G are the shear moduli obtained by Voigt, Reuss and Voigt-Reuss-Hill, respectively. In order to illustrate the accuracy of the calculation results, the author also calculated the elastic constants of the γ-CrB phase at 0 GPa, then compared them with related literatur
(9) |
(10) |
Phase | Pressure/GPa | Source | C11/GPa | C12/GPa | C13/GPa | C22/GPa | C23/GPa | C33/GPa | C44/GPa | C55/GPa | C66/GPa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
α-CrB | 0 | 579.1 | 104.7 | 93.1 | |||||||
β-CrB | 90 | 754.6 | 521.8 | 410.4 | 902.8 | 254.1 | 455.5 | ||||
γ-CrB | 0 | 512.3 | 176.1 | 177.5 | 612.7 | 161.8 | 606.9 | 262.8 | 275.2 | 236.5 | |
Ref.[ | 503.5 | 182.8 | 159.3 | 588.2 | 158.9 | 586.8 | 237.1 | 272.6 | 219.2 | ||
Ref.[ | 507.9 | 176.1 | 174.5 | 601.2 | 160.6 | 616.3 | 230.4 | 276.3 | 226.0 | ||
Ref.[ | 505 | 170 | 166 | 604 | 147 | 613 | 233 | 278 | 225 |
The elastic constant of the γ-CrB phase is in good agreement with the literature values, indicating that the calculated results of this study are more accurate. Substituting the data in
From
Fig.6 shows the curves that reflect the change of the elastic constants and the elastic moduli of CrB with pressures. The values of elastic moduli are listed in
Phase | α-CrB | β-CrB | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pressure/GPa | 0 | 20 | 40 | 60 | 80 | 90 | 90 | 100 | 120 | 140 |
B/GPa | 262.9 | 330.0 | 393.3 | 453.2 | 510.8 | 533.0 | 969.2 | 985.5 | 1029.1 | 1100.4 |
G/GPa | 136.9 | 173.0 | 207.6 | 241.0 | 273.8 | 305.2 | 242.6 | 258.7 | 290.4 | 318.6 |
E/GPa | 349.8 | 441.8 | 529.8 | 614.2 | 697.0 | 769.0 | 671.8 | 713.8 | 796.4 | 871.8 |
ν | 0.272 | 0.288 | 0.301 | 0.309 | 0.316 | 0.318 | 0.925 | 0.733 | 0.357 | 0.891 |
C12‒C44/GPa | 3.7 | 28.8 | 48.2 | 71.1 | 93.9 | 105.1 | ||||
C13‒C44/GPa | 213.3 | 222.8 | 396.1 | 264.9 | ||||||
B/G | 1.92 | 1.90 | 1.89 | 1.88 | 1.86 | 1.75 | 3.99 | 3.81 | 3.54 | 3.45 |
When the pressure exceeds 90 GPa to form a phase change, the elastic constant of β-CrB phase changes significantly. The value of C11 decreases from 1287.4 GPa to 754.6 GPa, while C12 increases from 165.9 GPa to 521.8 GPa. The change of elastic constants directly affects the elastic modulus of CrB, as shown in Fig.6b. B value mainly reflects the material's resistance to compression. The larger the value, the stronger the compression resistance. The value of E and G mainly reflects the material's stiffness. The larger value means that the material has stronger stiffness. The bulk modulus B, shear modulus G, and Young's modulus E of both α-CrB and β-CrB phases increase with an increase in pressure. When the pressure exceeds 90 GPa to form a phase change, the elastic modulus of β-CrB phase changes significantly. The bulk modulus B value increases significantly from 533.0 GPa to 969.2 GPa, while the shear modulus G decreases from 305.2 GPa to 242.6 GPa, Young's modulus E decreases from 769.0 GPa to 671.8 GPa. It can be said that when the pressure exceeds 90 GPa to form a phase change, the compression resistance of the CrB phase is greatly increased, whereas the stiffness is slightly reduced.

Fig.7 shows the hardness and B/G values of CrB phase calculated under different pressures. Vickers hardness is calculated according to
(11) |
Fig.7 Hardness and B/G values of CrB phase calculated under different pressures
With an increase in pressure, the hardness of α-CrB phase gradually increases, reaching the maximum value of 28 GPa at 90 GPa. When the pressure exceeds 90 GPa, the hardness of the β-CrB phase decreases significantly, as low as 9.3 GPa.
With an increase in pressure, the volume incompressibility of the material increases, so the bulk modulus of the material increases. This can be clearly seen from Fig.6b. From

The reason for the change of the elastic modulus and hardness of CrB during the phase change will be discussed in Section 2.6 in conjunction with the analysis of the electronic structures.
Toughness and brittleness are important characteristics of material mechanical properties. In general, the natural ductility and brittleness are predicted by Poisson's rati
For hardness materials, the elastic anisotropy of materials is an important mechanical property. According to
(12) |
(13) |
(14) |
(15) |
where Sij is the elastic compliance matrix, l1, l2, and l3 are the direction cosines. The adoption of the relationship of the direction cosines in spherical coordinates with respect to θ and φ yields l1=sinθcosφ, l2=sinθsinφ, and l3=cosφ. The calculated surface contours and anisotropic properties of bulk modulus and shear modulus are shown in Fig.8 and Fig.9.
Fig.8 shows the anisotropic surface contours and projections of shear modulus of α-CrB and β-CrB at 90 GPa. An important factor that determines the hardness of a material is the ability to resist shear deformation. The maximum and minimum shear modulus of α-CrB phase is 296.9 and 196.8 GPa, respectively, Gmax/Gmin=1.51. The maximum and minimum shear modulus of β-CrB phase is 326.1 and 224.7 GPa, respectively, Gmax/Gmin=1.58. The shear modulus' aniso-tropy of β-CrB phase is not much different from that of α-CrB phase.

Fig.9 shows the surface contours and anisotropic properties of bulk modulus of α-CrB and β-CrB at 90 GPa. The maxi-mum and minimum bulk modulus of α-CrB phase is 1602.2 and 662.8 GPa, respectively, Bmax/Bmin=2.42. The maximum and minimum bulk modulus of β-CrB phase is 4479.3 and 1358.8 GPa, respectively, Bmax/Bmin=3.30. The shear modulus' anisotropy of β-CrB phase is not much different from that of α-CrB phase. The anisotropy of bulk modulus of β-CrB is stronger than that of α-CrB phase.
On the one hand, the most fundamental reason that determines the mechanical properties of materials is the strength of the internal atomic bonding of the materials, on the other hand, it is the crystal structures. The calculated results show that when the pressure exceeds 90 GPa, CrB will under-go a structural phase change, from α-CrB phase to β-CrB phase. At this time, the volume of β-CrB phase is reduced, that is, the distance between atoms is closer, which leads to a stronger interaction force between atoms in the β-CrB phase. From the perspective of electronic structure, this is mainly manifested in two aspects. (1) In β-CrB phase, the s and p orbitals of the B atoms in B atomic layer hybridize to form a covalent bond network and hybridize with the d orbitals of the Cr atoms in Cr atomic layer to form ionic bonds. These three atomic orbitals are hybridized, forming covalent bonds and ionic bonds. In α-CrB phase, the d orbital of Cr and p orbital of B are hybridized, and the Cr atoms and the B atoms only form ionic bonds. (2) The density of states energy range in the α-CrB phase is smaller and the peak value is higher, while the density of states energy range in the β-CrB phase is wider and the peak value is relatively low. The band dispersion in the β-CrB phase is strong, and thus the atomic orbital interaction is stronger.

Therefore, the stronger interaction of atoms in the β-CrB phase will result in excellent mechanical properties of the crystal. It is not difficult to see from the calculation results of the mechanical properties that after the phase change, the bulk modulus of the β-CrB phase reaches to 969.2 GPa, which is much higher than that of α-CrB phase, indicating that the volume of the β-CrB crystals has greater incompressibility. However, it is not difficult to find that the shear modulus and Young's modulus of β-CrB phase are lower than those of α-CrB phase. This depends on the crystal structures of the α-CrB and β-CrB phase. The α-CrB phase crystal has a cubic structure, in which Cr and B atoms are staggered in the [001], [010], and [100] crystal directions, and form a chemical bond network with each other. While β-CrB phase has a tetragonal structure, in which Cr and B atoms are clearly arranged in layers and stacked in the manner of ABAB. In this way, in the β-CrB phase, covalent bonds network are formed among B atoms on the (001) crystal plane, and on the (110) crystal plane perpendicular to it, ionic bonds are formed among Cr atoms and the B atoms.
Combining the above analysis, it can be concluded that, when a phase change occurs, compared with β-CrB phase, α-CrB phase has lower interatomic force and smaller bulk mo-dulus. But in the crystal structure, the formation of chemical bonds network among atoms reduces the anisotropy of the bulk modulus, so α-CrB phase has relatively high hardness and better comprehensive mechanical properties at 90 GPa.
1) Two structures of CrB are searched by one formula unit. α-CrB phase has a cubic structure with a space group Fm-3m (No. 225), in which Cr and B atoms are staggered in the [001], [010], and [100] crystal directions. β-CrB phase has a tetragonal structure with a space group P4/mmm (No. 123), in which Cr and B atoms are clearly arranged in layers and stacked in the manner of ABAB. When the pressure exceeds 90 GPa, CrB will undergo a structural phase change, from
α-CrB phase to β-CrB phase.
2) The analysis result of the electronic structure shows that at 90 GPa, in β-CrB phase, the s and p orbitals of the B atoms in the B atomic layer are hybridized to form covalent bonds network and hybridize with the d orbitals of the Cr atoms in Cr atomic layer, forming ionic bonds. The hybridization of these three atomic orbitals to form covalent bonds and ionic bonds is the main way of bonding among atoms in β-CrB phase. In α-CrB phase, the d orbital of Cr atom and the p or-bital of B atom hybridize, and Cr atoms form bonds with B atoms.
3) The calculated results of mechanical properties show that when pressure increases, the hardness of α-CrB phase gradu-ally increases, reaching the maximum value of 28 GPa at 90 GPa. The matching degree of toughness and hardness is the best, that is, the comprehensive mechanical properties of CrB are the best currently. When the pressure exceeds 90 GPa and the phase transition occurs, the hardness of β-CrB phase decreases significantly to as low as 9.3 GPa, and the B/G value increases to 3.9 currently, showing an obvious toughness characteristic.
4) The calculated results of mechanical anisotropy show that when the pressure exceeds 90 GPa to form a phase change, α-CrB phase has lower interatomic force and smaller bulk modulus. But in the crystal structure, the formation of chemical bonds network among atoms reduces the anisotropy of the bulk modulus, and thus, α-CrB phase has relatively high hardness and better comprehensive mechanical properties at 90 GPa.
References
Balasubramanian Karthik, Khare Sanjay V, Gall Daniel. Acta Materialia[J], 2018, 152 (1): 175 [Baidu Scholar]
Beake Ben D, Harris Adrian J. Vacuum[J], 2019, 159: 17 [Baidu Scholar]
Kovalev A I, Wainstein D L, Rashkovskiy A Y et al. Vacuum[J], 2009, 84 (1): 184 [Baidu Scholar]
Puvaneswari S, Rajeswarapalanichamy R, Sudha Priyanga G. Materials Chemistry and Physics[J], 2015, 151: 149 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Shuanglun, Pan Yong, Lin Yuanhua et al. Computational Materials Science[J], 2018, 146: 18 [Baidu Scholar]
Kapadia B M. Journal of Heat Treating[J], 1987, 5(1): 41 [Baidu Scholar]
Nnamchi Paul S. Materials & Design[J], 2016, 108: 60 [Baidu Scholar]
Xing W, Meng F, Yu R. Sci Rep[J], 2016, 6: 21 794 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang Jin, Oganov Artem R, Li Xinfeng et al. Physical Review B[J], 2017, 95 (2): [Baidu Scholar]
Liao P K, Spear K E. Bulletin of Alloy Phase Diagrams[J], 1986, 7: 232 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang Yanwen, Zhang Jidong. Journal of Sichuan University, Natural Science Edition[J], 2018, 55(4): 775 [Baidu Scholar]
Li Xiaohong, Cui Hongling, Zhang Ruizhou. Vacuum[J], 2017, 145: 234 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Xia, Wang Lan, Pan Yong et al. Vacuum[J], 2017, 135: 121 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Yanchao, Lv Jian, Zhu Li et al. Physical Review B[J], 2010, 82 (9): [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Yanchao, Lv Jian, Zhu Li et al. Computer Physics Communications[J], 2012, 183(10): 2063 [Baidu Scholar]
Coleman Jonathan N, Lotya Mustafa, O'Neill Arlene et al. Science[J], 2011, 331(6017): 568 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang Chunli, Yin Huanhuan, Han Min et al. ACS Nano[J], 2014, 8(4): 3761 [Baidu Scholar]
Kresse Georg, Furthmüller Jürgen. Physical Review B[J], 1996, 54(16): 11 169 [Baidu Scholar]
Perdew J P, Ruzsinszky A, Csonka G I et al. Phys Rev Lett[J], 2008, 100(13): 136 406 [Baidu Scholar]
Sun Bo, Liu Shaojun, Zhu Wenjun. 2006, [Baidu Scholar]
Switendick A C, Morosin B. AIP Conference Proceedings[C]. American: American Institute of Physics, 1991: 205 [Baidu Scholar]
Monkhorst Hendrik J, Pack James D. Physical Review B[J], 1976, 13(12): 5188 [Baidu Scholar]
Chung D H, Buessem W R. Journal of Applied Physics[J], 1967, 38(6): 2535 [Baidu Scholar]
Du Xiaodong, Ding Houfu, Xuan Tianpeng. Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals[J], 2005, 15(12): 1980 [Baidu Scholar]
Qin Ping, Gao Zhenbang, Liu Haidi et al. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics[J], 2019, 36(4): 491 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang Haiming, Dai Fuzhi, Xiang Huimin et al. Journal of Materials Science & Technology[J], 2019, 35(8): 1593 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Bing, Wang De Yu, Cheng Zhenxiang et al. Chem Phys Chem[J], 2013, 14(6): 1245 [Baidu Scholar]
Born Max, Huang Kun, Lax M. American Journal of Physics[J], 1955, 23(7): 474 [Baidu Scholar]
Chung D H, Buessem W R. Journal of Applied Physics[J], 1967, 38(5): 2010 [Baidu Scholar]
Chong Xiaoyu, Jiang Yehua, Zhou Rong et al. Journal of Alloys and compounds[J], 2014, 610: 684 [Baidu Scholar]
Li Runyue, Duan Yonghua. Philosophical Magazine[J], 2016, [Baidu Scholar]
96(10): 972 [Baidu Scholar]
Xu Xuewen, Fu Kun, Li Lanlan et al. Physica B: Condensed Matter[J], 2013, 419: 105 [Baidu Scholar]
Sun Yuan, Yang Ancang, Duan Yonghua et al. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials[J], 2022, 103: 105 781 [Baidu Scholar]
Pugh S F. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science[J], 1954, 45(367): 823 [Baidu Scholar]
Pettifor D G. Materials Science and Technology[J], 1992, [Baidu Scholar]
8(4): 345 [Baidu Scholar]
Hearmon Roy Frederick Stanley, Maradudin Alexei A. Physics Today[J], 1961, 14(10): 48 [Baidu Scholar]