Abstract
The influence of Ti addition into Al-based alloy fabricated by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) technique was demonstrated. The microstructure characteristics, phase identification and nano-hardness of the LPBF-processed samples without or with 3wt% Ti addition were investigated by scanning electron microscope, electron backscatter diffraction, X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscope and nano-indentation tests. The results reveal that a refined grain microstructure and lower average grain sizes can be obtained. Due to the heterogeneous nucleation provided by Al3Ti precipitated phases, the ranges of grain sizes are reduced within 2.5 μm. As the low angle grain boundary increases, higher crystal lattice distortion energy contributes to the increase in average nano-hardness (to 2.36 GPa) and Young's modulus (to 92.72 GPa) values. The <100> texture of LPBF-processed Al-based alloy with 3wt% Ti addition is slightly enhanced, while there is still a random crystal orientation. The phase transformation from α-Al to Al3Ti can be obtained.
Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is a laser-based and powder-based additive manufacturing technology that fabricates three dimensional components in a track-by-track and layer-by-layer fashio
With the increasing demand for lightweight and thermal conductivity in the automotive industry, aluminium-silicon (Al-Si) alloys have received great interests in relevant researche
This research aims to prepare Al-based alloy/Ti mixed powders by low-energy ball milling. The microstructure characteristics, phase identification and formation mechanism of composites produced by LPBF were analyzed by means of advanced characterization techniques. The influence of LPBF-processed samples without or with Ti addition on the grain boundary distribution and measured nano-hardness was also discussed.
The feedstock AlSi10Mg alloy was gas atomized powders with particle size of 15‒53 μm. To increase the powder bed density, smaller sizes of Ti powders were adopted. The distribution of gas atomized micron Ti particle (TA0) diameters was D10=6.64 μm, D50=12.9 μm and D90=23.4 μm. The determined chemical composition of AlSi10Mg powders was 9.41wt% Si, 0.42wt% Mg and the balance Al. The morphology of two types of powders was recorded by SEM (TESCAN VEGA3, Czech Republic). Most powders show a regular spherical morphology, as shown in Fig.

Fig.1 Morphologies of powder particles: (a) AlSi10Mg and (b) Ti
According to the Zhang's calculation results, the refinement of predicted grain size is limited when the Ti content is over 1.5wt

Fig.2 Distribution and morphology of AlSi10Mg/Ti mixed powders (a‒b) and corresponding EDS spectra (c‒d)
The LPBF experiments were performed on a self-developed machine (Yongnian, Jiangsu, China), as shown in

Fig.3 Schematic of LPBF
After being removed from the substrate through electrical discharge machining, the samples were placed in ethanol and cleaned by ultrasound wave at room temperature for 30 min. The specimens were then polished, ground and etched with 0.5vol% HNO3 for 5 s. SEM (ZEISS EVO 18, Germany) and X-ray diffractometer (XRD, MiniFlex600, Japan) with Cu-Kα radiation were utilized for the identification of microstructure morphology and phases, respectively. A transmission electron microscope (TEM, TECNAI G2, Holland) equipped with EDS analysis was used to investigate the element distribution and crystal structures of phases. The LPBF-processed samples with thickness of 100 nm were prepared by the ion-milling technique. The electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) was conducted on a Hitachi S-3400N SEM equipped with a HKL-EBSD system to investigate the grain sizes and texture intensity. An array of 25×25 indentations with a square area of 145 μm×145 μm on the microstructure was implemented with an iNano instrument (Nanomechanics, Inc., America) to evaluate the nano-hardness and Young's modulus values with or without 3wt% Ti addition. Before the nano-indentation tests, the surface of the sample was polished according to the standard procedures. Indentations were performed at room temperature to a peak force of 5 mN at a rate of approximately one indent per second.

Fig.4 TEM image of Al-Si eutectic microstructure (a); line mapping results along the cell boundary (b); TEM image of new phases distribu- tion (c); SEM image of microstructure morphology with 3wt% Ti addition (d)

Fig.5 XRD patterns of LPBF-processed samples without and with 3wt% Ti addition
XRD patterns of LPBF-processed AlSi10Mg samples without Ti addition (blue curve) and AlSi10Mg/Ti composites (pink curve) obtained within a wide 2θ range (20°–90°) are shown in
To verify the occurrence of crystalline dimension,
(1) |
Crystal plane | (111) | (200) | (220) | (311) | (222) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Without Ti | 2θ/(°) | 38.441 | 44.681 | 65.101 | 78.241 | 82.462 |
θ/(°) | 19.221 | 22.341 | 32.551 | 39.121 | 41.231 | |
FWHM | 0.137 | 0.162 | 0.206 | 0.262 | 0.271 | |
3wt% Ti | 2θ/(°) | 38.261 | 44.521 | 64.941 | 78.122 | 82.361 |
θ/(°) | 19.131 | 22.2605 | 32.471 | 39.061 | 41.181 | |
FWHM | 0.165 | 0.199 | 0.260 | 0.344 | 0.326 |
Herein, k is constant (0.89), λ is radiation wavelength (0.154 186 nm), β is the FWHM and θ is the diffraction angle. According to
Instantaneous energy from laser irradiation causes rapid melting and solidification in the molten pools. Greater undercooling (ΔT) at the solid-liquid interface front provides an energetically favourable condition and promotes nucleation and growth. Dependent on the ratio of thermal gradient (G) and growth rate (R), the mode of solidification and feature fineness can be determine

Fig.6 Grain morphology distributions without and with 3% Ti addition: (a, c) IPFs of the top surface; (b, d) grains in colour representing the sizes smaller than 1 μm with the step size of 0.13 μm; (e) grain misorientation; (f) distribution of grain sizes
To further illustrate the influence of Ti addition on the microstructure, the grain boundary distribution and pole figure of LPBF-processed aluminium without and with 3wt% Ti addition are compared.

Fig.7 Comparison of LPBF-processed aluminium alloys without (a, c) or with (b, d) 3wt% Ti addition: (a‒b) grain boundaries distribution and (c‒d) pole figures
The grain sizes between 0.5–1 μm, and network morphol-ogies with 3wt% Ti addition are depicted in

Fig.8 HRTEM image of network morphology and precipitated phases of as-built samples with 3wt% Ti addition (a) and corresponding EDS results of point labelled in Fig.8a (b); HRTEM image of precipitated phase upon the grain boundary with 3wt% Ti (c) and corresponding SAED pattern (d); schematic of crystal structures (e)
Combined with the results of Section 2.1 and Ref. [
As stated above, the changes in grain sizes and distortion energy have impact on nano-hardness and Young's modulus. In this study, the NanoBlitz 3D release method implemented in the iNano instrument was used to characterize the LPBF-processed samples without and with 3wt% Ti addition. The nano-hardness (H) can be defined as follow
(2) |
where P is the maximum load and A is the projected area of the indentation. The Young's modulus (Er) can be expressed by the following equation:
(3) |
where β is constant (1.034) and S is the contact stiffness. The corresponding highly resolved maps of nano-hardness and Young's modulus are created, as shown in

Fig.9 Mechanical properties of LPBF-processed aluminum alloys without and with 3wt% Ti addition: (a‒b) nano-hardness and (c‒d) Young's modulus
According to the Hall-Petch relationship, the yield strength is inversely proportional to the grain sizes. Grain refinement can be induced by the effect of hetero- geneous nucleation. However, the precipitated phases belong to brittle phases within a high stiffness, which may have a deteriorative effect on strength-ductility trade- off. Thereby, the influence of intermetallic compounds amount on the final mechanical properties of LPBF-processed samples with different Ti proportions needs to be further explored.
1) The influence of 3wt% Ti addition on the microstructure characteristics and phase identification of LPBF-processed Al-based alloys is investigated. Depending on factors of temperature gradient and solidification rate, the microstructure displays a fine cell-like substructure with anisotropy characteristics.
2) When 3wt% Ti is added, precipitated phases are distributed along the grain boundary or inside the grains. The heterogeneous nucleation effect of substantial precipitated phases promotes the grain refinement and reduces the grain sizes. The precipitated phase has tetragonal Al3Ti crystal structure, but operates little effect on texture intensity and crystal orientation.
3) The transformation of HAGBs into LAGBs promotes the increase in distortion energy. The average nano-hardness and Young's modulus of the LPBF-processed Al-based sample with 3wt% Ti addition can increase to approximately 2.36 and 92.72 GPa, respectively. The influence of increasing Ti amount on the microstructure evolution, formation of intermetallic compounds as well as the mechanical properties needs to be further investigated.
References
Guan J R, Wang Q P. Materials[J], 2023, 16(7): 2757 [Baidu Scholar]
Sing S L, Yeong W Y. Virtual and Physical Prototyping[J], 2020, 15: 359 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang J L, Song B, Wei Q S et al. Journal of Materials Science & Technology[J], 2019, 35: 270 [Baidu Scholar]
Aboulkhair N T, Everitt N M, Ashcroft I et al. Additive Manufacturing[J], 2014,1‒4: 77 [Baidu Scholar]
Olakanmi E O, Cochrane R F, Dalgarno K W et al. Progress in Materials Science[J], 2015, 74: 401 [Baidu Scholar]
Cui X M, Liang S B, Zhao X P et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2023, 52(5): 1603 [Baidu Scholar]
Wei H L, Elmer J W, Debroy T. Acta Materialia[J], 2016, 115: 123 [Baidu Scholar]
Chowdhury S, Yadaiah N, Prakash C et al. Journal of Materials Research and Technology[J], 2022, 20: 2109 [Baidu Scholar]
Mao B Y, Liu Y, Ye J W et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2023, 52(3): 860 [Baidu Scholar]
Zheng M, Wei L, Chen J et al. Journal of Materials Research and Technology[J], 2021, 11: 392 [Baidu Scholar]
Volpato G M, Tetzlaff U, Fredel M C. Additive Manufactur- ing[J], 2022, 55: 102871 [Baidu Scholar]
Tian Z H, Zhang C Q, Wang D Y et al. Applied Science[J], 2020,10(1): 81 [Baidu Scholar]
Ma Z B, Zhang K F, Ren Z H et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2020, 828: 154350 [Baidu Scholar]
Mao Z F, Zhang D, Wei P T et al. Materials[J], 2017, 10: 333 [Baidu Scholar]
Tang X P, Chen X H, Sun F J et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2022, 924: 166627 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu Y G, Zhang J Q, Tan Q Y et al. Optics and Laser Techno-logy[J], 2021, 134: 106649 [Baidu Scholar]
Luo X, Li D D, Yang C et al. Additive Manufacturing[J], 2022, 51: 102640 [Baidu Scholar]
He B B, Wu W H, Zhang L et al. Vacuum[J], 2018, 150: 79 [Baidu Scholar]
Miller W S, Zhuang L, Bottema J et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2000, 280: 37 [Baidu Scholar]
Aversa A, Marchese G, Sabbori A et al. Materials[J], 2019, [Baidu Scholar]
12(7): 1007 [Baidu Scholar]
Kang N, Coddet P, Liao H L et al. Applied Surface Science[J], 2016, 378: 142 [Baidu Scholar]
Read N, Wang W, Essa K et al. Materials and Design[J], 2015, 65: 417 [Baidu Scholar]
Li W, Li S, Liu J et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2016, 663: 116 [Baidu Scholar]
Tradowsky U, White J, Ward R M et al. Materials and De- [Baidu Scholar]
sign[J], 2016, 105: 212 [Baidu Scholar]
Trevisan F, Calignano F, Lorusso M et al. Materials[J], 2017, 10: 76 [Baidu Scholar]
Brandl E, Heckenberger U, Holzinger V et al. Materials and Design[J], 2012, 34: 159 [Baidu Scholar]
Dadbakhsh S, Mertens R, Hao L et al. Advanced Engineering Materials[J], 2019, 21: 3 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang H Q, Gu D. Journal of Composite Materials[J], 2015, [Baidu Scholar]
49(13): 1639 [Baidu Scholar]
Yuan P, Gu D. Journal of Physics D-Applied Physics[J], 2015, 48: 035303 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhao X, Song B, Fan W et al. Journal of Alloys and Com- pounds[J], 2016, 665: 271 [Baidu Scholar]
Li X P, Ji G, Chen Z et al. Acta Materialia[J], 2017, 129: 183 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhao X, Gu D, Ma C L et al. Vacuum[J], 2019, 160: 189 [Baidu Scholar]
Martin J H, Yahata B D, Hundley J M et al. Nature[J], 2017, 549: 365 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhao H L, White D R, Debroy T. Metallurgical Reviews[J], 1999, 44: 238 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang J L, Gao J B, Song B et al. Additive Manufacturing[J], 2020, 38: 101829 [Baidu Scholar]
Wu J, Wang X Q, Wang W et al. Acta Materialia[J], 2016, 117: 311 [Baidu Scholar]
Kim D K, Woo W, Hwang J H et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2016, 686: 281 [Baidu Scholar]
Thijs L, Kempen K, Kruth J P et al. Acta Materialia[J], 2013, 61: 1809 [Baidu Scholar]
Kuryntsen S. Materials[J], 2022, 15: 122 [Baidu Scholar]
Han Q, Setchi R, Evans S L. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology[J], 2017, 88: 1429 [Baidu Scholar]
Foadian F, Soltanieh M, Adeli M et al. Metallurgical and Materials Transaction A[J], 2014, 45(4): 1823 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Q, Zhang S, Zhang C H et al. Vacuum[J], 2017, 141: 38 [Baidu Scholar]
Suwas S, Ray R K. Crystallographic Texture of Materials[M]. New York: Springer, 2014 [Baidu Scholar]
Pang X Z, Chen X X, Yang J B et al. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids[J], 2019, 131: 243 [Baidu Scholar]
Fan Z, Wang Y, Zhang Y et al. Acta Materialia[J], 2015, 84: 292 [Baidu Scholar]
Jian X, Huang Z F, Xing J D et al. Materials Chemistry and Physics[J], 2019, 221: 311 [Baidu Scholar]
Oliver W C, Pharr G M. MRS Bulletin[J], 2010, 35: 897 [Baidu Scholar]
Lipsitt H A. Materials Research Society Symposium Pro-ceedings[C]. Pennsylvania: Materials Research Society, 1985: 39 [Baidu Scholar]