Abstract
The microstructure and mechanical properties of Inconel 617 alloy rolled at room temperature with different deformation degrees (20%, 50%, 70%) were investigated. The grain refinement mechanism and main texture types of Inconel 617 alloy during rolling were analyzed via electron backscatter diffraction and X-ray diffraction, and the microhardness and tensile properties of Inconel 617 alloy with different deformation degrees were tested. Results reveal that the grains of Inconel 617 alloy are refined during the rolling deformation process, and the refinement mechanism is the fragmentation of original grains caused by the increase in dis-location density and strain gradient. The main microtextures of the rolled samples are Goss {011}<001>, Rotated Goss {110}<110>, Brass {011}<211>, and P {011}<112> textures, and their intensity is increased with increase in deformation degree. After rolling deformation, the strength of the Inconel 617 alloy is improved and the ductility is reduced by the combined effect of grain refinement and dislocation strengthening. Comprehensively, the yield strength and elongation of Inconel 617 alloy after 20% deformation are 772.48 MPa and 0.1962, respectively, presenting good synergy effect.
Inconel 617 nickel-based superalloy is widely used in aerospace, marine, and other fields because of its excellent high-temperature microstructure stability and corrosion resis-tanc
The rolling plastic deformation technique has the advan-tages of simple operation, wide application field, and remark-ably grain refinement effec
In order to better understand the effect of rolling defor-mation on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Inconel 617 alloy, this research conducted rolling process at room temperature to refine the grain size. The plastic defor-mation of Inconel 617 alloy was realized. The grain refine-ment and texture evolution of the samples with different deformation degrees were analyzed by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). In addition, the variation mechanism of microhardness and tensile properties was discussed. This research provided guidance for the investigation of the microtextures and mechanical properties of Inconel 617 alloy during rolling deformation.
The chemical composition of the commercial Inconel 617 alloy was Cr=20.80wt%, Mo=9.12wt%, Al=1.28wt%, Co=13.10wt%, Fe=0.80wt%, C=0.07wt%, Si=0.11wt%, Ti=0.22wt%, and balanced Ni. The initial Inconel 617 alloy was solution treated at 1150 °C for 60 min. Solid solution strength-ening elements (Cr, Co, Mo) accounted for 43.20wt% of the Inconel 617 alloy. The square sample of 60 mm×30 mm×10 mm was machined via wire electrical discharge machining. Then, multi-pass rolling was conducted, the deformation degree of each pass was 10%, and finally the cold rolled samples with total deformation degrees of 20%, 50%, and 70% were obtained. Besides, the original alloy (without cold rolling deformation) was also investigated as reference group.
The room temperature microhardness of the Inconel 617 alloy was measured using a microhardness tester. The microhardness test load was 0.1 kg, the loading time was 15 s, and at least 15 points of each sample were tested to obtain the average value. The dog-bone shaped samples with size of 25 mm×6 mm×1.5 mm were prepared by slow wire cutting and mechanical polishing. The tensile properties of the Inconel 617 alloy were tested by a uniaxial tensile testing machine, and the tensile rate was 1 mm/min. To ensure the repeatability of the experimental results, at least three tensile tests were performed under each set of experiment parameters.
The crystallographic structure of the Inconel 617 alloy with different deformation degrees was analyzed by XRD. The diffraction source was Cu target material (λ=0.154 06 nm). The voltage, current, step length, and scanning range were set as 40 kV, 150 mA, 5°/min, and 10°≤2θ≤90°, respectively. Microstructure and grain size were observed by EBSD. EBSD samples of 10 mm×10 mm×5 mm were firstly cut, then polished by mechanical grinding, and finally electropolished in the solution containing 90 mL C2H5OH and 10 mL HClO4. EBSD data were processed using Channel 5 software.

Fig.1 Grain boundary distribution maps of Inconel 617 alloy with different deformation degrees: (a) original, (b) 20%, (c) 50%, and (d) 70%

Fig.2 Inverse pole figures of Inconel 617 alloy with different deformation degrees: (a) original, (b) 20%, (c) 50%, and (d) 70%

Fig.3 XRD patterns of Inconel 617 alloy with different deformation degrees
Based on XRD patterns, the preferred orientation of the crystal planes can be estimated according to the diffraction peak intensity through the following formul
(1) |
where TC(hkl) is the relative texture coefficient, I(hkl) is the diffraction peak intensity of the (hkl) crystal plane, I0(hkl) is the diffraction peak intensity of the (hkl) crystal plane in the standard PDF card, and N is the number of total planes. The texture coefficients of the crystal planes corresponding to the main diffraction peaks are calculated, as listed in
Deformation degree | Intensity/cps | TC(hkl)/% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(111) | (200) | (220) | (111) | (200) | (220) | |
Original | 5360 | 246 | 765 | 84.13 | 3.86 | 12.01 |
20% | 3972 | 155 | 1093 | 76.09 | 2.97 | 20.94 |
50% | 896 | 320 | 4290 | 16.27 | 5.81 | 77.92 |
70% | 815 | 380 | 4606 | 14.05 | 6.55 | 79.40 |
The orientation distribution function (ODF) cannot only determine the texture type but also quantitatively analyze the intensity of texture.

Fig.4 Positions of special orientation fibers (a) and standard textures (b) in Euler space

Fig.5 ODF maps in Euler space of Inconel 617 alloy with different deformation degrees: (a) original, (b) 20%, (c) 50%, and (d) 70%

Fig.6 Microtexture intensities on special orientation fibers in Euler space (a–c) and texture contents (d) of Inconel 617 alloy with different deformation degrees: (a) α-fiber, (b) γ-fiber, and (c) τ-fiber
The microhardness of the metal materials reflects the strain hardening ability and deformation resistance of the local area near the indentatio

Fig.7 Microhardness of Inconel 617 alloy with different deformation degrees

Fig.8 True stress-true strain curves of Inconel 617 alloy with different deformation degrees
Deformation degree | Yield strength, σ0.2/MPa | Ultimate tensile strength, σb/MPa | Elongation, δ | Work hardening exponent, n |
---|---|---|---|---|
Original | 479.18±18.4 | 879.45±26.1 | 0.2776±0.05 | 0.2196 |
20% | 772.48±23.7 | 1023.37±43.4 | 0.1962±0.03 | 0.1357 |
50% | 1326.9±40.2 | 1488.67±46.8 | 0.0503±0.02 | 0.0576 |
70% | 1495.8±35.3 | 1584.67±45.6 | 0.0361±0.02 | 0.0257 |
elongation of Inconel 617 alloy after 20% deformation are 772.48 MPa and 0.1962, respectively, presenting good synergy effect.
The true stress-true strain curve of metallic materials follows the Hollomon equatio
(2) |
where K is the strength coefficient and n is the work hardening exponent. Take logarithm of both sides of
(3) |

Fig.9 lnσ
The tensile fracture morphologies of Inconel 617 alloy with different deformation degrees are shown in

Fig.10 Tensile fracture morphologies of Inconel 617 alloy with different deformation degrees: (a) original, (b) 20%, (c) 50%, and (d) 70%
1) After rolling deformation, the proportion of low-angle grain boundaries of Inconel 617 alloy increases, and the strain gradient increases. Thus, the original grains fragment, and fine grains are formed.
2) The original Inconel 617 alloy has free orientation, and the proportion of deformation microtextures (S, Brass, Copper) increases after cold rolling. After 70% deformation, the proportion of deformation microtexture is 79.36%.
3) When the rolling deformation degree is more than 50%, Inconel 617 alloy has a strong shear texture, and with the increase in rolling deformation, the shear texture changes from Shear1 {111}<110> to Shear2 {111}<112>.
4) With the increase in deformation degree, the microhardness and strength of Inconel 617 alloy are increased, whereas the elongation is decreased. When the deformation degree is 20%, the strength and elongation of Inconel 617 alloy are well coordinated, presenting good synergy effect.
References
Hu Honglei, Zhao Mingjiu, Rong Lijian. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2020, 49(1): 131 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Salari S, Rahman M S, Beheshti A et al. Mechanics Research Communications[J], 2022, 121: 103875 [Baidu Scholar]
Ji J J, Wang Y J, Yu L D et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2023, 52(4): 1244 [Baidu Scholar]
Bai Yaguan, Nie Yihong, Kou Jinfeng et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2022, 51(1): 327 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Hosseini H S, Shamanian M, Kermanpur A. Materials Characterization[J], 2011, 62(4): 425 [Baidu Scholar]
Visweswara R C, Santhi S N C, Sastry G V S et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2021, 800: 140317 [Baidu Scholar]
Jiang Mengling, Chen Yanhui, Kong Bin et al. Titanium Industry Progress[J], 2023, 40(4): 35 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Jing Xiaoyan, Yuan Yi, Yu Fang et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2009, 38(7): 1154 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Anand M, Das A K. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2022, 929: 166949 [Baidu Scholar]
Chen Jiayu, Yu Qiuying, Dong Jianxin et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2017, 46(10): 2929 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang H B, Zhao W, Huang D et al. Journal of Manufacturing Processes[J], 2023, 108: 280 [Baidu Scholar]
Li W, Cao Y, Huang G J et al. Journal of Materials Research and Technology[J], 2024, 28: 730 [Baidu Scholar]
Xin Z, Jiang Y B, Wu Z X et al. Materials Characterization[J], 2023, 207: 113557 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang X M, Ding Y T, Gao Y B et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2021, 823: 141739 [Baidu Scholar]
Polkowska A, Lech S, Polkowski W. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2020, 787: 139478 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu T, Zheng Q, Cheng X N et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2022, 850: 143549 [Baidu Scholar]
Luo J T, Chu R H, Yu W L et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2019, 799: 302 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Y Q, Yuan C, Wei J X et al. Journal of Materials Research and Technology[J], 2023, 24: 2743 [Baidu Scholar]
Yu Hao, Kang Yonglin, Liu Delu et al. Chinese Journal of Engineering[J], 2001, 23(6): 526 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Tang Weiqin, Zhang Shaorui, Fan Xiaohui et al. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals[J], 2010, 20(3): 371 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Y, Tang W, Zhang L. Journal of Materials Science and Technology[J], 2015, 31(2): 175 [Baidu Scholar]
Milner J L, Abu-Farha F, Kurfess T et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2014, 619: 12 [Baidu Scholar]
Godoi R P, Zanquetta B D, Rubert J B et al. Materials Science Forum[J], 2021, 1016: 715 [Baidu Scholar]
Guo Y, Wang S R, Liu W T et al. Tribology International[J], 2020, 144: 106138 [Baidu Scholar]
Li Y S, Zhang Y, Tao N R et al. Acta Materialia[J], 2009, [Baidu Scholar]
57(3): 761 [Baidu Scholar]